Residues His-15 and Arg-17 of HPr participate differently in catabolite signal processing via CcpA

Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance with Small Molecules Targeting LsrK: Challenges and Opportunities

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat with severe health and economic consequences. The available antibiotics are losing efficacy, and the hunt for alternative strategies is a priority. Quorum sensing (QS) controls biofilm and virulence factors production. Thus, the quenching of QS to prevent pathogenicity and to increase bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics is an appealing therapeutic strategy. The phosphorylation of autoinducer-2 (a mediator in QS) by LsrK is a crucial step in triggering the QS cascade. Thus, LsrK represents a valuable target in fighting AMR. Few LsrK inhibitors have been reported so far, allowing ample room for further exploration. This perspective aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current knowledge about the structural and biological properties of LsrK and the state-of-the-art technology for LsrK inhibitor design. We elaborate on the challenges in developing novel LsrK inhibitors and point out promising avenues for further research.

Probing the regulatory effects of specific mutations in three major binding domains of the pleiotropic regulator CcpA of Bacillus subtilis

Carbon catabolite control is required for efficient use of available carbon sources to ensure rapid growth of bacteria. CcpA is a global regulator of carbon metabolism in Gram-positive bacteria like Bacillus subtilis. In this study the genome-wide gene regulation of a CcpA knockout and three specific CcpA mutants were studied by transcriptome analysis, to further elucidate the function of specific binding sites in CcpA. The following three amino acids were mutated to characterize their function: M17(R) which is involved in DNA binding, T62(H) which is important for the allosteric switch in CcpA upon HPr-Ser46-P binding, and R304(W) which is important for binding of the coeffectors HPr-Ser46-P and fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. The results confirm that CcpA was also involved in gene regulation in the absence of glucose. CcpA-M17R showed a small relief of Carbon Catabolite Control; the CcpA-M17R mutant regulates fewer genes than the CcpA-wt and the palindromicity of the cre site is less important for CcpA-M17R. CcpA-T62H was a stronger repressor than CcpA-wt and also acted as a strong repressor in the absence of glucose. CcpA-R304W was shown here to be less dependent on HPr-Ser46-P for its carbon catabolite control activities. The results presented here provide detailed information on alterations in gene regulation for each CcpA-mutant.

CcpA forms complexes with CodY and RpoA in Bacillus subtilis

The Bacillus subtilis catabolite control protein A (CcpA) is a global transcriptional regulator that is controlled by interactions with the phosphoproteins histidine-containing protein (HPr)Ser46P and the catabolite responsive HPr (Crh)Ser46P and with low molecular weight effectors, depending on the availability of preferred carbon sources such as glucose. Distinct point mutations in CcpA abolish the regulation of some but not all target genes, suggesting additional interactions of CcpA. Therefore, in vivo crosslinking and MS were applied to identify CcpA complexes active in repression and activation. To compensate for an excess of promoters only repressed by CcpA, this experiment was accomplished with cells using multiple copies of the activated ackA promoter. Among the identified proteins HPr, RNA polymerase subunits and the global regulator transcriptional pleiotropic repressor (CodY) were observed. Bacterial two-hybrid assays combining each RNA polymerase subunit with CcpA localized CcpA binding at the α-subunit of the RNA polymerase (RpoA). In vivo crosslinking combined with immunoblot analyses revealed CcpA-RpoA complexes in cultures with or without glucose, whereas CcpA-HPr and CcpA-CodY complexes occurred only or predominantly in cultures with glucose. Surface plasmon resonance analyses confirmed the binding of CcpA to the N-terminal domain (αNTD) and C-terminal domain (αCTD) of RpoA, as well as to CodY. Furthermore, interactions of CodY with the αNTD and the αCTD were detected by surface plasmon resonance. The K(D) values of complexes of CcpA or CodY with the αNTD or the αCTD are in the range 5-8 μm. CcpA and CodY form a loose complex with a K(D) of 60 μm. These data were combined to propose a model for a transcription initiation complex at the ackA promoter.

Structures of carbon catabolite protein A-(HPr-Ser46-P) bound to diverse catabolite response element sites reveal the basis for high-affinity binding to degenerate DNA operators

In Gram-positive bacteria, carbon catabolite protein A (CcpA) is the master regulator of carbon catabolite control, which ensures optimal energy usage under diverse conditions. Unlike other LacI-GalR proteins, CcpA is activated for DNA binding by first forming a complex with the phosphoprotein HPr-Ser46-P. Bacillus subtilis CcpA functions as both a transcription repressor and activator and binds to more than 50 operators called catabolite response elements (cres). These sites are highly degenerate with the consensus, WTGNNARCGNWWWCAW. How CcpA–(HPr-Ser46-P) binds such diverse sequences is unclear. To gain insight into this question, we solved the structures of the CcpA–(HPr-Ser46-P) complex bound to three different operators, the synthetic (syn) cre, ackA2 cre and gntR-down cre. Strikingly, the structures show that the CcpA-bound operators display different bend angles, ranging from 31° to 56°. These differences are accommodated by a flexible linkage between the CcpA helix-turn-helix-loop-helix motif and hinge helices, which allows independent docking of these DNA-binding modules. This flexibility coupled with an abundance of non-polar residues capable of non-specific nucleobase interactions permits CcpA–(HPr-Ser46-P) to bind diverse operators. Indeed, biochemical data show that CcpA–(HPr-Ser46-P) binds the three cre sites with similar affinities. Thus, the data reveal properties that license this protein to function as a global transcription regulator.

