Onchocercal eye disease and the impact of Mectizan treatment

Chorioretinitis among Immigrant and Travellers. Comment on Mansour et al. Presumed Onchocerciasis Chorioretinitis Spilling over into North America, Europe and Middle East. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3626

We read, with interest, the paper by Mansour et al [...].

Preliminary assessment of Onchocerca-induced visual impairment using clinical fundus camera in Gashaka local government area of Taraba state, north eastern Nigeria

Introduction

Onchocerciasis is the world's second leading cause of infectious blindness and remains a major problem in parts of Africa. In light of the efforts targeted towards improving ongoing elimination program, this study assessed onchocerca-induced visual impairments in Gashaka local government areas (LGA) in Taraba State, north-eastern Nigeria.

Methods

In 2019, we recruited 158 consenting visually impaired persons across three communities in Garbabi ward of Gashaka LGA. To avoid confusion with co-endemic trachoma, the integrity of the tarsal conjunctiva, eyelashes were assessed using direct light. The anterior segment of the eye was also examined using a torchlight with oblique illumination. However, the posterior segment of the eye was assessed using a fundus camera. Two photographic images for the left and right eye of each participant were captured using the clinical fundus camera. The photographic eye images that were too dark were discarded, and only clear images were analyzed by two ophthalmologists. An ocular manifestation report was recorded for each participant following consensus between the ophthalmologists.

Results

Of the 316 photographic eye images, almost half 146 (46.2%) from 73 participants were just too destroyed for light to penetrate and was not included in the analysis. Only 170 from 85 participants were clear and examinable. A total of 33 (39%) participants had chorioretinitis suggestive of onchocerciasis, including 22(25.9%) with chorio-retinal atrophy, 7(8.2%) and 4(4.7%) had chorioretinal atrophy in combination with early cataract and signs of trachoma respectively. In addition, 3(3.5%) of the participant had eye images which showed lens opacities, 1(1.2%) showed signs of keratoconus and 1(1.2%) showed a scared and pigmented cornea, possibly due to onchocerciasis. Furthermore, 28 (32.9%) had some ill-defined changes and 19 (22.4%) showed poorly defined chorio-retinal atrophy.

Conclusion

In a bid to sustain MDA gains towards elimination of onchocerciasis, this work highlights the need for continuous assessment of onchocerciasis induced visual impairment, strengthening of ivermectin delivery and optimizing compliance and patient care among affected populations. These would require resource acquisition and local capacity building. Our preliminary findings call for further operational research on ocular morbidity as well as future stakeholders' consultations in this important and understudied area.

Anti-retinal autoantibodies in myopic macular degeneration: a pilot study

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency and types of anti-retinal autoantibodies (ARAs) in highly myopic patients and to explore any association between ARAs and the severity of myopic macular degeneration (MMD).

METHODS

This was a clinic-based study of 16 patients with high myopia (spherical equivalent worse than -6 dioptres or axial length (AL) ≥ 26.5 mm) recruited from the High Myopia clinic of the Singapore National Eye Centre. MMD was graded from fundus photographs according to the Meta-analysis for Pathologic Myopia (META-PM) classification. Severe MMD was defined as META-PM category 3 or 4. AL and logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured. Sera were obtained from subjects and analysed for the presence of ARAs with the western blot technique.

RESULTS

The mean AL was significantly longer in patients with severe MMD (n = 8) than those without severe MMD (n = 8) (31.50 vs. 28.51, p = 0.005). There was at least one ARA identified in all patients. The most common ARA was anti-carbonic anhydrase II (anti-CAII), present in nine patients (56.3%). Anti-CAII was detected in more patients with severe MMD than those without (75 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.32). LogMar BCVA was also worse in subjects with anti-CAII (0.5 ± 0.38 vs. 0.22 ± 0.08, p = 0.06). The number of ARAs significantly correlated with increasing AL (r = 0.61, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

ARAs are prevalent in patients with high myopia, and this increases with increasing AL. In particular, anti-CAII antibodies were highly prevalent in patients with severe MMD, suggesting that ARAs may be associated with MMD. Further studies are necessary to confirm these observations in larger cohorts.

