Nucleotide-dependent triggering of RNA polymerase-DNA interactions by an AAA regulator of transcription

Transcriptional regulation of soluble methane monooxygenase via enhancer-binding protein derived from Methylosinus sporium 5

Methane is a major greenhouse gas, and methanotrophs regulate the methane level in the carbon cycle. Soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) is expressed in various methanotroph genera, including Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria, and catalyzes the hydroxylation of methane to methanol. It has been proposed that MmoR regulates the expression of sMMO as an enhancer-binding protein under copper-limited conditions; however, details on this transcriptional regulation remain limited. Herein, we elucidate the transcriptional pathway of sMMO depending on copper ion concentration, which affects the interaction of MmoR and sigma factor. MmoR and sigma-54 (σ54) from Methylosinus sporium 5 were successfully overexpressed in Escherichia coli and purified to investigate sMMO transcription in methanotrophs. The results indicated that σ54 binds to a promoter positioned -24 (GG) and -12 (TGC) upstream between mmoG and mmoX1. The binding affinity and selectivity are lower (Kd = 184.6 ± 6.2 nM) than those of MmoR. MmoR interacts with the upstream activator sequence (UAS) with a strong binding affinity (Kd = 12.5 ± 0.5 nM). Mutational studies demonstrated that MmoR has high selectivity to its binding partner (ACA-xx-TGT). Titration assays have demonstrated that MmoR does not coordinate with copper ions directly; however, its binding affinity to UAS decreases in a low-copper-containing medium. MmoR strongly interacts with adenosine triphosphate (Kd = 62.8 ± 0.5 nM) to generate RNA polymerase complex. This study demonstrated that the binding events of both MmoR and σ54 that regulate transcription in M. sporium 5 depend on the copper ion concentration. IMPORTANCE This study provides biochemical evidence of transcriptional regulation of soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) in methanotrophs that control methane levels in ecological systems. Previous studies have proposed transcriptional regulation of MMOs, including sMMO and pMMO, while we provide further evidence to elucidate its mechanism using a purified enhancer-binding protein (MmoR) and transcription factor (σ54). The characterization studies of σ54 and MmoR identified the promoter binding sites and enhancer-binding sequences essential for sMMO expression. Our findings also demonstrate that MmoR functions as a trigger for sMMO expression due to the high specificity and selectivity for enhancer-binding sequences. The UV-visible spectrum of purified MmoR suggested an iron coordination like other GAF domain, and that ATP is essential for the initiation of enhancer elements. Binding assays indicated that these interactions are blocked by the copper ion. These results provide novel insights into gene regulation of methanotrophs.

A general mechanism for transcription bubble nucleation in bacteria

Bacterial transcription initiation requires σ factors for nucleation of the transcription bubble. The canonical housekeeping σ factor, σ70, nucleates DNA melting via recognition of conserved bases of the promoter -10 motif, which are unstacked and captured in pockets of σ70. By contrast, the mechanism of transcription bubble nucleation and formation during the unrelated σN-mediated transcription initiation is poorly understood. Herein, we combine structural and biochemical approaches to establish that σN, like σ70, captures a flipped, unstacked base in a pocket formed between its N-terminal region I (RI) and extra-long helix features. Strikingly, RI inserts into the nascent bubble to stabilize the nucleated bubble prior to engagement of the obligate ATPase activator. Our data suggest a general paradigm of transcription initiation that requires σ factors to nucleate an early melted intermediate prior to productive RNA synthesis.

Relationship between the Chromosome Structural Dynamics and Gene Expression—A Chicken and Egg Dilemma?

Prokaryotic transcription was extensively studied over the last half-century. A great deal of data has been accumulated regarding the control of gene expression by transcription factors regulating their target genes by binding at specific DNA sites. However, there is a significant gap between the mechanistic description of transcriptional control obtained from in vitro biochemical studies and the complexity of transcriptional regulation in the context of the living cell. Indeed, recent studies provide ample evidence for additional levels of complexity pertaining to the regulation of transcription in vivo, such as, for example, the role of the subcellular localization and spatial organization of different molecular components involved in the transcriptional control and, especially, the role of chromosome configurational dynamics. The question as to how the chromosome is dynamically reorganized under the changing environmental conditions and how this reorganization is related to gene expression is still far from being clear. In this article, we focus on the relationships between the chromosome structural dynamics and modulation of gene expression during bacterial adaptation. We argue that spatial organization of the bacterial chromosome is of central importance in the adaptation of gene expression to changing environmental conditions and vice versa, that gene expression affects chromosome dynamics.

