1
|
Mangieri CW, Valenzuela CD, Solsky IB, Erali RA, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Exposure to Neoadjuvant Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy, Does it Effect Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy Perfusion? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2486-2493. [PMID: 36484904 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12933-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are commonly exposed to oxaliplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) regimens. The impact of systemic exposure to oxaliplatin prior to HIPEC with oxaliplatin is unknown. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional registry of CRS/HIPEC cases who received oxaliplatin-containing NAT, and compared patients who underwent HIPEC with oxaliplatin versus cases perfused with mitomycin C. The primary outcome was survival, defined by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Subgroup analysis was performed based on primary tumor etiology and completeness of cytoreduction. RESULTS A total of 333 cases satisfied the selection criteria-159 appendiceal primaries (all high-grade disease) and 174 colorectal cases. Thirty-one cases (9.3%) underwent HIPEC with oxaliplatin, with the remaining 302 cases (90.7%) receiving mitomycin C. Both cohorts were identical in regard to baseline characteristics, and both groups were alike in regard to NAT regimens and oxaliplatin exposure. There was no difference in survival outcomes. OS times were 2.9 (± 2.8) and 2.8 ( ± 3.6) years for oxaliplatin and mitomycin C perfusions, respectively (p = 0.94), and the 5-year OS rates were also similar at 9.7 and 18.5% (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-1.67, p = 0.24) for oxaliplatin and mitomycin cases, respectively. Likewise, DFS findings were similar, with survival of 2.5 (± 4.5) and 1.8 (± 2.4) years for oxaliplatin and mitomycin perfusions, respectively (p = 0.21). There was no difference in 5-year DFS rates, at 10.5 and 7.8% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.30-6.56, p = 0.68) for oxaliplatin and mitomycin C, respectively. Subgroup analysis found minimal discordant findings from the main results. CONCLUSION This analysis found no discernable association with NAT oxaliplatin exposure in regard to survival outcomes following CRS/HIPEC stratified out by perfusion agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Mangieri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Cristian D Valenzuela
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ian B Solsky
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Richard A Erali
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Perry Shen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El Asmar A, Delcourt M, Kamden L, Khaled C, Bohlok A, Moreau M, Sclafani F, Donckier V, Liberale G. Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serological Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1863-1869. [PMID: 36350459 PMCID: PMC9908702 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12736-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (PMCRC) is associated with a high risk of postoperative morbidity, thus making patient selection of upmost importance. Further to data showing an association between preoperative serological biomarkers and patient outcome in various solid tumors, in this study we aim to evaluate their prognostic value in patients with PMCRC treated with curative intent. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective study including patients with PMCRC treated by complete CRS ± HIPEC at our institution between 2011 and 2020. Preoperative serological biomarkers, along with other standard clinicopathological variables, were studied to determine their prognostic value. RESULTS A total of 94 out of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (46%) presented with synchronous PM. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 6. On univariate analysis, a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with poor prognosis in terms of overall survival (OS) [cutoff 3.567, hazard ratio (HR) 2.8 (1.4-5.3), p = 0.002], whereas a higher platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predicted favorable prognosis in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) [cutoff 185.4, HR 1.9 (1.07-3.53), p = 0.030]. On multivariate analysis, NLR > 3.567, positive lymph nodes (LNs), and PCI > 7 were independent predictive factors for worse OS, whereas NLR > 3.567 and positive LNs were significantly associated with worse DFS. PLR > 185.4 was associated with better DFS. CONCLUSION High preoperative NLR (> 3.567) and PLR (> 185.4) can predict outcome of patients with PMCRC treated by complete CRS ± HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine El Asmar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Martin Delcourt
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Leonel Kamden
