1
|
Jin L, Naidu K. When you hear hoofbeats, think horses before zebras - a case of recurrent small bowel obstructions with a twist. J Surg Case Rep 2023; 2023:rjad555. [PMID: 37846413 PMCID: PMC10576990 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Mechanical small bowel obstructions (SBOs) account for a considerable proportion of hospital admissions for acute abdominal pain. SBOs are most frequently caused by adhesions; and very few SBOs are associated with intraperitoneal devices. An 84-year-old man was admitted to our tertiary institution with recurrent SBOs that were initially believed to be caused by his implantable cardioverter defibrillator which had undergone intraperitoneal migration. However, this was later found to be a misguided 'zebra'; as the cause was revealed to be a common 'horse' - adhesions. This article shares our key learnings from this diagnostic dilemma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LongHai Jin
- Department of General Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia
| | - Krishanth Naidu
- Department of General Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT 2605, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rios-Diaz AJ, Cunning JR, Talwar AA, Christopher A, Broach RB, Hsu JY, Morris JB, Fischer JP. Reoperation Through a Prosthetic-Reinforced Abdominal Wall and Its Association With Postoperative Outcomes and Longitudinal Health Care Utilization. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:908-916. [PMID: 35921101 PMCID: PMC9350843 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Prosthetic reinforcement of critically sized incisional hernias is necessary to decrease hernia recurrence, but long-term prosthetic-mesh footprint may increase complication risk during subsequent abdominal operations. Objective To investigate the association of prior incisional hernia repair with mesh (IHRWM) with postoperative outcomes and health care utilization after common abdominal operations. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing inpatient abdominal surgical procedures during the period of January 2009 to December 2016, with at least 1 year of follow-up within 5 geographically diverse statewide inpatient/ambulatory databases (Florida, Iowa, Nebraska, New York, Utah). History of an abdominal operation was ascertained within the 3-year period preceding the index operation. Patients admitted to the hospital with a history of an abdominal operation (ie, bariatric, cholecystectomy, small- or large-bowel resection, prostatectomy, gynecologic) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. Patients with prior IHRWM were propensity score matched (1:1) to controls both with and without a history of an abdominal surgical procedure based on clinical and operative characteristics. Data analysis was conducted from March 1 to November 27, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a composite of adverse postoperative outcomes (surgical and nonsurgical). Secondary outcomes included health care utilization determined by length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and 1-year readmissions. Logistic and Cox regression determined the association of prior IHRWM with the outcomes of interest. Additional subanalyses matched and compared patients with prior IHR without mesh (IHRWOM) to those with a history of an abdominal operation. Results Of the 914 105 patients undergoing common abdominal surgical procedures (81 123 bariatric [8.9%], 284 450 small- or large-bowel resection [31.1%], 223 768 cholecystectomy [24.5%], 33 183 prostatectomy [3.6%], and 291 581 gynecologic [31.9%]), all 3517 patients (age group: 46-55 years, 1547 [44.0%]; 2396 majority sex [68.1%]) with prior IHRWM were matched to patients without a history of abdominal surgical procedures. After matching, prior IHRWM was associated with increased overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60), surgical complications (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34-1.70), length of hospital stay (mean increase of 1.03 days; 95% CI, 0.56-1.49 days; P < .001), index admission charges (predicted mean difference of $11 896.10; 95% CI, $6096.80-$17 695.40; P < .001), and 1-year unplanned readmissions (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002). This trend persisted even when comparing matched patients with prior IHRWM to patients with a history of abdominal surgical procedures, and the treatment outcome disappeared when comparing patients with prior IHRWOM to those without a previous abdominal operation. Conclusions and Relevance Reoperation through a previously prosthetic-reinforced abdominal wall was associated with increased surgical complications and health care utilization. This risk appeared to be independent of a history of abdominal surgical procedures and was magnified by the presence of a prosthetic-mesh footprint in the abdominal wall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arturo J Rios-Diaz
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica R Cunning
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ankoor A Talwar
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Adrienne Christopher
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robyn B Broach
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jesse Y Hsu
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jon B Morris
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - John P Fischer
