Limb Dominance and Its Effects on the Benefits of Intralimb Transfer of Learning: A Visuomotor Aiming Task

The nature of savings associated with a visuomotor adaptation task that involves one arm or both arms

The nature of savings in visuomotor adaptation is typically studied using a paradigm in which one arm experiences multiple conditions such as adaptation, washout and readaptation. It has seldom been studied, however, using a paradigm that involves both arms. Here, we examined the effect of (1) using different arms and (2) the availability of visual feedback during a washout session following visuomotor adaptation on savings. We first had healthy young adults adapt to a visuomotor rotation condition during reaching movements with the left arm. Following that, they experienced a washout session with either the left or right arm, with or without visual feedback, and then the readaptation session with the left arm again. We hypothesized that if savings occurred due to the explicit recall of cognitive strategies, the pattern of savings would be similar regardless of which arm was used during the washout session. Results showed that in terms of the percentage of savings, there was a significant difference between the conditions in which the left or right arm was used during the washout, but not between the conditions in which visual feedback was provided or absent. In terms of the rate of relearning, a significant difference was observed between the conditions in which the left or right arm was used during the washout, and also between the conditions in which visual feedback was provided or absent. These findings suggest that the explicit recall of strategies is not the only source for savings and further suggest that effector-specific, use-dependent learning can also contribute to savings.

The effects of a two-step transfer on a visuomotor adaptation task

The literature has shown robust effects of transfer-of-learning to the contralateral side and more recently transfer-of-learning effects to a new effector type on the ipsilateral side. Few studies have investigated the effects of transfer-of-learning when skills transfer to both a new effector type and the contralateral side (two-step transfer). The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of two-step transfer and to examine which aspects of the movement transfer and which aspects do not. Individuals practiced a 30° visual rotation task with either the dominant or non-dominant limb and with either the use of the fingers and wrist or elbow and shoulder. Following practice, participants performed the task with the untrained effector type on the contralateral side. Results showed that initial direction error and trajectory length transferred from the dominant to the non-dominant side and movement time transferred from the elbow and shoulder condition to the wrist and finger conditions irrespective of which limb was used during practice. The results offer a unique perspective on the current theoretical and practical implications for transfer-of-learning and are further discussed in this paper.