1
|
Effects of a Dulaglutide plus Calorie-Restricted Diet versus a Calorie-Restricted Diet on Visceral Fat and Metabolic Profiles in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15030556. [PMID: 36771262 PMCID: PMC9920202 DOI: 10.3390/nu15030556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The effects of dulaglutide and a calorie-restricted diet (CRD) on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and metabolic profiles in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have not been extensively investigated. In this study, we investigated whether dulaglutide combined with CRD could further reduce VAT and promote clinical benefits as compared with a CRD regimen alone in overweight or obese PCOS-affected women. Between May 2021 and May 2022, this single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial was conducted. Overall, 243 participants with PCOS were screened, of which 68 overweight or obese individuals were randomly randomized to undergo dulaglutide combined with CRD treatment (n = 35) or CRD treatment alone (n = 33). The duration of intervention was set as the time taken to achieve a 7% weight loss goal from baseline body weight, which was restricted to 6 months. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change in VAT area reduction between the groups. The secondary endpoints contained changes in menstrual frequency, metabolic profiles, hormonal parameters, liver fat, and body composition. As compared with the CRD group, the dulaglutide + CRD group had a considerably shorter median time to achieve 7% weight loss. There was no significant between-group difference in area change of VAT reduction (-0.97 cm2, 95% confidence interval from -14.36 to 12.42, p = 0.884). As compared with CRD alone, dulaglutide + CRD had significant advantages in reducing glycated hemoglobin A1c and postprandial plasma glucose levels. The results of the analyses showed different changes in menstruation frequency, additional metabolic profiles, hormonal markers, liver fat, and body composition between the two groups did not differ significantly. Nausea, vomiting, constipation, and loss of appetite were the main adverse events of dulaglutide. These results emphasize the value of dietary intervention as the first line of treatment for PCOS-affected women, while glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist therapy provides an efficient and typically well tolerated adjuvant therapy to aid in reaching weight targets based on dietary therapy in the population of overweight/obese PCOS-affected women.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ponce de León-Ballesteros G, Sánchez-Aguilar HA, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Herrera MF. Reaching LDL-C Targets in Patients with Moderate, High, and Very High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease After Bariatric Surgery According to Different Guidelines. Obes Surg 2021; 31:2087-2096. [PMID: 33469858 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05221-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is highly prevalent in obese patients and is the leading cause of death. High levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with higher coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the achievement of the currently proposed cardiovascular prevention goals after 1 year. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis from a prospectively built database of patients who underwent a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2004 to 2018. Patients with intermediate, high, or very high risk for CVD according to the 2018 AHA/ACC or the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines were selected. An analysis of clinical and biochemical variables in 1 year was performed. Logistic multivariate regressions were made to assess the impact of preoperative and weight loss parameters in the achievement of LDL-C goals. RESULTS From 1039 patients, 70 met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis of the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines, and 75 in the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Mean decrease in LDL-C levels was 21.1 ± 40.2 mg/dL 1 year after surgery, and 29/34 patients were off medications. The percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals according to the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines was 27.1%, whereas according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, the percentages was 9.3%. The %TWL was associated with achieving LDL-C goals according to the 2018 AHA/ACC at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS RYGB induces a significant weight loss and an improvement in LDL-C levels 1 year after surgery. The number of patients that reached the goals varies according to the guidelines used and ranged from 9.3 to 27.1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hugo A Sánchez-Aguilar
- Clinic for Nutrition and Obesity, ABC Medical Center, 116, Sur 136, Las Américas, Álvaro Obregón, 01120, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Carlos A Aguilar-Salinas
- Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Metabólicas, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.,Direccion de Nutricion, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.,Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Ave. Morones Prieto 3000, 64710, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico
| | - Miguel F Herrera
- Clinic for Nutrition and Obesity, ABC Medical Center, 116, Sur 136, Las Américas, Álvaro Obregón, 01120, Mexico City, Mexico. .,Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El Soueidy T, Kassir R, Nakhoul M, Balian A, Nunziante M, Safieddine M, Perlemuter G, Lainas P, Dagher I. Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication for the Treatment of Obesity: a Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2020; 31:1168-1182. [PMID: 33215360 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05112-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the last decade, laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) has been used as a bariatric procedure for the treatment of obesity, regarded as less invasive and less expensive than other surgical bariatric procedures. We aimed to systematically review the literature and highlight recent clinical data regarding outcomes of LGCP in the treatment of obesity. METHODS A comprehensive research of Pubmed database on LGCP was performed. The search was conducted on the first of May 2020 and was not limited to any date range. Outcomes of interest were surgical technique, postoperative complications, weight loss outcomes, comorbidities improvement or resolution, and revisional surgeries after technical failure or weight regain. RESULTS Fifty-three articles were eligible for inclusion, with 3103 patients undergoing LGCP (mean age: 13.8-55 years). Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) ranged from 31.2 to 47.8 kg/m2. Mean operative time ranged from 48 to 193 min. Length of hospital stay ranged from 0.75 to 7.2 days. Most studies provided postoperative follow-up up to 12 months. Mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) ranged from 30.2 to 71.1% and 35 to 77.1% at 6 and 12 months post-LGCP, respectively. Only one study followed patients for more than 10 years and mean %EWL at 1, 5, and 10 years was 67%, 55%, and 42%, respectively. CONCLUSION LGCP seems to be an acceptable surgical procedure for the treatment of obesity, especially in centers having a low medical budget. However, most existing comparative studies report superiority of LSG regarding weight loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni El Soueidy
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Radwan Kassir
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, CHU de la Réunion, Saint Denis, de la Réunion, France.
| | - Mary Nakhoul
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Axel Balian
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Antoine-Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92140, Clamart, France
| | - Marco Nunziante
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, CHU de la Réunion, Saint Denis, de la Réunion, France
| | - Maissa Safieddine
- Methodological Support Unit, INSERM, CIC1410, CHU Felix-Guyon, St-Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Gabriel Perlemuter
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Antoine-Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92140, Clamart, France.,Paris-Saclay University, F-91405, Orsay, France
| | - Panagiotis Lainas
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92140, Clamart, France.,Paris-Saclay University, F-91405, Orsay, France
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92140, Clamart, France.,Paris-Saclay University, F-91405, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|