Local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma: A Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Project

Clinical Significance and Risk Factors of Local Recurrence in Synovial Sarcoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 171 Cases

Objective: To investigate risk factors of local recurrence of synovial sarcoma and the impact of local recurrence on survival.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of patients with II to IIIB (AJCC8) synovial sarcoma who underwent surgery at our center between March 2005 and December 2016. Data relating clinicopathological factors, treatment and prognosis were collected. The impact of local recurrence on overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were analyzed. The prognostic factors associated with local recurrence were also analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Curves and Cox regression analysis.

Results: A total of 171 patients were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 66 patients (38.6%) experienced local recurrence. The 5-year OS, LRFS, and DRFS rates of patients with local recurrence were 37.6, 6.1, and 24.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that larger initial tumors, multiple recurrences, positive resection margins, marginal resection, and lack of adjuvant therapy were associated with higher local recurrence.

Conclusion: Local recurrence of synovial sarcoma is associated with distant metastasis and poor survival. Chemoradiation improves the prognosis of patients with local recurrence, in particular those for which recurrence occurs shortly after initial treatment.

Is local recurrence in bone and soft tissue sarcomas just a local recurrence or does it impact the overall survival, retrospective cohort from a sarcoma referral center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sarcoma local recurrence (LR) is often associated with metastasis, but it is unclear if LR can be a causal event leading to metastasis. We question if LR is best viewed as an independent oncologic event or as a worrisome harbinger threatening a patient's overall survival.

METHODS

We identified patients with LR and/or metastasis from an ongoing cohort of 629 patients with primary sarcoma and performed a detailed review to assess the timing of metastasis resulting in the following groups: (1) Isolated LR, (2) LR before metastasis, (3) LR within 6 months of metastasis, (4) LR 6-12 months after metastasis, (5) LR >12 months after metastasis, and (6) metastasis at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 patients met the inclusion criteria with an LR rate of 7%. Ten patients (2% of the entire cohort, 23% of LR) developed an LR before or within 6 months of metastasis. For patients without systemic disease preceding LR, 3 of 23 soft tissue sarcoma STS (13%) and 7 of 10 bone sarcoma (70%) subsequently developed metastasis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LR with subsequent metastasis is a rare event. LR appears to be best viewed as a marker of tumor aggressiveness rather than the cause of metastasis and poor survival. LR in bone sarcoma patients should warn providers of a high risk of imminent metastasis.

Distinct Clinical Characteristics of Unplanned Excision in Synovial Sarcoma

Background

We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of unplanned excisions of synovial sarcomas.

Methods

In total, 90 patients with synovial sarcomas in the extremities were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into unplanned excision (n = 38) and planned excision (n = 52) groups. The average follow-up period was 6 years. The clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes were compared.

Results

The unplanned excision group showed longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis (p = 0.023), smaller lesion dimensions (p = 0.001), superficial location (p = 0.049), and predilection in the upper extremities (p = 0.037). Synovial sarcomas were most commonly misdiagnosed as neurogenic tumors (56%) in the upper extremities or as cystic masses (47%) in the lower extremities. Oncological outcomes, including disease-specific survival, metastasis-free survival, or local recurrence were not significantly different between the 2 groups (p = 0.159, p = 0.444, and p = 0.335, respectively). Repeated unplanned excision (p = 0.012) and delayed re-excision (p = 0.038) were significant risk factors for local recurrence in the unplanned excision group.

Conclusions

Synovial sarcomas treated with unplanned excision had distinct characteristics. These findings are important for developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for synovial sarcoma.

Follow-up of the soft tissue sarcoma patient

Despite optimal treatment, patients with soft tissue sarcoma are at risk for recurrence and therefore appropriate surveillance is critical. At minimum, regularly scheduled clinical assessments and chest X-rays are necessary. Consensus guidelines are available; however, surveillance strategies must be personalized based on the risk for recurrence and inherent disease biology. Further research is needed on a number of issues, including the impact of surveillance on clinical outcome and the utility of molecular surveillance.

Prognostic factors for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours: are they the same in the multidisciplinary treatment era?

