Comparison of preseptal and pretarsal onabotulinum toxin an injection in patients with hemifacial spasm

Botulinum toxin treatment for hemifacial spasm: harmonising neurological and aesthetic outcomes

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) represents a challenging cranial movement disorder primarily affecting the facial nerve innervated muscles, with significant prevalence among Asians. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) injections, established as a primary therapeutic intervention since FDA approval, offer considerable effectiveness in alleviating spasms, albeit accompanied by challenges such as temporary effects and potential adverse events including facial asymmetry. This comprehensive review underscores the crucial need for harmonising neurological benefits and aesthetic outcomes in HFS management. The discussion delves into the interplay between facial aesthetics and neurological objectives in BoNT/A injections, emphasising precise techniques, dosages, and site considerations. Distinct aspects in neurological and aesthetic domains are also examined, including detailing the targeted muscles and injection methodologies for optimal therapeutic and aesthetic results. Importantly, evidence regarding various BoNT/A formulations, recommendations, and reconstitution guidelines in both neurology and aesthetics contexts are provided, along with a schematic approach outlining the stepwise process for BoNT/A injection in HFS treatment, addressing critical areas such as orbicularis oculi muscle sites, eyebrow correction strategies, mid- and lower-face considerations, contralateral injection sites, and post-injection follow-up and complication management. By highlighting the culmination of neurological efficacy and facial esthetics in BoNT/A treatment for HFS patients, this review proposes a holistic paradigm to achieve balanced symptomatic relief and natural aesthetic expression, ultimately enhancing quality of life for individuals grappling with HFS.

[Hemifacial spasm]

Hemifacial spasm (HFS), or facial hemispasm, is a paroxysmal hyperkinetic disorder involving muscles innervated by the facial nerve, mainly on the one hand. The development of HFS is based on neurovascular conflict. However, it is impossible to explain the clinical manifestations of HFS only by nerve compression. Both peripheral and central mechanisms are involved in the generation of HFS, with the formation of ephaptic transmission, antidromic excitation, primary or secondary hyper-excitability of the nuclear and supranuclear level of innervation. Two treatment methods are pathogenetically justified: microvascular decompression (MVD) and botulinum toxin (BTX) injections. The effectiveness of MVD is 95.37% with full or partial recovery. The recurrence rate does not exceed 2.4%. Facial nerve paralysis (2.7-22.5%) and hearing loss (1.9-20%) are the most common complications of treatment with the use of the MVD for HFS with partial or complete cure in most cases. Botulinum toxin injection chemo-denervation is a first-line treatment of primary and secondary HFS. HFS is an officially registered indication for the drug dysport (abobotulotoxin) (ABO) in the Russian Federation. Total doses of ABO ranged from 25 to 150 units for one side depending on the severity of the clinical manifestations. Studies demonstrate the statistically significant benefits of HFC treatment with ABO. ABO is generally well-tolerated. Adverse events (up to 3.6%) are transient and include ptosis, lacrimation, blurred vision, double vision, dry eyes and weak facial muscles.