Bacillus subtilis RecO nucleates RecA onto SsbA-coated single-stranded DNA

Bacillus subtilis RadA/Sms-Mediated Nascent Lagging-Strand Unwinding at Stalled or Reversed Forks Is a Two-Step Process: RadA/Sms Assists RecA Nucleation, and RecA Loads RadA/Sms

Replication fork rescue requires Bacillus subtilis RecA, its negative (SsbA) and positive (RecO) mediators, and fork-processing (RadA/Sms). To understand how they work to promote fork remodeling, reconstituted branched replication intermediates were used. We show that RadA/Sms (or its variant, RadA/Sms C13A) binds to the 5'-tail of a reversed fork with longer nascent lagging-strand and unwinds it in the 5'→3' direction, but RecA and its mediators limit unwinding. RadA/Sms cannot unwind a reversed fork with a longer nascent leading-strand, or a gapped stalled fork, but RecA interacts with and activates unwinding. Here, the molecular mechanism by which RadA/Sms, in concert with RecA, in a two-step reaction, unwinds the nascent lagging-strand of reversed or stalled forks is unveiled. First, RadA/Sms, as a mediator, contributes to SsbA displacement from the forks and nucleates RecA onto single-stranded DNA. Then, RecA, as a loader, interacts with and recruits RadA/Sms onto the nascent lagging strand of these DNA substrates to unwind them. Within this process, RecA limits RadA/Sms self-assembly to control fork processing, and RadA/Sms prevents RecA from provoking unnecessary recombination.

The RecD2 helicase balances RecA activities

DNA helicases of the RecD2 family are ubiquitous. Bacillus subtilis RecD2 in association with the single-stranded binding protein SsbA may contribute to replication fork progression, but its detailed action remains unknown. In this work, we explore the role of RecD2 during DNA replication and its interaction with the RecA recombinase. RecD2 inhibits replication restart, but this effect is not observed in the absence of SsbA. RecD2 slightly affects replication elongation. RecA inhibits leading and lagging strand synthesis, and RecD2, which physically interacts with RecA, counteracts this negative effect. In vivo results show that recD2 inactivation promotes RecA–ssDNA accumulation at low mitomycin C levels, and that RecA threads persist for a longer time after induction of DNA damage. In vitro, RecD2 modulates RecA-mediated DNA strand-exchange and catalyzes branch migration. These findings contribute to our understanding of how RecD2 may contribute to overcome a replicative stress, removing RecA from the ssDNA and, thus, it may act as a negative modulator of RecA filament growth.

PcrA Dissociates RecA Filaments and the SsbA and RecO Mediators Counterbalance Such Activity

PcrA depletion is lethal in wild-type Bacillus subtilis cells. The PcrA DNA helicase contributes to unwinding RNA from the template strand, backtracking the RNA polymerase, rescuing replication-transcription conflicts, and disassembling RecA from single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by poorly understood mechanisms. We show that, in the presence of RecA, circa one PcrA/plasmid-size circular ssDNA (cssDNA) molecule hydrolyzes ATP at a rate similar to that on the isolated cssDNA. PcrA K37A, which poorly hydrolyses ATP, fails to displace RecA from cssDNA. SsbA inhibits and blocks the ATPase activities of PcrA and RecA, respectively. RecO partially antagonizes and counteracts the negative effect of SsbA on PcrA- and RecA-mediated ATP hydrolysis, respectively. Conversely, multiple PcrA molecules are required to inhibit RecA·ATP-mediated DNA strand exchange (DSE). RecO and SsbA poorly antagonize the PcrA inhibitory effect on RecA·ATP-mediated DSE. We propose that two separable PcrA functions exist: an iterative translocating PcrA monomer strips RecA from cssDNA to prevent unnecessary recombination with the mediators SsbA and RecO balancing such activity; and a PcrA cluster that disrupts DNA transactions, as RecA-mediated DSE.

Single-molecule insight into stalled replication fork rescue in Escherichia coli

DNA replication forks stall at least once per cell cycle in Escherichia coli. DNA replication must be restarted if the cell is to survive. Restart is a multi-step process requiring the sequential action of several proteins whose actions are dictated by the nature of the impediment to fork progression. When fork progress is impeded, the sequential actions of SSB, RecG and the RuvABC complex are required for rescue. In contrast, when a template discontinuity results in the forked DNA breaking apart, the actions of the RecBCD pathway enzymes are required to resurrect the fork so that replication can resume. In this review, we focus primarily on the significant insight gained from single-molecule studies of individual proteins, protein complexes, and also, partially reconstituted regression and RecBCD pathways. This insight is related to the bulk-phase biochemical data to provide a comprehensive review of each protein or protein complex as it relates to stalled DNA replication fork rescue.

Elucidating Recombination Mediator Function Using Biophysical Tools

Simple Summary

This review recapitulates the initial knowledge acquired with genetics and biochemical experiments on Recombination mediator proteins in different domains of life. We further address how recent in vivo and in vitro biophysical tools were critical to deepen the understanding of RMPs molecular mechanisms in DNA and replication repair, and unveiled unexpected features. For instance, in bacteria, genetic and biochemical studies suggest a close proximity and coordination of action of the RecF, RecR and RecO proteins in order to ensure their RMP function, which is to overcome the single-strand binding protein (SSB) and facilitate the loading of the recombinase RecA onto ssDNA. In contrary to this expectation, using single-molecule fluorescent imaging in living cells, we showed recently that RecO and RecF do not colocalize and moreover harbor different spatiotemporal behavior relative to the replication machinery, suggesting distinct functions. Finally, we address how new biophysics tools could be used to answer outstanding questions about RMP function.

Abstract

The recombination mediator proteins (RMPs) are ubiquitous and play a crucial role in genome stability. RMPs facilitate the loading of recombinases like RecA onto single-stranded (ss) DNA coated by single-strand binding proteins like SSB. Despite sharing a common function, RMPs are the products of a convergent evolution and differ in (1) structure, (2) interaction partners and (3) molecular mechanisms. The RMP function is usually realized by a single protein in bacteriophages and eukaryotes, respectively UvsY or Orf, and RAD52 or BRCA2, while in bacteria three proteins RecF, RecO and RecR act cooperatively to displace SSB and load RecA onto a ssDNA region. Proteins working alongside to the RMPs in homologous recombination and DNA repair notably belongs to the RAD52 epistasis group in eukaryote and the RecF epistasis group in bacteria. Although RMPs have been studied for several decades, molecular mechanisms at the single-cell level are still not fully understood. Here, we summarize the current knowledge acquired on RMPs and review the crucial role of biophysical tools to investigate molecular mechanisms at the single-cell level in the physiological context.

