A novel site on gamma 3 subunits important for assembly of GABA(A) receptors

The cell adhesion molecule neuroplastin-65 is a novel interaction partner of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors

γ-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels that mediate fast inhibition in the central nervous system. Depending on their subunit composition, these receptors exhibit distinct pharmacological properties and differ in their ability to interact with proteins involved in receptor anchoring at synaptic or extra-synaptic sites. Whereas GABA(A) receptors containing α1, α2, or α3 subunits are mainly located synaptically where they interact with the submembranous scaffolding protein gephyrin, receptors containing α5 subunits are predominantly found extra-synaptically and seem to interact with radixin for anchorage. Neuroplastin is a cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is involved in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Our results reveal that neuroplastin and GABA(A) receptors can be co-purified from rat brain and exhibit a direct physical interaction as demonstrated by co-precipitation and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis in a heterologous expression system. The brain-specific isoform neuroplastin-65 co-localizes with GABA(A) receptors as shown in brain sections as well as in neuronal cultures, and such complexes can either contain gephyrin or be devoid of gephyrin. Neuroplastin-65 specifically co-localizes with α1 or α2 but not with α3 subunits at GABAergic synapses. In addition, neuroplastin-65 also co-localizes with GABA(A) receptor α5 subunits at extra-synaptic sites. Down-regulation of neuroplastin-65 by shRNA causes a loss of GABA(A) receptor α2 subunits at GABAergic synapses. These results suggest that neuroplastin-65 can co-localize with a subset of GABA(A) receptor subtypes and might contribute to anchoring and/or confining GABA(A) receptors to particular synaptic or extra-synaptic sites, thus affecting receptor mobility and synaptic strength.

GABAA receptor trafficking-mediated plasticity of inhibitory synapses

Proper developmental, neural cell-type-specific, and activity-dependent regulation of GABAergic transmission is essential for virtually all aspects of CNS function. The number of GABA(A) receptors in the postsynaptic membrane directly controls the efficacy of GABAergic synaptic transmission. Thus, regulated trafficking of GABA(A) receptors is essential for understanding brain function in both health and disease. Here we summarize recent progress in the understanding of mechanisms that allow dynamic adaptation of cell surface expression and postsynaptic accumulation and function of GABA(A) receptors. This includes activity-dependent and cell-type-specific changes in subunit gene expression, assembly of subunits into receptors, as well as exocytosis, endocytic recycling, diffusion dynamics, and degradation of GABA(A) receptors. In particular, we focus on the roles of receptor-interacting proteins, scaffold proteins, synaptic adhesion proteins, and enzymes that regulate the trafficking and function of receptors and associated proteins. In addition, we review neuropeptide signaling pathways that affect neural excitability through changes in GABA(A)R trafficking.

Regulation of GABA(A) receptor dynamics by interaction with purinergic P2X(2) receptors

γ-Aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA(A)Rs) in the spinal cord are evolving as an important target for drug development against pain. Purinergic P2X(2) receptors (P2X(2)Rs) are also expressed in spinal cord neurons and are known to cross-talk with GABA(A)Rs. Here, we investigated a possible "dynamic" interaction between GABA(A)Rs and P2X(2)Rs using co-immunoprecipitation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) studies in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells along with co-localization and single particle tracking studies in spinal cord neurons. Our results suggest that a significant proportion of P2X(2)Rs forms a transient complex with GABA(A)Rs inside the cell, thus stabilizing these receptors and using them for co-trafficking to the cell surface, where P2X(2)Rs and GABA(A)Rs are primarily located extra-synaptically. Furthermore, agonist-induced activation of P2X(2)Rs results in a Ca(2+)-dependent as well as an apparently Ca(2+)-independent increase in the mobility and an enhanced degradation of GABA(A)Rs, whereas P2X(2)Rs are stabilized and form larger clusters. Antagonist-induced blocking of P2XRs results in co-stabilization of this receptor complex at the cell surface. These results suggest a novel mechanism where association of P2X(2)Rs and GABA(A)Rs could be used for specific targeting to neuronal membranes, thus providing an extrasynaptic receptor reserve that could regulate the excitability of neurons. We further conclude that blocking the excitatory activity of excessively released ATP under diseased state by P2XR antagonists could simultaneously enhance synaptic inhibition mediated by GABA(A)Rs.

