Glucose and mental performance

Glucose and memory: the influence of drink, expectancy, and beliefs

RATIONALE

An increasing number of studies suggest that glucose can enhance aspects of memory and the central methodology is the use of the glucose-placebo design. One critical issue therefore is separating the pharmacological effects of glucose from the expectancies created by consuming a drink that might contain glucose.

OBJECTIVE

A modified balanced placebo design examined the role that expectancy and belief about the drink consumed has on the pharmacological changes observed following glucose consumption.

METHOD

Ninety-three participants, allocated according to a drink (glucose, placebo) × message (told glucose, told nothing, told placebo) unrelated design, were administered tasks assessing immediate and delayed verbal free recall, spatial recognition and semantic verification. Each task has some evidence for hippocampus involvement, and variations in task difficulty were used to assess the idea that glucose effects are sensitive to task difficulty.

RESULTS

While the messages biased drink judgements in the expected direction, judgements of drink content were at chance and glucose only enhanced delayed free recall. The subtle effects of the messages did not modify the glucose enhancement. However, believing glucose had been consumed showed an independent improvement in delayed free recall. There was no evidence that task complexity enhanced the glucose effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that expectancy effects are unlikely to be confused with glucose enhancements, but beliefs about consuming glucose can augment performance on delayed free recall. The discussion considers the hippocampus and complexity hypotheses of glucose's mode of action and proposes the routine collection of drink beliefs in future studies.

A systematic review of the effect of breakfast on the cognitive performance of children and adolescents

Breakfast is recommended as part of a healthy diet because it is associated with healthier macro- and micronutrient intakes, BMI and lifestyle. Breakfast is also widely promoted to improve cognitive function and academic performance, leading to the provision of breakfast initiatives by public health bodies. Despite this positive and intuitive perception of cognitive benefits, there has been no systematic review of the evidence. Systematic review methodology was employed to evaluate the effects of breakfast on cognitive performance in well-nourished children and nutritionally at-risk or stunted children. Acute experimental studies, school feeding programmes and studies of habitual breakfast intake are reviewed. Comparisons of breakfast v. no breakfast and breakfasts differing in energy and macronutrient composition are discussed. Included are forty-five studies described in forty-one papers published between 1950 and 2008. The evidence indicates that breakfast consumption is more beneficial than skipping breakfast, but this effect is more apparent in children whose nutritional status is compromised. There is a lack of research comparing breakfast type, precluding recommendations for the size and composition of an optimal breakfast for children's cognitive function. Few studies examined adolescents. Studies of school breakfast programmes suggest that such interventions can have positive effects on academic performance, but this may be in part explained by the increased school attendance that programmes encourage. The present systematic review considers methodological issues in this field and makes recommendations for future research design and policy priorities.

Acute effects of macronutrient manipulations on cognitive test performance in healthy young adults: A systematic research review

The potential for foods to exert effects on behaviour is increasingly recognised. Previous studies have incorporated both well-known and lesser-known cognitive tests in the evaluation of relationships between macronutrient interventions and mental performance. Systematic review methodology was used to identify studies of macronutrient effects on cognition, limited to acute effects in young, fasted, healthy adults. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 134 outcome measures. The studies reviewed displayed a predominance of soluble glucose manipulations, and a paucity of complex carbohydrate, protein or fat manipulations. Memory performance was most commonly measured, but verbal fluency, attention, reaction time, psychomotor skill and problem solving were also assessed. Significant differences in performance tended to occur under circumstances of more intense cognitive demand and after delays. Memory emerged as the most sensitive cognitive modality to macronutrient manipulations. Tasks identified as sensitive included Serial Sevens, Free Word Recall and Cued Word Recall, with tentative support for the Word Recognition Task. Findings also suggested that visuo-spatial memory may be influenced by macronutrient manipulations.