Evolution of Regulated Transcription

The genomes of all organisms abound with various cis-regulatory elements, which control gene activity. Transcriptional enhancers are a key group of such elements in eukaryotes and are DNA regions that form physical contacts with gene promoters and precisely orchestrate gene expression programs. Here, we follow gradual evolution of this regulatory system and discuss its features in different organisms. In eubacteria, an enhancer-like element is often a single regulatory element, is usually proximal to the core promoter, and is occupied by one or a few activators. Activation of gene expression in archaea is accompanied by the recruitment of an activator to several enhancer-like sites in the upstream promoter region. In eukaryotes, activation of expression is accompanied by the recruitment of activators to multiple enhancers, which may be distant from the core promoter, and the activators act through coactivators. The role of the general DNA architecture in transcription control increases in evolution. As a whole, it can be seen that enhancers of multicellular eukaryotes evolved from the corresponding prototypic enhancer-like regulatory elements with the gradually increasing genome size of organisms.

The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized activators of σ54-dependent transcription

Bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBPs) are transcriptional activators that assemble as hexameric rings in their active forms and utilize ATP hydrolysis to remodel the conformation of RNA polymerase containing the alternative sigma factor σ(54). We present a comprehensive and detailed summary of recent advances in our understanding of how these specialized molecular machines function. The review is structured by introducing each of the three domains in turn: the central catalytic domain, the N-terminal regulatory domain, and the C-terminal DNA binding domain. The role of the central catalytic domain is presented with particular reference to (i) oligomerization, (ii) ATP hydrolysis, and (iii) the key GAFTGA motif that contacts σ(54) for remodeling. Each of these functions forms a potential target of the signal-sensing N-terminal regulatory domain, which can act either positively or negatively to control the activation of σ(54)-dependent transcription. Finally, we focus on the DNA binding function of the C-terminal domain and the enhancer sites to which it binds. Particular attention is paid to the importance of σ(54) to the bacterial cell and its unique role in regulating transcription.

Promoter and regulon analysis of nitrogen assimilation factor, sigma54, reveal alternative strategy for E. coli MG1655 flagellar biosynthesis

Bacteria core RNA polymerase (RNAP) must associate with a σ factor to recognize promoter sequences. Promoters recognized by the σ⁵⁴ (or σ^N) associated RNA polymerase are unique in having conserved positions around −24 and −12 nucleotides upstream from the transcriptional start site. Using DNA microarrays representing the entire Escherichia coli genome and promoter validation approaches, we identify 40 in vivo targets of σ⁵⁴, the nitrogen assimilation σ factor, and estimate that there are 70 σ⁵⁴ promoters in total. Immunoprecipitation assays have been performed to further evaluate the efficiency of our approaches. In addition, promoter consensus binding search and primer extension assay helped us to identify a new σ⁵⁴ promoter carried by insB-5 in the upstream of flhDC operon. The involvement of σ⁵⁴ in flagellar biosynthesis in sequenced E. coli strain MG1655 indicates a fluid gene regulation phenomenon carried by some mobile elements in bacteria genome.

The role of the conserved phenylalanine in the sigma54-interacting GAFTGA motif of bacterial enhancer binding proteins

σ⁵⁴-dependent transcription requires activation by bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBPs). bEBPs are members of the AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) protein family and typically form hexameric structures that are crucial for their ATPase activity. The precise mechanism by which the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis is coupled to biological output has several unknowns. Here we use Escherichia coli PspF, a model bEBP involved in the transcription of stress response genes (psp operon), to study determinants of its contact features with the closed promoter complex. We demonstrate that substitution of a highly conserved phenylalanine (F85) residue within the L1 loop GAFTGA motif affects (i) the ATP hydrolysis rate of PspF, demonstrating the link between L1 and the nucleotide binding pocket; (ii) the internal organization of the hexameric ring; and (iii) σ⁵⁴ interactions. Importantly, we provide evidence for a close relationship between F85 and the −12 DNA fork junction structure, which may contribute to key interactions during the energy coupling step and the subsequent remodelling of the Eσ⁵⁴ closed complex. The functionality of F85 is distinct from that of other GAFTGA residues, especially T86 where in contrast to F85 a clean uncoupling phenotype is observed.

