Auditory and speech performance in cochlear implanted ANSD children

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

The goal of managing auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is to restore the children's ability to discriminate auditory information. Children who are not making sufficient progress in speech comprehension, and speech and language development after receiving adequate auditory re/habilitation and/or acoustic amplification may be candidates for cochlear implantation (CI). Despite the growing number of published literature on CI outcomes in children with ANSD, the current evidence is primarily based on case reports or retrospective chart reviews some of which had a limited number of children. In addition, the outcomes of CI seem to vary between children with ANSD. Thus, compelling evidence is lacking. This updated systematic review evaluated the speech perception, language, and speech intelligibility outcomes of children with ANSD post-CI.

METHODS

An online bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases. We included both interventional and observational studies that assessed the outcomes of the CI in  children with ANSD.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included in this systematic review. Several tests were used to assess speech perception following CI in children with ANSD. The findings of this study revealed that  children with ANSD had mean Categories of Auditory Performance scores ranging from 4.3 to 7 post-operatively, this result was better than the pre-operative scores which ranged between 0.4 to 2.5. Likewise, the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten, and multisyllabic lexical neighborhood test showed clinically relevant improvement after CI. The same findings were reported for language and speech intelligibility scores. One study investigated the quality of life/children satisfaction after CI and showed overall good satisfaction with the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review suggests that CI is a feasible and effective hearing  rehabilitation modality for children with ANSD.

REGISTRATION AND PROTOCOL

PROSPERO ID: CRD42021279140.

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in 75 patients with auditory neuropathy

Background

Cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) are variable, which hampers patients' decisions on CI.

Objective

This study aims to assess the outcomes of CI in individuals diagnosed with AN and to examine the various factors that may influence the effectiveness of this intervention.

Methods

A total of 75 patients diagnosed with AN were included in the study. The hearing threshold, the score of categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), and speech audiometry were tested. Genetic testing was conducted by medical exome sequencing in 46 patients.

Results

After CI, the average aided hearing threshold for patients with prelingual and post-lingual onset was 38.25 ± 6.63 dB and 32.58 ± 9.26 dB, respectively; CAP score improved to 5.52 ± 1.64 (p < 0.001) and 6.00 ± 0.96 (p < 0.001), respectively; SIR score increased to 3.57 ± 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 4.15 ± 0.95 (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum speech recognition ranged from 58 to 93% for prelingual onset patients and 43 to 98% for those with post-lingual onset. Speech outcomes of CI in cases with cochlear nerve (CN) deficiency were significantly poorer (p = 0.008). Molecular etiologies, including TWIST1, ACTG1, m.A7445G, and a copy-number variant (CNV) carrying ACTB, were related to AN here.

Conclusion

CI is a viable therapy option for patients with AN; CN deficiency might impact outcomes of CI.

An Umbrella Review of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Children With Auditory Neuropathy

PURPOSE

The objective of this overview of systematic reviews (SRs; umbrella review) was to systematically summarize and critically appraise current evidence of cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).

METHOD

This study was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. The methodological quality and the risk of bias in the included SRs were assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 checklist and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool, respectively.

RESULTS

According to eight included SRs, children with ANSD achieve CI outcomes (speech perception performance) similar to their peers with sensorineural hearing loss. In children with postsynaptic ANSD (cochlear nerve deficiency), cochlear nerve hypoplasia is associated with better speech recognition outcomes compared with cochlear nerve aplasia, especially in the absence of additional disabilities. Except for one study, the overall quality of the included SRs was critically low, and except for three studies, evidence of a high risk of bias was identified in other included SRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports CI benefits for children with ANSD. To improve the quality of evidence, well-designed, prospective studies with appropriate sample sizes, using valid outcome measures, clarifying matching criteria, and taking into account the role of confounding factors are essential.

