Identification of Novel Serological Autoantibodies in Takayasu Arteritis Patients Using HuProt Arrays

Clinical Significance of Uncommon, Non-Clinical, and Novel Autoantibodies

Autoantibodies are a common mark of autoimmune reaction and their identification in the patients' serum, cerebrospinal fluid, or tissues is generally believed to represent diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers of autoimmune diseases or autoinflammatory conditions. Traditionally, autoantibody testing is an important part of the clinical examination of suspected patients, and in the absence of reliable T cell tests, characterization of autoantibody responses might be suitable in finding causes of specific autoimmune responses, their strength, and sometimes commencement of autoimmune disease. Autoantibodies are also useful for prognostic stratification in clinically diverse groups of patients if checked repeatedly. Antibody discoveries are continuing, with important consequences for verifying autoimmune mechanisms, diagnostic feasibility, and clinical management. Adding newly identified autoantibody-autoantigen pairs to common clinical laboratory panels should help upgrade and harmonize the identification of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disorders and other autoimmune conditions. Herein, we aim to summarize our current knowledge of uncommon and novel autoantibodies in the context of discussing their validation, diagnostic practicability, and clinical relevance. The regular updates within the field are important and well justified.

Proteome microarray identifies autoantibody biomarkers for diagnosis of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has the highest mortality rate among malignant tumors worldwide. This study aimed to analyze the biological characteristics of serum proteins in hepatitis B (HBV)-related liver diseases, identify diagnostic biomarkers for HBV-infected HCC, and provide a scientific basis for its prevention and treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used HuProt arrays to identify candidate biomarkers for HBV-related liver diseases and verified the differential biomarkers by using an HCC-focused array. The biological characteristics of serum proteins were analyzed via bioinformatics. Serum biomarkers levels were validated by ELISA.

RESULTS

We identified 547 differentially expressed proteins from HBV-infected HCC in a screening cohort. After analyzing the biological characteristics of serum proteins, we identified 10 potential differential autoantibodies against tumor-associated antigens (TAAbs) and a candidate biomarker panel (APEX2, RCSD1, and TP53) for the diagnosis of HBV-associated HCC with 61.9% sensitivity and 81.7% specificity in an HCC-focused array validation cohort. Finally, the protein levels and diagnostic capability of the biomarker panel were confirmed in a large-sample validation cohort, and this panel was found to be superior to alpha-fetoprotein, the standard hallmark for the diagnosis of HCC.

CONCLUSION

The APEX2, RCSD1, and TP53 biomarker panels could be used for the diagnosis of HBV-associated HCC, providing a scientific basis for clinical practice.

Unveiling the autoreactome: Proteome-wide immunological fingerprints reveal the promise of plasma cell depleting therapy

The prevalence and burden of autoimmune and autoantibody mediated disease is increasing worldwide, yet most disease etiologies remain unclear. Despite numerous new targeted immunomodulatory therapies, comprehensive approaches to apply and evaluate the effects of these treatments longitudinally are lacking. Here, we leverage advances in programmable-phage immunoprecipitation (PhIP-Seq) methodology to explore the modulation, or lack thereof, of proteome-wide autoantibody profiles in both health and disease. We demonstrate that each individual, regardless of disease state, possesses a distinct set of autoreactivities constituting a unique immunological fingerprint, or "autoreactome", that is remarkably stable over years. In addition to uncovering important new biology, the autoreactome can be used to better evaluate the relative effectiveness of various therapies in altering autoantibody repertoires. We find that therapies targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) profoundly alter an individual's autoreactome, while anti-CD19 and CD-20 therapies have minimal effects, strongly suggesting a rationale for BCMA or other plasma cell targeted therapies in autoantibody mediated diseases.