Organization of an activator-bound RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Transcription initiation involves the conversion from closed promoter complexes, comprising RNA polymerase (RNAP) and double-stranded promoter DNA, to open complexes, in which the enzyme is able to access the DNA template in a single-stranded form. The complex between bacterial RNAP and its major variant sigma factor σ⁵⁴ remains as a closed complex until ATP hydrolysis-dependent remodeling by activator proteins occurs. This remodeling facilitates DNA melting and allows the transition to the open complex. Here we present cryoelectron microscopy reconstructions of bacterial RNAP in complex with σ⁵⁴ alone, and of RNAP-σ⁵⁴ with an AAA+ activator. Together with photo-crosslinking data that establish the location of promoter DNA within the complexes, we explain why the RNAP-σ⁵⁴ closed complex is unable to access the DNA template and propose how the structural changes induced by activator binding can initiate conformational changes that ultimately result in formation of the open complex.

Dissecting the ATP hydrolysis pathway of bacterial enhancer-binding proteins

bEBPs (bacterial enhancer-binding proteins) are AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) transcription activators that activate gene transcription through a specific bacterial sigma factor, sigma(54). Sigma(54)-RNAP (RNA polymerase) binds to promoter DNA sites and forms a stable closed complex, unable to proceed to transcription. The closed complex must be remodelled using energy from ATP hydrolysis provided by bEBPs to melt DNA and initiate transcription. Recently, large amounts of structural and biochemical data have produced insights into how ATP hydrolysis within the active site of bEBPs is coupled to the re-modelling of the closed complex. In the present article, we review some of the key nucleotides, mutations and techniques used and how they have contributed towards our understanding of the function of bEBPs.

Trapping of a transcription complex using a new nucleotide analogue: AMP aluminium fluoride

Mechanochemical proteins rely on ATP hydrolysis to establish the different functional states required for their biological output. Studying the transient functional intermediate states these proteins adopt as they progress through the ATP hydrolysis cycle is key to understanding the molecular basis of their mechanism. Many of these intermediates have been successfully 'trapped' and functionally characterised using ATP analogues. Here, we present a new nucleotide analogue, AMP-AlF(x), which traps PspF, a bacterial enhancer binding protein, in a stable complex with the sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme. The crystal structure of AMP-AlF(x)*PspF(1-275) provides new information on protein-nucleotide interactions and suggests that the beta and gamma phosphates are more important than the alpha phosphate in terms of sensing nucleotide bound states. In addition, functional data obtained with AMP-AlF(x) establish distinct roles for the conserved catalytic AAA(+) (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) residues, suggesting that AMP-AlF(x) is a powerful new tool to study AAA(+) protein family members and, more generally, Walker motif ATPases.

Protein-DNA interactions that govern AAA+ activator-dependent bacterial transcription initiation

Transcriptional control at the promoter melting step is not yet well understood. In this study, a site-directed photo-cross-linking method was used to systematically analyse component protein-DNA interactions that govern promoter melting by the enhancer-dependent Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) containing the sigma(54) promoter specificity factor (E sigma(54)) at a single base pair resolution in three functional states. The sigma(54)-factor imposes tight control upon the RNAP by creating a regulatory switch where promoter melting nucleates, approximately 12 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Promoter melting by E sigma(54) is only triggered upon remodelling of this regulatory switch by a specialised activator protein in an ATP-hydrolysing reaction. We demonstrate that prior to DNA melting, only the sigma(54)-factor directly interacts with the promoter in the regulatory switch within the initial closed E sigma(54)-promoter complex and one intermediate E sigma(54)-promoter complex. We establish that activator-induced conformational rearrangements in the regulatory switch are a prerequisite to allow the promoter to enter the catalytic cleft of the RNAP and hence establish the transcriptionally competent open complex, where full promoter melting occurs. These results significantly advance our current understanding of the structural transitions occurring at bacterial promoters, where regulation occurs at the DNA melting step.

