Risk of stroke and bleeding in relation to hypertension in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older and Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Decade of Experience

INTRODUCTION

Both the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its subsequent use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly increasing in patients of older age. In the absence of contra-indications, guidelines advocate anticoagulation based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score for all AF patients aged 75 and above. However, some practitioners are hesitant to prescribe anticoagulants to older and frail patients due to perceived elevated bleeding risks. This review delves into the comparative treatment outcomes of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in older patients with AF, particularly focusing on those of advanced age, frailty, increased risk of falling, chronic kidney disease (CKD), or with a history of major bleeding. Additionally, considerations on the use of off-label DOAC doses, the role of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure and future developments in factor XIa-inhibitors will be discussed.

RESULTS

While strong evidence supports the use of DOACs in the vital older patients with nonvalvular AF, it remains scant in frail patient groups. There is some evidence from non-randomized studies suggesting that the effect of DOACs compared with VKAs is consistent between frail and nonfrail patients. However, recent findings from a single randomized trial showed increased bleeding risks but comparable thromboembolic outcomes in frail individuals switching from VKAs to DOACs. In patients with an increased risk of falling, data suggest no relevant interaction of increased risk of falling on the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin. Resuming oral anticoagulants in patients with Af after major bleeding seems to be beneficial. Off-label low-dose DOAC is often prescribed to patients who were underrepresented in larger randomized trails because of an elevated risk of bleeding or overexposure to DOACs, but its effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs are the recommended oral anticoagulant for vital older patients with AF. The scarcity of data backing DOAC use in frail individuals, those with renal impairments, or significant bleeding history underscores the necessity for further investigation. However, existing evidence suggests at least similar effectiveness and safety and potential benefits for DOACs in these patient subsets. Therefore, there is no reason to suggest these patients should be treated differently than the established guidelines regarding anticoagulation.

Systolic blood pressure visit-to-visit variability and outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation

We aimed to assess the association between SBP-VVV and outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AF patients in the COOL-AF registry with SBP measured at baseline, and at least two other visits were studied. We defined SBP-VVV using the standard deviation (SD) of average SBP. Patients were categorized according to the quartiles of SBP SD. The associations between SBP-VVV and outcomes were assessed in the adjusted Cox model. We studied 3172 patients (mean age 67.7 years; 41.8% female), with the prevalence of hypertension being 69%. Warfarin was used in 69% of patients, whereas 7% received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. The minimum and maximum SD of average SBP in the study population was 0.58 and 56.38 mmHg respectively. The cutoff of SD of average SBP for each quartile in our study were 9.09, 12.15, and 16.21 mmHg. The rates of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke or systemic embolization (SSE), major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were 3.10, 1.42, 2.09, and 0.64 per 100 person-years, respectively. Compared with the first quartile, patients in the fourth quartile had a significantly higher risk of mortality (adjusted HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.13-2.25), bleeding (aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.25-2.96) and ICH (aHR 3.51, 95%CI 1.40-8.76). The risk of SSE was not significantly different among the quartiles. SBP-VVV had a significant impact on the long-term outcomes of Asian patients with AF, particularly mortality and bleeding. Adequate SBP control and maintaining SBP stability over time may improve outcomes for AF patients.

Development and trends in research on hypertension and atrial fibrillation: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to comprehensively analyze research related to hypertension and atrial fibrillation, 2 common cardiovascular diseases with significant global public health implications, using bibliometric methods from 2003 to 2022.

METHODS

From the Web of Science Core Collection database, literature on the theme of hypertension and atrial fibrillation was retrieved. Subsequently, comprehensive bibliometric analyses were conducted across multiple dimensions utilizing software tools such as VOSviewer, Citespace, Pajek, Scimago Graphica, and ClusterProfiler. These analyses encompassed examinations of the literature according to country/region, institution, authors, journals, citation relationships, and keywords.

