Carrying a rifle with both hands affects upper body transverse plane kinematics and pelvis-trunk coordination

The effect of weapon handling during load carriage across a range of military-relevant walking speeds

This study investigated the effects of weapon handling on the physiological responses and walking-gait kinematics during load carriage. Seventeen soldiers completed four twelve-minute bouts of treadmill walking at incremental speeds (3.5, 5.5, 6.5 km.h-1 and self-selected) carrying 23.2-kg of additional load, while either handling a weapon or not handling a weapon. Physiological, perceptual and biomechanical outcomes were measured throughout each trial. A weapon-by-speed interaction (p < .05) was observed for hip flexion-extension during loading response and mid-swing. Weapon handling elevated (p < .05) cardiorespiratory responses at 6.5 km.h-1. Main effects (p < .05) of weapon handling were observed for ventilation, oxygen pulse, effort perception, stride length and knee flexion-extension during toe-off. No main effects of weapon handling were observed for any other biomechanical measures. These findings demonstrate that physiological and biomechanical responses to weapon handling are likely walking-speed dependent.Practitioner summary: Weapon handling is an important part of many load-carriage tasks but is rarely investigated. Physiological and biomechanical responses were assessed at incremental speeds during load carriage. Despite similar biomechanics, there was greater physiological demands at faster walking speeds, suggesting an increased contribution from isometric muscle contractions for weapon stabilisation.

Can handling a weapon make soldiers more unstable?

Gait stability in soldiers can be affected by task constraints that may lead to injuries. This study determined the effects of weapon handling and speed on gait stability in seventeen soldiers walking on a treadmill with and without a replica weapon at self-selected (SS), 3.5 km·h-1, 5.5 km·h-1, and 6.5 km·h-1 while carrying a 23-kg load. Local dynamic stability was measured using accelerometry at the sacrum (LDESAC) and sternum (LDESTR). No significant weapon and speed interaction were found. A significant effect of speed for the LDESAC, and a significant effect of speed and weapon for the LDESTR were found. Per plane analyses showed that the weapon effect was consistent across all directions for the LDESTR but not for LDESAC. Weapon handling increased trunk but did not affect pelvis stability. Speed decreased stability when walking slower than SS and increased when faster. These findings can inform injury prevention strategies in the military. Practitioner summary: We determined the effects of two constraints in soldier's walking stability, weapon handling and speed, measured at the trunk and sacrum. No constraints interactions were found, however, lower stability when walking slow and greater stability with the weapon at the trunk can inform preventive strategies in military training.

Modeling the Metabolic Costs of Heavy Military Backpacking

Introduction

Existing predictive equations underestimate the metabolic costs of heavy military load carriage. Metabolic costs are specific to each type of military equipment, and backpack loads often impose the most sustained burden on the dismounted warfighter.

Purpose

This study aimed to develop and validate an equation for estimating metabolic rates during heavy backpacking for the US Army Load Carriage Decision Aid (LCDA), an integrated software mission planning tool.

Methods

Thirty healthy, active military-age adults (3 women, 27 men; age, 25 ± 7 yr; height, 1.74 ± 0.07 m; body mass, 77 ± 15 kg) walked for 6–21 min while carrying backpacks loaded up to 66% body mass at speeds between 0.45 and 1.97 m·s⁻¹. A new predictive model, the LCDA backpacking equation, was developed on metabolic rate data calculated from indirect calorimetry. Model estimation performance was evaluated internally by k-fold cross-validation and externally against seven historical reference data sets. We tested if the 90% confidence interval of the mean paired difference was within equivalence limits equal to 10% of the measured metabolic rate. Estimation accuracy and level of agreement were also evaluated by the bias and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), respectively.

Results

Estimates from the LCDA backpacking equation were statistically equivalent (P < 0.01) to metabolic rates measured in the current study (bias, −0.01 ± 0.62 W·kg⁻¹; CCC, 0.965) and from the seven independent data sets (bias, −0.08 ± 0.59 W·kg⁻¹; CCC, 0.926).

Conclusions

The newly derived LCDA backpacking equation provides close estimates of steady-state metabolic energy expenditure during heavy load carriage. These advances enable further optimization of thermal-work strain monitoring, sports nutrition, and hydration strategies.

