Revascularization of myocardial scar tissue following prostaglandin E1-therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease

Therapeutic effects of lipo-prostaglandin E1 on angiogenesis and neurogenesis after ischemic stroke in rats

Previous studies have demonstrated that prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) has a neuroprotective effect on cerebral ischemia. However, it remains unknown whether PGE1 promotes angiogenesis and neurogenesis after ischemic stroke. In this study, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to permanently distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Rats were treated with lipo-prostaglandin E1(lipo-PGE1, 10 μg/kg/d) or the same volume of 0.9% saline starting 24 hours after MCAO daily for 6 consecutive days. All rats were injected 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU, 50 mg/kg) intraperitoneally every 12 hours for 3 consecutive days before being sacrificed. At 7 and 14 days after MCAO or sham-operation, rats were sacrificed. Post-stroke neurological outcome, infarction volume, angiogenesis and neurogenesis were evaluated. Treatment with lipo-PGE1 significantly increased the vascular density in the peri-infarct areas at 7 and 14 days after MCAO. The lipo-PGE1 treatment significantly enhanced the proliferation and migration of endogenous neural stem cells in the ipsilateral subventricular zone. The neural stem cells associated with blood vessels closely within a neurovascular niche in lipo-PGE1-treated rats after stroke. The lipo-PGE1 treatment also significantly improved the neurological recovery after MCAO. These results indicate that treatment with lipo-PGE1 promotes post-stroke angiogenesis, neurogenesis and their interaction, which would contribute to neurological recovery after cerebral infarction. Our study provides novel experimental evidences for the neuroprotective roles of PGE1 in ischemic stroke.

Quantification of the effect of Lipo-PGE1 on angiogenesis

Fifteen rabbits were used to assess the effect of Lipo-PGE1 on neovascularization. Merocel(®) and Alloderm(®) of the same size were implanted separately under the back skin to act as matrices for vessel growth. Lipo-PGE1 was injected intravenously for 2 weeks in an experimental group of eight rabbits, and they were compared with a control group of seven untreated animals. Blood flow was measured using the (99m)TcO4(-) clearance technique. The mean blood clearance halftime (T1/2) and washout radioactivity were measured. Newly formed vessels were counted by CD31. The mean clearance halftime was 4005 ± 2161.3 and 13840 ± 4644.6 s in the experimental and control group, respectively, in the 1 × 2 × 1.5-cm-sized implants (p = 0.0125), and 1560 ± 1174.7 and 3405 ± 807.03 s, respectively, in the 2 × 2 × 1.5-cm-sized implants (p = 0.0413). Histological examinations revealed that the mean numbers of newly formed vessels in the experimental and control groups were 11 ± 1.58 and 7.8 ± 1.71, respectively, in the 1 × 2 × 1.5-cm-sized implants (p = 0.0501), and 20.19 ± 12.47 and 12.33 ± 3.25, respectively, in the 2 × 2 × 1.5-cm-sized implants (p = 0.02679). Lipo-PGE1 was found to be effective in promoting angiogenesis in a rabbit matrix model.

Continuous intravenous infusion of prostaglandin E1 improves myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with ischemic heart disease assessed by positron emission tomography: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Recent investigation has demonstrated that prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) therapy increased capillary density in explanted hearts. Dynamic (13)N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) is reliable for non-invasive measurement of myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of PGE(1) therapy during 4 weeks on reduction of myocardial perfusion abnormalities and increase of MPR in the patients with ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 11 patients who had symptomatic heart failure and documented myocardial ischemia to 4 weeks intravenous infusion of PGE(1) (2.5 ng/kg/min; 8 patients, age 60 ± 13 years) or saline (3 patients, age 57 ± 13 years). Dynamic (13)N-ammonia PET scans at rest and during adenosine stress were obtained at baseline and 12 weeks after treatment completion. Quantitative size/severity of perfusion defects and MPR change from baseline to follow-up PET were determined using a 17-segment model.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, baseline MPR in the PGE(1) group was significantly lower (1.96 ± 0.78 vs. 2.71 ± 0.73; P < 0.001). MPR significantly improved 12 weeks after completion of PGE(1) infusion (1.96 ± 0.78 to 2.16 ± 0.77; P < 0.001). In contrast, MPR declined significantly in the placebo group (2.71 ± 0.73 to 2.01 ± 0.58, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Four weeks of PGE(1) infusion sustained MPR improvement in patients with ischemic heart disease. This may be an attractive therapeutic approach for no-option patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 for uptitration of beta-blockade in patients with refractory, advanced chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

In advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) 20% of patients do not tolerate beta-blockers and 50% do not reach target doses.

AIM

To test whether levosimendan or prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) can facilitate uptitration of beta-blockers in advanced CHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-five advanced CHF patients (LVEF<35%, NYHA class IIIb or IV) intolerant to beta-blocker uptitration to target doses (10 mg bisoprolol/day) were randomised to a monthly 24 h infusion with levosimendan (n=39) or a chronic infusion with PGE1 (n=36) for 3 months. Bisoprolol was uptitrated following predefined criteria. At 12 weeks, bisoprolol dose increased from 4 mg to 10 mg in both groups. Heart failure worsening occurred in 29 levosimendan patients (74%) versus 16 PGE1 patients (44%, p=0.008). Uptitration was impossible in 9 levosimendan patients (23%) versus 2 PGE1 patients (6%, p=0.03). The combined endpoint of death or urgent heart transplantation or implantation of a ventricular assist device was reached by 12 levosimendan patients (31%) versus 4 PGE1 patients (11%, p=0.04). After 1 year, LVEF increased from 23+/-7% to 28+/-11% (p=0.0004), and BNP decreased from 994+/-806 to 659+/-564 pg/ml (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Levosimendan and PGE1 facilitate uptitration of beta-blockers in previously intolerant CHF patients. PGE1 treatment allowed uptitration in more patients and resulted in a better clinical outcome compared to levosimendan. This approach increased LVEF and decreased BNP after 1 year.

Short-term effects of levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 on hemodynamic parameters and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Both levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) have beneficial effects on hemodynamic parameters and outcome compared to dobutamine in decompensated chronic heart failure (CHF).

AIMS

We compared short-term effects of levosimendan versus PGE1 on hemodynamic parameters and B-type natriuretic peptide levels (BNP) in patients with decompensated CHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

73 patients (cardiac index < 2.5 L/min/m2, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCP) >15 mmHg) with decompensated CHF were randomised to treatment with either a 24 h-infusion of levosimendan (n=38) or a chronic infusion of PGE1 (n = 35). Hemodynamic parameters and BNP were measured at baseline, 24 and 48 h, BNP levels were also measured after 1 week. Baseline characteristics including concomitant medication were similar in both groups. Levosimendan and PGE1 increased cardiac output (CO) after 24 and 48 h. Levosimendan increased CO twice as much as PGE1 (24 h: Levosimendan +1.1 +/- 0.1 L/min, PGE1 +0.6 +/- 0.1 L/min, p < 0.001). Both drugs produced a comparable reduction in PCP and pulmonary artery pressure after 24 and 48 h. Levosimendan decreased BNP by 28% after 24 h and 22% after 48 h, but effects disappeared after 1 week. In contrast, PGE1 decreased BNP by 15% after 48 h (no change at 24 h), but a decrease of 20% was sustained at 1 week.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential beneficial effects of levosimendan (greater increase in CO) and PGE1 (sustained decrease in BNP) may have a potential impact on clinical outcome.