Exploitation of a Chemical Nuclease to Investigate the Location and Orientation of the Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase α Subunit C-terminal Domains at Simple Promoters That Are Activated by Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein

Activation by NarL at the Escherichia coli ogt promoter

The Escherichia coli NarX/NarL two-component response-regulator system regulates gene expression in response to nitrate ions and the NarL protein is a global transcription factor, which activates transcript initiation at many target promoters. One such target, the E. coli ogt promoter, which controls the expression of an O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase, is dependent on NarL binding to two DNA targets centred at positions -44.5 and -77.5 upstream from the transcript start. Here, we describe ogt promoter derivatives that can be activated solely by NarL binding either at position -44.5 or position -77.5. We show that NarL can also activate the ogt promoter when located at position -67.5. We present data to argue that NarL-dependent activation of transcript initiation at the ogt promoter results from a direct interaction between NarL and a determinant in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. Footprinting experiments show that, at the -44.5 promoter, NarL and the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit bind to opposite faces of promoter DNA, suggesting an unusual mechanism of transcription activation. Our work suggests new organisations for activator-dependent transcription at promoters and future applications for biotechnology.

Repression by cyclic AMP receptor protein at a distance

In a previous study of promoters dependent on the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), carrying tandem DNA sites for CRP, we found that the upstream-bound CRP could either enhance or repress transcription, depending on its location. Here, we have analyzed the interactions between CRP and the C-terminal domains of the RNA polymerase α subunits at some of these promoters. We report that the upstream-bound CRP interacts with these domains irrespective of whether it up- or downregulates promoter activity. Hence, disruption of this interaction can lead to either down- or upregulation, depending on its location.

IMPORTANCE

Many bacterial promoters carry multiple DNA sites for transcription factors. While most factors that downregulate promoter activity bind to targets that overlap or are downstream of the transcription start and -10 element, very few cases of repression from upstream locations have been reported. Since more Escherichia coli promoters are regulated by cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) than by any other transcription factor, and since multiple DNA sites for CRP are commonplace at promoters, our results suggest that promoter downregulation by transcription factors may be more prevalent than hitherto thought, and this will have implications for the annotation of promoters from new bacterial genome sequences.

Mechanism of bacterial transcription initiation: RNA polymerase - promoter binding, isomerization to initiation-competent open complexes, and initiation of RNA synthesis

Initiation of RNA synthesis from DNA templates by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a multi-step process, in which initial recognition of promoter DNA by RNAP triggers a series of conformational changes in both RNAP and promoter DNA. The bacterial RNAP functions as a molecular isomerization machine, using binding free energy to remodel the initial recognition complex, placing downstream duplex DNA in the active site cleft and then separating the nontemplate and template strands in the region surrounding the start site of RNA synthesis. In this initial unstable "open" complex the template strand appears correctly positioned in the active site. Subsequently, the nontemplate strand is repositioned and a clamp is assembled on duplex DNA downstream of the open region to form the highly stable open complex, RP(o). The transcription initiation factor, σ(70), plays critical roles in promoter recognition and RP(o) formation as well as in early steps of RNA synthesis.

Activation of sigma 28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization

The Escherichia coli aer regulatory region contains a single promoter that is recognized by RNA polymerase containing the flagellar sigma factor, sigma(28). Expression from this promoter is dependent on direct activation by the cyclic AMP receptor protein, which binds to a target centred 49.5 base pairs upstream from the transcript start. Activator-dependent transcription from the aer promoter was reconstituted in vitro, and a tethered inorganic nuclease was used to find the position of the C-terminal domains of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits in transcriptionally competent open complexes. We report that the ternary activator--RNA polymerase--aer promoter open complex is organized differently from complexes at previously characterized promoters. Among other E. coli promoters recognized by RNA polymerase containing sigma(28), only the trg promoter is activated directly by the cyclic AMP receptor protein. The organization of the different promoter elements and the activator binding site at the trg promoter is the same as at the aer promoter, suggesting a common activation mechanism.

