1
|
Frasie A, Houry M, Plourde C, Robert MT, Bouyer LJ, Roy JS. Feedback for the prevention and rehabilitation of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Work 2023; 76:61-94. [PMID: 36872834 DOI: 10.3233/wor-220545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) remain a challenge despite research aimed at improving their prevention and treatment. Extrinsic feedback has been suggested for the prevention and rehabilitation of WRMSDs to improve sensorimotor control, and ultimately to reduce pain and disability. However, there are few systematic reviews on the effectiveness of extrinsic feedback for WRMSDs. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review investigating the effect of extrinsic feedback for the prevention and rehabilitation of WRMSDs. METHODS Five databases (CINAHL, Embase, Ergonomics Abstract, PsycInfo, PubMed) were searched. Studies of various designs assessing the effects of extrinsic feedback during work tasks on three outcomes (function, symptoms, sensorimotor control) in the context of prevention and rehabilitation of WRMSDs were included. RESULTS Forty-nine studies were included, for a total sample of 3387 participants (including 925 injured) who performed work-related tasks in the workplace (27 studies) or in controlled environments (22 studies). The use of extrinsic feedback was shown to be effective in controlled environments for short-term prevention of functional limitations and sensorimotor alterations (very limited to moderate evidence) and for improving, in injured participants, function, symptoms and sensorimotor control (moderate evidence). In the workplace, it was shown to be effective for short-term prevention of functional limitations (limited evidence). There was conflicting evidence regarding its effect for WRMSD rehabilitation in the workplace. CONCLUSION Extrinsic feedback is an interesting complementary tool for the prevention and rehabilitation of WRMSDs in controlled environments. More evidence is needed regarding its effect for the prevention and rehabilitation of WRMSDs in the workplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Frasie
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), QuebecCity, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Maxime Houry
- Centre d'Études des Transformations des Activités Physiques etSportives (CETAPS), Université de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Charles Plourde
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), QuebecCity, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Maxime T Robert
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), QuebecCity, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Laurent J Bouyer
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), QuebecCity, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Roy
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), QuebecCity, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Eerd D, Munhall C, Irvin E, Rempel D, Brewer S, van der Beek AJ, Dennerlein JT, Tullar J, Skivington K, Pinion C, Amick B. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and symptoms: an update of the evidence. Occup Environ Med 2015; 73:62-70. [PMID: 26552695 PMCID: PMC4717459 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2015-102992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 09/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The burden of disabling musculoskeletal pain and injuries (musculoskeletal disorders, MSDs) arising from work-related causes in many workplaces remains substantial. There is little consensus on the most appropriate interventions for MSDs. Our objective was to update a systematic review of workplace-based interventions for preventing and managing upper extremity MSD (UEMSD). We followed a systematic review process developed by the Institute for Work & Health and an adapted best evidence synthesis. 6 electronic databases were searched (January 2008 until April 2013 inclusive) yielding 9909 non-duplicate references. 26 high-quality and medium-quality studies relevant to our research question were combined with 35 from the original review to synthesise the evidence on 30 different intervention categories. There was strong evidence for one intervention category, resistance training, leading to the recommendation: Implementing a workplace-based resistance training exercise programme can help prevent and manage UEMSD and symptoms. The synthesis also revealed moderate evidence for stretching programmes, mouse use feedback and forearm supports in preventing UEMSD or symptoms. There was also moderate evidence for no benefit for EMG biofeedback, job stress management training, and office workstation adjustment for UEMSD and symptoms. Messages are proposed for both these and other intervention categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Van Eerd
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - C Munhall
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - E Irvin
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Rempel
- Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Richmond, California, USA
| | - S Brewer
- CB&I, Inc, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
| | - A J van der Beek
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J T Dennerlein
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Physical Therapy, Movement & Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - J Tullar
- School of Public Health, Institute for Health Policy, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - K Skivington
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Pinion
- CB&I, Inc, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
| | - B Amick