RESULTS

It revealed an increasing interest and shifting focus in research over the years. The analysis covered 7936 relevant publications, demonstrating a gradual rise in research activity regarding hypertension combined with atrial fibrillation over the past 2 decades, with a stable growth trend in research outcomes. Geographically, Europe and the Americas, particularly the United States, have shown the most active research in this field, while China has also gained importance in recent years. Regarding institutional contributions, internationally renowned institutions such as the University of Birmingham and the Mayo Clinic have emerged as core forces in this research direction. Additionally, Professor Lip Gregory, with his prolific research output, has stood out among numerous scholars. The American Journal of Cardiology has become a primary platform for publishing research related to hypertension and atrial fibrillation, highlighting its central role in advancing knowledge dissemination in this field. The research focus has shifted from exploring the pathophysiological mechanisms to investigating the treatment of complications and risk factors associated with hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Future research will focus on in-depth exploration of genetic and molecular mechanisms, causal relationship exploration through Mendelian randomization studies, and the application of machine learning techniques in prediction and treatment, aiming to promote the development of precision medicine for cardiovascular diseases.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the developmental trajectory of research on hypertension and atrial fibrillation, presenting novel insights into trends and future research directions, thus offering information support and guidance for research in this crucial field of cardiovascular medicine.

Time in target range of systolic blood pressure and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients: results of the COOL-AF registry

We aimed to investigate the relationship between time in target range of systolic blood pressure (SBP-TTr) and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We analyzed the results from multicenter AF registry in Thailand. Blood pressure was recorded at baseline and at every 6 monthly follow-up visit. SBP-TTr were calculated using the Rosendaal method, based on a target SBP 120-140 mmHg. The outcomes were death, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding, and heart failure. A total of 3355 patients were studied (mean age 67.8 years; 41.9% female). Average follow-up time was 32.1 ± 8.3 months. SBP-TTr was classified into 3 groups according to the tertiles. The incidence rates of all-cause death, SSE, major bleeding, and heart failure were 3.90 (3.51-4.34), 1.52 (1.27-1.80), 2.2 (1.90-2.53), and 2.83 (2.49-3.21) per 100 person-years, respectively. Patients in the 3rd tertile of SBP-TTr had lower rates of death, major bleeding and heart failure with adjusted hazard ratios 0.62 (0.48-0.80), p < 0.001, 0.64 (0.44-0.92), p = 0.016, and 0.61 (0.44-0.84), p = 0.003, respectively, compared to 1st SBP-TTr tertile. In conclusion, high SBP-TTr was associated with better clinical outcomes compared to other groups with lower SBP-TTr. This underscores the importance of good blood pressure control in AF patients.

Clinical Profiles and One-Year Outcome in Middle Eastern Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension: Analysis From the Jordan Atrial Fibrillation Study

Studies on the impact of hypertension (HTN) on the outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Middle East are scarce. The aim of this contemporary multicenter study is to evaluate the effect of the coexisting HTN on the baseline clinical profiles and 1-year prognosis in a cohort of Middle Eastern patients with AF. Consecutive AF patients in 29 hospitals and cardiology clinics were enrolled in the Jordan AF study (May 2019-December 2020). Patients were prospectively followed up for 1 year, and the study had no influence on their treatment, which was at the discretion of the treating physician. We compared clinical features, use of medications, and 1-year prognosis in patients with AF/HTN compared with AF/no HTN. Among 1849 non-valvular AF patients, 76.4% had HTN, with higher prevalence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke, and left ventricular hypertrophy in HTN patients. There was a higher thromboembolic and bleeding risk among HTN patients. At 1 year, HTN patients had significantly higher rates of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) (4.5%), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (2.4%), rehospitalization (27.9%), and major bleeding events (3.0%) compared with non-HTN patients. In this cohort, the coexistence of HTN was associated with worse baseline clinical profile and 1-year outcomes.

Stroke-Specific Predictors of Major Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Multicenter Registry-Based Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (CHA2DS2-VASc) and hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol (HAS-BLED) scores have been validated in estimating the risks of ischemic stroke and major bleeding, respectively, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated stroke-specific predictors of major bleeding in patients with stroke and AF who were taking oral anticoagulants (OACs).

METHODS

Subjects were selected from patients enrolled in the Korean ATrial fibrillaTion EvaluatioN regisTry in Ischemic strOke patieNts (K-ATTENTION) nationwide multicenter registry between 2013 and 2015. Patients were excluded if they were not taking OACs, had no brain imaging data, or had intracranial bleeding directly related to the index stroke. Major bleeding was defined according to International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between clinical variables and major bleeding and Kaplan-Meier estimates were performed to analyze event-free survival.