Bacillus subtilis PcrA Couples DNA Replication, Transcription, Recombination and Segregation

Bacillus subtilis PcrA abrogates replication-transcription conflicts in vivo and disrupts RecA nucleoprotein filaments in vitro. Inactivation of pcrA is lethal. We show that PcrA depletion lethality is suppressed by recJ (involved in end resection), recA (the recombinase), or mfd (transcription-coupled repair) inactivation, but not by inactivating end resection (addAB or recQ), positive and negative RecA modulators (rarA or recX and recU), or genes involved in the reactivation of a stalled RNA polymerase (recD2, helD, hepA, and ywqA). We also report that B. subtilis mutations previously designated as recL16 actually map to the recO locus, and confirm that PcrA depletion lethality is suppressed by recO inactivation. The pcrA gene is epistatic to recA or mfd, but it is not epistatic to addAB, recJ, recQ, recO16, rarA, recX, recU, recD2, helD, hepA, or ywqA in response to DNA damage. PcrA depletion led to the accumulation of unsegregated chromosomes, and this defect is increased by recQ, rarA, or recU inactivation. We propose that PcrA, which is crucial to maintain cell viability, is involved in different DNA transactions.

Bacillus subtilis RarA Acts as a Positive RecA Accessory Protein

Ubiquitous RarA AAA+ ATPases play crucial roles in the cellular response to blocked replication forks in pro- and eukaryotes. Here, we provide evidence that absence of RarA reduced the viability of ΔrecA, ΔrecO, and recF15 cells during unperturbed growth. The rarA gene was epistatic to recO and recF genes in response to H2O2- or MMS-induced DNA damage. Conversely, the inactivation of rarA partially suppressed the HR defect of mutants lacking end-resection (ΔaddAB, ΔrecJ, ΔrecQ, ΔrecS) or branch migration (ΔruvAB, ΔrecG, ΔradA) activity. RarA contributes to RecA thread formation, that are thought to be the active forms of RecA during homology search. The absence of RarA reduced RecA accumulation, and the formation of visible RecA threads in vivo upon DNA damage. When ΔrarA was combined with mutations in genuine RecA accessory genes, RecA accumulation was further reduced in ΔrarA ΔrecU and ΔrarA ΔrecX double mutant cells, and was blocked in ΔrarA recF15 cells. These results suggest that RarA contributes to the assembly of RecA nucleoprotein filaments onto single-stranded DNA, and possibly antagonizes RecA filament disassembly.

Viral SPP1 DNA is infectious in naturally competent Bacillus subtilis cells: inter- and intramolecular recombination pathways

A proteolyzed bacteriophage (phage) might release its DNA into the environment. Here, we define the recombination functions required to resurrect an infective lytic phage from inactive environmental viral DNA in naturally competent Bacillus subtilis cells. Using phage SPP1 DNA, a model that accounts for the obtained data is proposed (i) the DNA uptake apparatus takes up environmental SPP1 DNA, fragments it, and incorporates into the cytosol different linear single-stranded (ss) DNA molecules shorter than genome-length; (ii) the SsbA-DprA mediator loads RecA onto any fragmented linear SPP1 ssDNA, but negative modulators (RecX and RecU) promote a net RecA disassembly from these ssDNAs not homologous to the host genome; (iii) single strand annealing (SSA) proteins, DprA and RecO, anneal the SsbA- or SsbB-coated complementary strands, yielding tailed SPP1 duplex intermediates; (iv) RecA polymerized on these tailed intermediates invades a homologous region in another incomplete molecule, and in concert with RecD2 helicase, reconstitutes a complete linear phage genome with redundant regions at the ends of the molecule; and (v) DprA, RecO or viral G35P SSA, may catalyze the annealing of these terminally redundant regions, alone or with the help of an exonuclease, to produce a circular unit-length duplex viral genome ready to initiate replication.

Bacillus subtilis RecA interacts with and loads RadA/Sms to unwind recombination intermediates during natural chromosomal transformation

During natural transformation Bacillus subtilis RecA, polymerized onto the incoming single-stranded (ss) DNA, catalyses DNA strand invasion resulting in a displacement loop (D-loop) intermediate. A null radA mutation impairs chromosomal transformation, and RadA/Sms unwinds forked DNA in the 5′→3′ direction. We show that in the absence of RadA/Sms competent cells require the RecG translocase for natural chromosomal transformation. RadA/Sms tetracysteine motif (C13A and C13R) variants, which fail to interact with RecA, are also deficient in plasmid transformation, but this defect is suppressed by inactivating recA. The RadA/Sms C13A and C13R variants bind ssDNA, and this interaction stimulates their ATPase activity. Wild-type (wt) RadA/Sms interacts with and inhibits the ATPase activity of RecA, but RadA/Sms C13A fails to do it. RadA/Sms and its variants, C13A and C13R, bound to the 5′-tail of a DNA substrate, unwind DNA in the 5′→3′ direction. RecA interacts with and loads wt RadA/Sms to promote unwinding of a non-cognate 3′-tailed or 5′-fork DNA substrate, but RadA/Sms C13A or C13R fail to do it. We propose that wt RadA/Sms interaction with RecA is crucial to recruit the former onto D-loop DNA, and both proteins in concert catalyse D-loop extension to favour integration of ssDNA during chromosomal transformation.

Bacillus subtilis DisA regulates RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange

Bacillus subtilis diadenylate cyclase DisA converts two ATPs into c-di-AMP, but this activity is suppressed upon interaction with sites of DNA damage. DisA forms a rapid moving focus that pauses upon induction of DNA damage during spore development. We report that DisA pausing, however, was not observed in the absence of the RecO mediator or of the RecA recombinase, suggesting that DisA binds to recombination intermediates formed by RecA in concert with RecO. DisA, which physically interacts with RecA, was found to reduce its ATPase activity without competing for nucleotides or ssDNA. Furthermore, increasing DisA concentrations inhibit RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange, but this inhibition failed to occur when RecA was added prior to DisA, and was independent of RecA-mediated nucleotide hydrolysis or increasing concentrations of c-di-AMP. We propose that DisA may preserve genome integrity by downregulating RecA activities at several steps of the DNA damage tolerance pathway, allowing time for the repair machineries to restore genome stability. DisA might reduce RecA-mediated template switching by binding to a stalled or reversed fork.