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding X, Zhu J, Liu A, Guo Q, Cao Q, Xu Y, Hua Y, Yang Y, Li P. Preparation and Biocompatibility Study of Contrast-Enhanced Hernia Mesh Material. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2022; 19:703-715. [PMID: 35612710 DOI: 10.1007/s13770-022-00460-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meshes play a crucial role in hernia repair. However, the displacement of mesh inevitably leads to various associated complications. This process is difficult to be traced by conventional imaging means. The purpose of this study is to create a contrast-enhanced material with high-density property that can be detected by computed tomography (CT). METHODS The contrast-enhanced monofilament was manufactured from barium sulfate nanoparticles and medical polypropylene (PP/Ba). To characterize the composite, stress tensile tests and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. Toxicity and biocompatibility of PP/Ba materials was verified by in vitro cellular assays. Meanwhile, the inflammatory response was tested by protein adsorption assay. In addition, an animal model was established to demonstrate the long-term radiographic effect of the composite material in vivo. Subsequent pathological tests confirmed its in vivo compatibility. RESULTS The SEM revealed that the main component of the monofilament is carbon. In vitro cell experiments demonstrated that novel material does not affect cell activity and proliferation. Protein adsorption assays indicated that the contrast-enhanced material does not cause additional inflammatory responses. In addition, in vivo experiments illustrated that PP/Ba mesh can be detected by CT and has good in vivo compatibility. CONCLUSION These results highlight the excellent biocompatibility of the contrast-enhanced material, which is suitable for human abdominal wall tissue engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuzhong Ding
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, China
| | - Jiachen Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, No. 19, Qixiu Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Anning Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, China
| | - Qiyang Guo
- Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Qing Cao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, China
| | - Ye Hua
- Department of Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yumin Yang
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, No. 19, Qixiu Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boullenger J, Lafuma F, Baudin Trehiou C, Blond L, Gibert S, Kulendra N. Transmural migration of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass into the intestine in three cats. J Small Anim Pract 2022; 63:792-796. [PMID: 35419828 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Subcutaneous ureteral bypass™ is a device placed in cats with ureteral obstruction. The most common complications include system occlusion, urinary tract infection and sterile cystitis. In this case series, we describe three cats with subcutaneous ureteral bypass devices placed where transmural migration of subcutaneous ureteral bypass catheters into the small intestine resulted in gastrointestinal signs, urinary infection and subcutaneous ureteral bypass occlusion. The system was changed in one case and removed in the other two. In all cases, an intestinal resection and anastomosis was performed. All cats had a good medium-term outcome, and urinary infection persisted in the case for which the subcutaneous ureteral bypass system was changed. Transmural migration of the device should be considered in cats with subcutaneous ureteral bypass presenting with persistent urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal signs or device obstruction, even if imaging studies such as ultrasound or contrast studies do not demonstrate any abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boullenger
- Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Languedocia, 34080 Montpellier, France
| | - F Lafuma
- Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Languedocia, 34080 Montpellier, France
| | - C Baudin Trehiou
- Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Languedocia, 34080 Montpellier, France
| | - L Blond
- Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Languedocia, 34080 Montpellier, France
| | - S Gibert
- Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Languedocia, 34080 Montpellier, France
| | - N Kulendra
- North Downs Specialist Referrals, Bletchingley, RH1 4QP, UK.,Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL97TA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leach JR, Manoukian B, Stewart L. Mesh on the move: a case report of total transmural surgical mesh migration causing bowel obstruction. Clin J Gastroenterol 2020; 14:136-140. [PMID: 33241525 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-020-01291-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
We present the case of a 60-year-old man with a complex medical history, presenting to the hospital with generalized weakness and found to be markedly hyperglycemic. Early in the patient's hospital course, he developed abdominal pain and was found to have a small bowel obstruction secondary to intraluminal migrated surgical mesh entrapped in the terminal ileum. The bowel obstruction was relieved surgically with uncomplicated mesh removal and ileocecectomy. Surgical mesh migration is a relatively rare complication of hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction, and intraluminal mesh migration is an even more rare variant. Our case demonstrates key clinical and imaging features and serves as an important example of how such cases may present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ryan Leach
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Department of Radiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement St, Building 200, Room 2D-008, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.