A sigma54-dependent promoter in the regulatory region of the Escherichia coli rpoH gene

The Escherichia coli rpoH gene is transcribed from four known and differently regulated promoters: P1, P3, P4 and P5. This study demonstrates that the conserved consensus sequence of the sigma54 promoter in the regulatory region of the rpoH gene, described previously, is a functional promoter, P6. The evidence for this conclusion is: (i) the specific binding of the sigma54-RNAP holoenzyme to P6, (ii) the location of the transcription start site at the predicted position (C, 30 nt upstream of ATG) and (iii) the dependence of transcription on sigma54 and on an ATP-dependent activator. Nitrogen starvation, heat shock, ethanol and CCCP treatment did not activate transcription from P6 under the conditions examined. Two activators of sigma54 promoters, PspF and NtrC, were tested but neither of them acted specifically. Therefore, PspFDeltaHTH, a derivative of PspF, devoid of DNA binding capability but retaining its ATPase activity, was used for transcription in vitro, taking advantage of the relaxed specificity of ATP-dependent activators acting in solution. In experiments in vivo overexpression of PspFDeltaHTH from a plasmid was employed. Thus, the sigma54-dependent transcription capability of the P6 promoter was demonstrated both in vivo and in vitro, although the specific conditions inducing initiation of the transcription remain to be elucidated. The results clearly indicate that the closed sigma54-RNAP-promoter initiation complex was formed in vitro and in vivo and needed only an ATP-dependent activator to start transcription.

A role for the conserved GAFTGA motif of AAA+ transcription activators in sensing promoter DNA conformation

Transcription from sigma54-dependent bacterial promoters can be regarded as a second paradigm for bacterial gene transcription. The initial sigma54-RNA polymerase (RNAP).promoter complex, the closed complex, is transcriptionally silent. The transcriptionally proficient sigma54-RNAP.promoter complex, the open complex, is formed upon remodeling of the closed complex by actions of a specialized activator protein that belongs to the AAA (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) protein family in an ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction. The integrity of a highly conserved signature motif in the AAA activator (known as the GAFTGA motif) is important for the remodeling activity of the AAA activator and for open complex formation. We now provide evidence that the invariant threo-nine residue of the GAFTGA motif plays a role in sensing the DNA downstream of the sigma54-RNAP-binding site and in coupling this information to sigma54-RNAP via the conserved regulatory Region I domain of sigma54 during open complex formation.

Mapping ATP-dependent activation at a sigma54 promoter

The sigma(54) promoter specificity factor is distinct from other bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) sigma factors in that it forms a transcriptionally silent closed complex upon promoter binding. Transcriptional activation occurs through a nucleotide-dependent isomerization of sigma(54), mediated via its interactions with an enhancer-binding activator protein that utilizes the energy released in ATP hydrolysis to effect structural changes in sigma(54) and core RNA polymerase. The organization of sigma(54)-promoter and sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complexes was investigated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays using sigma(54) single cysteine-mutants labeled with an acceptor fluorophore and donor fluorophore-labeled DNA sequences containing mismatches that mimic nifH early- and late-melted promoters. The results show that sigma(54) undergoes spatial rearrangements of functionally important domains upon closed complex formation. sigma(54) and sigma(54)-RNAP promoter complexes reconstituted with the different mismatched DNA constructs were assayed by the addition of the activator phage shock protein F in the presence or absence of ATP and of non-hydrolysable analogues. Nucleotide-dependent alterations in fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiencies identify different functional states of the activator-sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex that exist throughout the mechano-chemical transduction pathway of transcriptional activation, i.e. from closed to open promoter complexes. The results suggest that open complex formation only occurs efficiently on replacement of a repressive fork junction with down-stream melted DNA.

