Role of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in delivering individualized disease-guided management of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk

Optimizing Anticoagulation Management in Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond the Guidelines. How and for Whom?

ABSTRACT

Anticoagulation therapy (AT) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment for thromboembolic event prevention. The AF burden, however, is of predictive relevance and may be used as a foundation for therapeutic decisions in individuals with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Remote rhythm monitoring devices can provide early detection of the arrhythmia, long-term rhythm monitoring, and the development of anticoagulation strategies based on AF recurrence profile and the total burden of the arrhythmia. Although the exact thromboembolic cut-off value for the AF burden has not yet been established, targeted anticoagulation treatments in the new oral anticoagulants era have shown encouraging outcomes. The combined evaluation of AF burden and patient thromboembolic risk reported in some studies supports the concept of tailored anticoagulation management, at least in a subset of patients with low AF burden and intermediate thromboembolic risk, for whom the guidelines recommend that AT should be individualized based on net clinical benefit and patient values and preferences. Although it is still premature to derive firm conclusions or algorithms diverging from the current guidelines, the combination of a patient's AF burden, thromboembolic risk, and bleeding risk can lead in the future to an individualized management of patients with a congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke, vascular disease, age 65-74 years sex category (female) (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc) score of 1 (2 for female patients), in whom the guidelines do not strictly recommend long-term AT. In this study, we provide an algorithm regarding the individualized implementation of anticoagulation strategies in AF in different patients' thromboembolic risk profiles, based on the available data on the so far tailored anticoagulation strategies in AF.

'Pill-in-the-pocket' Oral Anticoagulation Guided by Daily Rhythm Monitoring for Stroke Prevention in Patients with AF: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aims

In patients with a low AF burden and long periods of sinus rhythm, 'pill-in-the-pocket' oral anticoagulation (OAC) may, taken as needed in response to AF episodes, offer the same thromboembolic protection as continuous, life-long OAC, while reducing bleeding complications at the same time. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarise available evidence pertaining to the feasibility, safety and efficacy of pill-in-the-pocket OAC.

Methods

Medline and Embase were searched from inception to July 2022 for studies adopting a pill-in-the-pocket OAC strategy in AF patients guided by daily rhythm monitoring (PROSPERO/CRD42020209564). Outcomes of interest were extracted and event rates per patient-years of follow-up were calculated. A random effects model was used for pooled estimates.

Results

Eight studies were included (711 patients). Daily rhythm monitoring was continuous in six studies and intermittent in two (pulse checks or smartphone single-lead electrocardiograms were used). Anticoagulation criteria varied across studies, reflecting the uncertainty regarding the AF burden that warrants anticoagulation. The mean time from AF meeting OAC criteria to its initiation was not reported. Adopting pill-in-the-pocket OAC led to 390 (54.7%) patients stopping OAC, 85 (12.0%) patients taking pill-in-the-pocket OAC and 237 (33.3%) patients remaining on or returning to continuous OAC. Overall, annualised ischaemic stroke and major bleeding rates per patient-year of follow-up were low at 0.005 (95% CI [0.002-0.012]) and 0.024 (95% CI [0.013-0.043]), respectively.

Conclusion

Current evidence, although encouraging, is insufficient to inform practice. Additional studies are required to improve our understanding of the relationships between AF burden and thromboembolic risk to help define anticoagulation criteria and appropriate monitoring strategies.

Outpatient Initiation of Sotalol in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Utility of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices for Therapy Monitoring

Background

Antiarrhythmic drugs are often used in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Sotalol is conventionally initiated in the inpatient setting for monitoring efficacy and adverse effects, including QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP) proarrhythmia.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient initiation of sotalol for the treatment of AF in a select group of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): permanent pacemakers (PPMs), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and implantable loop recorders (ILRs) capable of continuous rhythm monitoring remotely.

