1
|
Chen X, Htet ZM, López-Alfonzo E, Martin A, Walters KJ. Proteasome interaction with ubiquitinated substrates: from mechanisms to therapies. FEBS J 2021; 288:5231-5251. [PMID: 33211406 PMCID: PMC8131406 DOI: 10.1111/febs.15638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is responsible for regulated proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. Its substrates are diverse in structure, function, sequence length, and amino acid composition, and are targeted to the proteasome by post-translational modification with ubiquitin. Ubiquitination occurs through a complex enzymatic cascade and can also signal for other cellular events, unrelated to proteasome-catalyzed degradation. Like other post-translational protein modifications, ubiquitination is reversible, with ubiquitin chain hydrolysis catalyzed by the action of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), ~ 90 of which exist in humans and allow for temporal events and dynamic ubiquitin-chain remodeling. DUBs have been known for decades to be an integral part of the proteasome, as deubiquitination is coupled to substrate unfolding and translocation into the internal degradation chamber. Moreover, the proteasome also binds several ubiquitinating enzymes and shuttle factors that recruit ubiquitinated substrates. The role of this intricate machinery and how ubiquitinated substrates interact with proteasomes remains an area of active investigation. Here, we review what has been learned about the mechanisms used by the proteasome to bind ubiquitinated substrates, substrate shuttle factors, ubiquitination machinery, and DUBs. We also discuss many open questions that require further study or the development of innovative approaches to be answered. Finally, we address the promise of expanded therapeutic targeting that could benefit from such new discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Chen
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Zaw Min Htet
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Erika López-Alfonzo
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Andreas Martin
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Kylie J Walters
- Protein Processing Section, Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Small-Molecule Inhibitors Targeting Proteasome-Associated Deubiquitinases. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22126213. [PMID: 34207520 PMCID: PMC8226605 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is the principal protease for regulated intracellular proteolysis. This multi-subunit complex is also pivotal for clearance of harmful proteins that are produced throughout the lifetime of eukaryotes. Recent structural and kinetic studies have revealed a multitude of conformational states of the proteasome in substrate-free and substrate-engaged forms. These conformational transitions demonstrate that proteasome is a highly dynamic machinery during substrate processing that can be also controlled by a number of proteasome-associated factors. Essentially, three distinct family of deubiquitinases–USP14, RPN11, and UCH37–are associated with the 19S regulatory particle of human proteasome. USP14 and UCH37 are capable of editing ubiquitin conjugates during the process of their dynamic engagement into the proteasome prior to the catalytic commitment. In contrast, RPN11-mediated deubiquitination is directly coupled to substrate degradation by sensing the proteasome’s conformational switch into the commitment steps. Therefore, proteasome-bound deubiquitinases are likely to tailor the degradation events in accordance with substrate processing steps and for dynamic proteolysis outcomes. Recent chemical screening efforts have yielded highly selective small-molecule inhibitors for targeting proteasomal deubiquitinases, such as USP14 and RPN11. USP14 inhibitors, IU1 and its progeny, were found to promote the degradation of a subset of substrates probably by overriding USP14-imposed checkpoint on the proteasome. On the other hand, capzimin, a RPN11 inhibitor, stabilized the proteasome substrates and showed the anti-proliferative effects on cancer cells. It is highly conceivable that these specific inhibitors will aid to dissect the role of each deubiquitinase on the proteasome. Moreover, customized targeting of proteasome-associated deubiquitinases may also provide versatile therapeutic strategies for induced or repressed protein degradation depending on proteolytic demand and cellular context.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is the most complex ATP-dependent protease machinery, of ~2.5 MDa mass, ubiquitously found in all eukaryotes. It selectively degrades ubiquitin-conjugated proteins and plays fundamentally indispensable roles in regulating almost all major aspects of cellular activities. To serve as the sole terminal "processor" for myriad ubiquitylation pathways, the proteasome evolved exceptional adaptability in dynamically organizing a large network of proteins, including ubiquitin receptors, shuttle factors, deubiquitinases, AAA-ATPase unfoldases, and ubiquitin ligases, to enable substrate selectivity and processing efficiency and to achieve regulation precision of a vast diversity of substrates. The inner working of the 26S proteasome is among the most sophisticated, enigmatic mechanisms of enzyme machinery in eukaryotic cells. Recent breakthroughs in three-dimensional atomic-level visualization of the 26S proteasome dynamics during polyubiquitylated substrate degradation elucidated an extensively detailed picture of its functional mechanisms, owing to progressive methodological advances associated with cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Multiple