Transcriptional specificity of RpoN1 and RpoN2 involves differential recognition of the promoter sequences and specific interaction with the cognate activator proteins

The four RpoN factors of Rhodobacter sphaeroides are functionally specialized. In this bacterium, RpoN1 and RpoN2 are specifically required for the transcription of the nitrogen fixation and flagellar genes, respectively. Analysis of the promoter sequences recognized by each of these RpoN proteins revealed some significant differences. To investigate the functional relevance of these differences, the flagellar promoter fliOp was sequentially mutagenized to resemble the nitrogen fixation promoter nifUp. Our results indicate that the promoter sequences recognized by these sigma factors have diverged enough so that particular positions of the promoter sequence are differentially recognized. In this regard, we demonstrate that the identity of the -11-position is critical for promoter discrimination by RpoN1 and RpoN2. Accordingly, purified RpoN proteins with a deletion of Region I, which has been involved in the recognition of the -11-position, did not show differential binding of fliOp and nifUp promoters. Substitution of the flagellar enhancer region located upstream fliOp by the enhancer region of nifUp allowed us to demonstrate that RpoN1 and RpoN2 interact specifically with their respective activator protein. In conclusion, two different molecular mechanisms underlie the transcriptional specialization of these sigma factors.

Structural insights into the activity of enhancer-binding proteins

Activators of bacterial sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme are mechanochemical proteins that use adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis to activate transcription. We have determined by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) a 20 angstrom resolution structure of an activator, phage shock protein F [PspF(1-275)], which is bound to an ATP transition state analog in complex with its basal factor, sigma54. By fitting the crystal structure of PspF(1-275) at 1.75 angstroms into the EM map, we identified two loops involved in binding sigma54. Comparing enhancer-binding structures in different nucleotide states and mutational analysis led us to propose nucleotide-dependent conformational changes that free the loops for association with sigma54.

Communication between Esigma(54) , promoter DNA and the conserved threonine residue in the GAFTGA motif of the PspF sigma-dependent activator during transcription activation

Conversion of Esigma(54) closed promoter complexes to open promoter complexes requires specialized activators which are members of the AAA (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) protein family. The ATP binding and hydrolysis activity of Esigma(54) activators is used in an energy coupling reaction to remodel the Esigma(54) closed promoter complex and to overcome the sigma(54)-imposed block on open complex formation. The remodelling target for the AAA activator within the Esigma(54) closed complex includes a complex interface contributed to by Region I of sigma(54), core RNA polymerase and a promoter DNA fork junction structure, comprising the Esigma(54) regulatory centre. One sigma(54) binding surface on Esigma(54) activators is a conserved sequence known as the GAFTGA motif. Here, we present a detailed characterization of the interaction between Region I of sigma(54) and the Escherichia coli AAA sigma(54) activator Phage shock protein F. Using Esigma(54) promoter complexes that mimic different conformations adopted by the DNA during open complex formation, we investigated the contribution of the conserved threonine residue in the GAFTGA motif to transcription activation. Our results suggest that the organization of the Esigma(54) regulatory centre, and in particular the conformation adopted by the sigma(54) Region I and the DNA fork junction structure during open complex formation, is communicated to the AAA activator via the conserved T residue of the GAFTGA motif.

Geometric and dynamic requirements for DNA looping, wrapping and unwrapping in the activation of E.coli glnAp2 transcription by NtrC

Transcriptional activation by the E.coli NtrC protein can occur via DNA looping between a DNA-bound activator and the target sigma(54) RNA polymerase. NtrC forms an octamer on DNA that is capable of binding two DNA molecules. Its ATPase activity is required for open complex formation. Geometric requirements for activation were assessed using a library of DNA bending sequences created by random ligation of A-tract oligonucleotides, as well as several designed sequences. Thirty random or designed sequences with a variety of DNA lengths and bending geometries were cloned in plasmids, and the library was used to replace the spacer between the NtrC binding sites and the core glnAp2 promoter. The activity of each promoter construct under nitrogen limitation was determined in vivo, in a lambda phage lacZ reporter system integrated as a single-copy lysogen to avoid titrating NtrC or polymerase. A wide variety of bending geometries was found to support a similar level of transcriptional activation ( approximately 3-4-fold). Computer modeling of the DNA trajectories suggests that the most inactive promoters have short spacer DNA and the NtrC sites on the opposite side of the helix as the wild-type sites; otherwise, the loop can form effectively. Flexibility and multivalency of the NtrC-Esigma(54) interaction apparently provides substantial independence from DNA stiffness constraints, and in general activation requires less efficient looping than repression. However, none of the random templates were as active as wild-type promoter. Subsidiary activator binding sites in the wild-type were found to be required for full activity, but, surprisingly, these sites could not be functionally replaced by strong binding sites. This suggests that one or more protomers in the NtrC octamer must form and then release contacts with DNA in order to complete the ATPase cycle and act as an AAA(+) activator of the Esigma(54). This dynamic DNA wrapping around the NtrC octamer is proposed to be necessary for efficient activation, and the wrapping may also reduce adventitious activation of other promoters.