Three-dimensional EM structure of an intact activator-dependent transcription initiation complex

We present the experimentally determined 3D structure of an intact activator-dependent transcription initiation complex comprising the Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP), RNA polymerase holoenzyme (RNAP), and a DNA fragment containing positions -78 to +20 of a Class I CAP-dependent promoter with a CAP site at position -61.5 and a premelted transcription bubble. A 20-A electron microscopy reconstruction was obtained by iterative projection-based matching of single particles visualized in carbon-sandwich negative stain and was fitted using atomic coordinate sets for CAP, RNAP, and DNA. The structure defines the organization of a Class I CAP-RNAP-promoter complex and supports previously proposed interactions of CAP with RNAP alpha subunit C-terminal domain (alphaCTD), interactions of alphaCTD with sigma(70) region 4, interactions of CAP and RNAP with promoter DNA, and phased-DNA-bend-dependent partial wrapping of DNA around the complex. The structure also reveals the positions and shapes of species-specific domains within the RNAP beta', beta, and sigma(70) subunits.

CRP binding and transcription activation at CRP-S sites

In Haemophilus influenzae, as in Escherichia coli, the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) activates transcription from hundreds of promoters by binding symmetrical DNA sites with the consensus half-site 5'-A(1)A(2)A(3)T(4)G(5)T(6)G(7)A(8)T(9)C(10)T(11). We have previously identified 13 H. influenzae CRP sites that differ from canonical (CRP-N) sites in the following features: (1) Both half-sites of these noncanonical (CRP-S) sites have C(6) instead of T(6), although they otherwise have an unusually high level of identity with the binding site consensus. (2) Only promoters with CRP-S sites require both the CRP and Sxy proteins for transcription activation. To study the functional significance of CRP-S site sequences, we purified H. influenzae (Hi)CRP and compared its DNA binding properties to those of the well-characterized E. coli (Ec)CRP. All EcCRP residues that contact DNA are conserved in HiCRP, and both proteins demonstrated a similar high affinity for the CRP-N consensus sequence. However, whereas EcCRP bound specifically to CRP-S sites in vitro, HiCRP did not. By systematically substituting base pairs in native promoters and in the CRP-N consensus sequence, we confirmed that HiCRP is highly specific for the perfect core sequence T(4)G(5)T(6)G(7)A(8) and is more selective than EcCRP at other positions in CRP sites. Even though converting C(6)-->T(6) greatly enhanced HiCRP binding to a CRP-S site, this had the unexpected effect of nearly abolishing promoter activity. A+T-rich sequences upstream of CRP-S sites were also found to be required for promoter activation, raising the possibility that Sxy binds these A+T sequences to simultaneously enable CRP-DNA binding and assist in RNA polymerase recruitment.

Advances in bacterial promoter recognition and its control by factors that do not bind DNA

Early work identified two promoter regions, the -10 and -35 elements, that interact sequence specifically with bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP). However, we now know that several additional promoter elements contact RNAP and influence transcription initiation. Furthermore, our picture of promoter control has evolved beyond one in which regulation results solely from activators and repressors that bind to DNA sequences near the RNAP binding site: many important transcription factors bind directly to RNAP without binding to DNA. These factors can target promoters by affecting specific kinetic steps on the pathway to open complex formation, thereby regulating RNA output from specific promoters.

Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli melR promoter: repression involves four molecules of MelR

The Escherichia coli MelR protein is a transcription activator that autoregulates its own promoter by repressing transcription initiation. Optimal repression requires MelR binding to a site that overlaps the melR transcription start point and to upstream sites. In this work, we have investigated the different determinants needed for optimal repression and their spatial requirements. We show that repression requires a complex involving four DNA-bound MelR molecules, and that the global CRP regulator plays little or no role.

Promoter activation by repositioning of RNA polymerase

Spo0A, a classical two-component-type response regulator in Bacillus subtilis, binds to a specific DNA sequence found in many promoters to repress or activate the transcription of over 100 genes. On the spoIIG promoter, one of the Spo0A binding sites, centered at position -40, overlaps a consensus -35 element that may also interact with region 4 of the sigma A (sigma(A)) subunit of RNA polymerase. Molecular modeling corroborated by genetic evidence led us to propose that the binding of Spo0A to this site repositions sigma(A) region 4 on the promoter. Therefore, we used a chemical nuclease, p-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA-Fe, that was covalently tethered to a single cysteine in region 4 of sigma(A) to map the position of sigma(A) on the promoter. The results indicated that in the absence of Spo0A, sigma(A) region 4 of the RNA polymerase was located near the -35 element sequence centered at position -40. However, in the presence of Spo0A, sigma(A) region 4 was displaced downstream from the -35 element by 4 bp. These and other results support the model in which the binding of Spo0A to the spoIIG promoter stimulates promoter utilization by repositioning prebound RNA polymerase and stabilizing the repositioned RNA polymerase-promoter complex at a new position that aligns sigma(A) region 2 with the -10 region sequences of the promoter, thus facilitating open complex formation.