sites of ubiquitin binding in the proteasome revealed a canonical mode of ubiquitin-dependent substrate engagement. The proteasome conformation in the act of substrate deubiquitylation provided insights into how the deubiquitylating activity of RPN11 is enhanced in the holoenzyme and is coupled to substrate translocation. Intriguingly, three principal modes of coordinated ATP hydrolysis in the heterohexameric AAA-ATPase motor were discovered to regulate intermediate functional steps of the proteasome, including ubiquitin-substrate engagement, deubiquitylation, initiation of substrate translocation and processive substrate degradation. The atomic dissection of the innermost working of the 26S proteasome opens up a new era in our understanding of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and has far-reaching implications in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youdong Mao
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02215, Massachusetts, USA. .,School of Physics, Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scarpa ES, Tasini F, Crinelli R, Ceccarini C, Magnani M, Bianchi M. The Ubiquitin Gene Expression Pattern and Sensitivity to UBB and UBC Knockdown Differentiate Primary 23132/87 and Metastatic MKN45 Gastric Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E5435. [PMID: 32751694 PMCID: PMC7432825 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common and lethal cancers. Alterations in the ubiquitin (Ub) system play key roles in the carcinogenetic process and in metastasis development. Overexpression of transcription factors YY1, HSF1 and SP1, known to regulate Ub gene expression, is a predictor of poor prognosis and shorter survival in several cancers. In this study, we compared a primary (23132/87) and a metastatic (MKN45) GC cell line. We found a statistically significant higher expression of three out of four Ub coding genes, UBC, UBB and RPS27A, in MKN45 compared to 23132/87. However, while the total Ub protein content and the distribution of Ub between the conjugated and free pools were similar in these two GC cell lines, the proteasome activity was higher in MKN45. Ub gene expression was not affected upon YY1, HSF1 or SP1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection, in both 23132/87 and MKN45 cell lines. Interestingly, the simultaneous knockdown of UBB and UBC mRNAs reduced the Ub content in both cell lines, but was more critical in the primary GC cell line 23132/87, causing a reduction in cell viability due to apoptosis induction and a decrease in the oncoprotein and metastatization marker β-catenin levels. Our results identify UBB and UBC as pro-survival genes in primary gastric adenocarcinoma 23132/87 cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Salvatore Scarpa
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino (PU), Italy; (F.T.); (R.C.); (C.C.); (M.M.); (M.B.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kudriaeva AA, Belogurov AA. Proteasome: a Nanomachinery of Creative Destruction. BIOCHEMISTRY (MOSCOW) 2019; 84:S159-S192. [PMID: 31213201 DOI: 10.1134/s0006297919140104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
In the middle of the 20th century, it was postulated that degradation of intracellular proteins is a stochastic process. More than fifty years of intense studies have finally proven that protein degradation is a very complex and tightly regulated in time and space process that plays an incredibly important role in the vast majority of metabolic pathways. Degradation of more than a half of intracellular proteins is controlled by a hierarchically aligned and evolutionarily perfect system consisting of many components, the main ones being ubiquitin ligases and proteasomes, together referred to as the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). The UPS includes more than 1000 individual components, and most of them are critical for the cell functioning and survival. In addition to the well-known signaling functions of ubiquitination, such as modification of substrates for proteasomal degradation and DNA repair, polyubiquitin (polyUb) chains are involved in other important cellular processes, e.g., cell cycle regulation, immunity, protein degradation in mitochondria, and even mRNA stability. This incredible variety of ubiquitination functions is related to the ubiquitin ability to form branching chains through the ε-amino group of any of seven lysine residues in its sequence. Deubiquitination is accomplished by proteins of the deubiquitinating enzyme family. The second main component of the UPS is proteasome, a multisubunit proteinase complex that, in addition to the degradation of functionally exhausted and damaged proteins, regulates many important cellular processes through controlled degradation of substrates, for example, transcription factors and cyclins. In addition to the ubiquitin-dependent-mediated degradation, there is also ubiquitin-independent degradation, when the proteolytic signal is either an intrinsic protein sequence or shuttle molecule. Protein hydrolysis is a critically important cellular function; therefore, any abnormalities in this process lead to systemic impairments further transforming into serious diseases, such as diabetes, malignant transformation, and neurodegenerative disorders (multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and Huntington's disease). In this review, we discuss the mechanisms that orchestrate all components of the UPS, as well as the plurality of the fine-tuning pathways of proteasomal degradation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Kudriaeva
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia.
