Hemodynamic stability during laryngeal electromyography procedures

Safety of Laryngeal Electromyography and Repetitive Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

Laryngeal Electromyography (LEMG) is a procedure used to assess electrical signals from laryngeal muscles. It is considered to be the gold standard test for examining vocal fold paresis/paralysis. Repetitive stimulation studies, which usually are performed at the time of LEMG, can aid in assessment of neuromuscular function. Electromyography poses risks to the patient due to the use of electricity and needles. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the safety of LEMG and discuss the possible complications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients from January 2015 through February 2022. Information from patient charts included age, sex, chief complaint, past medical history, family medical history, medications, social history, strobovideolaryngoscopy results, type of paresis, professional voice user status, presence of pacemaker, laryngeal electromyography and repetitive stimulation study results, and reported complications. Complications were considered to be anything that differed from the norm. Pain was included as a complication. Data were analyzed for relationships and significance.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients were included. Eighteen of the 500 (3.6%) experienced complications. Four (2.1%) males and 14 (4.5%) females experienced complications. Nine of the 18 (50%) reported pain after the procedure, 1 (5.56%) had excessive bleeding (controlled with pressure), 5 (27.78%) reported voice changes, and 3 (16.67%) experienced difficulty with completion of the procedure. No patients with pacemakers or patients taking anticoagulants had complications, but repetitive stimulation studies were not performed on patients with pacemakers.

CONCLUSIONS

LEMG and repetitive stimulation studies are safe and effective procedures to examine laryngeal muscles. Repetitive stimulation studies are not recommended for patients with pacemakers.

Anesthetic Management for Awake Tubeless Suspension Microlaryngoscopy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Patients' eligibility for bilateral selective laryngeal reinnervation surgery is evaluated by suspension microlaryngoscopy (SML) examination with laryngeal electromyography (LEMG). Maintaining spontaneous ventilation, with remifentanil sedation/analgesia without endotracheal tube, to allow the patient to phonate with the surgeon during awake, LEMG is a major challenge for the anesthesiologist and the otorhinololaryngologist. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel anesthesia protocol to manage airway access during awake tubeless SML.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Anesthesia records of patients undergoing awake SML with LEMG were retrospectively analyzed. Procedures were performed with remifentanil sedation/analgesia with targeted controlled infusion (TCI) in combination with local anesthesia. The main outcome was the failure rate of the anesthesia protocol during the procedure. Secondary outcomes were as follows: rate of apnea requiring ventilation, airway bleeding, regurgitation, hemodynamic data as well as vasopressor use, complications, and surgeon satisfaction with the procedure.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 39 patients between November 2017 and September 2019, the mean age was 52 years and 29 (74%) were female. All procedures were completed without complications (0% [0-9]). Three patients (8% [1.6-20.8]) had an intraoperative episode of hypoxemia requiring mask reventilation. There was no airway bleeding, no regurgitation, and no hypotensive episode. Three patients (8% [1.6-20.8]) had noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress after the end of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that awake tubeless SML allowing phonation during LEMG can be realized under sedation and local anesthesia. However, further data are needed concerning the intraoperative and postoperative safety of the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 2021.