Reverse optokinetic after-nystagmus generated by gaze fixation during optokinetic stimulation

Afternystagmus in darkness after suppression of optokinetic nystagmus: an interaction of motion aftereffect and retinal afterimages

The afternystagmus that occurs in the dark after gaze fixation during optokinetic stimulation is directed in the opposite direction relative to the previous optokinetic stimulus. The mechanism responsible for such afternystagmus after suppression of optokinetic nystagmus (ASOKN) is unclear. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain it, but none is conclusive. We hypothesized that ASOKN is driven by the interaction of two mechanisms: (1) motion-aftereffect (MAE)-induced eye movements and (2) retinal afterimages (RAIs) produced by fixation during the suppression of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN). We examined the correlation among ASOKN, MAE-induced eye movements, and RAIs in healthy subjects. Adapting stimuli consisted of moving random dot patterns and a fixation spot and their brightness was adjusted to induce different RAI durations. Test patterns were a stationary random dot pattern (to test for the presence of a MAE), a dim homogeneous background (to test for MAE driven eye movements), and a black background (to test for ASOKN and RAIs). MAEs were reported by 16 out of 17 subjects, but only 7 out of 17 subjects demonstrated MAE-induced eye movements. Importantly, ASOKN was only found when these seven subjects reported a RAI after suppression of OKN. Moreover, the duration of ASOKN was longer for high-brightness stimuli compared with low-brightness stimuli, just as RAIs persist longer with increasing brightness. We conclude that ASOKN results from the interaction of MAE-induced eye movements and RAIs.

Optokinetic nystagmus and after-nystagmus during a 6 hour bedrest study

CONCLUSIONS

A lengthy alteration of gravity direction produced different effects on the intrinsic horizontal and vertical optokinetic oculomotor systems.

OBJECTIVE

To examine both optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN) in a 6 h 6 degrees head-down bedrest study, in which the subjects were kept lying under simulated micro-gravity conditions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In six normal healthy adults, we repeatedly (five times) and comparatively studied OKN and OKAN evoked by horizontal and vertical stimuli. Stage 1 was an upright sitting position. During the 6 h bedrest condition, we studied OKN and OKAN in 90 degrees recumbent lateral positions (stages 2, 3, and 4). In stage 5 the subject returned to an upright position.

RESULTS

We confirmed that the change in gravity direction had various effects on the condition of OKN and OKAN. Also, we found that it took more than 3 h to reach a desirable level of systemic adaptive modification to the unique environmental condition. We considered that the early change was basically due to the changes in sensory inputs through the otolith organs, and the latter changes represented the adaptive process of the spatial orientation system. During the tilt, the occurrence rates of both horizontal and vertical OKANs were decreased; however, the conditions of these changes were different.

Cross-coupling in a body-translating reaction: interaural optokinetic stimulation reflects a gravitational cue

CONCLUSION

The velocity storage integrator does not play a dominant role in the postural response to vertical visual cues; more likely, retinal slip provides the main driving force. By contrast, sideways eye movement can drive the velocity storage integrator and preserve a gravitational cue, which would be observed as a cross-coupling effect on the postural response.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the mechanism by which optokinetic stimulation causes the body to translate and to determine whether the optokinetic information is accompanied by a gravitational cue, which would appear as a cross-coupling effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Directionally diverse optokinetic stimuli were presented to seven healthy subjects, with and without a fixation target, and the body-translation of the subjects was recorded.

RESULTS

Horizontal optokinetic stimulation with a fixation target caused the body to translate in the same direction as the optic flow. Upward or downward vertical optokinetic stimulation caused the body to translate backward or forward, respectively, only when a fixation target was present. When the subject's interaural axis was parallel to the optokinetic flow, diagonal optokinetic stimulation in the absence of a fixation target elicited responses in the pitch plane similar to those elicited by vertical stimulation in the presence of a fixation target.