Bacillus subtilis RadA/Sms contributes to chromosomal transformation and DNA repair in concert with RecA and circumvents replicative stress in concert with DisA

Bacillus subtilis radA is epistatic to disA and recA genes in response to methyl methane sulfonate- and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide-induced DNA damage. We show that ΔradA cells were sensitive to mitomycin C- and H₂O₂-induced damage and impaired in natural chromosomal transformation, whereas cells lacking DisA were not. RadA/Sms mutants in the conserved H1 (K104A and K104R) or KNRFG (K255A and K255R) motifs fail to rescue the sensitivity of ΔradA in response to the four different DNA damaging agents. A RadA/Sms H1 or KNRFG mutation impairs both chromosomal and plasmid transformation, but the latter defect was suppressed by inactivating RecA. RadA/Sms K255A, K255R and wild type RadA/Sms reduced the diadenylate cyclase activity of DisA, whereas RadA/Sms K104A and K104R blocked it. Single-stranded and Holliday junction DNA are preferentially bound over double-stranded DNA by RadA/Sms and its variants. Moreover, RadA/Sms ATPase activity was neither stimulated by a variety of DNA substrates nor by DisA. RadA/Sms possesses a 5´→3´ DNA helicase activity. The RadA/Sms mutants neither hydrolyze ATP nor unwind DNA. Thus, we propose that RadA/Sms has two activities: to modulate DisA and to promote RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange. Both activities are required to coordinate responses to replicative stress and genetic recombination.

Bacillus subtilis MutS Modulates RecA-Mediated DNA Strand Exchange Between Divergent DNA Sequences

The efficiency of horizontal gene transfer, which contributes to acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity traits, depends on nucleotide sequence and different mismatch-repair (MMR) proteins participate in this process. To study how MutL and MutS MMR proteins regulate recombination across species boundaries, we have studied natural chromosomal transformation with DNA up to ∼23% sequence divergence. We show that Bacillus subtilis natural chromosomal transformation decreased logarithmically with increased sequence divergence up to 15% in wild type (wt) cells or in cells lacking MutS2 or mismatch repair proteins (MutL, MutS or both). Beyond 15% sequence divergence, the chromosomal transformation efficiency is ∼100-fold higher in ΔmutS and ΔmutSL than in ΔmutS2 or wt cells. In the first phase of the biphasic curve (up to 15% sequence divergence), RecA-catalyzed DNA strand exchange contributes to the delineation of species, and in the second phase, homology-facilitated illegitimate recombination might aid in the restoration of inactivated genes. To understand how MutS modulates the integration process, we monitored DNA strand exchange reactions using a circular single-stranded DNA and a linear double-stranded DNA substrate with an internal 77-bp region with ∼16% or ∼54% sequence divergence in an otherwise homologous substrate. The former substrate delayed, whereas the latter halted RecA-mediated strand exchange. Interestingly, MutS addition overcame the heterologous barrier. We propose that MutS assists DNA strand exchange by facilitating RecA disassembly, and indirectly re-engagement with the homologous 5′-end of the linear duplex. Our data supports the idea that MutS modulates bidirectional RecA-mediated integration of divergent sequences and this is important for speciation.

RecA Regulation by RecU and DprA During Bacillus subtilis Natural Plasmid Transformation

Natural plasmid transformation plays an important role in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. During this process, Bacillus subtilis RecA physically interacts with RecU, RecX, and DprA. These three proteins are required for plasmid transformation, but RecA is not. In vitro, DprA recruits RecA onto SsbA-coated single-stranded (ss) DNA, whereas RecX inhibits RecA filament formation, leading to net filament disassembly. We show that a null recA (ΔrecA) mutation suppresses the plasmid transformation defect of competent ΔrecU cells, and that RecU is essential for both chromosomal and plasmid transformation in the ΔrecX context. RecU inhibits RecA filament growth and facilitates RecA disassembly from preformed filaments. Increasing SsbA concentrations additively contributes to RecU-mediated inhibition of RecA filament extension. DprA is necessary and sufficient to counteract the negative effect of both RecU and SsbA on RecA filament growth onto ssDNA. DprA-SsbA activates RecA to catalyze DNA strand exchange in the presence of RecU, but this effect was not observed if RecU was added prior to RecA. We propose that DprA contributes to RecA filament growth onto any internalized SsbA-coated ssDNA. When the ssDNA is homologous to the recipient, DprA antagonizes the inhibitory effect of RecU on RecA filament growth and helps RecA to catalyze chromosomal transformation. On the contrary, RecU promotes RecA filament disassembly from a heterologous (plasmid) ssDNA, overcoming an unsuccessful homology search and favoring plasmid transformation. The DprA–DprA interaction may promote strand annealing upon binding to the complementary plasmid strands and facilitating thereby plasmid transformation rather than through a mediation of RecA filament growth.

Bacillus subtilis RecA with DprA-SsbA antagonizes RecX function during natural transformation

Bacillus subtilis DprA and RecX proteins, which interact with RecA, are crucial for efficient chromosomal and plasmid transformation. We showed that RecA, in the rATP·Mg²⁺ bound form (RecA·ATP), could not compete with RecX, SsbA or SsbB for assembly onto single-stranded (ss)DNA, but RecA·dATP partially displaced these proteins from ssDNA. RecX promoted reversible depolymerization of preformed RecA·ATP filaments. The two-component DprA–SsbA mediator reversed the RecX negative effect on RecA filament extension, but not DprA or DprA and SsbB. In the presence of DprA–SsbA, RecX added prior to RecA·ATP inhibited DNA strand exchange, but this inhibition was reversed when RecX was added after RecA. We propose that RecA nucleation is more sensitive to RecX action than is RecA filament growth. DprA–SsbA facilitates formation of an active RecA filament that directly antagonizes the inhibitory effects of RecX. RecX and DprA enable chromosomal transformation by altering RecA filament dynamics. DprA–SsbA and RecX proteins constitute a new regulatory network of RecA function. DprA–SsbA contributes to the formation of an active RecA filament and directly antagonizes the inhibitory effects of RecX during natural transformation.