Methods

We conducted our clinical study in a real-world practice setting with longitudinal follow-up of the study cohort. We included adult patients with symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent AF eligible for sotalol for rhythm control strategy and who had CIEDs in our study. Patients with a known contraindication to sotalol were excluded. After making a shared management decision with patients, sotalol was initiated as an outpatient, with regular clinical encounters with patients to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment, and monitoring cardiac rhythm and QTc intervals with CIEDs utilizing their remote monitoring platforms.

Results

The study cohort comprised 105 patients; 38 (36%) females, mean age ± standard deviation (SD) 73.9 ± 10.36 years, and with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 3.26 ± 1.37 and left ventricular ejection fraction of 60.16 ± 9.10%. Twenty-six (24.8%) patients were implanted with PPMs, 10 (9.5%) with dual-chamber ICDs, and 69 (65.7%) with ILRs. Over a follow-up period of 23 ± 15 months, sotalol was continued at a steady median dose of 80 mg twice daily, 105 ± 42 mg (mean ± SD) in 77 (73%) patients who maintained sinus rhythm, and discontinued in 28 (27%) patients because of inefficacy or development of adverse effects. No adverse effects relating to QTc prolongation and TdP or mortality were observed during the study period.

Conclusions

Effective and safe outpatient initiation and maintenance of sotalol therapy is possible in select patients who have CIEDs for continuous remote monitoring and surveillance capabilities.

Outpatient initiation of dofetilide: insights from the complexities of atrial fibrillation management during the COVID-19 lockdown

Background

At peak COVID-19 lockdown, patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) were faced with an equipoise between a palliative rate-control versus cautious rhythm-control strategy, including hospitalization for initiation of antiarrhythmic drug/s (AADs) and cardiac procedures which was impossible due to hospitalization restrictions.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient initiation of dofetilide in patients with AF using cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for rhythm and QTc interval monitoring.

Methods

Adult patients with symptomatic AF with prior failure or intolerance to other AADs were enrolled if they were willing to in-office insertion of implantable loop recorders or already implanted with pacemakers or defibrillators capable of remote monitoring. Exclusion criteria were known medical contraindications of dofetilide and unable to provide consent. After making a shared management decision, dofetilide was initiated in a physician office, and rhythm and QTc intervals were monitored by ECGs and CIEDs. Patients were followed to assess the efficacy and safety of the treatment.

Results

The study cohort comprised of 30 patients, age 76 ± 7 years (mean ± standard deviation), 10 female (33%), CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 3.25 ± 1.3, ejection fraction 63.45% ± 8.52, and QTc interval 431.68 ± 45.09 ms. From 22 (73%) patients in AF at presentation, SR was restored in 14 (64%) patients after 4 doses of dofetilide. At 46 ± 59 days of follow-up, maintenance of SR in total 22 (73%) patients without cardiac adverse effects was accomplished.

Conclusion

Effective and safe outpatient initiation of dofetilide during the extenuating circumstance of COVID-19 lockdown was possible in patients with AF who had CIEDs.

Long-term rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder in patients after the first clinical atrial fibrillation episode. Towards an individualized management

Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmia with a variable clinical profile (symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes), the first symptomatic episode leads to its initial diagnosis in most cases. Nowadays, continuous and remote long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring is feasible by the use of implantable loop recorders. The data concerning the AF recurrences and progression after the first electrocardiographic-documented clinical AF episode demonstrates that a high percentage of patients may not suffer any other AF recurrence, or may present a low recurrence rate of the arrhythmia in the future. The AF burden may play a key role in the management of the arrhythmia as far as the decision-making for anticoagulation, rate and/or rhythm control therapy is concerned. There is evidence that a higher AF burden is associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke. Non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) anticoagulants are increasingly used in the management of AF, providing a more predictable effect with rapid onset and offset of their action. The use of these agents in combination with devices that provide a continuous remote rhythm monitoring capability has encouraged anticoagulation strategies based on the AF burden. Data from tailored anticoagulation studies in AF are in favor of the long-term rhythm monitoring, ensuring a patient-centered approach with a better evaluation and more individualized management of AF, especially in patients with intermediate thromboembolic risk and high bleeding risk. Further large randomized trials are needed, not only to evaluate such strategies but also to elucidate the long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring in the AF management.