Patella osteotomy for lateral retinaculum decompression in total knee arthroplasty

Management of patella maltracking after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Patella maltracking is among the most frequent causes of poor outcomes and early failure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with an incidence that ranges from 1 to 20%. Even if there is agreement between authors regarding the preoperative and intraoperative management of patella maltracking in TKA, less clear are postoperative conducts. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize and compare surgical techniques used to treat patella maltracking after TKA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed with a primary search on Medline through PubMed. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were used to edit the review. Screened studies had to provide clinical, functional and radiological results and complications of the proposed treatment to be included in the review.

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles were finally included. Three main types of surgical procedures and other minor techniques have been identified to manage patella maltracking after TKA. The choice of the proper technique to use in the specific case depends on several factors, first of all the malpositioning of the prosthetic components.

CONCLUSION

Patella maltracking after TKA represents a frequent and challenging problem for orthopedic surgeons. Treatments described in the literature are often able to correct an abnormal patellar tracking; nevertheless, authors report variable percentages of residual knee pain and dissatisfaction in re-treated patients. Therefore, it would be desirable to prevent the maltracking condition at the time of primary arthroplasty, using proper surgical precautions.

Patellar complications after total knee arthroplasty

Patellar complications are a source of poor total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes that can require re-operation or prosthetic revision. Complications can occur with or without patellar resurfacing. The objective of this work is to answer six questions. (1) Have risk factors been identified, and can they help to prevent patellar complications? Patellar complications are associated with valgus, obesity, lateral retinacular release, and a thin patella. Selecting a prosthetic trochlea that will ensure proper patellar tracking is important. Resurfacing is an option if patellar thickness is greater than 12mm. (2) What is the best management of patellar fracture? The answer depends on two factors: (a) is the extensor apparatus disrupted? and (b) is the patellar implant loose? When either factor is present, revision surgery is needed (extensor apparatus reconstruction, prosthetic implant removal). When neither factor is present, non-operative treatment is the rule. (3) What is the best management of patellar instability? Rotational malalignment should be sought. In the event of femoral and/or tibial rotational malalignment, revision surgery should be considered. If not performed, options consist of medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction and/or medialization tibial tuberosity osteotomy. (4) What is the best management of patellar clunk syndrome? When physiotherapy fails, arthroscopic resection can be considered. Recurrence can be treated by open resection, despite the higher risk of complications with this method. (5) What is the best management of anterior knee pain? The patient should be evaluated for causes amenable to treatment (fracture, instability, clunk, osteonecrosis, bony impingement on the prosthetic trochlea). If patellar resurfacing was performed, loosening should be considered. Otherwise, secondary resurfacing is appropriate only after convincingly ruling out other causes of pain. A painstaking evaluation is mandatory before repeat surgery for anterior knee pain: surgery is not in order in the 10% to 15% of cases that have no identifiable explanation. (6) What can be done to treat patellar defects? Available options include re-implantation (with bone grafting, cement, a biconvex implant, or a metallic frame), bone grafting without re-implantation, patellar reconstruction, patellectomy (best avoided due to the resulting loss of strength), osteotomy, and extensor apparatus allograft reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

Partial lateral patellar facetectomy as an alternative to lateral release in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

This study presents the selective use of partial patellar lateral facetectomy for maltracking during primary TKA, as an alternative to lateral release. Twenty three partial facetectomies were performed out of 191 TKAs (12%). Balanced tracking was achieved in 22 knees. At follow-up 2 patients had persistent anterior knee pain. Mean Knee Society score (KSS) was 94 and mean functional KSS was 86. Mean patellar score was 28. Patellar tilt angles were within 2 degrees in all but one knee. Patellar translation was within 2 mm in all cases. No complications were recorded. A control group of 46 matched patients had similar functional and radiographic results. If tracking is not satisfactory at the conclusion of TKA, our method of choice would be partial lateral facetectomy.

A technique of staged lateral release to correct patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty

Optimal patellar tracking and component alignment are important in achieving a well-functioning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The patella is constrained partly by design of the prosthetic trochlear groove, and patellar tracking is governed by a combination of static and dynamic factors. Maltracking may result from excessive or unbalanced tension in the surrounding soft tissues. This article describes a staged progressive lateral release of the patellar retinaculum in TKA, which is classified into 6 stages. Stage 1 transects the deep lateral patellofemoral ligament; stages 2 to 6 extend the lateral patellar incision distally from vastus lateralis to the tibial tubercle. This technique was used in a series of 96 primary TKAs. We report the rates of the various stages of lateral release and the variables that might affect the decision to perform such a release.