Preliminary experience and feasibility test using a novel 3D virtual-reality microscope for otologic surgical procedures

Outcomes After Exoscopic Versus Microscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the outcomes of exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care otology-neurotology practice.

PATIENTS

Adult subjects with a diagnosis of tympanic membrane perforation from 2018 to 2022.

INTERVENTION

Exoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty with cartilage + perichondrium or perichondrium/fascia graft.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were graft success rate (1 wk, 3 wk, 3 mo, and 6 mo postoperatively) and operative time. Secondary outcomes included audiometric outcomes of postoperative air-bone gap (ABG), change in ABG, pure tone average (PTA), speech reception threshold (SRT), and word recognition score (WRS) at 6-month follow-up and complication rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak, facial nerve injury, persistent tinnitus, and persistent vertigo.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty by a single surgeon. Thirty-six patients underwent exoscopic tympanoplasty, and 35 patients underwent microscopic tympanoplasty. Cartilage and perichondrium were utilized in 27 subjects (75.0%) in the exoscopic group and in 25 subjects (71.4%) in the microscopic group (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.04). Graft success rate was as follows (exoscope versus microscope): 100% (36/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 1 week (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.0), 97.2% (35/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 3 weeks (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.1), 97.2% (35/36) versus 94.3% (33/35) at 3 months (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.07), and 91.7% (33/36) versus 91.4% (32/35) at 6 months (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.0). Operative time was 57.7 minutes for the exoscopic group and 65.4 minutes for the microscopic group (p = 0.08, 95% CI [-16.4, 0.9], Cohen's d = 0.4). There were no serious complications. All preoperative and postoperative audiometric outcomes were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes after exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty are comparable.

Cadaveric study of ergonomics and performance using a robotic exoscope with a head-mounted display in spine surgery

The conventional microscope has the disadvantage of a potentially unergonomic posture for the surgeon, which can affect performance. Monitor-based exoscopes could provide a more ergonomic posture, as already shown in pre-clinical studies. The aim of this study was to test the usability and comfort of a novel head-mounted display (HMD)-based exoscope on spinal surgical approaches in a simulated OR setting. A total of 21 neurosurgeons naïve to the device were participated in this prospective trial. After a standardized training session with the device, participants were asked to perform a single-level thoracolumbar decompression surgery on human cadavers using the exoscope. Subsequently, all participants completed a comfort and safety questionnaire. For the objective evaluation of the performance, all interventions were videotaped and analyzed. Twelve men and nine women with a mean age of 34 (range: 24-57) were participating in the study. Average time for decompression was 15 min (IqR 9.6; 24.2); three participants (14%) terminated the procedure prematurely. In these dropouts, a significantly higher incidence of back/neck pain (p = 0.002 for back, p = 0.046 for neck pain) as well as an increased frequency of HMD readjustments (p = 0.045) and decreased depth perception (p = 0.03) were documented. Overall, the surgeons' satisfaction with the exoscope was 84% (IqR 75; 100). Using a standardized, pre-interventional training, it is possible for exoscope-naïve surgeons to perform sufficient spinal decompression using the HMD-based exoscope with a high satisfaction. However, inaccurate HMD setup prior to the start of the procedure may lead to discomfort and unsatisfactory results.

First experience of lymphaticovenular anastomosis using BHC RobotiScope: A case report

RATIONALE

The RoboticScope (BHS Technologies GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria) is a robotic exoscope, which consists of a robotic arm that holds a 3-dimensional camera. It has an advantage that a surgeon can perform an operation comfortably with a favorable ergonomic position. Also, it allows the delivery of clear and high-quality visualization for surgeons. In this study, we would like to share our initial experience with this newly developed microscope technology in lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). To the best of our knowledge, it is the first experience of LVA using this microscope in Asia.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 65-year-old woman presented with bilateral lower extremity lymphedema after a hysterectomy that was performed 25 years back. Despite complex decongestive physiotherapy, an edematous symptom in both legs worsened.

DIAGNOSES

In lymphoscintigraphy, a decreased visualization of main lymphatic flow in both the lower extremities was evident which was further suggestive of lymphatic obstruction.

INTERVENTION

Although both sides showed edematous symptoms, we decided to proceed with the surgery on the left side first, because of the worsened condition. Four LVAs were performed at the dorsum of the foot (×2), ankle, and the superior edge of the knee using RoboticScope.

OUTCOMES

At 6-months follow-up after operation, the postoperative circumference diameters were improved than preoperative in 10 cm above the knee (45 cm vs 49 cm), 10cm below the knee (37 cm vs 41 cm) and lateral malleolus (25 cm vs 28 cm). The lower extremity lymphedema index was also improved from 346.7 to 287.4 postoperatively. The RoboticScope provided a high-resolution image and a favorable ergonomic position during an operation.