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has lead to increasing use of combination of medical and surgical therapy. The aim of this study was to look at outcomes from a series of surgically treated GISTs and determine prognostic factors in the context of multimodal therapy.

METHODS

We analysed 104 single surgeon's patients with GIST. End points of the study were disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Three- and 5-year DSS rates were 96.7 and 94.6 %. On univariate analysis, clear resection margins were predictive of DSS. Patients with R2 resection had a worse prognosis (3-year DSS rate of 83.3 %; 5-year DSS rate of 62.5 %) compared to patients with R0 (3-year DSS rate of 98 %; 5-year DSS rate of 98 %) or R1 resection (3-year DSS rate of 100 %; 5-year DSS rate of 100 %) (R0 vs R1 vs. R2 p = 0.001). Pre-operative factors associated with R2 resection were clinical metastatic disease (p < 0.001), non-gastric tumour site (p = 0.002) and large tumour diameter (p = 0.031). Three- and 5-year DFS rates were 65.5 and 59.8 %. Serosal perforation (p = 0.013) and mitotic rate (p = 0.05) were found to be independently predictive of increased DFS. The presence of serosal perforation was associated with tumour site (p = 0.018), mitotic rate (p = 0.035), tumour diameter (p < 0.001), growth pattern (p = 0.007) and age (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

In the multidisciplinary management of GIST, serosal perforation may represent an additional predictor of recurrence along with mitotic rate. Complete macroscopic surgical resection is the most reliable prognostic factor, and an aggressive surgical approach should be advocated.

Patterns of local recurrence and dose fractionation of adjuvant radiation therapy in 462 patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremity and trunk wall

PURPOSE

To study the impact of dose fractionation of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) on local recurrence (LR) and the relation of LR to radiation fields.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

LR rates were analyzed in 462 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma who underwent surgical excision and adjuvant RT at five Scandinavian sarcoma centers from 1998 to 2009. Medical records were reviewed for dose fractionation parameters and to determine the location of the LR relative to the radiation portals.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 462 patients developed a LR (11.9%). Negative prognostic factors included intralesional surgical margin (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.08-20.0), high malignancy grade (HR: 5.82, 95% CI: 1.31-25.8), age at diagnosis (HR per 10 years: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.56), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor histological subtype (HR: 6.66, 95% CI: 2.56-17.3). RT dose was tailored to margin status. No correlation between RT dose and LR rate was found in multiple Cox regression analysis. The majority (65%) of LRs occurred within the primary RT volume.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant dose-response effect of adjuvant RT was demonstrated. Interestingly, patients given 45-Gy accelerated RT (1.8 Gy twice daily/2.5 weeks) had the best local outcome. A total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions seemed adequate following wide margin surgery. The risk of LR was associated with histopathologic subtype, which should be included in the treatment algorithm of adjuvant RT in soft tissue sarcoma.

Predictors and clinical significance of local recurrence in extremity soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage surgery (LSS) has gained widespread acceptance as the current treatment for treating extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and has been greatly refined since its inception. Combined with improved adjuvant treatment modalities, rates of local relapse have greatly decreased. Nonetheless, local recurrence still occurs and identifying the cause and the subsequent effects of local recurrence can provide valuable insights as LSS continues to evolve.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 278 patients treated for STS of the extremities between 2000 and 2006. Of these, 41 patients developed a local recurrence while 247 did not. Tumor characteristics and prognostic outcomes were analyzed. Wilcoxon rank sum test and either χ(2) or Fisher's exact was used to compare variables. Kaplan Meier and Gray's test for cumulative risk were also performed.

RESULTS

Patients who had a positive margin were 3.76 times more likely to develop local recurrence when compared to those with negative margins. This corresponds to a 38% risk of local recurrence if the margins were positive after six years vs. 12% if the margins were negative. In patients who underwent a re-excision, the presence or absence of residual disease upon re-excision did not have any bearing on local recurrence (p = 0.27). In comparing patients with and without local recurrence, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate and the proportion encountering distant metastasis and death due to sarcoma (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advancements in surgery, radiation and imaging, positive margins still occur, and the presence of positive margins following definitive treatment continues to remain as a strong predictor for local recurrence. While local recurrence represents a negative outcome for a patient, its impact on future prognosis is influenced by a variety of factors such as time to local recurrence as well as the tumor's inherent biological characteristics.