Reorganisation of an RNA polymerase-promoter DNA complex for DNA melting

Sigma factors, the key regulatory components of the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP), direct promoter DNA binding and DNA melting. The sigma(54)-RNAP forms promoter complexes in which DNA melting is only triggered by an activator and ATP hydrolysis-driven reorganisation of an initial sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex. We report that an initial bacterial RNAP-DNA complex can be reorganised by an activator to form an intermediate transcription initiation complex where full DNA melting has not yet occurred. Using sigma(54) as a chemical nuclease we now show that the reorganisation of the initial sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex occurs upon interaction with the activator at the transition point of ATP hydrolysis. We demonstrate that this reorganisation event is an early step in the transcription initiation pathway that occurs independently of RNAP parts normally associated with stable DNA melting and open complex formation. Using photoreactive DNA probes, we provide evidence that within this reorganised sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex, DNA contacts across the 'to be melted' sequences are made by the sigma(54) subunit. Strikingly, the activator protein, but not core RNAP subunits, is close to these DNA sequences.

Regulated communication between the upstream face of RNA polymerase and the beta' subunit jaw domain

We used bacteriophage T7-encoded transcription inhibitor gene protein 2 (gp2) as a probe to study the contribution of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) beta' subunit jaw domain--the site of gp2 binding--to activator and ATP hydrolysis-dependent open complex formation by the sigma(54)-RNAP. We show that, unlike sigma(70)-dependent transcription, activated transcription by sigma(54)-RNAP is resistant to gp2. In contrast, activator and ATP hydrolysis-independent transcription by sigma(54)-RNAP is highly sensitive to gp2. We provide evidence that an activator- and ATP hydrolysis-dependent conformational change involving the beta' jaw domain and promoter DNA is the basis for gp2-resistant transcription by sigma(54)-RNAP. Our results establish that accessory factors bound to the upstream face of the RNAP, communicate with the beta' jaw domain, and that such communication is subjected to regulation.

Nucleotide-dependent interactions between a fork junction-RNA polymerase complex and an AAA+ transcriptional activator protein

Enhancer-dependent transcriptional activators that act upon the sigma54 bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme belong to the extensive AAA+ superfamily of mechanochemical ATPases. Formation and collapse of the transition state for ATP hydrolysis engenders direct interactions between AAA+ activators and the sigma54 factor, required for RNA polymerase isomerization. A DNA fork junction structure present within closed complexes serves as a nucleation point for the DNA melting seen in open promoter complexes and restricts spontaneous activator-independent RNA polymerase isomerization. We now provide physical evidence showing that the ADP.AlF(x) bound form of the AAA+ domain of the transcriptional activator protein PspF changes interactions between sigma54-RNA polymerase and a DNA fork junction structure present in the closed promoter complex. The results suggest that one functional state of the nucleotide-bound activator serves to alter DNA binding by sigma54 and sigma54-RNA polymerase and appears to drive events that precede DNA opening. Clear evidence for a DNA-interacting activity in the AAA+ domain of PspF was obtained, suggesting that PspF may make a direct contact to the DNA component of a basal promoter complex to promote changes in sigma54-RNA polymerase-DNA interactions that favour open complex formation. We also provide evidence for two distinct closed promoter complexes with differing stabilities.

