Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to wait and see policy in patients with small T1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Patients of stage I oral cancer with pathologically low‐risk feature managed by primary tumor resection alone: Impact of depth of invasion and a nomogram analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the importance of depth of invasion (DOI) in patients with pathologically low‐risk feature stage I oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) managed by primary tumor resection alone.

Methods

Patients with stage I OSCC, at pathologically low risk, underwent primary tumor resection without neck dissection were enrolled retrospectively between 2007 and 2015. Low risk was defined as the absence of positive or close margins, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, worst pattern of invasion‐5, and poor differentiation in histologic grade. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and regional recurrence free survival (RRFS). A nomogram based on the DOI was established for predicting RRFS.

Results

A total of 198 patients were enrolled in this study. DOI was the only prognosticator to achieve statistical significance in all primary endpoints according to univariate analysis. Patients with DOI <3 mm tumor showed better five‐year OS, CSS, LRFS, and RRFS than those with DOI ≥3 mm tumor. The concordance index of the nomogram model without DOI was 0.684, which could increase to 0.733 when DOI was included in the calculation.

Conclusion

Patients with pathologically low‐risk stage I OSCC correlate with a higher chance in occult neck metastasis if increasing DOI (≥3 mm) is noticed. Indeed, the chance of occult neck metastasis is significantly higher in this group (14% vs. 2%) than in those with DOI <3 mm. Elective neck dissection is advised if DOI is ≥3 mm to achieve better clinical outcomes.

Level of Evidence

4.

A Systematic Review of Oral Biopsies, Sample Types, and Detection Techniques Applied in Relation to Oral Cancer Detection

Background: Early identification of the stage of oral cancer development can lead to better treatment outcomes and avoid malignant transformation. Therefore, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview that describes the development of standardized procedures for oral sample collection, characterization, and molecular risk assessment. This can help investigators to choose the appropriate sampling method and downstream analyses for different purposes. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Using both PubMed and Web of Science databases, four independent authors conducted a literature search between 15 and 21 June 2021. We used key search terms to broaden the search for studies. Non-conforming articles were removed using an EndNote-based and manual approach. Reviewers used a designed form to extract data. Results: This review included a total of 3574 records, after eliminating duplicate articles and excluding papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 202 articles were included in this review. We summarized the sampling methods, biopsy samples, and downstream analysis. The biopsy techniques were classified into tissue and liquid biopsy. The common sequential analysis of tissue biopsy includes histopathological examination such as H&E or IHC to identify various pathogenic features. Meanwhile, liquid samples such as saliva, blood, and urine are analyzed for the purpose of screening to detect mutations in cancer. Commonly used technologies are PCR, RT-PCR, high-throughput sequencing, and metabolomic analysis. Conclusions: Currently, tissue biopsies provide increased diagnostic value compared to liquid biopsy. However, the minimal invasiveness and convenience of liquid biopsy make it a suitable method for mass screening and eventual clinical adoption. The analysis of samples includes histological and molecular analysis. Metabolite analysis is rising but remains scarce.

Usefulness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for detecting neck nodal metastasis in early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) as an alternative to elective neck dissection.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search for relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases.

METHODS

Two reviewers individually searched the five databases up to November 2019. For studies that met inclusion criteria, data on patient diagnoses were pooled, including true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. Methodological quality was checked with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (version 2) tool.

RESULTS

In total, 98 observational or retrospective studies were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of SLNB was 326.165 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 231.477-459.587; I²  = 0%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.982. Sensitivity was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.804-0.848), and specificity was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.975-0.986). The correlation between sensitivity and the false positive rate was -0.076, which indicates that heterogeneity did not exist. Subgroup analyses were performed with the subgroups reference test type, publication year, and study type. No significant difference was found within the reference test type subgroup. However, differences within the publication year and study type subgroups were significant, where the retrospective study subgroup was significantly more sensitive and specific than the prospective study subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Results of this meta-analysis imply that the high specificity of SLNB supports its role as a diagnostic tool for patients with clinical tumor stage (CT)1-2 clinically negative (N0) OSCC. More studies should be done to further verify the results of this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2a Laryngoscope, 131:E459-E465, 2021.

Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cT1/T2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cT1/T2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) patients. A comprehensive and systematic literature review was performed by searching the Embase and PubMed databases for English language articles published up to December 2016. The pooled overall sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection rate, sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of SLNB which used neck dissection or follow-up as a reference test. The Q test and I ² statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity across the studies. Subgroup analyses were performed in consideration of higher contribution of different clinical characteristics on the SLNB diagnostic value. Begg's linear regression and Egger's regression tests were conducted to evaluate the publication bias. Thirty-five studies (with 1084 patients) were included. The pooled SLN detection rate was 98% (95% CI 97-100%). The pooled overall sensitivity and NPV of SLNB were 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97), respectively. The subgroup analyses demonstrated that higher extracted number of patients (n ≥ 30) from the included studies achieved a more stable NPV than lower number of patients. SLNB can effectively predict the status of regional lymph nodes in cT1/T2N0 TSCC patients. With high sensitivity and NPV, SLNB can guide the treatment of SLNB-positive patients with neck dissections and those with negative SLNBs with follow-ups in order to avoid unnecessary surgical morbidity.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of 66 Studies

OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in early oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC) still remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic value of SLNB in clinically neck-negative T1-2 OSCC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for relevant literature published up to September 11, 2016 was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials, and the reference lists of eligible studies were examined. Data from different studies were pooled to estimate the summary sentinel lymph node(SLN) identification rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value. Summary receiver operator characteristic curve(SROC) was plotted and area under the SROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the overall diagnostic efficacy. Threshold effect was assessed with use of the spearman correlation coefficient. Between-study heterogeneity was tested using the Q tests and the I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses were conducted in view of the greater effect of different study characteristics on diagnostic efficacy of SLN. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test was performed to evaluate publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was evaluated through omitting studies one by one and comparing the pooled results of random-effects model and fixed-effects model. All analyses were performed using Review Manager (version 5.3.5), Meta-DiSc (version 1.4), Comprehensive Meta Analysis (version 2.0) and STATA (version 12).