| | - Bryan Manoukian
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Lygia Stewart
- Department of Surgery, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Petersen K, Morrison J, Oprea V, Grischkan D, Koch A, Lorenz R, Bendavid R, Iakovlev V. Necessary duration of follow-up to assess complications of mesh in hernia surgery: a time-lapse study based on 460 explants. Hernia 2020; 25:1239-1251. [PMID: 32960368 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02297-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk of complications following hernia repair is the key parameter to assess risk/benefit ratio of a technique. As mesh devices are permanent, their risks are life-long. Too many reports in the past assessed mesh safety prematurely after short follow-ups. We aimed to explore what length of follow up would reveal the full extent of complications. METHODS Time lapses between implantation and excision were analyzed in 460 cases of meshes excised for complications after hernia repair. Patterns of percentage growth and time lapses at 50th and 95th percentiles were used to compare groups of different hernia type, age, gender and reason for excision. RESULTS The 50th and 95th case percentiles in the dataset were at 3.75 and 15.0 years between mesh implantation and excision. For hernia types, the longest time lapses were for groin hernias (4.0 and 16.11 years at 50th and 95th percentiles). The shortest were for umbilical hernias (2.16 and 9.68 years). Males had later excisions than females (4.11 and 16.1 vs. 2.47 and 9.79 years). Younger patients (< 45 y.o.) had later excisions than older patients (4.12 and 17.68 vs. 3.37 and 10.0 years). Out of all subgroups, the longest time lapses were for groin hernias in younger males (4.77 and 18.89 years) and for mesh erosion into organs (4.67 and 17.0 years). CONCLUSIONS Follow-up of more than 15 years is needed to fully assess complications after mesh hernia repair. Especially longer periods are needed to detect mesh erosion into organs and complications in younger males. Presently, short observations and lack of reporting standard in the literature prohibit accurate assessment of complication risks. We propose to use cumulative incidence for standardized risk reporting (y% risk at x years). This will show time-dependent patterns and allow comparisons between different techniques and studies of variable duration. Standardization will also help to predict long-term risks beyond shorter (practical) follow-ups and facilitate real-time monitoring during surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Morrison
- Chatham Kent Health Alliance, Chatham, Ontario, Canada
| | - V Oprea
- Military Hospital of Cluj, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Romania
| | | | - A Koch
- Day Surgery and Hernia Center, Cottbus, Germany
| | - R Lorenz
- , Hernia Center 3+CHIRURGEN, Berlin, Germany
| | - R Bendavid
- Department of Surgery, Shouldice Hospital, Thornhill, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - V Iakovlev
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee Y, Bae BN. Transmural Mesh Migration From the Abdominal Wall to the Rectum After Hernia Repair Using a Prolene Mesh: A Case Report. Ann Coloproctol 2020; 37:S28-S33. [PMID: 32674553 PMCID: PMC8359694 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.04.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Mesh erosion or migration is a rare and late complication after hernia repair. Its incidence is increasing as the utilization of prosthetic mesh gains popularity for abdominal hernia repair. However, mesh migration is exceedingly rare and its clinical presentation is atypical and diverse. Therefore, the management of mesh migration should be individualized to each patient. This research reports the case of a 94-year-old man with transmural migration of Prolene mesh (Ethicon) from the abdominal wall to the rectum 14 years after incisional hernia repair. He presented with only chronic abdominal pain and constipation. Migration of the mesh and a fistula between the right abdominal wall and transverse colon was observed on computed tomography. The mesh was evacuated manually from the anus without any sequelae. These findings made this case atypical, since complete transluminal migration of mesh is exceedingly rare and mesh erosion or migration requires surgical treatment in many cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujin Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Noe Bae
- Department of General Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Manzini G, Henne-Bruns D, Kremer M. Severe complications after mesh migration following abdominal hernial repair: report of two cases and review of literature. GMS INTERDISCIPLINARY PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY DGPW 2019; 8:Doc09. [PMID: 31275799 PMCID: PMC6545489 DOI: 10.3205/iprs000135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Migration of mesh after ventral and incisional hernia repair is a rare but well described complication. The aim of our work is to present two cases of mesh migration after incisional hernia repair and to review the current literature. Methods: We describe the two cases of mesh migration that occurred at our department. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature search. Results: In both cases we observed a mesh migration with formation of an entero-cutaneous fistula that required surgical therapy. In the literature search we found a total of 16 publications dealing with mesh migration after incisional (n=14) and ventral hernia (n=2) repair in adult patients (15 case reports and one retrospective study). In 9 out of 15 patients (54%) who presented with mesh migration or erosion, a polypropylene mesh was responsible for this complication. Conclusions: Mesh migration after abdominal hernia repair is rare, the only available retrospective study reports a rate of 2.7%. The ability of polypropylene mesh to migrate into hollow viscera is well known and confirmed both by our data and the results of the literature review. As the incidence of mesh erosion/migration is significantly lower than the recurrence rate after hernia repair without mesh, up to now, no better alternative exists for the treatment of abdominal wall hernia than mesh augmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Manzini
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Germany
| | - Doris Henne-Bruns
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Kremer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Germany.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Isherwood J, Stephenson J, Rees Y, Bhardwaj N. Unusual case of post-operative small bowel obstruction. ANZ J Surg 2019; 90:389-391. [PMID: 31066185 DOI: 10.1111/ans.15170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John Isherwood
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - James Stephenson
- Department of Radiology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Yvonne Rees
- Department of Radiology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Neil Bhardwaj
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chronic anemia due to transmural e-PTFE anti-adhesive barrier mesh migration in the small bowel after open incisional hernia repair: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2018; 53:54-57. [PMID: 30384142 PMCID: PMC6214886 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Mesh related unusual complication. Intraluminal mesh migration. Mesh erosion.
