Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring: Some Technical Considerations

Multimaterial and multifunctional neural interfaces: from surface-type and implantable electrodes to fiber-based devices

Development of neural interfaces from surface electrodes to fibers with various type, functionality, and materials.

Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring detection of carotid compression during ACDF surgery in a patient with a vascularly isolated hemisphere

The authors report herein a case of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in which findings on somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring led to the correction of carotid artery compression in a patient with a vascularly isolated hemisphere (no significant collateral blood vessels to the carotid artery territory). The amplitude of the cortical SSEP component to left ulnar nerve stimulation progressively decreased in multiple runs, but there were no changes in the cervicomedullary SSEP component to the same stimulus. When the lateral (right-sided) retractor was removed, the cortical SSEP component returned to baseline. The retraction was then intermittently relaxed during the rest of the operation, and the patient suffered no neurological morbidity. Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrated a vascularly isolated right hemisphere. During anterior cervical spine surgery, carotid artery compression by the retractor can cause hemispheric ischemia and infarction in patients with inadequate collateral circulation. The primary purpose of SSEP monitoring during ACDF surgery is to detect compromise of the dorsal column somatosensory pathways within the cervical spinal cord, but intraoperative SSEP monitoring can also detect hemispheric ischemia. Concurrent recording of cervicomedullary SSEPs can help differentiate cortical SSEP changes due to hemispheric ischemia from those due to compromise of the dorsal column pathways. If there are adverse changes in the cortical SSEPs but no changes in the cervicomedullary SSEPs, the possibility of hemispheric ischemia due to carotid artery compression by the retractor should be considered.

What Is the Frequency of Intraoperative Alerts During Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Current Neuromonitoring Methodology? A Retrospective Study of 218 Surgical Procedures

INTRODUCTION

There is variability in intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), anesthetic and surgical techniques for the treatment of pediatric spinal deformity. This study evaluates a series of patients treated at multiple centers utilizing transcranial motor and somatosensory evoked potentials (TcMEP and SSEP) and electromyography (EMG). The frequency of alerts and the intraoperative follow-up is reported.

METHODS

Standard patient demographics and IONM data were collected from a two-month cohort of pediatric spine deformity cases.

RESULTS

Data from 218 scoliosis patients were included from 46 facilities and 72 surgeons. Baseline upper and lower extremity TcMEP data were present in 96.7% and 93.9% patients respectively. Baseline upper and lower SSEPs were present in 99.5% and 95.4% respectively Surgical TCMEP alerts occurred in 19 (8.7%) patients during deformity correction (n = 11), placement of instrumentation (n = 5), decompression (n = 2), and closing (n = 1) with concurrent SSEP alerts occurring in five patients. Nine had TCMEP recovery, eight showed partial recovery and two did not recover. Additional alerts occurred due to: positioning (n = 16), inhalational agent change (n = 4), global physiological change (n = 4) and technical reasons (n = 2). A total of 2164 pedicle screws were tested. Of 197 (9.1%) screws that tested from 6-9 mA, 171 (65.4%) were left unchanged, 10 (51%) removed, eight (4.1%) repositioned with improved threshold, and eight (4.1%) without improvement. Of 26 screws that tested ≤ 5 milliamperes (mA), 17 (65.4%) were left unchanged, five (19.2%) removed, two (7.7%) repositioned with improved threshold, and two (7.7%) without improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

IONM provides data that causes re-evaluation in about 10% of pediatric spinal deformity cases.

Detection of Position-Related Sciatic Nerve Dysfunction by Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spinal Surgery

It is well established that intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are sensitive to plexus and peripheral nerve dysfunction related to malpositioning of patients during spinal surgery. While most reports focus on upper extremity nerve or brachial plexus effects, there is very little on detection of sciatic nerve compromise. Recording of the SSEP at the popliteal fossa is a common strategy to aid in troubleshooting stimulus-related problems or distal peripheral tibial nerve failure; yet position-related sciatic nerve effects may not be realized by changes in the popliteal fossa response. Three posterior lumbar surgeries are reviewed in which there was evidence of proximal lower extremity peripheral nerve dysfunction related to positioning. Loss of posterior tibial nerve SSEPs with preservation of the peripheral popliteal fossa response recording occurred in the absence of critical surgical manipulations. Efforts at repositioning and release of tension on the lower limbs promptly resulted in recovey of lost responses. Two of the three cases involved patients in a kneeling position with a tight strap across the posterior thigh. Standard SSEP recordings used in intraoperative neuromonitoring do not specifically localize intraoperative changes to the sciatic nerve; thus, such changes affecting SSEPs above the popliteal fossa mimic iatrogenic changes occurring at the surgical site. These case reports show that when the stage of surgery does not support iatrogenic changes, malpositioning affecting sciatic nerve should be considered, especially for patients placed in a kneeling position on an Andrews frame.

Mechanisms of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes

Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) changes during intraoperative monitoring may reflect damage to or potentially reversible dysfunction of the ear, the eighth nerve, or the brainstem auditory pathways up to the level of the mesencephalon. They may also be caused by other physiologic mechanisms such as anesthesia, hypothermia, and acoustic masking from drilling noise, or they may result from technical factors that prevent proper stimulus delivery or recording of an evoked potential that is actually present. Cochlear ischemia or infarction resulting from compromise of the internal auditory artery and inner ear damage during temporal bone drilling will affect all BAEP components, including wave I. Direct mechanical or thermal trauma to the eighth nerve will delay, attenuate, and possibly eliminate waves III and V, but wave I, which is generated at the cochlear end of the eighth nerve, may be preserved. During scraping of tumor off the eighth nerve, force applied in an ear-toward-brainstem direction can avulse the fragile fibers of the distal eighth nerve at the area cribrosa. Prolonging the I-to-III interpeak interval during retraction of the cerebellum and brainstem reflects stretching of the eighth nerve, and is often reversible. Vasospasm within the eighth nerve can cause similar, potentially reversible BAEP changes. Damage to the brainstem auditory pathways at or below the level of the mesencephalon will delay and attenuate or eliminate wave V. Wave III is affected similarly if the damage is at or caudal to the region of the superior olivary complex. These BAEP changes may reflect direct mechanical or thermal damage to the brainstem, brainstem compression, or ischemia or infarction resulting from vascular compromise. During BAEP monitoring, examination of the pattern of BAEP changes, analysis of their correlation with surgical maneuvers, and investigation for possible contributory technical factors can help to determine the cause of the BAEP changes and provide the appropriate information to the rest of the surgical team.