Detection of Neisseria meningitidis by LightCycler PCR

Combined assay for two-hour identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis and concomitant detection of 16S ribosomal DNA in cerebrospinal fluid by real-time PCR

The main object was to examine the diagnostic performance of a novel combination of a specific real-time PCR (combined real-time PCR) for immediate and simultaneous detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis and of a real-time PCR of the 16S rRNA gene (16S DNA). During 12 months, 1015 routine CSF samples were consecutively collected from patients in the County of Aarhus, Denmark. The samples were cultured, examined by microscopy, and, in parallel, CSF DNA was automatically purified and subjected to real-time PCR. Melting curve analysis discriminated between the 2 specific pathogens and 16S DNA positive samples were sequenced. Clinical data were extracted from patients having positive samples. Clinically, 35 of 46 (76%) patients with positive samples had bacterial meningitis. 18 of these 35 patients had a concomitant culture and real-time PCR-positive sample. The remaining 17 patients were either culture positive (n =7) or real-time PCR-positive (n = 10). The aetiology of bacterial meningitis was revealed by microscopy in 18/35 (51.4%), culture in 24/35 (68.6%) and combined real-time PCR in 27/35 (77.1%) patients, respectively. In conclusion, the combined real-time PCR strategy is superior to microscopy and a valuable supplement to routine culture to establish the aetiology of bacterial meningitis.

Multicenter validation of the cppB gene as a PCR target for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

The cppB gene is often used as a target for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by PCR. Using a coded panel of 500 DNA samples, we determined that the cppB gene is missing in 5.8% of N. gonorrhoeae strains, and therefore we consider the cppB gene to be an unsuitable target.

Real-time Fluorescent PCR Techniques to Study Microbial-Host Interactions

This chapter describes how real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performs and how it may be used to detect microbial pathogens and the relationship they form with their host. Research and diagnostic microbiology laboratories contain a mix of traditional and leading-edge, in-house and commercial assays for the detection of microbes and the effects they impart upon target tissues, organs, and systems. The PCR has undergone significant change over the last decade, to the extent that only a small proportion of scientists have been able or willing to keep abreast of the latest offerings. The chapter reviews these changes. It discusses the second-generation of PCR technology-kinetic or real-time PCR, a tool gaining widespread acceptance in many scientific disciplines but especially in the microbiology laboratory.

Detection of Neisseria Meningitidis in clinical samples by a duplex real-time PCR targeting the porA and ctrA genes

BACKGROUND

In recent years PCR has proven to be a highly sensitive and specific method for the diagnosis of infections caused by Neisseria meningitidis.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed and evaluated a N. meningitidis LightCycler real-time duplex PCR (NM-LCdPCR) capable of simultaneously detecting and distinguishing between two separate genes on the N. meningitidis genome.

METHODS

The NM-LCdPCR was developed on the LightCycler platform (Roche Diagnostics, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) and comprised two primer pairs and two hybridization probe sets, enabling the detection of both the porA and ctrA genes within the same reaction mix. To distinguish between the fluorescence emitted by each hybridization probe set, each downstream probe was labeled with a different fluorophore (either LC-Red640 or LC-Red705). The results obtained by the NM-LCdPCR were then compared with the results obtained by a mono-specific LightCycler assay targeting the porA gene only (porA-LCPCR).

PATIENTS

One-hundred and forty-eight clinical samples from patients with suspected meningococcal infection were evaluated.

RESULTS

The results of the NM-LCdPCR and porA-LCPCR gave 100% agreement; N. meningitidis DNA was detected in 25 samples whereas 123 samples were negative by both assays. The breakdown of the NM-LCdPCR results show that both genes were detected in 26 of the 28 positive samples.

DISCUSSION

By targeting two separate N. meningitidis genes, the NM-LCdPCR has the potential to prevent the false-positive results which may arise from sequence variation. In addition, the ability to detect and discriminate between the two different N. meningitidis genes within the same reaction mix offers a rapid means for confirming the presence of N. meningitidis DNA in clinical samples, thereby reducing the need for subsequent confirmatory assays to be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity and specificity of the NM-LCdPCR assay, combined with its ability to detect and discriminate both the N. meningitidis porA and ctrA genes, make it suitable for the diagnosis of N. meningitidis infections in the routine clinical laboratory.