Molecular Mechanisms That Contribute to Horizontal Transfer of Plasmids by the Bacteriophage SPP1

Natural transformation and viral-mediated transduction are the main avenues of horizontal gene transfer in Firmicutes. Bacillus subtilis SPP1 is a generalized transducing bacteriophage. Using this lytic phage as a model, we have analyzed how viral replication and recombination systems contribute to the transfer of plasmid-borne antibiotic resistances. Phage SPP1 DNA replication relies on essential phage-encoded replisome organizer (G38P), helicase loader (G39P), hexameric replicative helicase (G40P), recombinase (G35P) and in less extent on the partially dispensable 5′→3′ exonuclease (G34.1P), the single-stranded DNA binding protein (G36P) and the Holliday junction resolvase (G44P). Correspondingly, the accumulation of linear concatemeric plasmid DNA, and the formation of transducing particles were blocked in the absence of G35P, G38P, G39P, and G40P, greatly reduced in the G34.1P, G36P mutants, and slightly reduced in G44P mutants. In contrast, establishment of injected linear plasmid DNA in the recipient host was independent of viral-encoded functions. DNA homology between SPP1 and the plasmid, rather than a viral packaging signal, enhanced the accumulation of packagable plasmid DNA. The transfer efficiency was also dependent on plasmid copy number, and rolling-circle plasmids were encapsidated at higher frequencies than theta-type replicating plasmids.

Transposition of insertion sequence IS256Bsu1 in Bacillus subtilis 168 is strictly dependent on recA

We developed an insertion sequence transposition detection system called the "jumping cat assay" and applied it to the Bacillus subtilis chromosome using IS256Bsu1 derived from B. subtilis natto. The high frequency of transposition enabled us to explore host factors; combining the assay and genetic analyses revealed that recA is essential for the transposition of IS256Bsu1. Detailed analyses using various domain mutants of recA demonstrated that this essentiality is not related to the function of recA in homologous recombination. Instead, the ATP binding and hydrolysis function seemed to be crucial for IS transposition. To elucidate the role of recA, we focused on the muB gene of the enterobacteriophage Mu. Based on information from the NCBI Conserved Domain Database, both MuB and RecA belong to the P-loop dNTPase superfamily. Further experiments revealed that muB complements the transposition-defective phenotype of a recA deletant, although it could not rescue UV sensitivity. These results suggest that recA shares a common function with muB that helps the transposition of IS256Bsu1 in B. subtilis.

Advances in structural studies of recombination mediator proteins

Recombination mediator proteins (RMPs) are critical for genome integrity in all organisms. They include phage UvsY, prokaryotic RecF, -O, -R (RecFOR) and eukaryotic Rad52, Breast Cancer susceptibility 2 (BRCA2) and Partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) proteins. BRCA2 and PALB2 are tumor suppressors implicated in cancer. RMPs regulate binding of RecA-like recombinases to sites of DNA damage to initiate the most efficient non-mutagenic repair of broken chromosome and other deleterious DNA lesions. Mechanistically, RMPs stimulate a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) hand-off from ssDNA binding proteins (ssbs) such as gp32, SSB and RPA, to recombinases, activating DNA repair only at the time and site of the damage event. This review summarizes structural studies of RMPs and their implications for understanding mechanism and function. Comparative analysis of RMPs is complicated due to their convergent evolution. In contrast to the evolutionary conserved ssbs and recombinases, RMPs are extremely diverse in sequence and structure. Structural studies are particularly important in such cases to reveal common features of the entire family and specific features of regulatory mechanisms for each member. All RMPs are characterized by specific DNA-binding domains and include variable protein interaction motifs. The complexity of such RMPs corresponds to the ever-growing number of DNA metabolism events they participate in under normal and pathological conditions and requires additional comprehensive structure-functional studies.

Addressing the Requirements of High-Sensitivity Single-Molecule Imaging of Low-Copy-Number Proteins in Bacteria

Single-molecule fluorescence super-resolution imaging and tracking provide nanometer-scale information about subcellular protein positions and dynamics. These single-molecule imaging experiments can be very powerful, but they are best suited to high-copy number proteins where many measurements can be made sequentially in each cell. We describe artifacts associated with the challenge of imaging a protein expressed in only a few copies per cell. We image live Bacillus subtilis in a fluorescence microscope, and demonstrate that under standard single-molecule imaging conditions, unlabeled B. subtilis cells display punctate red fluorescent spots indistinguishable from the few PAmCherry fluorescent protein single molecules under investigation. All Bacillus species investigated were strongly affected by this artifact, whereas we did not find a significant number of these background sources in two other species we investigated, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. With single-molecule resolution, we characterize the number, spatial distribution, and intensities of these impurity spots.

Chromosomal transformation in Bacillus subtilis is a non-polar recombination reaction

Natural chromosomal transformation is one of the primary driving forces of bacterial evolution. This reaction involves the recombination of the internalized linear single-stranded (ss) DNA with the homologous resident duplex via RecA-mediated integration in concert with SsbA and DprA or RecO. We show that sequence divergence prevents Bacillus subtilis chromosomal transformation in a log-linear fashion, but it exerts a minor effect when the divergence is localized at a discrete end. In the nucleotide bound form, RecA shows no apparent preference to initiate recombination at the 3′- or 5′-complementary end of the linear duplex with circular ssDNA, but nucleotide hydrolysis is required when heterology is present at both ends. RecA·dATP initiates pairing of the linear 5′ and 3′ complementary ends, but only initiation at the 5′-end remains stably paired in the absence of SsbA. Our results suggest that during gene transfer RecA·ATP, in concert with SsbA and DprA or RecO, shows a moderate preference for the 3′-end of the duplex. We show that RecA-mediated recombination initiated at the 3′- or 5′-complementary end might have significant implication on the ecological diversification of bacterial species with natural transformation.

Bacillus subtilis RecO and SsbA are crucial for RecA-mediated recombinational DNA repair

Genetic data have revealed that the absence of Bacillus subtilis RecO and one of the end-processing avenues (AddAB or RecJ) renders cells as sensitive to DNA damaging agents as the null recA, suggesting that both end-resection pathways require RecO for recombination. RecA, in the rATP·Mg(2+) bound form (RecA·ATP), is inactive to catalyze DNA recombination between linear double-stranded (ds) DNA and naked complementary circular single-stranded (ss) DNA. We showed that RecA·ATP could not nucleate and/or polymerize on SsbA·ssDNA or SsbB·ssDNA complexes. RecA·ATP nucleates and polymerizes on RecO·ssDNA·SsbA complexes more efficiently than on RecO·ssDNA·SsbB complexes. Limiting SsbA concentrations were sufficient to stimulate RecA·ATP assembly on the RecO·ssDNA·SsbB complexes. RecO and SsbA are necessary and sufficient to 'activate' RecA·ATP to catalyze DNA strand exchange, whereas the AddAB complex, RecO alone or in concert with SsbB was not sufficient. In presence of AddAB, RecO and SsbA are still necessary for efficient RecA·ATP-mediated three-strand exchange recombination. Based on genetic and biochemical data, we proposed that SsbA and RecO (or SsbA, RecO and RecR in vivo) are crucial for RecA activation for both, AddAB and RecJ-RecQ (RecS) recombinational repair pathways.