Sigma54-dependent transcription activator phage shock protein F of Escherichia coli: a fragmentation approach to identify sequences that contribute to self-association

Proteins that belong to the AAA (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily of mechanochemical enzymes are versatile and control a wide array of cellular functions. Many AAA proteins share the common property of self-association into oligomeric structures and use nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to regulate their biological output. The Escherichia coli transcription activator PspF (phage shock protein F) is a member of the sigma54-dependent transcriptional activators that belong to the AAA protein family. Nucleotide interactions condition the functional state of PspF, enabling it to self-associate and interact with its target, the sigma54-RNAP (RNA polymerase) closed complex. The self-association determinants within the AAA domain of sigma54-dependent activators remain poorly characterized. In the present study, we have used a fragment of the AAA domain of PspF as a probe to study the nucleotide-conditioned self-association of PspF. Results show that the PspF fragment acts in trans to inhibit specifically self-association of PspF. The PspF fragment prevented efficient binding of nucleotides to PspF, consistent with the observation that the site for nucleotide interactions within an oligomer of AAA proteins is created between two protomers. Using proximity-based footprinting and cross-linking techniques, we demonstrate that the sequences represented in this fragment are close to one protomer-protomer interface within a PspF oligomer. As the sequences represented in this PspF fragment also contain a highly conserved motif that interacts with the sigma54-RNAP closed complex, we suggest that PspF may be organized to link nucleotide interactions and self-association to sigma54-RNAP binding and transcription activation.

ATP-dependent transcriptional activation by bacterial PspF AAA+protein

Transcription activation by bacterial sigma(54)-dependent enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs) requires their tri-nucleotide hydrolysis to restructure the sigma(54) RNA polymerase (RNAP). EBPs share sequence similarity with guanine nucleotide binding-proteins and ATPases associated with various cellular activities (AAA) proteins, especially in the mononucleotide binding P-loop fold. Using the phage shock protein F (PspF) EBP, we identify P-loop residues responsible for nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, consistent with their roles in other P-loop NTPases. We show the refined low-resolution structure of an EBP, PspF, revealing a hexameric ring organisation characteristic of AAA proteins. Functioning of EBPs involves ATP binding, higher oligomer formation and ATP hydrolysis coupled to the restructuring of the RNAP. This is thought to be a highly coordinated multi-step process, but the nucleotide-driven mechanism of oligomerisation and ATP hydrolysis is little understood. Our kinetic and structural data strongly suggest that three PspF dimers assemble to form a hexamer upon nucleotide binding. During the ATP hydrolysis cycle, both ATP and ADP are bound to oligomeric PspF, in line with a sequential hydrolysis cycle. We identify a putative R-finger, and show its involvement in ATP hydrolysis. Substitution of this arginine residue results in nucleotide-independent formation of hexameric rings, structurally linking the putative R-finger and, by inference, a specific nucleotide interaction to the control of PspF oligomerisation.

Mapping sigma 54-RNA polymerase interactions at the -24 consensus promoter element

The sigma 54 promoter specificity factor is distinct from sigma 70-type factors. The sigma 54-RNA polymerase binds to promoters with conserved sequence elements at -24 and -12 and utilizes specialized enhancer-binding activators to convert, through an ATP-dependent process, closed promoter complexes to open promoter complexes. The interface between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and promoter DNA is poorly characterized, contrasting with sigma 70. Here, sigma 54 was modified with strategically positioned cleavage reagents to provide physical evidence that the highly conserved RpoN box motif of sigma 54 is close to and may therefore interact with the consensus -24 promoter element. We show that the spatial relationship between the sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the -24 promoter element remains unchanged during closed to open complex conversion and transcription initiation but changes during the early elongation phase. In contrast, the spatial relationship between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the consensus -12 promoter element changes upon conversion of the closed promoter complex to an open one. We provide evidence that some -12 promoter region-sigma 54 interactions are dependent upon either the core RNA polymerase or a fork junction DNA structure at the -12-position, indicating that DNA fork junctions can substitute for core RNAP. We also show the beta-subunit flap domain contributes to different sets of sigma-promoter DNA interactions at sigma 54- and sigma 70-dependent promoters.