RESULTS

Of a total of 3,213 patients, 1,414 subjects (mean age of 72.6 years, 52.5% males) were enrolled in this study. Major bleeding was reported in 34 patients during the median follow-up period of 1.73 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, p=0.006), hypertension (HR 3.18, p=0.030), persistent AF type (HR 2.51, p=0.016), and initial hemoglobin level (HR 0.74, p=0.001) were independently associated with major bleeding risk. Except for hypertension, these associations remained significant after adjusting for the HAS-BLED score. Intracranial atherosclerosis presented a trend of association without statistical significance (HR 2.21, p=0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that major bleeding risk was independently associated with stroke-specific factors in anticoagulated patients with stroke and AF. This has the clinical implication that baseline characteristics of patients with stroke and AF should be considered in secondary prevention, which would bring the net clinical benefit of balancing recurrent stroke prevention with minimal bleeding complications.

Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal

Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is one pillar of the management of this common arrhythmia. Substantial advances in the epidemiology and associated pathophysiology underlying AF-related stroke and thrombo-embolism are evident. Furthermore, the introduction of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (also called direct oral anticoagulants) has clearly changed our approach to stroke prevention in AF, such that the default should be to offer oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention, unless the patient is at low risk. A strategy of early rhythm control is also beneficial in reducing strokes in selected patients with recent onset AF, when compared to rate control. Cardiovascular risk factor management, with optimization of comorbidities and attention to lifestyle factors, and the patient's psychological morbidity are also essential. Finally, in selected patients with absolute contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion or exclusion may be considered. The aim of this state-of-the-art review article is to provide an overview of the current status of AF-related stroke and prevention strategies. A holistic or integrated care approach to AF management is recommended to minimize the risk of stroke in patients with AF, based on the evidence-based Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway, as follows: A: Avoid stroke with Anticoagulation; B: Better patient-centred, symptom-directed decisions on rate or rhythm control; C: Cardiovascular risk factor and comorbidity optimization, including lifestyle changes.

Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing According to STOPP-2 Criteria among Discharged Older Patients-An Observational Retrospective Study

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes associated with old age, along with multimorbidity and polypharmacy might lead to inappropriate prescribing and adverse reactions. Explicit criteria such as the Screening tool of older people's prescribing (STOPP) are useful to identify potential inappropriate prescribing's (PIPs). Our retrospective study included discharge papers from patients aged ≥65 years, from an internal medicine department in Romania (January-June 2018). A subset of the STOPP-2 criteria was used to assess the prevalence and characteristics of PIPs. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of associated risk factors (i.e., age, gender, polypharmacy and specific disease). Out of the 516 discharge papers analyzed, 417 were further assessed for PIPs. Patients' mean age was 75 years, 61.63% were female and 55.16% had at least one PIP, with 81.30% having one or two PIPs. Antithrombotic agents in patients with significant bleeding risk was the most prevalent PIP (23.98%), followed by the use of benzodiazepines (9.11%). Polypharmacy, extreme (>10 drugs) polypharmacy, hypertension and congestive heart failure were found as independent risk factors. PIP was prevalent and increased with (extreme) polypharmacy and specific cardiac disease. Comprehensive criteria like STOPP should be regularly used in clinical practice to identify PIPs to prevent potential harm.

Atrial Fibrillation Detection and Management in Hypertension

Hypertension is prevalent in >70% of atrial fibrillation patients. In turn, hypertensive patients have up to 73% greater likelihood of atrial fibrillation. Current guidelines recommend that a systematic atrial fibrillation screening may be justified in all patients aged ≥65 years with at least 1 cardiovascular disease, including hypertension. Although most blood pressure monitors include algorithms to detect atrial fibrillation with a high sensitivity of 96 [92-98]% and specificity of 94 [91-96]%, an electrocardiography confirmation is necessary to establish a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Early detection and diagnosis of atrial fibrillation is important to allow initiation of atrial fibrillation management. In the Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial (EAST-AFNET 4), hypertension was present in 88% of participants, and early rhythm control therapy lowered the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with early atrial fibrillation aged >75 or with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2 (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 (doubled), Diabetes, Stroke (doubled), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category [female]) and cardiovascular condition. Strategies for early atrial fibrillation detection should always be linked to a comprehensive atrial fibrillation work-up infrastructure organized within an integrated ABC pathway (Anticoagulation/Avoid stroke; Better symptom control; Cardiovascular and Comorbidity optimization). For secondary prophylaxis, blood pressure control should be embedded in a combined risk factor management program. In hypertensive patients where no atrial fibrillation is detected, intensive blood pressure lowering therapy for primary prophylaxis should be initiated to reduce the risk of developing atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular complications in the future. The aim of the article is to review the current literature on atrial fibrillation detection and management in hypertensive patients.