Anchoring the potential energy surface of the diacetylene dimer

Big Changes for Small Noncovalent Dimers: Revisiting the Potential Energy Surfaces of (P2)2 and (PCCP)2 with CCSD(T) Optimizations and Vibrational Frequencies

This article details the re-examination of low-lying stationary points on the potential energy surfaces (PESs) of two challenging noncovalent homogeneous dimers, (P2)2 and (PCCP)2. The work was motivated by the rather large differences between MP2 and CCSD(T) energetics that were recently reported for these systems (J. Comput. Chem. 2014, 35, 479-487). The current investigation reveals significant qualitative and quantitative changes when the CCSD(T) method is used to characterize the stationary points instead of MP2. For example, CCSD(T) optimizations and harmonic vibrational frequency computations with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set indicate that the parallel-slipped (PS) structure is the only P2 dimer stationary point examined that is a minimum (zero imaginary frequencies, ni = 0), whereas prior MP2 computations indicated that it was a transition state (ni = 1). Furthermore, the L-shaped structure of (P2)2 was the only minimum according to MP2 computations, but it collapses to the PS structure on the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ PES. For the larger PCCP dimer, the CCSD(T) computations reveal that four rather than just two of the six stationary points characterized are minima. A series of explicitly correlated single-point energies were computed for all of the optimized structures to estimate the MP2 and CCSD(T) electronic energies at the complete basis set limit. CCSDT(Q) computations were also performed to assess the effects of dynamical electron correlation beyond the CCSD(T) level. For both (P2)2 and (PCCP)2, dispersion remains the dominant attractive component to the interaction energy according to symmetry-adapted perturbation theory analyses, and it is also the most challenging component to accurately evaluate.

Characterization of the potential energy surfaces of two small but challenging noncovalent dimers: (P2 )2 and (PCCP)2

This work characterizes eight stationary points of the P2 dimer and six stationary points of the PCCP dimer, including a newly identified minimum on both potential energy surfaces. Full geometry optimizations and corresponding harmonic vibrational frequencies were computed with the second-order Møller-Plesset (MP2) electronic structure method and six different basis sets: aug-cc-pVXZ, aug-cc-pV(X+d)Z, and aug-cc-pCVXZ where X = T, Q. A new L-shaped structure with C2 symmetry is the only minimum for the P2 dimer at the MP2 level of theory with these basis sets. The previously reported parallel-slipped structure with C2 h symmetry and a newly identified cross configuration with D2 symmetry are the only minima for the PCCP dimer. Single point energies were also computed using the canonical MP2 and CCSD(T) methods as well as the explicitly correlated MP2-F12 and CCSD(T)-F12 methods and the aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q, 5) basis sets. The energetics obtained with the explicitly correlated methods were very similar to the canonical results for the larger basis sets. Extrapolations were performed to estimate the complete basis set (CBS) limit MP2 and CCSD(T) binding energies. MP2 and MP2-F12 significantly overbind the P2 and PCCP dimers relative to the CCSD(T) and CCSD(T)-F12 binding energies by as much as 1.5 kcal mol(-1) for the former and 5.0 kcal mol(-1) for the latter at the CBS limit. The dominant attractive component of the interaction energy for each dimer configuration was dispersion according to several symmetry-adapted perturbation theory analyses.

Basis set dependence of higher-order correlation effects in π-type interactions

The basis set dependence of higher-order correlation effects on π-type interaction energies was examined by scanning the potential energy surfaces of five dimer systems. The dimers of acetylene (H-C≡C-H), diacetylene (H-C≡C-C≡C-H), cyanogen (N≡C-C≡N), diphosphorous (P≡P), and 1,4-diphosphabutadiyne (P≡C-C≡P) were studied in three different configurations: cross, parallel-displaced, and t-shaped. More than 800 potential energy curves (PECs) were generated by computing the interaction energies for all 15 dimer configurations over a range of intermolecular distances with the MP2, coupled-cluster single double (CCSD), and coupled-cluster single double triple (CCSD(T)) methods in conjunction with 21 basis sets ranging from a small 6-31G*(0.25) split-valence basis set to a large aug-cc-pVQZ correlation consistent basis set. Standard extrapolation techniques were also used to construct MP2, CCSD, and CCSD(T) complete basis set (CBS) limit PECs as well as CBS limit higher-order correlation corrections based on the differences between CCSD(T) and MP2 interaction energies, denoted δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)), and the corresponding differences between CCSD(T) and CCSD interactions energies, denoted δ(CCSD)(CCSD(T)). Double-ζ basis sets struggled to reproduce the former but provided quite reasonable descriptions of the latter as long as diffuse functions were included. The aug-cc-pVDZ basis deviated from the δ(CCSD)(CCSD(T)) CBS limit by only 0.06 kcal mol(-1) on average and never by more than 0.24 kcal mol(-1), whereas the corresponding deviations were approximately twice that for the δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)) term. While triple-ζ basis sets typically improved results, only aug-cc-pVTZ provided appreciable improvement over utilizing the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set to compute δ(CCSD)(CCSD(T)). Counterpoise (CP) corrections were also applied to all double- and triple-ζ basis sets, but they rarely yielded a better description of these higher-order correlation effects. CP corrections only consistently improved results when the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set was used to compute δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)), yielding mean and maximum absolute deviations from the CBS values of 0.10 and 0.39 kcal mol(-1), respectively, for all five dimer systems.