Multiple modes for conferring surface expression of homomeric beta1 GABAA receptors

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor assembles from individual subunits to form ligand-gated ion channels. Human (h) beta3 subunits assemble to form homomeric surface receptors in somatic cells, but hbeta1 subunits do not. We have identified three distinct sets of amino acid residues in the N-terminal extracellular domain of the hbeta1 subunit, which when mutated to the homologous residue in hbeta3 allow expression as a functional homomeric receptor. The three sets likely result in three modes of assembly. Mode 1 expression results from a single amino acid change at residue hbeta1 Asp-37. Mode 2 expression results from mutations of residues between positions 44 and 73 together with residues between positions 169 and 173. Finally, mode 3 results from the mutations A45V and K196R. Examination of homology-based structural models indicates that many of the residues are unlikely to be involved in physical inter-subunit interactions, suggesting that a major alteration is stabilization of an assembly competent form of the subunit. These mutations do not, however, have a major effect on the surface expression of heteromeric receptors which include the alpha1 subunit.

Spontaneous cross-link of mutated alpha1 subunits during GABA(A) receptor assembly

gamma-Aminobutyric acid, type A (GABA(A)) receptor alpha1 subunits containing a cysteine mutation at a position in the channel mouth (H109C) surprisingly formed a spontaneous cross-link with each other in receptors composed of alpha1H109C, beta3, and gamma2 subunits. Cross-linking of two alpha1H109C subunits did not significantly change the affinity of [(3)H]muscimol or [(3)H]Ro15-1788 binding in alpha1H109Cbeta3gamma2 receptors, but GABA displayed a reduced potency for activating chloride currents. On reduction of the disulfide bond, however, GABA activation as well as diazepam modulation was similar in mutated and wild-type receptors, suggesting that these receptors exhibited the same subunit stoichiometry and arrangement. Disulfide bonds could not be reoxidized by copper phenanthroline after having been reduced in completely assembled receptors, suggesting that cross-linking can only occur at an early stage of assembly. The cross-link of alpha1H109C subunits and the subsequent transport of the resulting homodimers to the cell surface caused a reduction of the intracellular pool of alpha1H109C subunits and a reduced formation of completely assembled receptors. The formation of alpha1H109C homodimers as well as of correctly assembled GABA(A) receptors containing cross-linked alpha1H109C subunits could indicate that homodimerization of alpha1 subunits via contacts located in the channel mouth might be one starting point of GABA(A) receptor assembly. Alternatively the assembly mechanism might have started with the formation of heterodimers followed by a cross-link of mutated alpha1 subunits at the heterotrimeric stage. The formation of cross-linked alpha1H109C homodimers would then have occurred independently in a separate pathway.

The role of GABAA receptor biogenesis, structure and function in epilepsy

Maintaining the correct balance in neuronal activation is of paramount importance to normal brain function. Imbalances due to changes in excitation or inhibition can lead to a variety of disorders ranging from the clinically extreme (e.g. epilepsy) to the more subtle (e.g. anxiety). In the brain, the most common inhibitory synapses are regulated by GABAA (γ-aminobutyric acid type A) receptors, a role commensurate with their importance as therapeutic targets. Remarkably, we still know relatively little about GABAA receptor biogenesis. Receptors are constructed as pentameric ion channels, with α and β subunits being the minimal requirement, and the incorporation of a γ subunit being necessary for benzodiazepine modulation and synaptic targeting. Insights have been provided by the discovery of several specific assembly signals within different GABAA receptor subunits. Moreover, a number of recent studies on GABAA receptor mutations associated with epilepsy have further enhanced our understanding of GABAA receptor biogenesis, structure and function.

Selective changes in thalamic and cortical GABAA receptor subunits in a model of acquired absence epilepsy in the rat

Neonatal treatment of Long-Evans Hooded rats with the cholesterol synthesis inhibitor (CSI) AY9944 has been shown to increase occurrence of spike-waves in EEG recordings and decrease benzodiazepines sensitivity of GABA(A) receptor-mediated responses in neurons from the thalamic reticular nuclei (nRt, Wu et al., 2004). The present experiments were designed to investigate the changes in the gamma2 and alpha1 subunits of the GABA(A) receptor in CSI model rats as possible mechanisms of these changes. Western blot, immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR techniques were performed to measure the levels of GABA(A) receptor gamma2 and alpha1 subunit transcripts and protein in the nRt and ventrobasal (VB) relay nuclei of thalamus and in somatosensory cortex. In CSI model animals, Western blot results showed that gamma2 subunit expression significantly decreased in thalamus (control, n=6: 0.17+/-0.02 relative to actin vs. CSI model, n=6: 0.11+/-0.01, P<0.05) but neither in cortex nor in hippocampal tissues. Conversely, alpha1 subunit expression decreased in CSI model somatosensory cortex, but not in nRt and VB. The present results demonstrate that neonatal block of cholesterol synthesis produces region- and subunit-specific decreases in GABA(A) receptor subunits in thalamus and cortex. Selective reductions in GABA(A) receptor subunits in thalamus may play a role in pathophysiology of absence epilepsy.