The financial burden of reexcising incompletely excised soft tissue sarcomas: a cost analysis

BACKGROUND

Although survival outcomes have been evaluated between those undergoing a planned primary excision and those undergoing a reexcision following an unplanned resection, the financial implications associated with a reexcision have yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

A query for financial data (professional, technical, indirect charges) for soft tissue sarcoma excisions from 2005 to 2008 was performed. A total of 304 patients (200 primary excisions and 104 reexcisions) were identified. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and χ2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare differences in demographics and tumor characteristics. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed with bootstrapping techniques.

RESULTS

The average professional charge for a primary excision was $9,694 and $12,896 for a reexcision (p<.001). After adjusting for tumor size, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, grade, and site, patients undergoing reexcision saw an increase of $3,699 in professional charges more than those with a primary excision (p<.001). Although every 1-cm increase in size of the tumor results in an increase of $148 for a primary excision (p=.006), size was not an independent factor in affecting reexcision charges. The grade of the tumor was positively associated with professional charges of both groups such that higher-grade tumors resulted in higher charges compared to lower-grade tumors (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Reexcision of an incompletely excised sarcoma results in significantly higher professional charges when compared to a single, planned complete excision. Additionally, when the cost of the primary unplanned surgery is considered, the financial burden nearly doubles.

[Cost analysis of the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in reference centres]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic and treatment costs in patients referred to a reference centre with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study consisted of a historic cohort of 48 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with soft tissue sarcomas and treated in our centres between the years 2009 and 2011, both prior to and after performing the biopsy. The cost per procedure was taken from the official list of prices published in the year 2009. A comparative study of the data was performed using the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

The mean cost per patient was 14,427.58€. In those referred before the biopsy, the overall mean cost was 11,818.67€, and in those referred afterwards, it was 6,456.74€ (p=.0073). There were no significant differences in the diagnostic costs between the groups. However, the mean cosy of the treatment per patient was higher in the second group (p=.0121).

DISCUSSION

The referral to centres with experienced multidisciplinary teams in this disease is a common fact highlighted in many articles, where the financial savings have also been demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, as well as improving the care aspect of the patients when they are referred to a specialist centre prior to the biopsy, there is also a lower health care cost.

Inadvertent surgical resection of soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) published Improving Outcome Guidance in 2006 defining urgent referral criteria for soft tissue sarcoma (STSs) with the twin aims of improving diagnostic accuracy and overall outcome. Despite these guidelines inadvertent excisions of soft tissue sarcomas continue to occur with alarming frequency, potentially compromising patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the East Midlands Sarcoma Service experience of treating inadvertent excision of STSs and highlight the patient profile, referral pattern, subsequent management and oncological outcome associated with inadvertent resection.

METHODS

Patients were identified from our sarcoma database and a retrospective case note review performed.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year period, 42 patients presented to our specialist centre after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas. There were 29 men and 13 women, with a mean age at presentation of 59 years (19-90). 50% of the tumours were located in lower extremity, 33% around the trunk and 17% in the upper extremity. The unplanned surgery was most commonly from general surgeons, plastic surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners followed by vascular surgeons. Re-resection was undertaken in 40 cases to achieve clear margins with residual tumour present in 74% of cases. Limb salvage surgery was not possible in 5 cases.

CONCLUSION

Unplanned excision of sarcoma by non-oncologic surgeons remains a problem. It appears that it is equally prevalent in varied surgical community and general practitioners. Excision of large or deep solid soft tissue masses without tissue diagnosis is unacceptable.

Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom

Despite the clinical and financial implications, there is little evidence about how patients who have been treated for soft tissue sarcoma should be followed up. The purpose of this study was to determine current practice in the United Kingdom. 192 clinicians treating patients with soft tissue sarcoma were surveyed with a postal questionnaire enquiring about frequency and method of follow up and how patients would be followed up in each of 3 clinical scenarios: a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at low risk of relapse; a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at high risk of relapse; and a patient with a retroperitoneal or abdominal tumour. 155 (81%) clinicians responded. Clinic visits and X-rays were the most frequently used methods of follow up. Chest CT scans, local site imaging, and blood tests were used infrequently. The intensity and methods of follow up varied with each of the clinical scenarios. There was a seven-to-twenty fold variation in cost between the least and the most expensive regimes. Respondents were generally supportive of the development of the clinical trial in this area.