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
King TK, Severin CN, Van Eerd D, Ibrahim S, Cole D, Amick B, Steenstra IA. A pilot randomised control trial of the effectiveness of a biofeedback mouse in reducing self-reported pain among office workers. ERGONOMICS 2012; 56:59-68. [PMID: 23140249 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.733735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A pilot study examined the effectiveness of a biofeedback mouse in reducing upper extremity pain and discomfort in office workers; in addition, relative mouse use (RMU), satisfaction and the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in a workplace setting were evaluated. The mouse would gently vibrate if the hand was idle for more than 12 s. The feedback reminded users to rest the arm in neutral, supported postures. Analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in shoulder pain and discomfort for the intervention group at T2 (38.7% lower than controls). Statistically significant differences in RMU time between groups were seen post intervention (-7% at T1 and +15% at T2 for the intervention group). Fifty-five percent of the intervention group was willing to continue using the mouse. It appears feasible to perform an RCT for this type of intervention in a workplace setting. Further study including more participants is suggested. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY The study findings support the feasibility of conducting randomised control trials in office settings to evaluate ergonomics interventions. The intervention resulted in reduced pain and discomfort in the shoulder. The intervention could be a relevant tool in the reduction of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder. Further research will better explain the study's preliminary findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor K King
- The Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Korte EM, Huysmans MA, de Jong AM, van de Ven JGM, Ruijsendaal M. Effects of four types of non-obtrusive feedback on computer behaviour, task performance and comfort. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2012; 43:344-353. [PMID: 21726853 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2009] [Accepted: 05/31/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of non-obtrusive feedback on continuous lifted hand/finger behaviour, task performance and comfort. In an experiment with 24 participants the effects of two visual and two tactile feedback signals were compared to a no-feedback condition in a computer task. Results from the objective measures showed that all types of feedback were equally effective to reduce lifted hand/finger behaviour (effectiveness) compared to absence of feedback, while task performance was not affected (efficiency). In contrast to objective measures, subjective user experience was significantly different for the four types of feedback signals. Continuous tactile feedback appeared to be the best signal; not only the effectiveness and efficiency were rated reasonable, it also scored best on perceived match between signal and required action. This study shows the importance of including user experiences when investigating usability of feedback signals. Non-obtrusive feedback embedded in products and environments may successfully be used to support office workers to adopt healthy, productive and comfortable working behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsbeth M de Korte
- TNO Work & Employment, P.O. Box 718, 2130 AS Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cancelliere C, Cassidy JD, Ammendolia C, Côté P. Are workplace health promotion programs effective at improving presenteeism in workers? A systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the literature. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:395. [PMID: 21615940 PMCID: PMC3123596 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2011] [Accepted: 05/26/2011] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Presenteeism is highly prevalent and costly to employers. It is defined as being present at work, but limited in some aspect of job performance by a health problem. Workplace health promotion (WHP) is a common strategy used to enhance on-the-job productivity. The primary objective is to determine if WHP programs are effective in improving presenteeism. The secondary objectives are to identify characteristics of successful programs and potential risk factors for presenteeism. Methods The Cochrane Library, Medline, and other electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2010. Reference lists were examined, key journals were hand-searched and experts were contacted. Included studies were original research that contained data on at least 20 participants (≥ 18 years of age), and examined the impacts of WHP programs implemented at the workplace. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to rate studies. 'Strong' and 'moderate' studies were abstracted into evidence tables, and a best evidence synthesis was performed. Interventions were deemed successful if they improved the outcome of interest. Their program components were identified, as were possible risk factors contributing to presenteeism. Results After 2,032 titles and abstracts were screened, 47 articles were reviewed, and 14 were accepted (4 strong and 10 moderate studies). These studies contained preliminary evidence for a positive effect of some WHP programs. Successful programs offered organizational leadership, health risk screening, individually tailored programs, and a supportive workplace culture. Potential risk factors contributing to presenteeism included being overweight, a poor diet, a lack of exercise, high stress, and poor relations with co-workers and management. Limitations: This review is limited to English publications. A large number of reviewed studies (70%) were inadmissible due to issues of bias, thus limiting the amount of primary evidence. The uncertainties surrounding presenteeism measurement is of significant concern as a source of bias. Conclusions The presenteeism literature is young and heterogeneous. There is preliminary evidence that some WHP programs can positively affect presenteeism and that certain risk factors are of importance. Future research would benefit from standard presenteeism metrics and studies conducted across a broad range of workplace settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Cancelliere