Identification of amino acid residues important for assembly of GABA receptor alpha1 and gamma2 subunits

Comparative models of GABA(A) receptors composed of alpha1 beta3 gamma2 subunits were generated using the acetylcholine-binding protein (AChBP) as a template and were used for predicting putative engineered cross-link sites between the alpha1 and the gamma2 subunit. The respective amino acid residues were substituted by cysteines and disulfide bond formation between subunits was investigated on co-transfection into human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells. Although disulfide bond formation between subunits could not be observed, results indicated that mutations studied influenced assembly of GABA(A) receptors. Whereas residue alpha1A108 was important for the formation of assembly intermediates with beta3 and gamma2 subunits consistent with its proposed location at the alpha1(+) side of GABA(A) receptors, residues gamma2T125 and gamma2P127 were important for assembly with beta3 subunits. Mutation of each of these residues also caused an impaired expression of receptors at the cell surface. In contrast, mutated residues alpha1F99C, alpha1S106C or gamma2T126C only impaired the formation of receptors at the cell surface when co-expressed with subunits in which their predicted interaction partner was also mutated. These data are consistent with the prediction that the mutated residue pairs are located close to each other.

The juvenile myoclonic epilepsy GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit mutation A322D produces asymmetrical, subunit position-dependent reduction of heterozygous receptor currents and alpha1 subunit protein expression

Individuals with autosomal dominant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy are heterozygous for a GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit mutation (alpha1A322D). GABA(A) receptor alphabetagamma subunits are arranged around the pore in a beta-alpha-beta-alpha-gamma sequence (counterclockwise from the synaptic cleft). Therefore, each alpha1 subunit has different adjacent subunits, and heterozygous expression of alpha1(A322D), beta, and gamma subunits could produce receptors with four different subunit arrangements: beta-alpha1-beta-alpha1-gamma (wild type); beta-alpha1(A322D)-beta-alpha1-gamma (Het(betaalphabeta)); beta-alpha1-beta-alpha1(A322D)-gamma (Het(betaalphagamma));beta-alpha1(A322D)-beta-alpha1(A322D)-gamma (homozygous). Expression of a 1:1 mixture of wild-type andalpha1(A322D) subunits with beta2S and gamma2S subunits (heterozygous transfection) produced smaller currents than wild type and much larger currents than homozygous mutant transfections. Western blot and biotinylation assays demonstrated that the amount of total and surface alpha1 subunit from heterozygous transfections was also intermediate between those of wild-type and homozygous mutant transfections. alpha1(A322D) mutations were then made in covalently tethered triplet (gamma2S-beta2S-alpha1) and tandem (beta2S-alpha1) concatamers to target selectively alpha1(A322D) to each of the asymmetric alpha1 subunits. Coexpression of mutant and wild-type concatamers resulted in expression of either Het(betaalphabeta) or Het(betaalphagamma) receptors. Het(betaalphabeta) currents were smaller than wild type and much larger than Het(betaalphagamma) and homozygous currents. Furthermore, Het(betaalphabeta) transfections contained less beta-alpha concatamer than wild type but more than both Het(betaalphagamma) and homozygous mutant transfections. Thus, whole-cell currents and protein expression of heterozygous alpha1(A322D)beta2Sgamma2S receptors depended on the position of the mutant alpha1 subunit, and GABA(A) receptor currents in heterozygous individuals likely result primarily from wild-type and Het(betaalphabeta) receptors with little contribution from Het(betaalphagamma) and homozygous receptors.

Comparative modeling of GABA(A) receptors: limits, insights, future developments

GABA(A) receptors are chloride ion channels that mediate fast synaptic transmission and belong to a superfamily of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. The recently published crystal structure of the acetylcholine binding protein can be used as a template for comparative modeling of the extracellular domain of GABA(A) receptors. In this commentary, difficulties with comparative modeling at low sequence identity are discussed, the degree of structural conservation to be expected within the superfamily is analyzed and numerical estimates of model uncertainties in functional regions are provided. Topography of the binding sites at subunit-interfaces is examined and possible targets for rational mutagenesis studies are suggested. Allosteric motions are considered and a mechanism for mediation of positive cooperativity at the benzodiazepine site is proposed.

