Laryngeal cancer in non-smoking and non-drinking patients

Epidemiological, Clinical, and Oncological Outcomes of non-Alcohol Drinking and non-Smoking Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Distinct Entity

Purpose: To explore the discrepancy in clinicopathological and prognostic features between smoking and alcohol drinking (SA) and non-smoking and non-alcohol drinking (NSNA) patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Methods: This retrospective study including 1735 patients with LSCC was conducted from January 2005 to December 2010, which were categorized into 4 groups, NSNA group, smoking only group, alcohol-drinking only group, and SA group. We compared overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and indicated clinicopathological features by Cox proportional hazards regression models before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 415 patients (23.92%) were identified as NSNA. The SA group was predominantly patients ≤60 years old (46.63%) while the NSNA group was more older (58.07%). NSNA group was more likely to present at earlier disease stage and more female. No significant difference in OS (P = .685) and DFS (P = .976) was found between the 2 groups. In addition to age and recurrence and metastasis being common independent prognostic factors in terms of OS in both groups of patients, NSNA group also exhibited other factors, namely tumor area >3.7 cm² and positive resection margin. For DFS, N + stage, tumor size >3.7 cm², and positive resection margin were prognostic features specific to NSNA group. Conclusion: The outcome is similar in LSCC patients with and without SA. NSNA group shows a distinct profile from that found in SA group. Clinicopathological features from NSNA group should be considered for LSCC management.

Potentially malignant lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract

Mucosal lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract usually concern the squamous epithelium of the surface. Many precancerous alterations now designated as potentially malignant are caused by DNA damage resulting from long term exposure to tobacco and alcohol consumption. The distinction from conditions with a similar phenotype but caused by different reasons such as viral infection may be difficult. Furthermore, a magnitude of similar appearing lesions with different clinical background and different biological behavior are discussed in this paper.

Early detection in head and neck cancer - current state and future perspectives

Survival and quality of life in head and neck cancer are directly linked to the size of the primary tumor at first detection. In order to achieve substantial gain at these issues, both, primary prevention and secondary prevention, which is early detection of malignant lesions at a small size, have to be improved. So far, there is not only a lack in the necessary infrastructure not only in Germany, but rather worldwide, but additionally the techniques developed so far for early detection have a significance and specificity too low as to warrant safe implementation for screening programs. However, the advancements recently achieved in endoscopy and in quantitative analysis of hypocellular specimens open new perspectives for secondary prevention. Chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) pinpoint suspicious lesions more easily, confocal endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography obtain optical sections through those lesions, and hyperspectral imaging classifies lesions according to characteristic spectral signatures. These techniques therefore obtain optical biopsies. Once a "bloody" biopsy has been taken, the plethora of parameters that can be quantified objectively has been increased and could be the basis for an objective and quantitative classification of epithelial lesions (multiparametric cytometry, quantitative histology). Finally, cytomics and proteomics approaches, and lab-on-the-chip technology might help to identify patients at high-risk. Sensitivity and specificity of these approaches have to be validated, yet, and some techniques have to be adapted for the specific conditions for early detection of head and neck cancer. On this background it has to be stated that it is still a long way to go until a population based screening for head and neck cancer is available. The recent results of screening for cancer of the prostate and breast highlight the difficulties implemented in such a task.

Laryngeal carcinoma in nonsmoking patients

OBJECTIVES

Smoking is a known risk factor for laryngeal carcinoma. We sought to describe the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of nonsmoking patients with laryngeal carcinoma.

METHODS

Of 1,443 patients treated for laryngeal carcinoma between 1960 and 2006, 55 (3.8%) were nonsmokers: 40 (73%) had never smoked and 15 (27%) had stopped smoking 12 years or more before diagnosis. Patient characteristics and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 87% men; the mean age at diagnosis was 67 years. All lesions but one were located in the glottis. The 5-year survival rate for the whole group was 85%. Most tumors were detected early. Of 38 patients (69%) with stage T1 disease, there was no significant difference in prognostic features between those who had never smoked and those who had smoked in the past.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer than 5% of patients with laryngeal carcinoma were nonsmokers. Like smokers, this subgroup was characterized by a male predominance and an approximate age at diagnosis in the seventh decade. Unlike smokers, nonsmokers show a greater predilection for glottic rather than supraglottic disease. There was no difference in prognosis between smokers and nonsmokers, regardless of whether they had smoked in the past.

Extraösophagealer Reflux und Zenker-Divertikel

INTRODUCTION

Patients with Zenker's diverticulum often present with a hiatal hernia. Theoretically, the gastric acid fluid could rise up to the hypopharynx producing an injury to the mucosa of Killian's triangle and hypertrophy of the cricopharyngeal muscle. We performed dual-channel pH monitoring in healthy people as a control group and in patients with a Zenker's diverticulum to elucidate the relationship between Zenker's diverticulum and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as extraesophageal reflux (EER).

METHODS

Patients with Zenker's diverticulum underwent dual-channel 24-h pH monitoring to exclude the possibility of an EER or a GERD. The measurements were performed in 4 patients preoperatively and postoperatively as well as in 14 patients only postoperatively. The control group consisted of healthy volunteers who did not suffer from a reflux disease (n=20). In each group we determined the number of refluxes, the fraction time, the RAI (reflux area index), and the DeMeester Score Index. In addition we classified the severity of the EER with a grading system which was developed in an earlier study in our department.

RESULTS

Patients with a Zenker's diverticulum suffered significantly from EER (p<0.01). The difference between the patients measured preoperatively and the patients postoperatively was minor. More than 72% of the patients suffered from a severe EER.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a Zenker's diverticulum have a high possibility of suffering from EER and GERD. The pathophysiology of this relationship can only be speculated. In addition to a cricopharyngeal myotomy, long-term therapy with a PPI (proton pump inhibitor) seems indicated.