Complications of skull reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy

Infection-related failure of autologous versus allogenic cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Cranioplasty is required after decompressive craniectomy (DC) to restore brain protection and cosmetic appearance, as well as to optimize rehabilitation potential from underlying disease. Although the procedure is straightforward, complications either caused by bone flap resorption (BFR) or graft infection (GI), contribute to relevant comorbidity and increasing health care cost. Synthetic calvarial implants (allogenic cranioplasty) are not susceptible to resorption and cumulative failure rates (BFR and GI) tend therefore to be lower in comparison with autologous bone. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to pool existing evidence of infection-related cranioplasty failure in autologous versus allogenic cranioplasty, when bone resorption is removed from the equation.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science medical databases was performed on three time points (2018, 2020 and 2022). All clinical studies published between January 2010 and December 2022, in which autologous and allogenic cranioplasty was performed after DC, were considered for inclusion. Studies including non-DC cranioplasty and cranioplasty in children were excluded. The cranioplasty failure rate based on GI in both autologous and allogenic groups was noted. Data were extracted by means of standardized tables and all included studies were subjected to a risk of bias (RoB) assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment tool.

Results

A total of 411 articles were identified and screened. After duplicate removal, 106 full-texts were analyzed. Eventually, 14 studies fulfilled the defined inclusion criteria including one randomized controlled trial, one prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies. All but one study were rated as of poor quality based on the RoB analysis, mainly due to lacking disclosure why which material (autologous vs. allogenic) was chosen and how GI was defined. The infection-related cranioplasty failure rate was 6.9% (125/1808) for autologous and 8.3% (63/761) for allogenic implants resulting in an OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.13 (Z ​= ​1.24; p ​= ​0.22).

Conclusion

In respect to infection-related cranioplasty failure, autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy does not underperform compared to synthetic implants. This result must be interpreted in light of limitations of existing studies. Risk of graft infection does not seem a valid argument to prefer one implant material over the other. Offering an economically superior, biocompatible and perfect fitting cranioplasty implant, autologous cranioplasty can still have a role as the first option in patients with low risk of developing osteolysis or for whom BFR might not be of major concern.

Trial registration

This systematic review was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. PROSPERO: CRD42018081720.

Predictive Factors of Surgical Site Infection Following Cranioplasty: A Study Including 3D Printed Implants

In patients who have undergone decompressive craniectomy (DC), subsequent cranioplasty is required to reconstruct cranial defects. Surgical site infection (SSI) following cranioplasty is a devastating complication that can lead to cranioplasty failure. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to identify predictive factors for SSI following cranioplasty by reviewing procedures performed over a 10-year period. A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who underwent cranioplasty following DC between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution. The patients were divided into two groups, non-SSI and SSI, in order to identify clinical variables that are significantly correlated with SSI following cranioplasty. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were then performed to identify predictive factors associated with SSI following cranioplasty. A total of 172 patients who underwent cranioplasty, including 48 who received customized three-dimensional (3D) printed implants, were enrolled in the present study. SSI occurred in 17 patients (9.9%). Statistically significant differences were detected between the non-SSI and SSI groups with respect to presence of fluid collections on CT scans before and after cranioplasty. Presence of fluid collections on computed tomography (CT) scan before (p = 0.0114) and after cranioplasty (p < 0.0000) showed significant association with event-free survival rate for SSI. In a univariate analysis, significant predictors for SSI were fluid collection before (p = 0.0172) and after (p < 0.0001) cranioplasty. In a multivariate analysis, only the presence of fluid collection after cranioplasty was significantly associated with the occurrence of SSI (p < 0.0001). The present study investigated predictive factors that may help identify patients at risk of SSI following cranioplasty and provide guidelines associated with the procedure. Based on the results of the present study, only the presence of fluid collection on CT scan after cranioplasty was significantly associated with the occurrence of SSI. Further investigation with long-term follow-up and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.