LESSONS

The results represent the possibility of the application of a robotic microscope in the field of microsurgery, and further studies are necessitated to confirm the efficacy of this system.

[New Technologies in Microsurgery: Potential, Indications and Economical Aspects - Report of the Consensus Workshop of the German-Speaking Society for Microsurgery of Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM)]

Recently, several new technologies to support microsurgeons have received European market approval. This article summarizes and discusses the impressions of an expert panel to classify the potential of new technologies in terms of benefits for the surgeon, specific indications and economic aspects during the 42nd Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM) in Graz, Austria. In general, the expert panel addressed the principles and prerequisite for the successful establishment of new technologies and, in particular, novel optical and robotic systems. For this purpose, the current scientific literature was reviewed and initial clinical experience in the context of case series and retrospective studies was presented by the members of the expert panel. In the ensuing discussion, it was pointed out that it will first be necessary to identify patient subgroups in which the use of the new technologies is most likely to achieve a clinical benefit. Since clinical approval has already been granted for some systems, an approach can be developed for immediate clinical application from the simplest possible use to ever finer applications, i. e. from microsurgery to supermicrosurgery. Initially, funding for cost-intensive systems would presumably not be possible through revenue from standard care, but only through grants or subsidized clinical trials. In a final survey, the majority of meeting participants see the need for a price reduction of both visualization and surgical robotics technologies to enable widespread clinical establishment. Likewise, a majority of participants would prefer a combination of an exoscope or robotic microscope and a surgical robot for clinical use. The present consensus work addresses the development of a strategy for the effective establishment of new technologies, which should further increase the surgical quality of selected interventions.

Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery and Its Future in Plastic Surgery

Within the last 20 years, robotic-assisted surgeries have been implemented as routine procedures in many surgical fields, except in plastic surgery. Although several case series report promising results, technical and economic aspects have prevented its translation into clinical routine. This review is based on a PubMed and Google Scholar database search, including case reports, case series, clinical and preclinical trials, as well as patents. Past, recent approaches, ongoing patents, as well as eight specific systems for robotic-assisted microsurgery and their potential to be translated into a clinical routine, are described. They may lay the ground for a novel field within plastic surgery. This review provides an overview of the emerging technologies and clinical and preclinical studies and discusses the potential of robotic assistance in the field of plastic surgery.

A Novel Three-Dimensional Robot Arm Steered Camera for Ear Surgery

ABSTRACT

Ear surgery requires magnified imaging of anatomical structures from its beginning to achieve safe and successful surgical outcomes. The historical evolution of magnification in otology has developed from monocular to binocular, and to three-dimensional and even to digital in modern times. Current technological advancements pursue high-quality visualization for the best surgical outcomes but also ergonomic for surgeons. Here, we evaluated the usability of such new technology in common otological surgeries like cochlear implantation and stapedectomy for the first time in patients. A three-dimensional camera mounted to a robot arm has hands-free control by goggles worn by the surgeon on a head mount. The camera at a distance of the patients but can also be draped in a sterile way that it forms a barrier tent between patient and surgical personnel in the theatre. The main reason to evaluate the feasibility of this new exoscope was driven by COVID-19 obligate measures for elective surgery such as hearing restoration. This new technology can be considered an important advantage for the surgeons working in microsurgery to perform their elective operations without aerosolization of the drill rinsing water possibly containing contaminated tissue. From a subjective point of view, the image quality is equivalent to conventional microscopes to provide safe otologic surgery.

Performance of microvascular anastomosis with a new robotic visualization system: proof of concept

Microvascular procedures require visual magnification of the surgical field, e.g. by a microscope. This can be accompanied by an unergonomic posture with musculoskeletal pain or long-term degenerative changes as the eye is bound to the ocular throughout the whole procedure. The presented study describes the advantages and drawbacks of a 3D exoscope camera system. The RoboticScope^®-system (BHS Technologies^®, Innsbruck, Austria) features a high-resolution 3D-camera that is placed over the surgical field and a head-mounted-display (HMD) that the camera pictures are transferred to. A motion sensor in the HMD allows for hands-free change of the exoscope position via head movements. For general evaluation of the system functions coronary artery anastomoses of ex-vivo pig hearts were performed. Second, the system was evaluated for anastomosis of a radial-forearm-free-flap in a clinical setting/in vivo. The system positioning was possible entirely hands-free using head movements. Camera control was intuitive; visualization of the operation site was adequate and independent from head or body position. Besides technical instructions of the providing company, there was no special surgical training of the surgeons or involved staff upfront performing the procedures necessary. An ergonomic assessment questionnaire showed a favorable ergonomic position in comparison to surgery with a microscope. The outcome of the operated patient was good. There were no intra- or postoperative complications. The exoscope facilitates a change of head and body position without losing focus of the operation site and an ergonomic working position. Repeated applications have to clarify if the system benefits in clinical routine.