Introduction Meshes are commonly employed in abdominal hernia repair to reduce recurrence rates. Prosthetic repair, however, increases the risk of mesh related complications, including migration into adjacent viscera and erosion which can occur as uncommon and can be difficult to be diagnose. Presentation of case This is a case of transmural migration of composite mesh into the bowel, presenting as chronic abdominal pain and anemia 14 years after incisional hernia repair. Discussion Mesh implantation in hernia repair has increased the incidence of complications, such as seroma, hematoma and infection. Migration into adjacent viscera and erosion may present as complications related to the use of meshes. Their precise frequency after abdominal wall hernia repair is not well known and their late occurrence can make the diagnosis difficult. Conclusion Transmural migration of composite mesh is an uncommon complication of incisional hernia repair. Its pathogenesis is still not completely clear but it has been reported many years after implant surgery. It should be considered in a typical presentation of patients with history of previous prosthetic ventral hernia repair.
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel R, Reid TH, Parker SG, Windsor A. Intraluminal mesh migration causing enteroenteric and enterocutaneous fistula: a case and discussion of the 'mesh problem'. BMJ Case Rep 2018; 2018:bcr-2017-223476. [PMID: 29666083 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-223476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of synthetic mesh in the abdominal compartment has recently become a topic of debate as high profile public cases have called into question their safety. Several case reports have demonstrated significant complications due to intra-abdominal mesh. Furthermore, some studies have suggested that the rates of these severe complications are underestimated. We present the case of a patient who developed an enteroenteric and enterocutaenous fistulae, an abdominal wall collection and an intraperitoneal inflammatory mass from intraluminal migration of a synthetic mesh inserted during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. We discuss the considerations and complications of using synthetic mesh for ventral hernia repair and discuss the scientific evidence behind the increasingly apparent 'mesh problem'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reeya Patel
- General Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas H Reid
- General Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sam G Parker
- General Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alistair Windsor
- General Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsapralis D, Vasiliades G, Zaxou Z, Delimpaltadaki M, Margetousakis TH, Papadakis H, Machairas A, Misiakos EP. Bowel obstruction secondary to migration of a Ventralex mesh: report of a rare complication. Hernia 2018; 22:711-714. [PMID: 29372340 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1720-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D Tsapralis
- Department of General Surgery, General Hospital/Health Center of Ierapetra, Ierapetra, Crete, Greece
| | - G Vasiliades
- Department of General Surgery, General Hospital/Health Center of Ierapetra, Ierapetra, Crete, Greece
| | - Z Zaxou
- Department of General Surgery, General Hospital/Health Center of Ierapetra, Ierapetra, Crete, Greece
| | - M Delimpaltadaki
- Department of General Surgery, General Hospital/Health Center of Ierapetra, Ierapetra, Crete, Greece
| | - T H Margetousakis
- Department of General Surgery, General Hospital/Health Center of Ierapetra, Ierapetra, Crete, Greece
| | - H Papadakis
- Department of General Surgery, General Hospital/Health Center of Ierapetra, Ierapetra, Crete, Greece
| | - A Machairas
- 3rd Department of General Surgery, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Chaidari, Athens, Greece
| | - E P Misiakos
- 3rd Department of General Surgery, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Chaidari, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|