Improved survival with radiation therapy in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a SEER analysis

PURPOSE

The benefit of radiation therapy in extremity soft tissue sarcomas remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of radiation therapy on overall survival among patients with primary soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity who underwent limb-sparing surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database that included data from January 1, 1988, to December 31, 2005. A total of 6,960 patients constituted the study population. Overall survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meir method and for patients with low- and high-grade tumors. Hazard ratios were calculated based on multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of the cohort, 47% received radiation therapy. There was no significant difference in overall survival among patients with low-grade tumors by radiation therapy. In high-grade tumors, the 3-year overall survival was 73% in patients who received radiation therapy vs. 63% for those who did not receive radiation therapy (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with high-grade tumors who received radiation therapy had an improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.79). In patients receiving radiation therapy, 13.5% received it in a neoadjuvant setting. The incidence of patients receiving neoadjuvant radiation did not change significantly between 1988 and 2005.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest population-based study reported in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. It reports that radiation was associated with improved survival in patients with high-grade tumors.

Retrospective study of the surgical management and outcome of nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas of the groin and axilla in children

PURPOSE

The incidence of pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTSs) of the groin and axilla is unknown, and the optimal surgical approach to these patients is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated at St Jude Children's Research Hospital from January 1962 to March 2007 for NRSTSs of the groin and axilla. Demographic variables, tumor pathology, clinical management, and outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 300 patients treated for NRSTSs, only 10 had tumors of the axilla or groin (6 of whom had synovial sarcoma). Surgical interventions included wide resection of the tumor (n = 7), marginal resection (n = 1), subtotal resection (n = 1), and biopsy only (n = 1). Six patients underwent lymph node sampling; all were negative for tumor. Short- and long-term surgical complications were rare. Four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 3) and/or radiotherapy (n = 2). At a median follow-up of 8.5 years, 7 of the 10 were surviving free of disease. Two of these patients died of tumor progression (1 with metastases at diagnosis and 1 with an unresectable tumor at diagnosis), and one patient who was free of NRSTS died of secondary breast carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric NRSTSs of the axilla and groin are rare, but outcomes are similar to those of other patients with NRSTS. Wide local excision of the tumor with preservation of good limb function should be the surgical goal and may be sufficient therapy in some cases.

Radiotherapy to improve local control regardless of surgical margin and malignancy grade in extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma: a Scandinavian sarcoma group study

PURPOSE

Adjuvant radiotherapy has during the past decades become increasingly used in the treatment of localized soft tissue sarcoma. We evaluated the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on local recurrence rates (LRRs) in Scandinavia between 1986 and 2005.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 1,093 adult patients with extremity or trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma treated at four Scandinavian sarcoma centers were stratified according to the treatment period (1986-1991, 1992-1997, and 1998-2005). The use of adjuvant RT, quality of the surgical margin, interval between surgery and RT, and LRR were analyzed. The median follow-up was 5 years.

RESULTS

The use of RT (77% treated postoperatively) increased from 28% to 53%, and the 5-year LRR decreased from 27% to 15%. The rate of wide surgical margins did not increase. The risk factors for local recurrence were histologic high-grade malignancy (hazard ratio [HR], 5), an intralesional (HR, 6) or marginal (HR, 3) surgical margin, and no RT (HR, 3). The effect of RT on the LRR was also significant after a wide margin resection and in low-grade malignant tumors. The LRR was the same after preoperative and postoperative RT. The median interval from surgery to the start of RT was 7 weeks, and 98% started RT within 4 months. The LRR was the same in patients who started treatment before and after 7 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that adjuvant RT effectively prevents local recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma, irrespective of the tumor depth, malignancy grade, and surgical margin status. The effect was most pronounced in deep-seated, high-grade tumors, even when removed with a wide surgical margin.