Replication Restart after Replication-Transcription Conflicts Requires RecA in Bacillus subtilis

Efficient duplication of genomes depends on reactivation of replication forks outside the origin. Replication restart can be facilitated by recombination proteins, especially if single- or double-strand breaks form in the DNA. Each type of DNA break is processed by a distinct pathway, though both depend on the RecA protein. One common obstacle that can stall forks, potentially leading to breaks in the DNA, is transcription. Though replication stalling by transcription is prevalent, the nature of DNA breaks and the prerequisites for replication restart in response to these encounters remain unknown. Here, we used an engineered site-specific replication-transcription conflict to identify and dissect the pathways required for the resolution and restart of replication forks stalled by transcription in Bacillus subtilis. We found that RecA, its loader proteins RecO and AddAB, and the Holliday junction resolvase RecU are required for efficient survival and replication restart after conflicts with transcription. Genetic analyses showed that RecO and AddAB act in parallel to facilitate RecA loading at the site of the conflict but that they can each partially compensate for the other's absence. Finally, we found that RecA and either RecO or AddAB are required for the replication restart and helicase loader protein, DnaD, to associate with the engineered conflict region. These results suggest that conflicts can lead to both single-strand gaps and double-strand breaks in the DNA and that RecA loading and Holliday junction resolution are required for replication restart at regions of replication-transcription conflicts.

IMPORTANCE

Head-on conflicts between replication and transcription occur when a gene is expressed from the lagging strand. These encounters stall the replisome and potentially break the DNA. We investigated the necessary mechanisms for Bacillus subtilis cells to overcome a site-specific engineered conflict with transcription of a protein-coding gene. We found that the recombination proteins RecO and AddAB both load RecA onto the DNA in response to the head-on conflict. Additionally, RecA loading by one of the two pathways was required for both replication restart and efficient survival of the collision. Our findings suggest that both single-strand gaps and double-strand DNA breaks occur at head-on conflict regions and demonstrate a requirement for recombination to restart replication after collisions with transcription.

Characterization of biochemical properties of Bacillus subtilis RecQ helicase

RecQ family helicases function as safeguards of the genome. Unlike Escherichia coli, the Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis bacterium possesses two RecQ-like homologues, RecQ[Bs] and RecS, which are required for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. RecQ[Bs] also binds to the forked DNA to ensure a smooth progression of the cell cycle. Here we present the first biochemical analysis of recombinant RecQ[Bs]. RecQ[Bs] binds weakly to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and blunt-ended double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) but strongly to forked dsDNA. The protein exhibits a DNA-stimulated ATPase activity and ATP- and Mg(2+)-dependent DNA helicase activity with a 3' → 5' polarity. Molecular modeling shows that RecQ[Bs] shares high sequence and structure similarity with E. coli RecQ. Surprisingly, RecQ[Bs] resembles the truncated Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sgs1 and human RecQ helicases more than RecQ[Ec] with regard to its enzymatic activities. Specifically, RecQ[Bs] unwinds forked dsDNA and DNA duplexes with a 3'-overhang but is inactive on blunt-ended dsDNA and 5'-overhung duplexes. Interestingly, RecQ[Bs] unwinds blunt-ended DNA with structural features, including nicks, gaps, 5'-flaps, Kappa joints, synthetic replication forks, and Holliday junctions. We discuss these findings in the context of RecQ[Bs]'s possible functions in preserving genomic stability.

Roles of Bacillus subtilis DprA and SsbA in RecA-mediated genetic recombination

Bacillus subtilis competence-induced RecA, SsbA, SsbB, and DprA are required to internalize and to recombine single-stranded (ss) DNA with homologous resident duplex. RecA, in the ATP · Mg(2+)-bound form (RecA · ATP), can nucleate and form filament onto ssDNA but is inactive to catalyze DNA recombination. We report that SsbA or SsbB bound to ssDNA blocks the RecA filament formation and fails to activate recombination. DprA facilitates RecA filamentation; however, the filaments cannot engage in DNA recombination. When ssDNA was preincubated with SsbA, but not SsbB, DprA was able to activate DNA strand exchange dependent on RecA · ATP. This work demonstrates that RecA · ATP, in concert with SsbA and DprA, catalyzes DNA strand exchange, and SsbB is an accessory factor in the reaction. In contrast, RecA · dATP efficiently catalyzes strand exchange even in the absence of single-stranded binding proteins or DprA, and addition of the accessory factors marginally improved it. We proposed that the RecA-bound nucleotide (ATP and to a lesser extent dATP) might dictate the requirement for accessory factors.

RecO and RecR are necessary for RecA loading in response to DNA damage and replication fork stress

RecA is central to maintaining genome integrity in bacterial cells. Despite the near-ubiquitous conservation of RecA in eubacteria, the pathways that facilitate RecA loading and repair center assembly have remained poorly understood in Bacillus subtilis. Here, we show that RecA rapidly colocalizes with the DNA polymerase complex (replisome) immediately following DNA damage or damage-independent replication fork arrest. In Escherichia coli, the RecFOR and RecBCD pathways serve to load RecA and the choice between these two pathways depends on the type of damage under repair. We found in B. subtilis that the rapid localization of RecA to repair centers is strictly dependent on RecO and RecR in response to all types of damage examined, including a site-specific double-stranded break and damage-independent replication fork arrest. Furthermore, we provide evidence that, although RecF is not required for RecA repair center formation in vivo, RecF does increase the efficiency of repair center assembly, suggesting that RecF may influence the initial stages of RecA nucleation or filament extension. We further identify single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) as an additional component important for RecA repair center assembly. Truncation of the SSB C terminus impairs the ability of B. subtilis to form repair centers in response to damage and damage-independent fork arrest. With these results, we conclude that the SSB-dependent recruitment of RecOR to the replisome is necessary for loading and organizing RecA into repair centers in response to DNA damage and replication fork arrest.