Characterization of a mannose utilization system in Bacillus subtilis

The mannose operon of Bacillus subtilis consists of three genes, manP, manA, and yjdF, which are responsible for the transport and utilization of mannose. Upstream and in the same orientation as the mannose operon a regulatory gene, manR, codes for a transcription activator of the mannose operon, as shown in this study. Both mannose operon transcription and manR transcription are inducible by mannose. The presence of mannose resulted in a 4- to 7-fold increase in expression of lacZ from the manP promoter (P(manP)) and in a 3-fold increase in expression of lacZ from the manR promoter (P(manR)). The transcription start sites of manPA-yjdF and manR were determined to be a single A residue and a single G residue, respectively, preceded by -10 and -35 boxes resembling a vegetative sigma(A) promoter structure. Through deletion analysis the target sequences of ManR upstream of P(manP) and P(manR) were identified between bp -80 and -35 with respect to the transcriptional start site of both promoters. Deletion of manP (mannose transporter) resulted in constitutive expression from both the P(manP) and P(manR) promoters, indicating that the phosphotransferase system (PTS) component EII(Man) has a negative effect on regulation of the mannose operon and manR. Moreover, both P(manP) and P(manR) are subject to carbon catabolite repression (CCR). By constructing protein sequence alignments a DNA binding motif at the N-terminal end, two PTS regulation domains (PRDs), and an EIIA- and EIIB-like domain were identified in the ManR sequence, indicating that ManR is a PRD-containing transcription activator. Like findings for other PRD regulators, the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-dependent phosphorylation by the histidine protein HPr via His15 plays an essential role in transcriptional activation of P(manP) and P(manR). Phosphorylation of Ser46 of HPr or of the homologous Crh protein by HPr kinase and formation of a repressor complex with CcpA are parts of the B. subtilis CCR system. Only in the double mutant with an HPr Ser46Ala mutation and a crh knockout mutation was CCR strongly reduced. In contrast, P(manR) and P(manP) were not inducible in a ccpA deletion mutant.

Screen for leukotoxin mutants in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: genes of the phosphotransferase system are required for leukotoxin biosynthesis

Aggregatibacter (formerly Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans is a pathogen that causes localized aggressive periodontitis and extraoral infections including infective endocarditis. Recently, we reported that A. actinomycetemcomitans is beta-hemolytic on certain growth media due to the production of leukotoxin (LtxA). Based on this observation and our ability to generate random transposon insertions in A. actinomycetemcomitans, we developed and carried out a rapid screen for LtxA mutants. Using PCR, we mapped several of the mutations to genes that are known or predicted to be required for LtxA production, including ltxA, ltxB, ltxD, and tdeA. In addition, we identified an insertion in a gene previously not recognized to be involved in LtxA biosynthesis, ptsH. ptsH encodes the protein HPr, a phosphocarrier protein that is part of the sugar phosphotransferase system. HPr results in the phosphorylation of other proteins and ultimately in the activation of adenylate cyclase and cyclic AMP (cAMP) production. The ptsH mutant showed only partial hemolysis on blood agar and did not produce LtxA. The phenotype was complemented by supplying wild-type ptsH in trans, and real-time PCR analysis showed that the ptsH mutant produced approximately 10-fold less ltxA mRNA than the wild-type strain. The levels of cAMP in the ptsH mutant were significantly lower than in the wild-type strain, and LtxA production could be restored by adding exogenous cAMP to the culture.

Structure of full-length transcription regulator CcpA in the apo form

The catabolite control protein A (CcpA) from Bacillus megaterium is a member of the bacterial repressor protein family GalR-LacI. CcpA functions as master transcriptional regulator of carbon catabolite repression/regulation in firmicutes. Here we present the crystal structure of full-length apo CcpA at 2.5 A resolution from B. megaterium. The structure reveals the location of the helix-turn-helix domain as well as the hinge region, which were not visible due to their high flexibility in earlier crystallographic studies on CcpA molecules. The structure of the apo CcpA homodimer in the present form is in contrast to other reported structures for CcpA.

Structural mechanism for the fine-tuning of CcpA function by the small molecule effectors glucose 6-phosphate and fructose 1,6-bisphosphate

In Gram-positive bacteria, carbon catabolite regulation (CCR) is mediated by the carbon catabolite control protein A (CcpA), a member of the LacI-GalR family of transcription regulators. Unlike other LacI-GalR proteins, CcpA is activated to bind DNA by binding the phosphoproteins HPr-Ser46-P or Crh-Ser46-P. However, fine regulation of CCR is accomplished by the small molecule effectors, glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) and fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (FBP), which somehow enhance CcpA-(HPr-Ser46-P) binding to DNA. Unlike the CcpA-(HPr-Ser46-P) complex, DNA binding by CcpA-(Crh-Ser46-P) is not stimulated by G6P or FBP. To understand the fine-tuning mechanism of these effectors, we solved the structures of the CcpA core, DeltaCcpA, which lacks the N-terminal DNA-binding domain, in complex with HPr-Ser46-P and G6P or FBP. G6P and FBP bind in a deep cleft, between the N and C subdomains of CcpA. Neither interacts with HPr-Ser46-P. This suggests that one role of the adjunct corepressors is to buttress the DNA-binding conformation effected by the binding of HPr-Ser46-P to the CcpA dimer N subdomains. However, the structures reveal that an unexpected function of adjunct corepressor binding is to bolster cross interactions between HPr-Ser46-P residue Arg17 and residues Asp69 and Asp99 of the other CcpA subunit. These cross contacts, which are weak or not present in the CcpA-(Crh-Ser46-P) complex, stimulate the CcpA-(HPr-Ser46-P)-DNA interaction specifically. Thus, stabilization of the closed conformation and bolstering of cross contacts between CcpA and its other corepressor, HPr-Ser46-P, provide a molecular explanation for how adjunct corepressors G6P and FBP enhance the interaction between CcpA-(HPr-Ser46-P) and cognate DNA.