Onchocerca volvulus infection and serological prevalence, ocular onchocerciasis and parasite transmission in northern and central Togo after decades of Simulium damnosum s.l. vector control and mass drug administration of ivermectin

Background

Mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin has become the main intervention to control onchocerciasis or “river blindness”. In Togo, after many years of MDA, Onchocerca volvulus infection has declined dramatically, and elimination appears achievable, but in certain river basins the current situation remains unknown. We have conducted parasitological, serological, ophthalmological, and entomological assessments in northern and central Togo within the river basins of Ôti, Kéran and Mô.

Methodology/Principal findings

Examinations were completed in 1,455 participants from 11 onchocerciasis sentinel villages, and O. volvulus transmission by Simulium damnosum sensu lato (s.l.) was evaluated. In children (aged 1–10 years), the prevalence of microfilariae (Mf) was 2.3% and in adults it ranged from 5.1 to 13.3%. Positive IgG4 responses to O. volvulus adult (crude) worm antigen (OvAg) and the recombinant Ov16 antigen were in all-ages 48.7% and 34.4%, and 29.1% and 14.9% in children, respectively. In the river basin villages of Kéran, Mô and Ôti, the IgG4 seroprevalences to OvAg in children were 51.7%, 23.5% and 12.7%, respectively, and to the Ov16 antigen 33.3% (Kéran) and 5.2% (Ôti). Onchocerciasis ocular lesions (punctate keratitis, evolving iridocyclitis and chorioretinitis) were observed in children and young adults. O. volvulus-specific DNA (Ov150) was detected by poolscreen in vector samples collected from Tchitchira/Kéran(22.8%), Bouzalo/Mô(11.3%), Baghan/Mô(2.9%) and Pancerys/Ôti(4.9%); prevalences of O. volvulus infection in S. damnosum s.l. were, respectively, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1% and 0.2%.

Conclusions/Significance

In the northern and central river basins in Togo, interruption of O. volvulus transmission has not yet been attained. Patent O. volvulus infections, positive antibody responses, progressive ocular onchocerciasis were diagnosed, and parasite transmission by S. damnosum s.l. occurred close to the survey locations. Future interventions may require approaches selectively targeted to non-complying endemic populations, to the seasonality of parasite transmission and national onchocerciasis control programs should harmonize cross-border MDA as a coordinated intervention.

Mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin has become the main tool in the efforts to control and eliminate onchocerciasis (“river blindness”). In some areas, and after many years of MDA, levels of Onchocerca volvulus infection (the causative parasite) have declined greatly, and elimination appears achievable. In certain river basins of northern and central Togo, the present epidemiological situation remains unknown. The guidelines of the World Health Organization recommend that before ivermectin MDA can be stopped, interruption of O. volvulus transmission must be demonstrated. To this end, parasitological, serological, ophthalmological, and entomological assessments were conducted in the Ôti, Kéran and Mô river basins. O. volvulus infections and positive antibody responses were found in children aged ≤10 years and adults. Progressive ocular onchocerciasis was diagnosed, and parasite transmission by Simulium damnosum s.l. (the disease vector) occurred close to the survey locations. Thus, O. volvulus transmission continues in northern and central Togo, and future interventions may require approaches selectively adapted to seasonal migration of non-complying endemic populations in and out of the river basins, as well as seasonal transmission by the vectors. National control programmes should harmonize cross-border MDA as a coordinated intervention.