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Charif Khaled
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ali Bohlok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Moreau
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francesco Sclafani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Donckier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gabriel Liberale
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mangieri CW, Moaven O, Valenzuela CD, Erali RA, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Utility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in cases of incomplete cytoreductive surgery. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:703-711. [PMID: 34841542 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is typically reserved for a complete or optimal cytoreduction. There is the potential for therapeutic effect of HIPEC with an incomplete cytoreduction, particularly for near optimal cytoreductions. METHODS Retrospective review of incomplete cytoreductions (R2b, R2c) for appendiceal and colorectal primaries. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analysis for primary etiology and specific cytoreductive score. RESULTS A total of 121 cases of incomplete CRS, 74 CRS alone, and 47 CRS-HIPEC. For the entire study group there was a survival benefit with HIPEC. OS and PFS were 2.3 versus 1.4 (p = 0.001) and 1.6 versus 0.7 (p < 0.0001) respectively for cases with and without HIPEC. Subgroup analysis of appendiceal neoplasms, 43 CRS-HIPEC and 50 CRS alone, found HIPEC benefit persisted; OS and PFS were 2.4 versus 1.5 (p = 0.016) and 1.7 versus 0.8 (p < 0.0001), respectively for cases with and without HIPEC. Benefit most pronounced in low-grade cases with doubling of the OS and PFS (p = 0.004). With colorectal primary cases, 10 CRS-HIPEC and 18 CRS alone, no difference in OS and PFS. When stratifying out by cytoreduction scores, R2b and R2c, HIPEC only provided a benefit for R2b cases; OS and PFS for R2b cases were 2.28 versus 1.01 (p = 0.011) and 1.67 versus 0.75 (p = 0.001), respectively for cases with and without HIPEC. CONCLUSION HIPEC has utility for incomplete cytoreductions with appendiceal neoplasms, greatest effect with low-grade appendiceal neoplasms. HIPEC is only beneficial for near optimal cytoreductions (R2b).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Mangieri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Omeed Moaven
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Cristian D Valenzuela
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard A Erali
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Surgical Oncology Section, Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Preclinical In Vivo-Models to Investigate HIPEC; Current Methodologies and Challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143430. [PMID: 34298644 PMCID: PMC8303745 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) depends on patient selection, tumor type, delivery technique, and treatment parameters such as temperature, carrier solution, type of drug, dosage, volume, and treatment duration. Preclinical research offers a powerful tool to investigate the impact of these parameters and to assists in designing potentially more effective treatment protocols and clinical trials. This study aims to review the objectives, methods, and clinical relevance of in vivo preclinical HIPEC studies found in the literature. In total, 60 articles were included in this study. The selected articles were screened on the HIPEC parameters. Recommendations are provided and possible pitfalls are discussed on the choice of type of animal and tumor model per stratified parameters and study goal. The guidelines presented in this paper can improve the clinical relevance and impact of future in vivo HIPEC experiments. Abstract Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment modality for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of various origins which aims for cure in combination with cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Efficacy of CRS-HIPEC depends on patient selection, tumor type, delivery technique, and treatment parameters such as temperature, carrier solution, type of drug, dosage, volume, and treatment duration. Preclinical research offers a powerful tool to investigate the impact of these parameters and to assist in designing potentially more effective treatment protocols and clinical trials. The different methodologies for peritoneal disease and HIPEC are variable. This study aims to review the objectives, methods, and clinical relevance of in vivo preclinical HIPEC studies found in the literature. In this review, recommendations are provided and possible pitfalls are discussed on the choice of type of animal and tumor model per stratified parameters and study goal. The guidelines presented in this paper can improve the clinical relevance and impact of future in vivo HIPEC experiments.
