The modified temporalis muscle flap in reconstruction of palate and temporal deformity

Temporal Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques

The temporal region is a great source of vascularized flap, providing extremely variable and versatile options for reconstruction in head and neck surgery. Its popularity has led to the conception of a large variety of different flaps, in terms of contents and design. Temporal flaps are highly pliable and flexible, providing adequate bulk to obliterate dead spaces and improving engraftment, thus facilitating wound healing. The need to access different anatomical compartments, often far from the original flap anatomical site, has led surgeons to develop techniques to enlarge pedicles and bulk, by reverting and splitting flaps' contents, as well as through partial mandibular and zygomatic resection. To further increase versatility, a multilayered combination of different regional tissues and muscle segmentation techniques has been described. Historically, each flap has had its own proponents and opponents, but a pointy review systematizing techniques and comparatively analyzing different flaps was still missing in the literature. The field of use of some flaps has been progressively limited by the increasing relevance of free tissue transfers, which nowadays may provide success rates up to 95% with a constrained morbidity, thus offering an effective alternative, when available. Given the wide range of reconstructive strategies based on temporal flaps, there is still a great debate on nomenclature and surgical techniques. The present study systematizes the topic, classifying regional flaps according to contents and indications. Harvesting techniques are described stepwise and schematically illustrated, thus offering an indispensable tool to the armamentarium of reconstructive surgeons.

Temporal Muscle Flap as a Treatment of an Extensive Cleft Palate in an Adult Patient

For the management of cleft palate, the surgical approach has been suggested at an early stage even in childhood, varying in the number of interventions. Once the interventions are not performed at appropriate times, such as sequences that may accompany specific psychological, functional, and aesthetic effects. Since it has been indicated, temporal muscle flap is a technique with satisfactory results for a resolution of extensive clef palate in adult patients. The purpose of this paper is reporting a case of temporal muscle flap in the soft and hard palate of an adult with a reconstruction of the donor area with a titanium mesh. A 37 year old male patient with cleft lip/palate, complained of difficulty in speech, chewing, swallowing, and breathing. Clinically, it was observed oroantral communication in the region of the hard and soft palate, with a previous cheiloplasty. A temporal rotation was planned to close the fissure for the treatment. The modified coronal approach was used. Temporal muscle traction and its interposition in the palate region were performed through the tunneling technique, and mass suturing was performed. After 3 years, he presented satisfactory results, with the improvement of the quality of life, as well as the area of exposure. In conclusion, since it has been indicated, temporal muscle flap is a technique with satisfactory results for a resolution of extensive cleft palate in adult patients.

Bilateral Temporal Myofascial Flap for the Reconstruction of Frontal Sinus Defects

BACKGROUND

A frontal sinus infection, following a transsinus skull base procedure, portends potentially life-threatening complications, making surgical revision mandatory in refractory infections. The authors describe the application of the bilateral temporal myofascial flap (BTMF) as a valuable option for frontal sinus reconstruction, when pericranial or galeal-frontalis myofascial flap (GFMF) is no longer available.

METHODS

A microanatomic laboratory cadaver investigation was conducted to obtain anthropometric measurements. Surgical technique is described, and intraoperative images are provided.

RESULTS

The surgical steps of this technique and the related intraoperative images are reported. One case illustration regarding frontal sinus reconstruction following a postoperative infection, as a complication after a transsinus procedure, is reported.

CONCLUSION

The BTMF should be considered as a valuable option for frontal sinus reconstruction after transsinus skull base procedures when GFMF is not available.