RESULTS

66 studies comprising 3566 patients with cT1-2N0 OSCC were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled SLN identification rate was 96.3%(95% CI: 95.3%-97.0%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.89), pooled negative predictive value was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95), and AUC was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analyses indicated that SLN assessment with immunohistochemistry(IHC) achieved a significantly higher sensitivity than without IHC.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that SLNB has a high diagnostic accuracy in cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma, and is an ideal alternative to elective neck dissection. Furthermore, the use of IHC can significantly improve SLNB diagnostic sensitivity for early OSCC.

Additional non-sentinel lymph node metastases in early oral cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes

To determine risk factors for additional non-sentinel lymph node metastases in neck dissection specimens of patients with early stage oral cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). A retrospective analysis of 36 previously untreated SLNB positive patients in our institution and investigation of currently available literature of positive SLNB patients in early stage oral cancer was done. Degree of metastatic involvement [classified as isolated tumor cells (ITC), micro- and macrometastasis] of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), the status of other SLNs, and additional non-SLN metastases in neck dissection specimens were analyzed. Of 27 studies, comprising 511 patients with positive SLNs, the pooled prevalence of non-SLN metastasis in patients with positive SLNs was 31 %. Non-SLN metastases were detected (available from 9 studies) in 13, 20, and 40 % of patients with ITC, micro-, and macrometastasis in the SLN, respectively. The probability of non-SLN metastasis seems to be higher in the case of more than one positive SLN (29 vs. 24 %), the absence of negative SLNs (40 vs. 19 %), and a positive SLN ratio of more than 50 % (38 vs. 19 %). Additional non-SLN metastases were found in 31 % of neck dissections following positive SLNB. The presence of multiple positive SLNs, the absence of negative SLNs, and a positive SLN ratio of more than 50 % may be predictive factors for non-SLN metastases. Classification of SLNs into ITC, micro-, and macrometastasis in the future SLNB studies is important to answer the question if treatment of the neck is always needed after positive SLNB.

The lingual lymph node identified as a sentinel node on CT lymphography in a patient with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue

We performed CT lymphography on an 81-year-old female patient with a histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue with no clinical or radiological evidence of cervical lymph node involvement. The lateral lingual lymph node was identified as a sentinel node, which is the first lymph node to receive drainage from a primary tumour. CT lymphography also showed draining lymphatics passing through the sublingual space, the medial side of the submandibular gland and near the hyoid bone and connected with the middle internal jugular node. Although metastasis to the lateral lingual lymph node is known as one of the crucial events in determining survival outcome in cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth, very few reports are available on the imaging of the lateral lingual lymph node metastasis. This is the first report regarding the lateral lingual lymph node identified as a sentinel node demonstrated on CT lymphography.

The role of elective supraomohyoidal neck dissection in the treatment of early, node-negative oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC): a retrospective analysis of 122 cases

The adequate treatment of the neck in early, clinically node-negative oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains controversial. To assess whether elective supraomohyoid neck dissection is reasonable and efficient in early, locally circumscribed OSCC, the outcomes of treatment of 122 patients with an OSCC of clinical UICC stage I or II were retrospectively analysed in this study. Occult lymph node metastases were detected in 13.9% (17/122) of cases. They were more frequently found in T2 compared to T1 tumours (19.7% (14/71) vs. 5.9% (3/51), p=0.03), age, gender and grading had no influence on the prevalence of occult lymph node metastases (all p-values>0.05) in a multivariate logistic regression model. Subsequent multivariate survival analysis found that the presence of occult metastases was an independent predictor of reduced disease-free survival after 5 years (82.2% vs. 62.5%, p=0.004, and 61.9% vs. 17.8%, p<0.001, respectively). Elective supraomohyoid neck dissection detects occult metastases in early, node-negative OSCC, and patients with early OSCC exhibiting occult metastases should be considered as high risk patients, warranting additional therapeutic regimes.

Detection of lymph node micrometastases in patients with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck

While the significance of large cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous carcinomas is well established, the import of a finding of regional nodal micrometastases (where a micrometastasis is defined as a metastatic deposit greater than 0.2 mm and not greater than 2.0 mm in greatest dimension) or isolated tumor cells in those patients is less clearly understood. Some earlier investigators have suggested that finding micrometastases does not have an impact on prognosis; some later investigators, however, have taken issue with this position, arguing that finding either micrometastases or isolated tumor cells might portend a poorer prognosis for head and neck cancer patients. At this juncture, it is difficult to advance a single recommendation for handling a finding of micrometastases or isolated tumor cells. It would be helpful if two courses of action were followed: first, while the detection of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells remains an investigatory practice, data should be collected and analyzed with an eye to discerning whether such findings are indeed of significance to the individual head and neck cancer patient. Second, rigorous definitions of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (such as the definitions suggested here) should be developed and widely employed so as to permit ready comparison between the results as they are reported by different investigators.