Collapse
|
5
|
Yurttas C, Horvath P, Fischer I, Meisner C, Nadalin S, Königsrainer I, Königsrainer A, Beckert S, Löffler MW. A Prospective, Phase I/II, Open-Label Pilot Trial to Assess the Safety of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After Oncological Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9086-9095. [PMID: 34131821 PMCID: PMC8205203 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10187-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common fatal disease with unfavorable prognosis, even after oncological resection. To improve survival, adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been suggested. Whether HIPEC entails disproportional short-term mortality is unknown and a prospectively determined adverse events profile is lacking. Since both pancreatic resection and HIPEC may relevantly influence morbidity and mortality, this uncontrolled single-arm, open-label, phase I/II pilot trial was designed to assess the 30-day mortality rate, treatment feasibility, and adverse events connected with HIPEC after oncological pancreatic surgery. METHODS This trial recruited patients scheduled for PDAC resection. A sample size of 16 patients receiving study interventions was estimated to establish a predefined margin of treatment-associated short-term mortality with a power of > 80%. Patients achieving complete macroscopic resection received HIPEC with gemcitabine administered at 1000 mg/m2 body surface area heated to 42 °C for 1 hour. RESULTS Within 30 days after intervention, no patient died or experienced any adverse events higher than grade 3 that were related to HIPEC. Furthermore, treatment-related adverse events were prospectively documented and categorized as expected or unexpected. This trial supports that the actual mortality rate after PDAC resection and HIPEC is below 10%. HIPEC treatment proved feasible in 89% of patients allocated to intervention. Pancreatic fistulas, as key complications after pancreas surgery, occurred in 3/13 patients under risk. CONCLUSION Combined pancreas resection and gemcitabine HIPEC proved feasible and safe, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Based on these results, further clinical evaluation can be justified. REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02863471 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Yurttas
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Horvath
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Imma Fischer
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Meisner
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ingmar Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC2180) 'Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies', University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Beckert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | - Markus W Löffler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC2180) 'Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies', University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,Interfaculty Institute for Cell Biology, Department of Immunology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carboni F, Valle M. Limitations of the PRODIGE 7 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e176. [PMID: 33932374 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00088-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Carboni
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome 00144, Italy.
| | - Mario Valle
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome 00144, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brind'Amour A, Dubé P, Tremblay JF, Soucisse ML, Mack L, Bouchard-Fortier A, McCart JA, Govindarajan A, Bischof D, Haase E, Giacomantonio C, Hebbard P, Younan R, MacNeill A, Boulanger-Gobeil C, Sidéris L. Canadian guidelines on the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e621-e631. [PMID: 33380878 PMCID: PMC7755452 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern management of colorectal cancer (crc) with peritoneal metastasis (pm) is based on a combination of cytoreductive surgery (crs), systemic chemotherapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec). Although the role of hipec has recently been questioned with respect to results from the prodige 7 trial, the role and benefit of a complete crs were confirmed, as observed with a 41-month gain in median survival in that study, and 15% of patients remaining disease-free at 5 years. Still, crc with pm is associated with a poor prognosis, and good patient selection is essential. Many questions about the optimal management approach for such patients remain, but all patients with pm from crc should be referred to, or discussed with, a pm surgical oncologist, because cure is possible. The objective of the present guideline is to offer a practical approach to the management of pm from crc and to reflect on the new practice standards set by recent publications on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Brind'Amour
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, chu de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City
| | - P Dubé
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - J F Tremblay
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - M L Soucisse
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | - L Mack
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - J A McCart
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - A Govindarajan
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - D Bischof
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - E Haase
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | | | - P Hebbard
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - R Younan
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - A MacNeill
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | | - L Sidéris
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koh CE, Ansari N, Morris D, Moran B. Beware mis-representation of PRODIGE 7: danger of throwing out the cytoreductive surgery baby with the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy bathwater. ANZ J Surg 2020; 89:992-994. [PMID: 31522482 DOI: 10.1111/ans.15424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cherry E Koh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,SOuRCe (Surgical Outcomes Research Centre), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nabila Ansari
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,SOuRCe (Surgical Outcomes Research Centre), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Morris
- Peritoneal Malignancy Unit, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brendan Moran
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Peritoneal Malignancy Institute Basingstoke, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pocard M, Reymond MA. "Peritoneal failure": A new concept to explain negative results of randomized trials evaluating intraperitoneal therapies. Pleura Peritoneum 2020; 5:20200117. [PMID: 32566729 PMCID: PMC7292232 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Pocard
- Université de Paris, INSERM UMR 1275 CAP Paris-Tech, F-75010Paris, France
- Service de chirurgie digestive et cancérologique Hôpital Lariboisière 2 rue AmbroiseParé, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Marc A. Reymond
- National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum (NCPP) Tübingen University, Tübingen72076, Germany
| |
Collapse
|