Sustainable control of onchocerciasis: ocular pathology in onchocerciasis patients treated annually with ivermectin for 23 years: a cohort study

The evolution and persistence of ocular pathology was assessed in a cohort of Onchocerca volvulus infected patients treated annually with ivermectin for 23 years. Patients were resident in rural Central and Kara Region of Togo and ocular examinations included testing of visual acuity, slit lamp examination of the anterior eye segment and the eye fundus by ophthalmoscopy. Before ivermectin treatment, vivid O.volvulus microfilariae (MF) were observed in the right and left anterior eye chamber in 52% and 42% of patients (n = 82), and dead MF were seen in the right and left cornea in 24% and 15% of cases, respectively. At 23 years post initial treatment (PIT), none of the patients (n = 82) presented with MF in the anterior chamber and cornea. A complete resolution of punctate keratitis (PK) lesions without observable corneal scars was present at 23 years PIT (p<0.0001), and sclerosing keratitits (SK) lessened by half, but mainly in patients with lesions at early stage of evolution. Early-stage iridocyclitis diminished from 42%(rE) and 40%(lE) to 13% (rE+lE)(p<0.0001), but advanced iridocyclitis augmented (p<0.001) at 23 years PIT compared to before ivermectin. Advanced-stage papillitis and chorioretinitis did not regress, while early-stage papillitis present in 28%(rE) and 27%(lE) of patients at before ivermectin regressed to 17%(rE) and 18%(lE), and early-stage chorioretinitis present in 51%(rE+lE) of cases at before ivermectin was observed in 12%(rE) and 13%(lE) at 23 years PIT (p<0.0001). Thus, regular annual ivermectin treatment eliminated and prevented the migration of O. volvulus microfilariae into the anterior eye chamber and cornea; keratitis punctata lesions resolved completely and early-stage sclerosing keratitits and iridocyclitis regressed, whilst advanced lesions of the anterior and posterior eye segment remained progressive. In conclusion, annual ivermectin treatments may prevent the emergence of ocular pathology in those populations still exposed to O.volvulus infection.

Trial Registration: www.pactr.orgPACTR201303000464219)

Ivermectin for onchocercal eye disease (river blindness)

BACKGROUND

It is believed that ivermectin (a microfilaricide) could prevent blindness due to onchocerciasis. However, when given to everyone in communities where onchocerciasis is common, the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye are uncertain and data on whether the drug prevents visual loss are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of ivermectin in preventing visual impairment and visual field loss in onchocercal eye disease. The secondary aim was to assess the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye in onchocerciasis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1950 to April 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2012), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 2 April 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials with at least one year of follow-up comparing ivermectin with placebo or no treatment. Participants in the trials were people normally resident in endemic onchocercal communities with or without one or more characteristic signs of ocular onchocerciasis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We contacted study authors for additional information. As trials varied in design and setting, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included four trials: two small studies (n = 398) in which people with onchocercal infection were given one dose of ivermectin or placebo and followed up for one year; and two larger community-based studies (n = 4941) whereby all individuals in selected communities were treated every six or 12 months with ivermectin or placebo, whether or not they were infected, and followed for two to three years. The studies provide evidence that treating people who have onchocerciasis with ivermectin reduces the number of microfilariae in their skin and eye(s) and reduces the number of punctate opacities. There was weaker evidence that ivermectin reduced the risk of chorioretinitis. The studies were too small and of too short a duration to provide evidence for an effect on sclerosing keratitis, iridocyclitis, optic nerve disease or visual loss. One community-based study in communities mesoendemic for the savannah strain of O.volvulus provided evidence that annual mass treatment with ivermectin reduces the risk of new cases of optic nerve disease and visual field loss. The other community-based study of mass biannual treatment of ivermectin in communities affected by the forest strain of O.volvulus demonstrated reductions in microfilarial load, punctate keratitis and iridocyclitis but not sclerosing keratitis, chorioretinitis, optic atrophy or visual impairment. The study was underpowered to estimate the effect of ivermectin on visual impairment and other less frequent clinical signs. The studies included in this review reported some adverse effects, in particular an increased risk of postural hypotension in people treated with ivermectin.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The lack of evidence for prevention of visual impairment and blindness should not be interpreted to mean that ivermectin is not effective, however, clearly this is a key question that remains unanswered. The main evidence for a protective effect of mass treatment with ivermectin on visual field loss and optic nerve disease comes from communities mesoendemic for the savannah strain of O.volvulus. Whether these findings can be applied to communities with different endemicity and affected by the forest strain is unclear. Serious adverse effects were rarely reported. None of the studies, however, were conducted in areas where people are infected with Loa loa (loiasis).