The C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit plays a role in the CI-dependent activation of the bacteriophage lambda pM promoter

The bacteriophage lambda p(M) promoter is required for maintenance of the lambda prophage in Escherichia coli, as it facilitates transcription of the cI gene, encoding the lambda repressor (CI). CI levels are maintained through a transcriptional feedback mechanism whereby CI can serve as an activator or a repressor of p(M). CI activates p(M) through cooperative binding to the O(R)1 and O(R)2 sites within the O(R) operator, with the O(R)2-bound CI dimer making contact with domain 4 of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit (sigma(4)). Here we demonstrate that the 261 and 287 determinants of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD), as well as the DNA-binding determinant, are important for CI-dependent activation of p(M). We also show that the location of alphaCTD at the p(M) promoter changes in the presence of CI. Thus, in the absence of CI, one alphaCTD is located on the DNA at position -44 relative to the transcription start site, whereas in the presence of CI, alphaCTD is located at position -54, between the CI-binding sites at O(R)1 and O(R)2. These results suggest that contacts between CI and both alphaCTD and sigma are required for efficient CI-dependent activation of p(M).

Recruitment of RNA polymerase to Class II CRP-dependent promoters is improved by a second upstream-bound CRP molecule

Genetics and biochemistry have been exploited to investigate transcription activation by the Escherichia coli CRP (cAMP receptor protein) factor at promoters with a DNA site for CRP near position −41 and the effects of a second upstream-bound CRP molecule. We show that the upstream-bound CRP contributes to transcription activation by improving the recruitment of RNA polymerase.

Additional determinants within Escherichia coli FNR activating region 1 and RNA polymerase alpha subunit required for transcription activation

The global anaerobic regulator FNR is a DNA binding protein that activates transcription of genes required for anaerobic metabolism in Escherichia coli through interactions with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of FNR amino acid residues 181 to 193 of FNR was utilized to determine which amino acid side chains are required for transcription of both class II and class I promoters. In vivo assays of FNR function demonstrated that a core of residues (F181, R184, S187, and R189) was required for efficient activation of class II promoters, while at a class I promoter, FF(-61.5), only S187 and R189 were critical for FNR activation. Site-directed mutagenesis of positions 184, 187, and 189 revealed that the positive charge contributes to the function of the side chain at positions 184 and 189 while the serine hydroxyl is critical for the function of position 187. Subsequent analysis of the carboxy-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alphaCTD) of RNAP, using an alanine library in single copy, revealed that in addition to previously characterized side chains (D305, R317, and L318), E286 and E288 contributed to FNR activation of both class II and class I promoters, suggesting that alphaCTD region 285 to 288 also participates in activation by FNR. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that multiple side chains within region 181 to 192 are required for FNR activation and the surface of alphaCTD required for FNR activation is more extensive than previously observed.

rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli

Ribosomal RNA transcription is the rate-limiting step in ribosome synthesis in bacteria and has been investigated intensely for over half a century. Multiple mechanisms ensure that rRNA synthesis rates are appropriate for the cell's particular growth condition. Recently, important advances have been made in our understanding of rRNA transcription initiation in Escherichia coli. These include (a) a model at the atomic level of the network of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions that recruit RNA polymerase to rRNA promoters, accounting for their extraordinary strength; (b) discovery of the nonredundant roles of two small molecule effectors, ppGpp and the initiating NTP, in regulation of rRNA transcription initiation; and (c) identification of a new component of the transcription machinery, DksA, that is absolutely required for regulation of rRNA promoter activity. Together, these advances provide clues important for our molecular understanding not only of rRNA transcription, but also of transcription in general.

Sequence-independent upstream DNA-alphaCTD interactions strongly stimulate Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-lacUV5 promoter association