Molecular determinants of the DprA-RecA interaction for nucleation on ssDNA

Natural transformation is a major mechanism of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria that depends on DNA recombination. RecA is central to the homologous recombination pathway, catalyzing DNA strand invasion and homology search. DprA was shown to be a key binding partner of RecA acting as a specific mediator for its loading on the incoming exogenous ssDNA. Although the 3D structures of both RecA and DprA have been solved, the mechanisms underlying their cross-talk remained elusive. By combining molecular docking simulations and experimental validation, we identified a region on RecA, buried at its self-assembly interface and involving three basic residues that contact an acidic triad of DprA previously shown to be crucial for the interaction. At the core of these patches, ^DprAM238 and ^RecAF230 are involved in the interaction. The other DprA binding regions of RecA could involve the N-terminal α-helix and a DNA-binding region. Our data favor a model of DprA acting as a cap of the RecA filament, involving a DprA−RecA interplay at two levels: their own oligomeric states and their respective interaction with DNA. Our model forms the basis for a mechanistic explanation of how DprA can act as a mediator for the loading of RecA on ssDNA.

DNA double strand break end-processing and RecA induce RecN expression levels in Bacillus subtilis

Bacillus subtilis cells respond to double strand breaks (DSBs) with an ordered recruitment of repair proteins to the site lesion, being RecN one of the first responders. In B. subtilis, one of the responses to DSBs is to increase RecN expression rather than modifying its turnover rate. End-processing activities and the RecA protein itself contribute to increase RecN levels after DNA DSBs. RecO is required for RecA filament formation and full SOS induction, but its absence did not significantly affect RecN expression. Neither the absence of LexA nor the phosphorylation state of RecA or SsbA significantly affect RecN expression levels. These findings identify two major mechanisms (SOS and DSB response) used to respond to DSBs, with LexA required for one of them (SOS response). The DSB response, which requires end-processing and RecA or short RecO-independent RecA filaments, highlights the importance of guarding genome stability by modulating the DNA damage responses.

Bacillus subtilis RecA and its accessory factors, RecF, RecO, RecR and RecX, are required for spore resistance to DNA double-strand break

Bacillus subtilis RecA is important for spore resistance to DNA damage, even though spores contain a single non-replicating genome. We report that inactivation of RecA or its accessory factors, RecF, RecO, RecR and RecX, drastically reduce survival of mature dormant spores to ultrahigh vacuum desiccation and ionizing radiation that induce single strand (ss) DNA nicks and double-strand breaks (DSBs). The presence of non-cleavable LexA renders spores less sensitive to DSBs, and spores impaired in DSB recognition or end-processing show sensitivities to X-rays similar to wild-type. In vitro RecA cannot compete with SsbA for nucleation onto ssDNA in the presence of ATP. RecO is sufficient, at least in vitro, to overcome SsbA inhibition and stimulate RecA polymerization on SsbA-coated ssDNA. In the presence of SsbA, RecA slightly affects DNA replication in vitro, but addition of RecO facilitates RecA-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis. We propose that repairing of the DNA lesions generates a replication stress to germinating spores, and the RecA·ssDNA filament might act by preventing potentially dangerous forms of DNA repair occurring during replication. RecA might stabilize a stalled fork or prevent or promote dissolution of reversed forks rather than its cleavage that should require end-processing.

Bacillus subtilis DprA recruits RecA onto single-stranded DNA and mediates annealing of complementary strands coated by SsbB and SsbA

Naturally transformable bacteria recombine internalized ssDNA with a homologous resident duplex (chromosomal transformation) or complementary internalized ssDNAs (plasmid or viral transformation). Bacillus subtilis competence-induced DprA, RecA, SsbB, and SsbA proteins are involved in the early processing of the internalized ssDNA, with DprA physically interacting with RecA. SsbB and SsbA bind and melt secondary structures in ssDNA but limit RecA loading onto ssDNA. DprA binds to ssDNA and facilitates partial dislodging of both single-stranded binding (SSB) proteins from ssDNA. In the absence of homologous duplex DNA, DprA does not significantly increase RecA nucleation onto protein-free ssDNA. DprA facilitates RecA nucleation and filament extension onto SsbB-coated or SsbB plus SsbA-coated ssDNA. DprA facilitates RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange in the presence of both SSB proteins. DprA, which plays a crucial role in plasmid transformation, anneals complementary strands preferentially coated by SsbB to form duplex circular plasmid molecules. Our results provide a mechanistic framework for conceptualizing the coordinated events modulated by SsbB in concert with SsbA and DprA that are crucial for RecA-dependent chromosomal transformation and RecA-independent plasmid transformation.

Early steps of double-strand break repair in Bacillus subtilis

All organisms rely on integrated networks to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in order to preserve the integrity of the genetic information, to re-establish replication, and to ensure proper chromosomal segregation. Genetic, cytological, biochemical and structural approaches have been used to analyze how Bacillus subtilis senses DNA damage and responds to DSBs. RecN, which is among the first responders to DNA DSBs, promotes the ordered recruitment of repair proteins to the site of a lesion. Cells have evolved different mechanisms for efficient end processing to create a 3'-tailed duplex DNA, the substrate for RecA binding, in the repair of one- and two-ended DSBs. Strand continuity is re-established via homologous recombination (HR), utilizing an intact homologous DNA molecule as a template. In the absence of transient diploidy or of HR, however, two-ended DSBs can be directly re-ligated via error-prone non-homologous end-joining. Here we review recent findings that shed light on the early stages of DSB repair in Firmicutes.

DNA repair and genome maintenance in Bacillus subtilis

From microbes to multicellular eukaryotic organisms, all cells contain pathways responsible for genome maintenance. DNA replication allows for the faithful duplication of the genome, whereas DNA repair pathways preserve DNA integrity in response to damage originating from endogenous and exogenous sources. The basic pathways important for DNA replication and repair are often conserved throughout biology. In bacteria, high-fidelity repair is balanced with low-fidelity repair and mutagenesis. Such a balance is important for maintaining viability while providing an opportunity for the advantageous selection of mutations when faced with a changing environment. Over the last decade, studies of DNA repair pathways in bacteria have demonstrated considerable differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Here we review and discuss the DNA repair, genome maintenance, and DNA damage checkpoint pathways of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. We present their molecular mechanisms and compare the functions and regulation of several pathways with known information on other organisms. We also discuss DNA repair during different growth phases and the developmental program of sporulation. In summary, we present a review of the function, regulation, and molecular mechanisms of DNA repair and mutagenesis in Gram-positive bacteria, with a strong emphasis on B. subtilis.