The effects of incremental changes in rucksack load on lower extremity joint Kinetic patterns during ruck marching

Injuries are often attributed to ruck marching. Therefore, it is important to examine how load carriage influences gait mechanics. The purpose of this study was to examine how subtle changes in rucksack load influence joint torque patterns during marching. Fourteen Army ROTC cadets marched with light, moderate, and heavy rucksack loads. Kinetic and kinematic data were recorded via an instrumented treadmill and motion capture system and principal component analysis was used to analyse the joint torque waveforms. Cadets exhibited moderate-large increases in knee extension torques during early stance (effect sizes ≥0.45) and small-moderate increases in ankle plantarflexion torques during push off (effect sizes ≥0.23) with each incremental increase in rucksack load. The lighter load also resulted in lower hip extension torques during early stance and flexion torques during late stance, vs. the moderate and heavier loads (effect sizes ≥0.23). It appears that subtle changes in rucksack load influence marching mechanics. Practitioner Summary: The purpose of this study was to examine how relatively subtle changes in rucksack load influence marching mechanics. Army ROTC cadets marched with relatively light, moderate, and heavy rucksack loads. Our results indicate that even subtle changes in rucksack load influence joint torque patterns of the hip, knee, and ankle. Abbreviations: ROTC: reserve officer training corps; RoF: rating-of-fatigue; PC: principal component; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient; ES: effect size.

Tactical combat movements: inter-individual variation in performance due to the effects of load carriage

An examination into the effects of carried military equipment on the performance of two tactical combat movement simulations was conducted. Nineteen Airfield Defence Guards performed a break contact (five 30-m sprints) and a fire and movement simulation (16 6-m bounds) in five load conditions (10-30 kg). Heavier loads significantly increased movement duration on the break contact (0.8%/kg load) and fire and movement (1.1%/kg). Performance deterioration was observed from the beginning to the end of the series of movements (bounds or sprints) with deterioration becoming significantly greater in heavier load conditions. Inter-individual variation between slower and faster participants showed a range in load effects; 0.6, 0.8%/kg for fast and 1.0, 1.4%/kg for slow (break contact, fire and movement, respectively). Velocity profiles revealed that the initial acceleration and peak velocity were the primary determinants of performance. As the duration of these tactical combat movements reflects periods of heightened vulnerability, these findings highlight important implications for commanders. Practitioner Summary: Increasing amounts of carried military equipment impairs the performance of tactical combat movements. Examination of inter-individual variation in velocity profiles identified that the initial acceleration and the peak velocity achieved during sprints and bounds are key determinants of overall performance.

Biomechanics of Load Carriage--Historical Perspectives and Recent Insights

Loads carried by the warfighter have increased substantially throughout recorded history, with the typical U.S. ground soldier carrying external loads averaging 45 kg during operations in Afghanistan. Incidence of disability in the U.S. Army has also increased sixfold since the 1980s, predominantly driven by increases in musculoskeletal injuries, with load carriage implicated as a possible mechanism. This article will provide a brief overview of the biomechanics of load carriage and will provide some recent insights into how the stress of the loads carried by military personnel can affect the musculoskeletal system. Studies into the biomechanics of load carriage have documented motion-related differences such as increased step rate, decreased stride length, and more trunk lean with increases in pack-borne loads. However, there is a paucity of literature on the relationship between load carriage and biomechanical mechanisms of overuse injury. Findings of recent studies will be presented, which add mechanistic information to increased stresses on the lower extremity. This was particularly true at the knee, where in one study, peak knee extension moment increased 115% when carrying a 55 kg load (0.87 ± 0.16 Nm·kg⁻¹) vs. no external load (0.40 ± 0.13 Nm·kg⁻¹). Efforts to model injury mechanisms require continued biomechanical measurements in humans while carrying occupationally relevant loads to be validated. Specifically, imaging technologies (e.g., bone geometry scans) should be incorporated to produce higher fidelity model of the stresses and strains experienced by the load carrier. In addition to laboratory-based biomechanics, data are needed to further explore the mechanistic relationship between load magnitude and injury; to this end, wearable sensors should continue to be exploited to accurately quantify biomechanical stresses related to load carriage in the field.