A 15-year Review of 260 Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: II. Management and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Following a review of the demographic and clinical characteristics of all pediatric patients diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) by a pediatric health care system from 2005 to 2020, the present report highlights the type and timing of intervention and outcomes in the same 260 patients with ANSD.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study reviewing the demographic data, medical history, imaging studies, audiological and speech language data, type of audiological intervention (hearing aids or cochlear implants), and mode of communication in 260 pediatric patients diagnosed with ANSD over a 15-year period.

RESULTS

A significant decrease over time in the age at hearing aid fitting was observed. While a similar reduction in the age at implantation occurred over time, cochlear implantation is still rarely performed by 12 months of age in most ANSD patients. Among bilateral ANSD patients fitted with hearing aids, the majority (89.2%) did not benefit from conventional amplification and most received cochlear implants. Some hearing aid benefit for speech and language development was observed in 5.8%, though communication difficulties were persistent and most used a combination of oral and sign language for communication. Only six patients (5%) received significant benefit from their hearing aids for speech and language development.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of ANSD management over a 15-year period reveals that hearing aids are not a viable option to develop speech and language for most infants and children with ANSD. This finding confirms previous reports and suggest that while hearing aid trials are warranted, children must be tracked closely so as to avoid delays in decision making. Cochlear implantation constitutes the major (if not only) rehabilitative intervention that allows for speech perception in patients who do not benefit from conventional amplification.

Systematic Literature Review and Early Benefit of Cochlear Implantation in Two Pediatric Auditory Neuropathy Cases

Approximately 1 in 10 children with hearing loss is affected by auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). People who have ANSD usually have great difficulty understanding speech or communicating. However, it is possible for these patients to have audiograms that may indicate profound hearing loss up to normal hearing. This disorder is prognosed with positive, intact or present otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and/or cochlear microphonics (CM) as well as abnormal or absent auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Treatment methods include conventional hearing aids as well as cochlear implants. Cochlear implants (CI) usually promise better speech understanding for ANSD patients. We performed a systematic literature review aiming to show what improvements can effectively be achieved with cochlear implants in children with ANSD and compare this with our experience with two cases of ANSD implanted at our clinic. The retrospective review of two young CI patients diagnosed with ANSD during infancy demonstrated improvements over time in speech development communicated by their parents.

Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to critically assess the effect of cochlear implantation on auditory and speech performance outcomes of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMbase, and Web of Science. The outcomes included speech recognition score, Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) score, and open-set speech perception. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies was included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data showed that, there were no significant differences between ANSD and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) groups in terms of speech recognition score (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.45, 0.47; P = .959),CAP (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: -0.13, 1.54; P = .098), SIR score (SMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.49, 0.32; P = .667), and open-set speech perception (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.05; P = .142). Sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies one at a time showed that the overall estimate and level of heterogeneity did not change substantially.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence suggested that children with ANSD who underwent cochlear implants achieved comparable effects in auditory and speech performance as children with non-ANSD SNHL.

Determination of language performance by discriminant function analysis in Mandarin-speaking preschoolers with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

OBJECTIVE

Characteristics of the audiological performance of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) have been identified; however, studies regarding factors influencing their language development, especially those related to aural-oral rehabilitation, are relatively few. This study aimed to investigate classification functions among the factors regarding audiological, interventional (rehabilitation) and demographic variables that can help determine group membership in language performance for Mandarin-speaking preschoolers with ANSD.

METHODS

Children with ANSD aged 3-6 years (n = 27) enrolled in an auditory-verbal therapy were recruited. The combination of factors that could be used to predict memberships of children regarding whether they achieved age-appropriate language performance or were at risk of language delay were explored using discriminant function analysis.