A dual role for mycobacterial RecO in RecA-dependent homologous recombination and RecA-independent single-strand annealing

Mycobacteria have two genetically distinct pathways for the homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks: homologous recombination (HR) and single-strand annealing (SSA). HR is abolished by deletion of RecA and reduced in the absence of the AdnAB helicase/nuclease. By contrast, SSA is RecA-independent and requires RecBCD. Here we examine the function of RecO in mycobacterial DNA recombination and repair. Loss of RecO elicits hypersensitivity to DNA damaging agents similar to that caused by deletion of RecA. We show that RecO participates in RecA-dependent HR in a pathway parallel to the AdnAB pathway. We also find that RecO plays a role in the RecA-independent SSA pathway. The mycobacterial RecO protein displays a zinc-dependent DNA binding activity in vitro and accelerates the annealing of SSB-coated single-stranded DNA. These findings establish a role for RecO in two pathways of mycobacterial DNA double-strand break repair and suggest an in vivo function for the DNA annealing activity of RecO proteins, thereby underscoring their similarity to eukaryal Rad52.

RecX facilitates homologous recombination by modulating RecA activities

The Bacillus subtilis recH342 strain, which decreases interspecies recombination without significantly affecting the frequency of transformation with homogamic DNA, carried a point mutation in the putative recX (yfhG) gene, and the mutation was renamed as recX342. We show that RecX (264 residues long), which shares partial identity with the Proteobacterial RecX (<180 residues), is a genuine recombination protein, and its primary function is to modulate the SOS response and to facilitate RecA-mediated recombinational repair and genetic recombination. RecX-YFP formed discrete foci on the nucleoid, which were coincident in time with RecF, in response to DNA damage, and on the poles and/or the nucleoid upon stochastic induction of programmed natural competence. When DNA was damaged, the RecX foci co-localized with RecA threads that persisted for a longer time in the recX context. The absence of RecX severely impaired natural transformation both with plasmid and chromosomal DNA. We show that RecX suppresses the negative effect exerted by RecA during plasmid transformation, prevents RecA mis-sensing of single-stranded DNA tracts, and modulates DNA strand exchange. RecX, by modulating the “length or packing” of a RecA filament, facilitates the initiation of recombination and increases recombination across species.

This study describes mechanisms employed by the bacterium Bacillus subtilis to survive DNA damages by recombinational repair (RR) and to provide genetic variation via genetic recombination (GR). At the center of homologous recombination (HR) is the recombinase RecA, which forms RecA·ssDNA filaments to mediate SOS induction and to promote DNA strand exchange, a step needed for both RR and GR. Genetic data presented here highlight the complexity of the network of RecA accessory factors that regulate HR activities, with RecX counteracting the role of RecF in SOS induction. The absence of both RecA modulators, however, blocked RR and GR. Insights into the spatio-temporal recruitment of RecA to preserve genome integrity, to overcome the barriers of gene flow, and its regulation by mediators and modulators are provided. Chromosomal transformation, which declines with increasing evolutionary distance, depends on HR. Indeed, the presence of the RecX modulator decreases the genetic barrier between closely related organisms. The role of RecA mediators and modulators on the preservation of genome integrity and long-term genome evolution is discussed.

The cell pole: the site of cross talk between the DNA uptake and genetic recombination machinery

Natural transformation is a programmed mechanism characterized by binding of free double-stranded (ds) DNA from the environment to the cell pole in rod-shaped bacteria. In Bacillus subtilis some competence proteins, which process the dsDNA and translocate single-stranded (ss) DNA into the cytosol, recruit a set of recombination proteins mainly to one of the cell poles. A subset of single-stranded binding proteins, working as "guardians", protects ssDNA from degradation and limit the RecA recombinase loading. Then, the "mediators" overcome the inhibitory role of guardians, and recruit RecA onto ssDNA. A RecA·ssDNA filament searches for homology on the chromosome and, in a process that is controlled by "modulators", catalyzes strand invasion with the generation of a displacement loop (D-loop). A D-loop resolvase or "resolver" cleaves this intermediate, limited DNA replication restores missing information and a DNA ligase seals the DNA ends. However, if any step fails, the "rescuers" will repair the broken end to rescue chromosomal transformation. If the ssDNA does not share homology with resident DNA, but it contains information for autonomous replication, guardian and mediator proteins catalyze plasmid establishment after inhibition of RecA. DNA replication and ligation reconstitute the molecule (plasmid transformation). In this review, the interacting network that leads to a cross talk between proteins of the uptake and genetic recombination machinery will be placed into prospective.

Genetic recombination in Bacillus subtilis: a division of labor between two single-strand DNA-binding proteins

We have investigated the structural, biochemical and cellular roles of the two single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding proteins from Bacillus subtilis, SsbA and SsbB. During transformation, SsbB localizes at the DNA entry pole where it binds and protects internalized ssDNA. The 2.8-Å resolution structure of SsbB bound to ssDNA reveals a similar overall protein architecture and ssDNA-binding surface to that of Escherichia coli SSB. SsbA, which binds ssDNA with higher affinity than SsbB, co-assembles onto SsbB-coated ssDNA and the two proteins inhibit ssDNA binding by the recombinase RecA. During chromosomal transformation, the RecA mediators RecO and DprA provide RecA access to ssDNA. Interestingly, RecO interaction with ssDNA-bound SsbA helps to dislodge both SsbA and SsbB from the DNA more efficiently than if the DNA is coated only with SsbA. Once RecA is nucleated onto the ssDNA, RecA filament elongation displaces SsbA and SsbB and enables RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange. During plasmid transformation, RecO localizes to the entry pole and catalyzes annealing of SsbA- or SsbA/SsbB-coated complementary ssDNAs to form duplex DNA with ssDNA tails. Our results provide a mechanistic framework for rationalizing the coordinated events modulated by SsbA, SsbB and RecO that are crucial for RecA-dependent chromosomal transformation and RecA-independent plasmid transformation.

SSB functions as a sliding platform that migrates on DNA via reptation

SSB proteins bind to and control the accessibility of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), likely facilitated by their ability to diffuse on ssDNA. Using a hybrid single-molecule method combining fluorescence and force, we probed how proteins with large binding site sizes can migrate rapidly on DNA and how protein-protein interactions and tension may modulate the motion. We observed force-induced progressive unraveling of ssDNA from the SSB surface between 1 and 6 pN, followed by SSB dissociation at ∼10 pN, and obtained experimental evidence of a reptation mechanism for protein movement along DNA wherein a protein slides via DNA bulge formation and propagation. SSB diffusion persists even when bound with RecO and at forces under which the fully wrapped state is perturbed, suggesting that even in crowded cellular conditions SSB can act as a sliding platform to recruit and carry its interacting proteins for use in DNA replication, recombination and repair.