High incidence of metastatic disease in primary high grade and large extremity soft tissue sarcomas treated without chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The risk of metastasis and the survival in patients with primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas is worse when tumour size is large and the grade of malignancy is high. Such tumours may receive chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RTX) for optimising local control. Irradiation can either be applied preoperatively or after tumour resection. The question arises if the kind of RTX in the absence of chemotherapy influences the outcome concerning local control, metastatic disease, survival and complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of 233 patients with a primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated between 1990 - 2000 with a mean follow-up of 35.8 (4-120) months in our institute. 41 patients had high grade, deep and large tumours (>8 cm), an AJCC stage III (no evidence of metastasis prior to treatment) and were treated with limb salvage surgery and irradiation but stayed without additional chemotherapy. Two groups of patients were compared: the first group received postoperative RTX after tumour resection (n = 33); the second group was treated with preoperative RTX (n = 8). Both groups did not differ concerning clinical parameters. We analysed primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

56% (23/41) of the population developed metastatic disease, 24% (10/41) local recurrence. The risk of metastasis was higher in the group with preoperative irradiation (p = 0.046). The overall (p = 0.0248) and relapse free survival (p = 0.104) were worse in this group. The delay to tumour resection amounted 8 weeks on average in the preoperative group. Local control was not different (p = 0.38) in both study groups. Wound infections and other combined therapy related complications were equally distributed (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Without chemotherapy there remains a high risk of metastasis in AJCC grade 3 patients. In high risk patients treated without chemotherapy the elapsed time to tumour resection after preoperative radiation might contribute to the development of metastasis. This outcome may support the thesis that a combination of RTX and offensive multimodal treatment protocols is advantageous in such a subset of patients.

SURGICAL MARGIN AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL IN SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA

BACKGROUND

The goal of surgeons treating soft tissue sarcoma is to gain local control, to avoid risk of local recurrence and to avoid compromise of the patient's potential survival. The aim of the investigation was to assess the significance of the extent of surgical margin on the chance of death, metastasis and local recurrence.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-nine patients who presented with soft tissue sarcoma without metastatic disease were analysed.

RESULTS

The extent of the surgical margin was not clinically or statistically significant in the development of metastatic disease. The presence of a contaminated surgical margin led to a significantly higher rate of local recurrence (as did a narrow surgical margin less than 1 mm). A margin greater than 1 mm allowed a satisfactory outcome in terms of low local recurrence rates. In terms of overall survival, the failure to achieve a wide surgical margin (wide contaminated margin) led to an increased relative death rate. However, when the margin was not contaminated (even if the margin was very close, less than 1 mm), the overall survival rate was similar across all groups. Patients who had radical resections did poorly; they generally belonged to a group in which palliative surgery was carried out, and they showed very high relative metastasis and death rates.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides statistically significant evidence that increasing the width of resection improves local control and overall survival.

Prognostic factors in soft tissue leiomyosarcoma of the extremities: a retrospective analysis of 42 cases

AIMS

Soft tissue leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are rare tumours which are associated with a poor prognosis. The goals of the present study were to describe the clinico-pathological and prognostic features of 42 patients affected by soft tissue LMS of the extremities.

METHODS

The following clinical and pathological parameters were analysed: age, sex, site, size, depth, previous surgical procedures, stage, histological type, nuclear atypia, grade, mitotic activity, necrosis, surgical margins, therapy. Disease-free survival rates were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall 2-year and 5-year disease free survival rates were 42.3% and 32.6%, respectively. By univariate analysis, tumour size (< or =10 cm vs. >10 cm; p = 0.01), average mitotic rate (< or =19/10 HPF vs. >19/10 HPF; p = 0.05), type of excision (wide vs. marginal or intralesional; p = 0.001) and adjuvant radiotherapy (none vs. brachytherapy+external beam radiotherapy vs. external beam radiotherapy; p = 0.02) were significantly correlated with disease progression. By multivariate analysis, the only factor that was found to be an independent predictor of disease relapse was type of excision (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Large tumour size and high mitotic rate resulted adverse prognostic factors. Adjuvant radiation therapy, in combination with wide surgical excision, allowed the best chance of cure.