- Master of Public Health Program, Faculty of Graduate Studies, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aas RW, Tuntland H, Holte KA, Røe C, Lund T, Marklund S, Moller A. Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2011:CD008160. [PMID: 21491405 PMCID: PMC6485986 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008160.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries. Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers' absenteeism. Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions (WIs) in adult workers with neck pain. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 3), and MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ISI Web of Science, OTseeker, PEDro to July 2009, with no language limitations;screened reference lists; and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCT), in which at least 50% of the participants had neck pain at baseline and received interventions conducted at the workplace. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Authors were contacted for missing information. Since the interventions varied to a large extend, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) terminology was used to classify the intervention components. This heterogeneity restricted pooling of data to only one meta-analysis of two studies. MAIN RESULTS We identified 1995 references and included10 RCTs (2745 workers). Two studies were assessed with low risk of bias. Most trials (N = 8) examined office workers. Few workers were sick-listed. Thus, WIs were seldom designed to improve return-to-work. Overall, there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity. If present, significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times. There was moderate quality evidence (1 study, 415 workers) that a four-component WI was significantly more effective in reducing sick leave in the intermediate-term (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.95), but not in the short- (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.34) or long-term (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.26). These findings might be because only a small proportion of the workers were sick-listed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term, which was not sustained over time. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. There is an urgent need for high quality RCTs with well designed WIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi Wågø Aas
- International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS)Box 8046StavangerNorway4068
| | - Hanne Tuntland
- Bergen University CollegeFaculty of Health and Social SciencesHaugeveien 28BergenNorway5005
| | - Kari Anne Holte
- International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS)Box 8046StavangerNorway4068
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Oslo University Hospital UllevålPhysical Medicine and RehabilitationKirkevn 166OsloNorway0407
| | - Thomas Lund
- International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS)Box 8046StavangerNorway4068
| | - Staffan Marklund
- Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience and Division of Insurance MedicineBerzelius väg 3StockholmSweden171 77
| | - Anders Moller
- Nordic School of Public HealthGothenburgSwedenSE‐40242
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Eerd D, Hogg-Johnson S, Mazumder A, Cole D, Wells R, Moore A. Task exposures in an office environment: a comparison of methods. ERGONOMICS 2009; 52:1248-1258. [PMID: 19787504 DOI: 10.1080/00140130903023683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Task-related factors such as frequency and duration are associated with musculoskeletal disorders in office settings. The primary objective was to compare various task recording methods as measures of exposure in an office workplace. A total of 41 workers from different jobs were recruited from a large urban newspaper (71% female, mean age 41 years SD 9.6). Questionnaire, task diaries, direct observation and video methods were used to record tasks. A common set of task codes was used across methods. Different estimates of task duration, number of tasks and task transitions arose from the different methods. Self-report methods did not consistently result in longer task duration estimates. Methodological issues could explain some of the differences in estimates seen between methods observed. It was concluded that different task recording methods result in different estimates of exposure likely due to different exposure constructs. This work addresses issues of exposure measurement in office environments. It is of relevance to ergonomists/researchers interested in how to best assess the risk of injury among office workers. The paper discusses the trade-offs between precision, accuracy and burden in the collection of computer task-based exposure measures and different underlying constructs captures in each method.
Collapse
|