An internal ribosome entry site in the coding region of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2 drives alternative translation start

Identification of an IRES within the coding region of the structural protein of human rhinovirus 16

As an alternative mechanism for cap-dependent (m7GpppN) translation, internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation has been observed in the 5' untranslated regions (5' UTR) and coding regions of a number of viral and eukaryotic mRNAs. In this study, a series of 5' terminal truncated structural protein genes that were fused with GFP was used to screen for potential IRESs, and IRESs were identified using a bicistronic luciferase vector or GFP expression vector possessing a hairpin structure. Our results revealed that a putative IRES was located between nt 1982 and 2281 in the VP3 coding region of the human rhinovirus 16 (HRV16) genomes. We also demonstrated that effective IRES-initiated protein expression in vitro did not occur through splicing sites or cryptic promoters. We confirmed that thapsigargin (TG), an inducer of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), facilitated increased IRES activity in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, the secondary structure of the IRES was predicted online using the RNAfold web server.

Identification of cryptic putative IRESs within the ORF encoding the nonstructural proteins of the human rhinovirus 16 genome

Internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation is a mechanism distinct from 5' cap-dependent translation. IRES elements are located mainly in the 5' untranslated regions (UTRs) of viral and eukaryotic mRNAs. However, IRESs are also found in the coding regions of some viral and eukaryotic genomes to initiate the translation of some functional truncated isoforms. Here, five putative IRES elements of human rhinovirus 16 (HRV16) were identified in the coding region of the nonstructural proteins P2 and P3 through fusion with green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression vectors and bicistronic vectors with a hairpin structure. These five putative IRESs were located at nucleotide positions 4286-4585, 5002-5126, 6245-6394, 6619-6718, and 6629-6778 in the HRV16 genome. The functionality of the five IRESs was confirmed by their ability to initiate GFP expression in vitro. This suggests that an alternative mechanism might be used to increase the efficiency of replication of HRV16.

Molecular Components of the RCC Grade

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a major cancer yet has long evaded extensive efforts to target it chemotherapeutically. Recent efforts to characterize its proteome and metabolome in a grade-defined manner has resulted in a global proteometabolomic reprogramming model yielding a number of potential drug targets, many of which are under the control of transcription factor and MYC proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor. Furthermore, through the use of conventional technologies such as immunohistochemistry, protein moonlighting, a phenomenon wherein a single protein performs more than one distinct biochemical or biophysical functions, is emerging as a second mode of operation for ccRCC metabolo-proteomic reprogramming. This renders the subcellular localization of the grade-defining biomarkers an additional layer of grade-defining ccRCC molecular signature, although its functional significance in ccRCC etiology is only beginning to emerge.

Reprogramming translation for gene therapy

Translational control plays a fundamental role in the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. Modulating translational efficiency allows the cell to fine-tune the expression of genes, spatially control protein localization, and trigger fast responses to environmental stresses. Translational regulation involves mechanisms acting on multiple steps of the protein synthesis pathway: initiation, elongation, and termination. Many cis-acting elements present in the 5' UTR of transcripts can influence translation at the initiation step. Among them, the Kozak sequence impacts translational efficiency by regulating the recognition of the start codon; upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are associated with inhibition of translation of the downstream protein; internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs) can promote cap-independent translation. CRISPR-Cas technology is a revolutionary gene-editing tool that has also been applied to the regulation of gene expression. In this chapter, we focus on the genome editing approaches developed to modulate the translational efficiency with the aim to find novel therapeutic approaches, in particular acting on the cis-elements, that regulate the initiation of protein synthesis.

Ubiquitin stimulated reversal of topoisomerase 2 DNA-protein crosslinks by TDP2

Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2) reverses Topoisomerase 2 DNA-protein crosslinks (TOP2-DPCs) in a direct-reversal pathway licensed by ZATTZNF451 SUMO2 E3 ligase and SUMOylation of TOP2. TDP2 also binds ubiquitin (Ub), but how Ub regulates TDP2 functions is unknown. Here, we show that TDP2 co-purifies with K63 and K27 poly-Ubiquitinated cellular proteins independently of, and separately from SUMOylated TOP2 complexes. Poly-ubiquitin chains of ≥ Ub3 stimulate TDP2 catalytic activity in nuclear extracts and enhance TDP2 binding of DNA-protein crosslinks in vitro. X-ray crystal structures and small-angle X-ray scattering analysis of TDP2-Ub complexes reveal that the TDP2 UBA domain binds K63-Ub3 in a 1:1 stoichiometric complex that relieves a UBA-regulated autoinhibitory state of TDP2. Our data indicates that that poly-Ub regulates TDP2-catalyzed TOP2-DPC removal, and TDP2 single nucleotide polymorphisms can disrupt the TDP2-Ubiquitin interface.

Mammalian Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterases in the Context of Mitochondrial DNA Repair

Mammalian mitochondria contain four topoisomerases encoded in the nuclear genome: TOP1MT, TOP2α, TOP2β, and TOP3α. They also contain the two known tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterases (TDPs): TDP1 and TDP2, including a specific TDP2^S isoform. Both TDP1 and TDP2 excise abortive topoisomerase cleavage complexes (TOPccs), yet their molecular structures and mechanisms are different. TDP1 is present across eukaryotes, from yeasts to humans and belongs to the phospholipase D family. It functions without a metal cofactor and has a broad activity range, as it also serves to cleanse blocking 3′-DNA ends bearing phosphoglycolate, deoxyribose phosphate, nucleoside, nucleoside analogs (zidovudine), abasic moieties, and with a lower efficiency, TOP2ccs. Found in higher vertebrates, TDP2 is absent in yeast where TDP1 appears to perform its functions. TDP2 belongs to the exonuclease/endonuclease/phosphodiesterase family and requires magnesium as a cofactor to excise TOP2ccs, and it also excises TOP1ccs, albeit with a lower efficiency. Here, we review TDP1 and TDP2 in the context of mitochondrial DNA repair and discuss potential new research areas centered on the mitochondrial TDPs.