The C-terminal domains of the two alpha-subunits (alphaCTD) in Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognize specific sequences called UP elements in some promoters. These interactions can increase transcription dramatically. Previously, effects of upstream DNA-alphaCTD interactions on transcription were quantified relative to control promoters with nonspecific DNA sequences substituted for UP elements. However, contributions of nonspecific upstream DNA-alphaCTD interactions to promoter activity have not been evaluated extensively. Here, we examine effects of removal of alphaCTD, upstream promoter DNA, or both on the rate of open-complex formation with promoters that lack UP elements. Deletion of alphaCTD decreased the composite second-order association rate constant, k(a), of RNAP for the lacUV5 promoter by approximately 10-fold. Much of this effect was attributable to a decrease in the isomerization rate constant, k(2). Removal of promoter DNA upstream of the -35 element also decreased both k(a) and k(2) approximately 10-fold. Upstream DNA extending approximately to base pair -100 was sufficient for maximal association rates of wild-type RNAP with lacUV5 promoter fragments. The alphaCTD and upstream DNA did not affect dissociation rates from the open complex. We suggest that sequence-independent upstream DNA interactions with alphaCTD are major contributors to initiation at many (or all) promoters (not merely promoters containing UP elements) and that these interactions facilitate isomerization events occurring well downstream of the alpha-binding sites. In addition to highlighting the functional importance of nonspecific protein-DNA interactions, these results suggest also that UP element-alphaCTD interactions play an even larger role in transcription initiation than appreciated previously.

Catabolite activator protein: DNA binding and transcription activation

Recently determined structures of the Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP) in complex with DNA, and in complex with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain (alphaCTD) and DNA, have yielded insights into how CAP binds DNA and activates transcription. Comparison of multiple structures of CAP-DNA complexes has revealed the contributions of direct and indirect readout to DNA binding by CAP. The structure of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex has provided the first structural description of interactions between a transcription activator and its functional target within the general transcription machinery. Using the structure of the CAP-alphaCTD-DNA complex, the structure of an RNA polymerase-DNA complex, and restraints from biophysical, biochemical and genetic experiments, it has been possible to construct detailed three-dimensional models of intact class I and class II transcription activation complexes.

Transcription activation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter: interactions of MelR with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

We have investigated the role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit during MelR-dependent activation of transcription at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter. To do this, we used a simplified melAB promoter derivative that is dependent on MelR binding at two 18 bp sites, located from position -34 to -51 and from position -54 to -71, upstream of the transcription start site. Results from experiments with hydroxyl radical footprinting, and with RNA polymerase, carrying alpha subunits that were tagged with a chemical nuclease, show that the C-terminal domains of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits are located near position -52 and near position -72 during transcription activation. We demonstrate that the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit is needed for open complex formation, and we describe two experiments showing that the RNA polymerase alpha subunit can interact with MelR. Finally, we used alanine scanning to identify determinants in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit that are important for MelR-dependent activation of the melAB promoter.

Regulation at complex bacterial promoters: how bacteria use different promoter organizations to produce different regulatory outcomes

Most bacterial promoters are regulated by several signals. This is reflected in the complexity of their organization, with multiple binding sites for different transcription factors. Studies of a small number of complex promoters have revealed different distinct mechanisms that integrate the effects of multiple transcription factors.

Location of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain at an FNR-dependent promoter: analysis using an artificial nuclease

The Escherichia coli FNR protein is a global transcription regulator that activates gene expression via interactions with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain. Using preparations of E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme, specifically labelled with a DNA cleavage reagent, we have determined the location and orientation of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in transcriptionally competent complexes at a class II FNR-dependent promoter. We conclude that one alpha subunit C-terminal domain binds immediately upstream of FNR, and that its position and orientation is the same as at similar promoters dependent on CRP, another E. coli transcription activator that is related to FNR. In complementary experiments, we show that the second alpha subunit C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase can be repositioned by upstream-bound CRP, but not by upstream-bound FNR.

Role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits in CII-dependent activation of the bacteriophage lambda pE promoter: identification of important residues and positioning of the alpha C-terminal domains

The bacteriophage lambda CII protein stimulates the activity of three phage promoters, p(E), p(I) and p(aQ), upon binding to a site overlapping the -35 element at each promoter. Here we used preparations of RNA polymerase carrying a DNA cleavage reagent attached to specific residues in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD) to demonstrate that one alphaCTD binds near position -41 at p(E), whilst the other alphaCTD binds further upstream. The alphaCTD bound near position -41 is oriented such that its 261 determinant is in close proximity to sigma(70). The location of alphaCTD in CII-dependent complexes at the p(E) promoter is very similar to that found at many activator-independent promoters, and represents an alternative configuration for alphaCTD at promoters where activators bind sites overlapping the -35 region. We also used an in vivo alanine scan analysis to show that the DNA-binding determinant of alphaCTD is involved in stimulation of the p(E) promoter by CII, and this was confirmed by in vitro transcription assays. We also show that whereas the K271E substitution in alphaCTD results in a drastic decrease in CII-dependent activation of p(E), the p(I) and p(aQ) promoters are less sensitive to this substitution, suggesting that the role of alphaCTD at the three lysogenic promoters may be different.