Advances and challenges in management of large vessel vasculitis

Glucocorticoids (GC) remains the mainstay for management of large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Recent introduction of interleukin-6 signaling blocker, tocilizumab has substantially changed the practice in management of patients with LVV, in particular, giant cell arteritis (GCA). Benefit of tocilizumab to patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is supported by observational studies, but randomized clinical trials are lacking. Addition of tocilizumab enables reduction of the total amount of GC in patients with GCA, but GC burden remains high and to be further reduced. Ongoing studies aim at minimal use of GC or even GC-free. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors appear to be beneficial to TAK despite their ineffectiveness to GCA. Randomized clinical trials are undergoing to target other inflammatory cytokines in both GCA and TAK. Janus kinase inhibitors alone or in combination with conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs showed promising results in treatment of TAK.

Identification of Anti-SNRPA as a Novel Serological Biomarker for Systemic Sclerosis Diagnosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic autoimmune disorder that leads to vasculopathy and tissue fibrosis. A lack of reliable biomarkers has been a challenge for clinical diagnosis of the disease. We employed a protein array-based approach to identify and validate SSc-specific autoantibodies. Phase I involved profiled autoimmunity using human proteome microarray (HuProt arrays) with 90 serum samples: 40 patients with SSc, 30 patients diagnosed with autoimmune diseases, and 20 healthy subjects. In Phase II, we constructed a focused array with candidates identified antigens and used this to profile a much larger cohort comprised of serum samples. Finally, we used a western blot analysis to validate the serum of validated proteins with high signal values. Bioinformatics analysis allowed us to identify 113 candidate autoantigens that were significantly associated with SSc. This two-phase strategy allowed us to identify and validate anti-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide A (SNRPA) as a novel SSc-specific serological biomarker. The observed positive rate of anti-SNRPA antibody in patients with SSc was 11.25%, which was significantly higher than that of any disease control group (3.33%) or healthy controls (1%). In conclusion, anti-SNRPA autoantibody serves as a novel biomarker for SSc diagnosis and may be promising for clinical applications.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Aortic Arch Emergencies: Takayasu Disease, Fibromuscular Dysplasia, and Aortic Arch Pathologies: A Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature

Non-atherosclerotic aortic arch pathologies (NA-AAPs) and anatomical variants are characterized as rare cardiovascular diseases with a low incidence rate, below 1 case per 2000 population, but enormous heterogeneity in terms of anatomical variants, i.e., Takayasu disease (TAK) and fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). In specific clinical scenarios, NA-AAPs constitute life-threatening disorders.

METHODS

In this study, 82 (1.07%) consecutive patients with NA-AAPs (including 38 TAKs, 26 FMDs, and 18 other AAPs) out of 7645 patients who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) for the aortic arch and its side-branch diseases at a single institution between 2002 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The recorded demographic, biochemical, diagnostic, operative, and postoperative factors were reviewed, and the functional outcomes were determined during follow-up. A systematic review of the literature was also performed.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 65 (79.3%) female and 17 (21.7%) male subjects with a mean age of 46.1 ± 14.9 years. Overall, 62 (75.6%) patients were diagnosed with either cerebral ischemia symptoms or aortic arch dissection on admission. The EVT was feasible in 59 (72%) patients, whereas 23 (28%) patients were referred for medical treatment. In EVT patients, severe periprocedural complications occurred in two (3.39%) patients, including one periprocedural death and one cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. During a median follow-up period of 64 months, cardiovascular events occurred in 24 (29.6%) patients (5 deaths, 13 ISs, and 6 myocardial infarctions). Repeated EVT for the index lesion was performed in 21/59 (35.6%) patients, including 19/33 (57.6%) in TAK and 2/13 (15.4%) in FMD. In the AAP group, one patient required additional stent-graft implantation for progressing dissection to the iliac arteries at 12 months. A baseline white blood count (odds ratio [HR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.39; p < 0.001) was the only independent prognostic factor for recurrent stenosis, while a baseline hemoglobin level (HR: 0.73, 95%CI: 0.59-0.89; p = 0.002) and coronary involvement (HR: 4.11, 95%CI: 1.74-9.71; p = 0.001) were independently associated with a risk of major cardiac and cerebral events according to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that AAPs should not be neglected in clinical settings, as it can be a life-threatening condition requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The knowledge of prognostic risk factors for adverse outcomes may improve surveillance in this group of patients.

