1
|
Blay JY, Penel N, Valentin T, Anract P, Duffaud F, Dufresne A, Verret B, Cordoba A, Italiano A, Brahmi M, Henon C, Amouyel T, Ray-Coquard I, Ferron G, Boudou-Rouquette P, Tlemsani C, Salas S, Rochwerger R, Faron M, Bompas E, Ducassou A, Gangloff D, Gouin F, Firmin N, Piperno-Neumann S, Rios M, Ropars M, Kurtz JE, Le Nail LR, Bertucci F, Carrere S, Llacer C, Watson S, Bonvalot S, Leroux A, Perrin C, Gantzer J, Pracht M, Narciso B, Monneur A, Lebbe C, Hervieu A, Saada-Bouzid E, Dubray-Longeras P, Fiorenza F, Chaigneau L, Nevieres ZM, Soibinet P, Bouché O, Guillemet C, Spano JP, Ruzic JC, Isambert N, Vaz G, Meeus P, Karanian M, Ngo C, Coindre JM, De Pinieux G, Le Loarer F, Ducimetiere F, Chemin C, Morelle M, Toulmonde M, Le Cesne A. Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:351-363. [PMID: 38246351 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020. RESULTS A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon.
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - T Valentin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - P Anract
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - F Duffaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - B Verret
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - A Cordoba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - A Italiano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - M Brahmi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Henon
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Amouyel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | | | - C Tlemsani
- Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Cochin Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris
| | - S Salas
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - R Rochwerger
- Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille
| | - M Faron
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes St. Herblain
| | - A Ducassou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - D Gangloff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud & IUCT Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - N Firmin
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Piperno-Neumann
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - M Rios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Ropars
- Department of Orthopedics, CHU Rennes, Rennes
| | | | | | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - S Carrere
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - C Llacer
- Service Orthopedie, CHU Nantes, Nantes
| | - S Watson
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Medical & Surgical & Radiotherapy Oncology ICM, Montpellier
| | - A Leroux
- INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier
| | - C Perrin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - J Gantzer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy
| | - M Pracht
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes
| | - B Narciso
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tours
| | - A Monneur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
| | - C Lebbe
- Department of Dermatology, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris; Department of CIC, INSERM U976 University Paris Diderot Saint Louis Hospital, Paris
| | - A Hervieu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice
| | - P Dubray-Longeras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand
| | - F Fiorenza
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CHU Limoges, Limoges
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medicine, CHU Besancon, Besancon
| | | | - P Soibinet
- Department of Medicine, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen
| | - O Bouché
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Reims, Reims
| | - C Guillemet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre J Godinot Reims, Reims
| | - J P Spano
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétriere, Paris
| | - J C Ruzic
- Departement d'oncologie, CHU, La Reunion
| | - N Isambert
- Service d'oncologie, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - G Vaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Karanian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Ngo
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - J M Coindre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | | | - F Le Loarer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - F Ducimetiere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - C Chemin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Morelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard, Lyon
| | - M Toulmonde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux; Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng J, Pollock G, Addams J, Bracamonte E, Chipollini J. Leiomyosarcoma of the scrotum: a case report and literature review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:1342-1346. [PMID: 33850768 PMCID: PMC8039593 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is one of the most common forms of soft tissue sarcoma with approximately 2,500 cases per year in the United States. The symptoms LMS vary depending upon the location, size, and spread of the tumor. In early stages, it may not be associated with any obvious symptoms so diagnosis and treatment may be delayed. In some cases, it can grow quickly and behave aggressively. Most types of LMS occur in the abdomen or in the uterus; although, scrotal LMS can be a very rare presentation of the disease. Here we present our case of a large, ulcerated scrotal LMS originating from subcutaneous tissue but not invading spermatic cord or tunica. Radical orchiectomy with high ligation of spermatic cord was performed, and patient had an uneventful postoperative course. This disease entity remains rare in the literature, and warrants larger studies in order to better understand treatment and oncologic outcomes. When LMS is identified early and is removed by surgical excision, prognosis can be good and full recovery quite likely. When LMS is already large or has spread to other parts of the body, treatment is relatively more complex and the prognosis poor. Hence, prompt diagnosis and treatment of genitourinary LMS require prompt attention, referral to tertiary, referral center should be strongly considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiping Zeng
- Department of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Grant Pollock
- Department of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Joel Addams
- Department of Pathology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Erika Bracamonte
- Department of Pathology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Juan Chipollini
- Department of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sampo MM, Klintrup K, Tukiainen EJ, Böhling TO, Blomqvist CP. Improved prognosis in soft-tissue sarcoma of extremity and trunk wall. Acta Orthop 2017; 88:116-120. [PMID: 27321676 PMCID: PMC5251257 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1196429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is rare, with challenging individualized treatment, so diagnostics and treatment should be centralized. Historical controls are sometimes used for investigation of whether new diagnostic or therapeutic tools affect patient outcome. However, as yet unknown factors may affect the outcome. We investigated prognostic factors and prognosis in 2 nationwide cohorts of patients diagnosed with a local STS during the periods 1998-2001 and 2005-2010, with special interest in finding factors lying behind possible improvement of prognosis. Patients and methods - 2 cohorts of patients with STS of the extremities or trunk diagnosed during the periods 1998-2001 and 2005-2010 were retrieved from the nationwide Finnish Cancer Registry. Detailed information was gathered from patient files. Results - Compared to first cohort, a larger proportion of patients with inadequate surgery in the second cohort received radiation therapy, and both the local control rate and the sarcoma-specific survival rate improved in the second cohort. For sarcoma-specific survival, cohort (HR =0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9), age, depth, grade, and margin were significant factors in multivariate analysis. For local control, cohort (HR =0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9), age, and margin were significant in multivariate analysis. Interpretation - Known prognostic factors including type of treatment did not entirely explain the secular trend of continuous improvement in prognosis in STS. This illustrates the danger of using historical controls for investigation of whether new diagnostic or therapeutic tools have an effect on patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika M Sampo
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital,Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki,Correspondence:
| | | | - Erkki J Tukiainen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tom O Böhling
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, and HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital
| | - Carl P Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki
| |
Collapse
|