Double-strand break repair in bacteria: a view from Bacillus subtilis

In all living organisms, the response to double-strand breaks (DSBs) is critical for the maintenance of chromosome integrity. Homologous recombination (HR), which utilizes a homologous template to prime DNA synthesis and to restore genetic information lost at the DNA break site, is a complex multistep response. In Bacillus subtilis, this response can be subdivided into five general acts: (1) recognition of the break site(s) and formation of a repair center (RC), which enables cells to commit to HR; (2) end-processing of the broken end(s) by different avenues to generate a 3'-tailed duplex and RecN-mediated DSB 'coordination'; (3) loading of RecA onto single-strand DNA at the RecN-induced RC and concomitant DNA strand exchange; (4) branch migration and resolution, or dissolution, of the recombination intermediates, and replication restart, followed by (5) disassembly of the recombination apparatus formed at the dynamic RC and segregation of sister chromosomes. When HR is impaired or an intact homologous template is not available, error-prone nonhomologous end-joining directly rejoins the two broken ends by ligation. In this review, we examine the functions that are known to contribute to DNA DSB repair in B. subtilis, and compare their properties with those of other bacterial phyla.

RecO-mediated DNA homology search and annealing is facilitated by SsbA

Bacillus subtilis RecO plays a central role in recombinational repair and genetic recombination by (i) stimulating RecA filamentation onto SsbA-coated single-stranded (ss) DNA, (ii) modulating the extent of RecA-mediated DNA strand exchange and (iii) promoting annealing of complementary DNA strands. Here, we report that RecO-mediated strand annealing is facilitated by cognate SsbA, but not by a heterologous one. Analysis of non-productive intermediates reveals that RecO interacts with SsbA-coated ssDNA, resulting in transient ternary complexes. The self-interaction of ternary complexes via RecO led to the formation of large nucleoprotein complexes. In the presence of homology, SsbA, at the nucleoprotein, removes DNA secondary structures, inhibits spontaneous strand annealing and facilitates RecO loading onto SsbA–ssDNA complex. RecO relieves SsbA inhibition of strand annealing and facilitates transient and random interactions between homologous naked ssDNA molecules. Finally, both proteins lose affinity for duplex DNA. Our results provide a mechanistic framework for rationalizing protein release and dsDNA zippering as coordinated events that are crucial for RecA-independent plasmid transformation.

Evidence for different pathways during horizontal gene transfer in competent Bacillus subtilis cells

Cytological and genetic evidence suggests that the Bacillus subtilis DNA uptake machinery localizes at a single cell pole and takes up single-stranded (ss) DNA. The integration of homologous donor DNA into the recipient chromosome requires RecA, while plasmid establishment, which is independent of RecA, requires at least RecO and RecU. RecA and RecN colocalize at the polar DNA uptake machinery, from which RecA forms filamentous structures, termed threads, in the presence of chromosomal DNA. We show that the transformation of chromosomal and of plasmid DNA follows distinct pathways. In the absence of DNA, RecU accumulated at a single cell pole in competent cells, dependent on RecA. Upon addition of any kind of DNA, RecA formed highly dynamic thread structures, which rapidly grew and shrank, and RecU dissipated from the pole. RecO visibly accumulated at the cell pole only upon addition of plasmid DNA, and, to a lesser degree, of phage DNA, but not of chromosomal DNA. RecO accumulation was weakly influenced by RecN, but not by RecA. RecO annealed ssDNA complexed with SsbA in vitro, independent of any nucleotide cofactor. The DNA end-joining Ku protein was also found to play a role in viral and plasmid transformation. On the other hand, transfection with SPP1 phage DNA required functions from both chromosomal and plasmid transformation pathways. The findings show that competent bacterial cells possess a dynamic DNA recombination machinery that responds in a differential manner depending if entering DNA shows homology with recipient DNA or has self-annealing potential. Transformation with chromosomal DNA only requires RecA, which forms dynamic filamentous structures that may mediate homology search and DNA strand invasion. Establishment of circular plasmid DNA requires accumulation of RecO at the competence pole, most likely mediating single-strand annealing, and RecU, which possibly down-regulates RecA. Transfection with SPP1 viral DNA follows an intermediate route that contains functions from both chromosomal and plasmid transformation pathways.

Many bacteria can actively acquire novel genetic material from their environment, which leads to the rapid spreading of, for example, antibiotic resistance genes. The bacterium Bacillus subtilis can differentiate into the state of competence, in which cells take up ssDNA through a DNA uptake complex that is specifically localized at a single cell pole. DNA can be integrated into the chromosome, via RecA, or can be reconstituted as circular dsDNA, if derived from plasmid or from viral DNA. We show that RecO, RecU, and Ku proteins, but not RecA, are important for plasmid transformation, and differentially accumulate at the polar DNA uptake machinery. Upon addition of any kind of DNA, the assembly of RecU at the competence pole dissipated, while RecA formed filamentous structures that rapidly grew and shrank within a 1 minute time scale. RecO visibly accumulated at the competence machinery only upon addition of plasmid DNA, but not of chromosomal DNA. In vitro, RecO was highly efficient at enhancing the annealing of complementary strands covered by SsbA, without the need for any nucleotide cofactor. The findings show that competent cells possess a dynamic recombination machinery and provide visual evidence for the existence of different pathways for transformation with chromosomal DNA or with plasmid DNA.

Bacillus subtilis polynucleotide phosphorylase 3'-to-5' DNase activity is involved in DNA repair

In the presence of Mn²⁺, an activity in a preparation of purified Bacillus subtilis RecN degrades single-stranded (ss) DNA with a 3′ → 5′ polarity. This activity is not associated with RecN itself, because RecN purified from cells lacking polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) does not show the exonuclease activity. We show here that, in the presence of Mn²⁺ and low-level inorganic phosphate (P_i), PNPase degrades ssDNA. The limited end-processing of DNA is regulated by ATP and is inactive in the presence of Mg²⁺ or high-level P_i. In contrast, the RNase activity of PNPase requires Mg²⁺ and P_i, suggesting that PNPase degradation of RNA and ssDNA occur by mutually exclusive mechanisms. A null pnpA mutation (ΔpnpA) is not epistatic with ΔrecA, but is epistatic with ΔrecN and Δku, which by themselves are non-epistatic. The addA5, ΔrecO, ΔrecQ (ΔrecJ), ΔrecU and ΔrecG mutations (representative of different epistatic groups), in the context of ΔpnpA, demonstrate gain- or loss-of-function by inactivation of repair-by-recombination, depending on acute or chronic exposure to the damaging agent and the nature of the DNA lesion. Our data suggest that PNPase is involved in various nucleic acid metabolic pathways, and its limited ssDNA exonuclease activity plays an important role in RecA-dependent and RecA-independent repair pathways.