Human antibody profiling technologies for autoimmune disease

Autoimmune diseases are caused by the break-down in self-tolerance mechanisms and can result in the generation of autoantibodies specific to human antigens. Human autoantigen profiling technologies such as solid surface arrays and display technologies are powerful high-throughput technologies utilised to discover and map novel autoantigens associated with disease. This review compares human autoantigen profiling technologies including the application of these approaches in chronic and post-infectious autoimmune disease. Each technology has advantages and limitations that should be considered when designing new projects to profile autoantibodies. Recent studies that have utilised these technologies across a range of diseases have highlighted marked heterogeneity in autoantibody specificity between individuals as a frequent feature. This individual heterogeneity suggests that epitope spreading maybe an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease in general and likely contributes to inflammatory tissue damage and symptoms. Studies focused on identifying autoantibody biomarkers for diagnosis should use targeted data analysis to identify the rarer public epitopes and antigens, common between individuals. Thus, utilisation of human autoantigen profiling technology, combined with different analysis approaches, can illuminate both pathogenesis and biomarker discovery.

Medium-vessel and large-vessel vasculitis in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article serves as an up-to-date examination of the latest findings in the field of paediatric large-vessel and medium-vessel vasculitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last 2 years and in the wake of SARS-CoV2 pandemic, a multitude of studies have increased our insight into these conditions. Although large-vessel and medium-vessel vasculitis are uncommon amongst children, they are a complex and multisystem with a constantly evolving landscape. Increasing numbers of reports from low-income and middle-income countries are shaping our understanding of the epidemiology of vasculitis in children. The influence of infectious disease and the microbiome are of particular interest in unravelling pathogenetic aspects. Improved understanding of the genetics and immunology offer opportunities for better diagnostic options and biomarkers of disease as well as targeted therapies.

SUMMARY

In this review, we address recent findings in epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical findings, bio-markers, imaging and treatment that have the potential to offer better management solutions for these uncommon conditions.

Autoantibody screening of plasma and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

Are there specific autoantibody profiles in patients with endometriosis that are different from those in controls?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This study did not reveal a significantly higher prevalence of autoantibodies in the studied groups of patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Various inflammatory factors are postulated to be involved in the pathomechanisms of endometriosis, and a potential link exists with autoimmune diseases, which may also play an important role. As the diagnosis of endometriosis remains invasive, it can only be confirmed using laparoscopy with histopathological examination of tissues. Numerous studies have focused on identifying useful biomarkers to confirm the disease, but without unequivocal effects. Autoantibodies are promising molecules that serve as potential prognostic factors.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A multicentre, cross-sectional study was conducted over 18 months (between 2018 and 2019), at eight Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in several cities across Poland on 137 patients undergoing laparoscopic examination for the diagnosis of endometriosis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS

During laparoscopy, we obtained plasma samples from 137 patients and peritoneal fluid (PF) samples from 98 patients. Patients with autoimmune diseases were excluded from the study. Autoantibody profiling was performed using HuProt v3.1 human proteome microarrays.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We observed no significant differences in the expression of autoantibodies in the plasma or PF between the endometriosis and control groups. The study revealed that in the PF of women with Stage II endometriosis, compared with other stages, there were significantly higher reactivity signals for ANAPC15 and GABPB1 (adj. P < 0.016 and adj. P < 0.026, respectively; logFC > 1 in both cases). Comparison of the luteal and follicular phases in endometriosis patients revealed that levels of NEIL1 (adj. P < 0.029), MAGEB4 (adj. P < 0.029), and TNIP2 (adj. P < 0.042) autoantibody signals were significantly higher in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase in PF samples of patients with endometriosis. No differences were observed between the two phases of the cycle in plasma or between women with endometriosis and controls. Clustering of PF and plasma samples did not reveal unique autoantibody profiles for endometriosis; however, comparison of PF and plasma in the same patient showed a high degree of concordance.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Although this study was performed using the highest-throughput protein array available, it does not cover the entire human proteome and cannot be used to study potentially promising post-translational modifications. Autoantibody levels depend on numerous factors, such as infections; therefore the autoantibody tests should be repeated for more objective results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Although endometriosis has been linked to different autoimmune diseases, it is unlikely that autoimmune responses mediated by specific autoantibodies play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of this inflammatory disease. Our study shows that in searching for biomarkers of endometriosis, it may be more efficient to use higher-throughput proteomic microarrays, which may allow the detection of potentially new biomarkers. Only research on such a scale, and possibly with different technologies, can help discover biomarkers that will change the method of endometriosis diagnosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by a grant from the Polish Ministry of Health (grant no. 6/6/4/1/NPZ/2017/1210/1352). It was also funded by the Estonian Research Council (grant PRG1076) and the Horizon 2020 Innovation Grant (ERIN; grant no. EU952516), Enterprise Estonia (grant no. EU48695), and MSCA-RISE-2020 project TRENDO (grant no. 101008193). The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Biomarkers in Takayasu arteritis