| | - A A Belogurov
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia. .,Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
As the endpoint for the ubiquitin-proteasome system, the 26S proteasome is the principal proteolytic machine responsible for regulated protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. The proteasome's cellular functions range from general protein homeostasis and stress response to the control of vital processes such as cell division and signal transduction. To reliably process all the proteins presented to it in the complex cellular environment, the proteasome must combine high promiscuity with exceptional substrate selectivity. Recent structural and biochemical studies have shed new light on the many steps involved in proteasomal substrate processing, including recognition, deubiquitination, and ATP-driven translocation and unfolding. In addition, these studies revealed a complex conformational landscape that ensures proper substrate selection before the proteasome commits to processive degradation. These advances in our understanding of the proteasome's intricate machinery set the stage for future studies on how the proteasome functions as a major regulator of the eukaryotic proteome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared A M Bard
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Ellen A Goodall
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Eric R Greene
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Erik Jonsson
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Ken C Dong
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Andreas Martin
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McDowell G, Philpott A. New Insights Into the Role of Ubiquitylation of Proteins. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2016; 325:35-88. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
8
|
Vander Linden RT, Hemmis CW, Schmitt B, Ndoja A, Whitby FG, Robinson H, Cohen RE, Yao T, Hill CP. Structural basis for the activation and inhibition of the UCH37 deubiquitylase. Mol Cell 2015; 57:901-911. [PMID: 25702872 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2014] [Revised: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The UCH37 deubiquitylase functions in two large and very different complexes, the 26S proteasome and the INO80 chromatin remodeler. We have performed biochemical characterization and determined crystal structures of UCH37 in complexes with RPN13 and NFRKB, which mediate its recruitment to the proteasome and INO80, respectively. RPN13 and NFRKB make similar contacts to the UCH37 C-terminal domain but quite different contacts to the catalytic UCH domain. RPN13 can activate UCH37 by disrupting dimerization, although physiologically relevant activation likely results from stabilization of a surface competent for ubiquitin binding and modulation of the active-site crossover loop. In contrast, NFRKB inhibits UCH37 by blocking the ubiquitin-binding site and by disrupting the enzyme active site. These findings reveal remarkable commonality in mechanisms of recruitment, yet very different mechanisms of regulating enzyme activity, and provide a foundation for understanding the roles of UCH37 in the unrelated proteasome and INO80 complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T Vander Linden
- Department of Biochemistry University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5650 USA
| | - Casey W Hemmis
- Department of Biochemistry University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5650 USA
| | - Benjamin Schmitt
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
| | - Ada Ndoja
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
| | - Frank G Whitby
- Department of Biochemistry University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5650 USA
| | - Howard Robinson
- Biology Department Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973 USA
| | - Robert E Cohen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
| | - Tingting Yao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
| | - Christopher P Hill
- Department of Biochemistry University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5650 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clague MJ, Barsukov I, Coulson JM, Liu H, Rigden DJ, Urbé S. Deubiquitylases from genes to organism. Physiol Rev 2013; 93:1289-315. [PMID: 23899565 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00002.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 330] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Ubiquitylation is a major posttranslational modification that controls most complex aspects of cell physiology. It is reversed through the action of a large family of deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) that are emerging as attractive therapeutic targets for a number of disease conditions. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the complement of human DUBs, indicating structural motifs, typical cellular copy numbers, and tissue expression profiles. We discuss the means by which specificity is achieved and how DUB activity may be regulated. Generically DUB catalytic activity may be used to 1) maintain free ubiquitin levels, 2) rescue proteins from ubiquitin-mediated degradation, and 3) control the dynamics of ubiquitin-mediated signaling events. Functional roles of individual DUBs from each of five subfamilies in specific cellular processes are highlighted with an emphasis on those linked to pathological conditions where the association is supported by whole organism models. We then specifically consider the role of DUBs associated with protein degradative machineries and the influence of specific DUBs upon expression of receptors and channels at the plasma membrane.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Clague
- Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, and Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu CW, Jacobson AD. Functions of the 19S complex in proteasomal degradation. Trends Biochem Sci 2013; 38:103-10. [PMID: 23290100 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2012] [Revised: 11/25/2012] [Accepted: 11/29/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The 26S proteasome degrades ubiquitylated proteins. It consists of the 20S proteasome and the PA700/19S complex. PA700 plays essential roles in processing ubiquitylated substrates; it can bind, deubiquitylate, and unfold ubiquitylated proteins, which then translocate into the proteolytic chamber of the 20S proteasome for degradation. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of PA700-mediated substrate binding and deubiquitylation, and provide models to explain how substrate binding and deubiquitylation could regulate proteasomal degradation. We also discuss the features and potential therapeutic uses of the two recently identified small molecule inhibitors of the proteasome-residing deubiquitylating enzymes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Wei Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12801 E. 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
D'Arcy P, Linder S. Proteasome deubiquitinases as novel targets for cancer therapy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012; 44:1729-38. [PMID: 22819849 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2012] [Revised: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 07/11/2012] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is a conserved pathway regulating numerous biological processes including protein turnover, DNA repair, and intracellular trafficking. Tumor cells are dependent on a functioning UPS, making it an ideal target for the development of novel anti-cancer therapies. The development of bortezomib (Velcade(®)) as a treatment for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma has verified this and suggests that targeting other components of the UPS may be a viable strategy for the treatment for cancer. We recently described a novel class of proteasome inhibitors that function by an alternative mechanism of action (D'Arcy et al., 2011). The small molecule b-AP15 blocks the deubiquitinase (DUB) activity of the 19S regulatory particle (19S RP) without inhibiting the proteolytic activities of the 20S core particle (20S CP). b-AP15 inhibits two proteasome-associated DUBs, USP14 and UCHL5, resulting in a rapid accumulation of high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates and a functional proteasome shutdown. Interestingly, b-AP15 displays several differences to bortezomib including insensitivity to over-expression of the anti-apoptotic mediator Bcl-2 and anti-tumor activity in solid tumor models. In this review we will discuss the potential of proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitors as additions to the therapeutic arsenal against cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pádraig D'Arcy
- Institute for Oncology-Pathology, Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska Institute, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Strachan J, Roach L, Sokratous K, Tooth D, Long J, Garner TP, Searle MS, Oldham NJ, Layfield R. Insights into the molecular composition of endogenous unanchored polyubiquitin chains. J Proteome Res 2012; 11:1969-80. [PMID: 22268864 DOI: 10.1021/pr201167n] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The diverse influences of ubiquitin, mediated by its post-translational covalent modification of other proteins, have been extensively investigated. However, more recently roles for unanchored (nonsubstrate linked) polyubiquitin chains have also been proposed. Here we describe the use of ubiquitin-binding domains to affinity purify endogenous unanchored polyubiquitin chains and their subsequent characterization by mass spectrometry (MS). Using the A20 Znf domain of the ubiquitin receptor ZNF216 we isolated a protein from skeletal muscle shown by a combination of nanoLC-MS and LC-MS/MS to represent an unmodified and unanchored K48-linked ubiquitin dimer. Selective purification of unanchored polyubiquitin chains using the Znf UBP (BUZ) domain of USP5/isopeptidase-T allowed the isolation of K48 and K11-linked ubiquitin dimers, as well as revealing longer chains containing as many as 15 ubiquitin moieties, which include the K48 linkage. Top-down nanoLC-MS/MS of the A20 Znf-purified ubiquitin dimer generated diagnostic ions consistent with the presence of the K48 linkage, illustrating for the first time the potential of this approach to probe connectivity within endogenous polyubiquitin modifications. As well as providing initial proteomic insights into the molecular composition of endogenous unanchored polyubiquitin chains, this work also represents the first definition of polyubiquitin chain length in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Strachan
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|