The spatial dependency of shoulder muscular demands during upward and downward exertions

Use of a factor analysis to assess biomechanical factors of American Sign Language in native and non-native signers

Prior studies suggest that native (born to at least one deaf or signing parent) and non-native signers have different musculoskeletal health outcomes from signing, but the individual and combined biomechanical factors driving these differences are not fully understood. Such group differences in signing may be explained by the five biomechanical factors of American Sign Language that have been previously identified: ballistic signing, hand and wrist deviations, work envelope, muscle tension, and "micro" rests. Prior work used motion capture and surface electromyography to collect joint kinematics and muscle activations, respectively, from ten native and thirteen non-native signers as they signed for 7.5 min. Each factor was individually compared between groups. A factor analysis was used to determine the relative contributions of each biomechanical factor between signing groups. No significant differences were found between groups for ballistic signing, hand and wrist deviations, work envelope volume, excursions from recommended work envelope, muscle tension, or "micro" rests. Factor analysis revealed that "micro" rests had the strongest contribution for both groups, while hand and wrist deviations had the weakest contribution. Muscle tension and work envelope had stronger contributions for native compared to non-native signers, while ballistic signing had a stronger contribution for non-native compared to native signers. Using a factor analysis enabled discernment of relative contributions of biomechanical variables across native and non-native signers that could not be detected through isolated analysis of individual measures. Differences in the contributions of these factors may help explain the differences in signing across native and non-native signers.

Determining best practices for manual pill crushing through evaluation of upper extremity muscle exposures

Nurses in long-term care homes often crush pills into a fine powder using a manual pill crushing device. This study provides novel quantitative data on muscle loading experienced during pill crushing. The influence of surface height, number of pills and device orientation were studied in twelve muscles of the upper extremity. Variations in the work surface height and number of pills crushed resulted in static shoulder and forearm muscle activations that exceeded recommended static limits. In most cases, working at approximately a 50th percentile female's hip height (87 cm) reduced the level of muscle activity, often to below the EMG-based exposure limit, compared to higher heights. A perpendicularly oriented device required substantially lower muscle activity in some shoulder muscles, with marginal differences occurring in muscles of the elbow and wrist. These data can inform practical design and work practice recommendations to reduce muscular activity while performing this important healthcare task.

Effect of Mechanically Passive, Wearable Shoulder Exoskeletons on Muscle Output During Dynamic Upper Extremity Movements: A Computational Simulation Study

Wearable passive (ie, spring powered) shoulder exoskeletons could reduce muscle output during motor tasks to help prevent or treat shoulder musculoskeletal disorders. However, most wearable passive shoulder exoskeletons have been designed and evaluated for static tasks, so it is unclear how they affect muscle output during dynamic tasks. The authors used a musculoskeletal model and Computed Muscle Control optimization to estimate muscle output with and without a wearable passive shoulder exoskeleton during 2 simulated dynamic tasks: abduction and upward reach. To an existing upper extremity musculoskeletal model, the authors added an exoskeleton model with 3-dimensional representations of the exoskeleton components, including a spring, cam wheel, force-transmitting shoulder cable, and wrapping surfaces that permitted the shoulder cable to wrap over the shoulder. The exoskeleton reduced net muscle-generated moments in positive shoulder elevation by 28% and 62% during the abduction and upward reach, respectively. However, muscle outputs (joint moments and muscle effort) were higher with the exoskeleton than without at some points of the movement. Muscle output was higher with the exoskeleton because the exoskeleton moment opposed the muscle-generated moment in some postures. The results of this study highlight the importance of evaluating muscle output for passive exoskeletons designed to support dynamic movements to ensure that the exoskeletons assist, rather than impede, movement.

Spatial dependency of shoulder muscle demand during dynamic unimanual and bimanual pushing and pulling

Work involving extensive pushing and pulling is associated with higher frequency of shoulder complaints. While reports of shoulder muscle demand during submaximal isometric tasks are abundant, dynamic submaximal push-pull exertions are not well understood. We evaluated how muscle demand (weighted EMG average) of surface glenohumeral muscles varies with task type and target. Seventeen healthy young adults performed seated unimanual and bimanual pushes and pulls to 3 thoracohumeral elevations (20°, 90°, 170°) and 4 elevation planes (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°) with loading at 15% of isometric push-pull capacity. Pulling required less demand than pushing (p < 0.0001). Muscle demand varied more with elevation than elevation plane. The lowest target had highest demand for pulling (p < 0.01), and the most elevated target had highest demand for pushing (p < 0.0001). Working above the shoulder is known to increase demand during isometric tasks, however, these results suggest that for dynamic tasks working against gravity has a larger effect on demand than task target.

Quantification of upper limb electromyographic measures and dysfunction of breast cancer survivors during performance of functional dynamic tasks

BACKGROUND

Upper limb morbidities within the breast cancer population can interfere with completing daily life activities. Current knowledge of upper limb capabilities is limited; previous increases in muscle activation on the affected cancer side suggest this population works at a higher fraction of their capability. The purposes of this study were to describe upper limb capabilities and dysfunction of breast cancer survivors through muscle activation monitoring via surface electromyography and muscle-specific strength tests during functional tasks.

METHODS

Fifty survivors performed 88 dynamic tasks (divided into range of motion-reach or rotate, activities of daily life and work tasks). Muscle activation was examined for functional and strength testing tasks.

FINDINGS

Total muscle effort (summation of integrated electromyography across measured muscles) was up to 5.1% greater on the affected side during work tasks (p=0.0258). Increased activations existed in posterior deltoid, supraspinatus, upper trapezius and serratus anterior (p<0.05) for several tasks, including daily living tasks. Reduced activation occurred in affected pectoralis major sternal during all tasks (p<0.0001-0.0032), and affected infraspinatus in all but daily living tasks (p=0.0002-0.0328). The affected side infraspinatus, supraspinatus and upper trapezius muscles demonstrated significant reductions in targeted strength testing (p=0.0001-0.0057).

INTERPRETATION

Both primary and secondary muscles (outside surgery and radiation fields) were affected. In general, this population works at higher levels of muscle effort for the affected side yet demonstrates weakness in strength testing, which may reflect tissue damage. Strengthening exercises for the posterior rotator cuff and upper trapezius may be the most beneficial.

The effects of hand force variation on shoulder muscle activation during submaximal exertions

Upper limb injuries are highly prevalent in the workplace and new tools are needed to proactively design workstations to reduce injury risk. The objective was to characterize spatial, load and direction dependency of muscle activity for hand exertions in the upper limb workspace. Electromyographic signals were collected from 14 upper limb muscles during exertions for all combinations of 4 submaximal hand forces (20/30/50/60 N) in 6 cardinal (up/down/left/right/forward/backward) directions at 5 hand locations. Linear muscle activity increases accompanied increased hand forces. Total muscle activity increases between 20 and 60 N hand forces ranged by direction from 92% (downward) to 189% (right). Prediction equations for all muscles depended on hand force, and linear, quadratic and interaction permutations of hand location. Muscle activity associated with manual tasks is load, direction and spatially dependent. Equations developed to describe these complex relationships can be used to better design future and evaluate current occupational activities.