RESULTS

Maternal education level, age at initial hearing aid fitting, and duration of rehabilitation were all significant factors in predicting the membership of children with ANSD and whether they could achieve an age-appropriate language level or were at risk for language delay. The correct rate for predicting the memberships ranged from 70.4% to 83.3%. Duration of rehabilitation accounted for the greatest effect on discriminant membership regarding achieving age-appropriate language performance and being at risk of language delay. Effect of maternal education level tended to centralize on language comprehension.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were observed in the quantifiable effects of predictors in discriminant functions for language ability domains. Except for using suitable hearing devices, adequate duration of enrollment in aural and oral rehabilitation would also be important for children with ANSD to develop better language abilities.

Auditory and verbal skills development post-cochlear implantation in Mandarin children with auditory neuropathy: a follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implant (CI) is commonly used as one of the interventions in auditory neuropathy (AN) children. However, there are limited studies regarding the efficiency of CI in AN children.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the auditory and verbal skills development between the AN and typically developing (TD) children with CI.

METHODS

The follow-up study compared the post-CI scores of questionnaires of AN and TD children about auditory and verbal skills development at 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months of CI use.

RESULTS

The results of auditory perception in AN and TD groups showed a significant improvement after first 3 months. Furthermore, the score was significantly lower in AN group after 18 months of CI use. The results of verbal skills in AN group showed a progressive trend after 9 months of CI use. Besides, the scores were significantly lower in AN group after 12 months of CI use.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

The auditory perception development in AN children with CI was rapidly improved during first 3 months, and verbal skills showed a trend of improvement after 9 months of CI use. However, the differences in auditory and verbal skills between AN and TD groups increased over time.

Prevalence, risk factors, and audiological characteristics of auditory neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and audiological characteristics of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) in the pediatric population.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of medical charts was conducted for children visiting two hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

STUDY SAMPLE

Medical records of 1025 patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) were reviewed. We analyzed the databases for results of audiological examinations, risk factors, and outcomes of intervention including hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implantation (CI).

RESULTS

Out of 1025 children with SNHL, 101 patients (9.85%) were identified to have ANSD. Audiological characteristics of the ANSD group revealed a severe-to-profound degree of hearing loss, all showed type A tympanogram and absent reflexes, absent auditory brainstem response (ABR) findings with present cochlear microphonic while otoacoustic emissions were absent in 54.5% of patients. The most prevalent risk factors for ANSD in this group were family history of hearing loss, consanguinity, hyperbilirubinemia, and low birth weight. Pure tone and speech detection thresholds improved significantly with CI compared to HA use in this sample of patients with ANSD.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that ANSD is not extremely rare among Saudi children with severe to profound hearing loss, with a prevalence of 9.85%.

Cortical Auditory Plasticity Following Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) can provide an insight into the maturation of the central auditory nervous system by recording the auditory cortex responses to speech stimuli. This study aimed to explore the central auditory system development in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) using cochlear implants (CIs) and to find the correlation of CAEP biomarkers with speech perception.

METHODS

This study was performed on 23 children with prelingual deafness, diagnosed with ANSD, as well as 23 children with prelingual deafness, without ANSD as the control group. All children underwent unilateral CI before the age of 3 years. Children with ANSD were classified into two groups, based on their CAEP results prior to implantation: children with a clear CAEP response (ANSD-I) and children without an identifiable CAEP (ANSD-II). The P1 component of CAEPs and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) were recorded before the initial device activation (baseline) and at 6, 12, and 24 months postimplantation.

RESULTS

The P1 CAEP responses were present in all children in the control group, while they were recorded in only 52% of ANSD children before the CI surgery. The longitudinal analysis revealed a significant reduction in the P1 latency and a significant improvement in the P1 amplitude across different time points in all study groups. However, the P1 latency and P1 amplitude were significantly shorter and larger in the control group than the ANSD group, respectively. Also, children in the ANSD-I group exhibited a slightly shorter P1 latency, a larger P1 amplitude, and a higher SIR score than the ANSD-II group after 2 years of follow-up. The P1 CAEP latency was significantly correlated with the SIR score.

CONCLUSION

The CAEP can be used as an objective indicator of auditory cortical maturation and a predictor of speech perception performance in implanted children with ANSD.