Cell surface expression of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptors is controlled by an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal

Two subunits of the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) have been identified (5-HT3A and 5-HT3B) that assemble into homomeric (5-HT3A) and heteromeric (5-HT3A+5-HT3B) complexes. Unassembled 5-HT3B subunits are efficiently retained within the cell. In this study, we address the mechanism controlling the release of 5-HT3B from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). An analysis of chimeric 5-HT3A receptor(R).5-HT3BR constructs suggests the presence of elements downstream of the first transmembrane domain of 5-HT3B subunits that inhibit cell surface expression. To investigate this possibility, truncated 5-HT3B subunits were constructed and assessed for their ability to access the cell surface in COS-7 and ts201 cells. Using this approach, we have identified the presence of an ER retention signal located within the first cytoplasmic loop between transmembrane domains I and II of 5-HT3B. Transplantation of this signal (CRAR) into the homologous region of 5-HT3A results in the ER retention of this subunit until rescued by co-assembly with wild-type 5-HT3A. The mutation of this ER retention signal in 5-HT3B (5-HT3BSGER) does not lead to cell surface expression, suggesting the presence of other signals or mechanisms to control the surface expression of 5-HT3BRs. The generation of truncated 5-HT3BSGER constructs confirmed that the CRAR signal does play an important role in the ER retention of 5-HT3B.

GABA(A) receptor composition is determined by distinct assembly signals within alpha and beta subunits

Key to understanding how receptor diversity is achieved and controlled is the identification of selective assembly signals capable of distinguishing between other subunit partners. We have identified that the beta1-3 subunits exhibit distinct assembly capabilities with the gamma2L subunit. Similarly, analysis of an assembly box in alpha1-(57-68) has revealed an absolute requirement for this region in the assembly of alphabeta receptors. Furthermore, a selective requirement for a single amino acid (Arg-66), previously shown to be essential for the formation of the low affinity GABA binding site, is observed. This residue is critical for the assembly of alpha1beta2 but not alpha1beta1 or alpha1beta3 receptors. We have confirmed the ability of the previously identified GKER signal in beta3 to direct the assembly of betagamma receptors. The GKER signal is also involved in driving assembly with the alpha1 subunit, conferring the ability to assemble with alpha1(R66A) on the beta2 subunit. Although this signal is sufficient to permit the formation of beta2gamma2 receptors, it is not necessary for beta3gamma2 receptor formation, suggesting the existence of alternative assembly signals. These findings support the belief that GABA(A) receptor assembly occurs via defined pathways to limit the receptor diversity.

Identification of an amino acid sequence within GABA(A) receptor beta3 subunits that is important for receptor assembly

GABA(A) receptors are chloride ion channels that can be opened by GABA, the most important inhibitory transmitter in the CNS. In the mammalian brain the majority of these pentameric receptors is composed of two alpha, two beta and one gamma subunit. To achieve the correct order of subunits around the pore, each subunit must form specific contacts via its plus (+) and minus (-) side. To identify a sequence on the beta3 subunit important for assembly, we generated various full-length or truncated chimeric beta3 constructs and investigated their ability to assemble with alpha1 and gamma2 subunits. It was demonstrated that replacement of the sequence beta3(76-89) by the homologous alpha1 sequence impaired assembly with alpha1 but not with gamma2 subunits in alpha1beta3gamma2-GABA(A) receptors. Other experiments indicated that assembly was impaired via the beta3(-) side of the chimeric subunit. Within the sequence beta3(76-89) the sequence beta3(85-89) seemed to be of primary importance for assembly with alpha1 subunits. A comparison with the structure of the acetylcholine-binding protein supports the conclusion that the sequence beta3(85-89) is located at the beta3(-) side and indicates that it contains amino acid residues that might directly interact with the (+) side of the neighbouring alpha1 subunit.

Homologous sites of GABA(A) receptor alpha(1), beta(3) and gamma(2) subunits are important for assembly

GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory transmitter receptors in the central nervous system. The majority of these receptors is composed of two alpha, two beta and one gamma subunit that assemble around an aqueous pore and form an intrinsic chloride ion channel. Using full-length or truncated chimeric subunits it was demonstrated that homologous sequences from different subunit classes, alpha(1)(54-68), beta(3)(52-66), and gamma(2)(67-81), are important for assembly of GABA(A) receptors composed of alpha(1), beta(3), and gamma(2) subunits. In addition, evidence was provided that these sequences all are located in topologically homologous regions of the different subunits. Finally, it was demonstrated that the sequences investigated cause a selective assembly with certain subunits only and thus influence subunit arrangement within GABA(A) receptors.