Ivermectin and onchocerciasis: is it all solved?

The donation of ivermectin by Merck and Co. Inc. has led to one of the most effective private-public partnerships controlling a disease of major public health importance particularly in Africa. The up scaling of ivermectin distribution during the last 15 years has been remarkable with almost 40 million people treated in 2003, many already on their regular annual dose. The tools that have been developed particularly by the APOC programme have been instrumental in this increase. However, ivermectin is a microfilaricide and does not kill the adult worms. Distribution will be needed for at least 25 years and latest estimates indicate that 90 million people need annual treatment if onchocerciasis is to be eliminated as a public health problem. In spite of this incredible progress it is difficult to see how the programme will be sustained, especially after the closure of APOC in 2010. A macrofilaricide destroying adult worms and safe for mass distribution would solve the problem of onchocerciasis.

Ivermectin for onchocercal eye disease (river blindness)

BACKGROUND

It is believed that ivermectin (a microfilaricide) could prevent blindness due to onchocerciasis. However, when given to everyone in communities where onchocerciasis is common, the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye are uncertain and data on whether the drug prevents visual loss is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of ivermectin in preventing visual acuity and visual field loss in onchocercal eye disease. The secondary aim is to assess the effects of ivermectin on lesions affecting the eye in onchocerciasis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group specialised register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register - CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the reference lists of identified trials, the Science Citation Index and we contacted investigators, experts and pharmaceutical companies to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials with at least one year follow up, comparing ivermectin at a dose of 150 micrograms per kilogram of body weight with either placebo or no treatment. Participants were people normally resident in endemic onchocercal communities with or without one or more characteristic signs of ocular onchocerciasis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Trials varied in design and setting, so no meta-analysis was done.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes five trials with data from 3810 participants. All the trials compared ivermectin with placebo and were judged to be of moderate risk of bias in terms of methodological quality. No statistically significant difference was observed in any trial (reporting visual acuity outcome) between ivermectin and placebo groups for visual acuity loss.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Questions about the effectiveness of ivermectin in preventing visual acuity loss have not been answered by best available evidence.

An Essential Role for Antibody in Neutrophil and Eosinophil Recruitment to the Cornea: B Cell-Deficient (μMT) Mice Fail to Develop Th2-Dependent, Helminth-Mediated Keratitis

Invasion of the corneal stroma by neutrophils and eosinophils and subsequent degranulation disrupts corneal clarity and can result in permanent loss of vision. In the current study, we used a model of helminth-induced inflammation to demonstrate a novel role for Ab in mediating recruitment of these inflammatory cells to the central cornea. C57BL/6 and B cell-deficient (μMT) mice were immunized s.c. and injected intrastromally with Ags from the parasitic helminth Onchocerca volvulus (which causes river blindness). C57BL/6 mice developed pronounced corneal opacification, which was associated with an Ag-specific IL-5 response and peripheral eosinophilia, temporal recruitment of neutrophils and eosinophils from the limbal vessels to the peripheral cornea and subsequent migration to the central cornea. In contrast, the corneas of μMT mice failed to develop keratitis after intrastromal injection of parasite Ags unless Ags were injected with immune sera. Eosinophils were recruited from the limbal vessels to the peripheral cornea in μMT mice, but failed to migrate to the central cornea, whereas neutrophil recruitment was impaired at both stages. With the exception of IL-5, T cell responses and peripheral eosinophils were not significantly different between C57BL/6 and μMT mice. Taken together, these findings not only demonstrate that Ab is required for the development of keratitis, but also show that recruitment of neutrophils to the cornea is Ab-dependent, whereas eosinophil migration is only partially dependent upon Ab interactions.