Cochlear Implant Behavioral Outcomes for Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Mini-Systematic Review

Objective The aim of this mini-systematic review was to evaluate the evidence reporting speech, language, and auditory behavioral outcome measures for children with a diagnosis of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) who received cochlear implants (CIs) prior to 3 years of age. Method A mini-systematic review of the literature supporting evidence-based practices was performed. Two databases were searched utilizing a search strategy derived from the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) framework. Peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2019 evaluating children with a diagnosis of ANSD who were implanted prior to 3 years of age with a range of speech, language, and auditory behavioral outcomes were included. Four articles meeting inclusion criteria were critically appraised for reputable research design and risks of bias. Each of the four studies was assigned a level of evidence for effectiveness and quality assessment rating. Results Evidence supports cochlear implantation as an appropriate intervention for children with ANSD. Improvements in outcome performance were observed in all the included studies. Children with ANSD fit with CIs can achieve outcomes similar to children with sensorineural hearing loss and CIs, despite the heterogeneity of ANSD. Conclusion These findings have implications for clinical practice and for future research with current CI technology for facilitating parent education, counseling, and realistic expectations for children with ANSD and CIs.

Hearing Loss Diagnosis and Early Hearing-Related Interventions in Infants With or at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review

AIM

To synthesize published evidence regarding hearing impairment diagnosis and interventions in infants with or at high risk for cerebral palsy in the first year after birth.

METHOD

Nine databases were searched for MeSH terms up to February 2020. Included studies were published in English, enrolled infants with or at high risk for cerebral palsy, and addressed hearing evaluation/rehabilitation within the first year after birth. Quality of evidence was evaluated using RTI Item Bank and QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria. Quality of the evidence ranged from low to high, revealing variability in diagnostic assessment methodologies and adherence to diagnostic schedules. Concerns for bias included lack of recognition of cerebral palsy effects and etiologies on functional hearing assessment methods and results. Two interventions (hearing aid and cochlear implantation) were identified; however, reported use was inconsistent.

INTERPRETATION

Hearing screening in infants with or at high risk for cerebral palsy requires evaluation of the entire auditory pathway preferentially using comprehensive electrophysiological panels of assessments. For infants with perinatal neural insults, pediatric neurologists are uniquely positioned to recommend adherence to systematic surveillance and comprehensive audiology assessments, regardless of comorbidities and motor impairments.

Clinical characteristics of patients with unilateral auditory neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with unilateral auditory neuropathy (UAN), and to provide guidance for future clinical diagnosis and research.

METHODS

Patients who were clinically diagnosed with UAN from 2004 to 2019 were included. Clinical characteristics, audiological features, imaging findings, genetic test results and management effect were summarized and followed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients [mean age, 4.35 ± 4.39 years; 22 (50.00%) males and 22 (50.00%) females] were enrolled for analyses. Among the 38 patients who were tested by pure-tone or behavioral audiometry, the degree of hearing loss of the affected ear was characterized as mild in 2 ears (5.26%), moderate in 5 (13.16%), severe in 9 (23.68%) and profound in 22 (57.89%). For the 44 contralateral ears, 33 (75.00%) showed normal hearing and 11 (25.00%) presented with sensorineural hearing loss. Auditory brainstem responses were absent or abnormal in all 44 affected ears, while otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonics were present. Among the 18 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 7 (38.89%) presented cochlear nerve deficiency (CND). Nineteen candidate variants were found in 12 patients among the 15 UAN patients who were conducted targeted gene capture and next generation sequencing. Thirty patients were followed up by telephone to investigate their management effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates comprehensive audiological features of patients with UAN to improve the clinical understanding and diagnosis. Some patients with UAN could show ipsilateral CND and MRI is essential to evaluate if the nerve is deficient. No pathogenic variants that directly related to the pathogenesis of UAN have been found in this study currently.