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare large vasculitis with unknown etiology, which affects the aorta and its primary branches, as well as the pulmonary and coronary arteries. Cellular and humoral immunity, chronic inflammation, and genetic factors are involved into TA pathogenesis. Several biomarkers, such as MMPs, TIMPs, cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, autoantibodies, complements, PTX3, sRAGE, NT-proBNP, 8-isoPGF_2α, NO₂^-, acute-phase and immunology-related proteins, thrombogenicity markers, ghrelin leptin and adipokines, endothelial damage and repair factors, genetic markers etc., related to the pathogenesis could be observed in patients with TA. These biomarkers have revealed great values in early diagnosis, evaluating disease activity, guiding clinical treatment options, and thus demonstrated significant clinical application values in TA. The combination of biomarkers assay and imaging examination may detect TA more accurately. The aim of this review is to systemically observe the clinical significance of these biomarkers in TA.

Audio-Vestibular Findings in Individuals with Takayasu's Arteritis

Takayasu's Arteritis is defined as inflammatory disease of the large blood vessels with unknown cause mostly affecting the aorta and its main branches. The patients diagnosed with Takayasu's arteritis are reported to have complaint of chronic dizziness. However, literature lacks detailed clinical evaluation of the auditory vestibular function in such patients. The current study documents the findings of auditory and vestibular evaluations in a rare syndrome. It was observed that patients with Takayasu's arteritis had abnormal auditory and vestibular evoked potentials.

Outcome Measures and Biomarkers for Disease Assessment in Takayasu Arteritis

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a less common large vessel vasculitis where histopathology of involved arteries is difficult to access except during open surgical procedures. Assessment of disease activity in TAK, therefore, relies on surrogate measures. Clinical disease activity measures such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) score, the Disease Extent Index in TAK (DEI.TAK) and the Indian TAK Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010) inconsistently associate with acute phase reactants (APRs). Computerized tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or color Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS) enables anatomical characterization of stenosis, dilatation, and vessel wall characteristics. Vascular wall uptake of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose or other ligands using positron emission tomography computerized tomography (PET-CT) helps assess metabolic activity, which reflects disease activity well in a subset of TAK with normal APRs. Angiographic scoring systems to quantitate the extent of vascular involvement in TAK have been developed recently. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein have a moderate performance in distinguishing active TAK. Numerous novel biomarkers are under evaluation in TAK. Limited literature suggests a better assessment of active disease by combining APRs, PET-CT, and circulating biomarkers. Validated damage indices and patient-reported outcome measures specific to TAK are lacking. Few biomarkers have been evaluated to reflect vascular damage in TAK and constitute important research agenda.

Takayasu arteritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent advances in Takayasu arteritis (TAK), mainly focusing on pathogenesis, imaging modalities, and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three novel clusters based on angiographic findings were identified in the Indian cohort and replicated in the North American cohorts. Different new imaging modalities have been tried in the assessment of arterial inflammation with promising results. There is more evidence on the long-term use of tocilizumab, but relapses are common. In light of the recent findings on the pathogenesis of TAK, Janus kinase inhibitors seem to be promising.

SUMMARY

Improvement in imaging modalities and in our understanding of the disease pathogenesis will allow us to better assess the disease activity and identify effective therapeutic agents.