An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy

OBJECTIVE

Performing a cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniotomy is a straightforward neurosurgical procedure, but it remains associated with a high complication rate. Surgical site infection (SSI), aseptic bone resorption (aBR), and need for a secondary CP are the most common complications. This observational study aimed to identify modifiable risk factors to prevent CP failure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients who underwent CP following decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) between 2010 and 2018 at a single institution. Predictors of SSI, aBR, and need for allograft CP were evaluated in a univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six patients treated with CP after DHC were included. The diagnoses leading to a DHC were as follows: stroke (83 patients, 44.6%), traumatic brain injury (55 patients, 29.6%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (33 patients, 17.7%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (15 patients, 8.1%). Post-CP SSI occurred in 25 patients (13.4%), whereas aBR occurred in 32 cases (17.2%). An altered posterior question-mark incision, ending behind the ear, was associated with a significantly lower infection rate and CP failure, compared to the classic question-mark incision (6.3% vs 18.4%; p = 0.021). The only significant predictor of aBR was patient age, in which those developing resorption were on average 16 years younger than those without aBR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary goal of this retrospective cohort analysis was to identify adjustable risk factors to prevent post-CP complications. In this analysis, a posterior question-mark incision proved beneficial regarding infection and CP failure. The authors believe that these findings are caused by the better vascularized skin flap due to preservation of the superficial temporal artery and partial preservation of the occipital artery. In this trial, the posterior question-mark incision was identified as an easily and costless adaptable technique to reduce CP failure rates.

The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review

The use of autologous bone flap for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy is a widely used strategy that allows alleviating health expenses. When the patient has recovered from the primary insult, the cranioplasty restores protection and cosmesis, recovering fluid dynamics and improving neurological status. During this time, the bone flap must be stored, but there is a lack of standardization of tissue banking practices for this aim. In this work, we have reviewed the literature on tissue processing and storage practices. Most of the published articles are focused from a strictly clinical and surgical point of view, paying less attention to issues related to tissue manipulation. When bone resorption is avoided and the risk of infection is controlled, the autograft represents the most efficient choice, with the lowest risk of complication. Otherwise, depending on the degree of involvement, the patient may have to undergo new surgery, assuming further risks and higher healthcare costs. Therefore, tissue banks must implement protocols to provide products with the highest possible clinical effectiveness, without compromising safety. With a centralised management of tissue banking practices there may be a more uniform approach, thus facilitating the standardization of procedures and guidelines.

Reduction in the infection rate of cranioplasty with a tailored antibiotic prophylaxis: a nonrandomized study

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty carries a high risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) for a scheduled procedure, particularly with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

METHODS

The goal of this retrospective study was to measure the effect of tailored antibiotic prophylaxis on SSIs resulting from cranioplasties. The authors collected a prospective database of cranioplasties from 2009 to 2018. Risk factors for SSI were registered, as well as infection occurring during the first year postoperatively. A new protocol was initiated in 2016 consisting of antibiotic prophylaxis tailored to the colonizing flora of the skin of the scalp and decolonization of patients who were nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); infection rates were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred nine cranioplasties were identified, 64 in the old protocol and 45 in the new protocol. Of the 109 cranioplasties, 16 (14.7%) suffered an infection, 14 (21.9%) in the old protocol group and 2 (4.4%) in the new protocol group (OR for the new protocol 0.166, 95% CI 0.036-0.772). Multiple surgeries (OR 3.44), Barthel ≤ 70 (OR 3.53), and previous infection (OR 3.9) were risk factors for SSI. Of the bacteria identified in the skin of the scalp, 22.2% were resistant to routine prophylaxis (cefazoline). Only one patient was identified as a nasal carrier of MRSA and was decolonized.

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of bacteria resistant to routine prophylaxis (cefazoline) was identified in the skin of these patients' scalps. The use of tailored antibiotic prophylaxis reduced significantly the infection rate in this particular set of patients.

Establishment and Characteristic Analysis of a Dog Model for Autologous Homologous Cranioplasty

Objective

The aim of this study is to establish a large animal (dog) model that can be referred clinically for autologous homologous cranioplasty.

Methods

Our large skull defect dog model was established by emulating the decompressive craniectomy with 22 adult beagle dogs. The autologous bones were taken out from the dogs and divided into two groups, the freeze-drying (FD) group and the single freezing (SF) group. They were then stored in the bone bank at -20°C after being irradiated with 25 KGy. Three months later, the bones were reimplanted. After operation, we closely watch the experimental objects for four more months examining the infection and survival of the bone graft.

Results

Through macroscopic observation, it was found that, among 44 cranial flaps (bilateral) from the rest of the 22 dogs, grade A cranial flaps accounted for 86.4% (19/22) in the SF group and only 31.8% (7/22) in the FD group. Although osteogenic osteoclast, Harvard tube, neovascularization, and angiogenic factors were found through the pathological results, including an electron microscope and calmodulin tracer, it could be verified by using X-CT and micro-CT that early bone resorption could be still found even in grade A bone flap.

Conclusion

By using the common clinical method to preserve the cranial flaps, we established an experimental dog model of autologous cranioplasty for a large area of cranial defect. It was proved that this model could reproduce the infections and bone resorption which typically happened in clinical autologous homologous cranioplasty. As a conclusion, the established model can be used as an effective experimental tool for further research to improve the success rate of autologous homologous cranioplasty.