1
|
Preliminary effectiveness of breast cancer screening among 1.22 million Chinese females and different cancer patterns between urban and rural women. Sci Rep 2016; 6:39459. [PMID: 27995968 PMCID: PMC5171648 DOI: 10.1038/srep39459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
To determine the preliminary effectiveness of breast cancer screening among Chinese females, 1226714 women aged 35–69 years first received clinical breast examinations. Urban women with suspected cancer received mammography followed by breast ultrasound (BUS), while rural suspected women underwent BUS followed by mammography. After one-year follow-up, 223 and 431 breast cancers were detected among urban and rural women (respectively), with overall detection rates of 0.56/1000 and 0.52/1000. Higher detection rates were significantly associated with older age at screening for both urban and rural women; additionally, urban women were at significantly higher risk if they had no job, no insurance, or were obese; additional risk factors specific to rural women included Han nationality, higher income, being unmarried, and having a family history of cancer (all P values < 0.05). Among screening-detected breast cancers in urban vs. rural women, 46.2% and 38.8% (respectively) were early stage, 62.5% and 66.3% were ≤2 centimeters, 38.0% and 47.3% included lymph-node involvement, and 14.0% and 6.0% were identified as carcinoma in situ. All abovementioned cancer characteristics were significantly better than clinic-detected cancers (all P values < 0.001). In conclusion, several important differences were found between urban and rural women in screening effectiveness and patterns of cancer distribution.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sever C, Abbott CL, de Baca ME, Khoury JD, Perkins SL, Reichard KK, Taylor A, Terebelo HR, Colasacco C, Rumble RB, Thomas NE. Bone Marrow Synoptic Reporting for Hematologic Neoplasms: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016; 140:932-49. [PMID: 26905483 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0450-sa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT -There is ample evidence from the solid tumor literature that synoptic reporting improves accuracy and completeness of relevant data. No evidence-based guidelines currently exist for synoptic reporting for bone marrow samples. OBJECTIVE -To develop evidence-based recommendations to standardize the basic components of a synoptic report template for bone marrow samples. DESIGN -The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center convened a panel of experts in hematopathology to develop recommendations. A systematic evidence review was conducted to address 5 key questions. Recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. RESULTS -Nine guideline statements were established to provide pathology laboratories with a framework by which to develop synoptic reporting templates for bone marrow samples. The guideline calls for specific data groups in the synoptic section of the pathology report; provides a list of evidence-based parameters for key, pertinent elements; and addresses ancillary testing. CONCLUSION -A framework for bone marrow synoptic reporting will improve completeness of the final report in a manner that is clear, succinct, and consistent among institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nicole E Thomas
- From the Department of Hematopathology, Pathology Associates of Albuquerque, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Dr Sever); the Department of Pathology, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, Massachusetts (Dr Abbott); Medical Laboratory Associates, Seattle, Washington (Dr de Baca); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Khoury); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Dr Perkins); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Reichard); Utah Pathology Services, Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Taylor); the Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Newland Medical Associates, Novi, Michigan (Dr Terebelo); the Departments of Governance (Ms Colasacco) and Surveys (Ms Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; and the Quality and Guidelines Department, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Mr Rumble)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Autier P, Boniol M, Middleton R, Doré JF, Héry C, Zheng T, Gavin A. Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening. Ann Oncol 2011; 22:1726-35. [PMID: 21252058 PMCID: PMC3144633 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer mortality is declining in many Western countries. If mammography screening contributed to decreases in mortality, then decreases in advanced breast cancer incidence should also be noticeable. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed incidence trends of advanced breast cancer in areas where mammography screening is practiced for at least 7 years with 60% minimum participation and where population-based registration of advanced breast cancer existed. Through a systematic Medline search, we identified relevant published data for Australia, Italy, Norway, Switzerland, The Netherlands, U.K. and the U.S.A. Data from cancer registries in Northern Ireland, Scotland, the U.S.A. (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER), and Connecticut), and Tasmania (Australia) were available for the study. Criterion for advanced cancer was the tumour size, and if not available, spread to regional/distant sites. RESULTS Age-adjusted annual percent changes (APCs) were stable or increasing in ten areas (APCs of -0.5% to 1.7%). In four areas (Firenze, the Netherlands, SEER and Connecticut) there were transient downward trends followed by increases back to pre-screening rates. CONCLUSIONS In areas with widespread sustained mammographic screening, trends in advanced breast cancer incidence do not support a substantial role for screening in the decrease in mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Autier
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, International Prevention Research Institute (iPRI), Lyon, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Austin R, Thompson B, Coory M, Walpole E, Francis G, Fritschi L. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations. Pathology 2009; 41:361-5. [PMID: 19404849 DOI: 10.1080/00313020902884469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Recommendations for the pathology reporting of breast cancer were released in Australia to ensure detailed communication of important prognostic features and good patient management. An audit of the reporting of invasive breast cancer in Queensland was conducted to determine how well these guidelines were utilised in 2004. METHODS A random sample of reports was audited for inclusion of recommended criteria. The proportion of reports meeting each of the criteria was determined and compared across whether the report was in a synoptic report template or in a free text format. Comparison was made with published data from prior to the release of the recommendations. RESULTS Of the 419 reports in the sample, at least 90% of reports included lesion size, histological type, histological grade, lymph node involvement, margins of excision, lymphovascular invasion, and changes in adjacent breast tissue individually, and 74% included all seven of these essential criteria. Synoptic reports accounted for 76% of the sample and were significantly more likely to have documented grade (p < 0.001), quadrant (p = 0.003), calcification (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), changes in non-neoplastic breast (p < 0.001) and ductal carcinoma in situ criteria (p < 0.001) compared with free text report format. The most notable improvements since the implementation of the recommendations were in documentation of adjacent breast tissue (92% versus 49%) and lymphovascular invasion (97% versus 54%). CONCLUSION Breast cancer reporting in Queensland has improved since the implementation of the recommendations, however further improvements would likely be seen if there is more widespread utilisation of a synoptic report format.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Austin
- Epidemiology Unit, Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer Control, The Cancer Council Queensland, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Srigley JR, McGowan T, Maclean A, Raby M, Ross J, Kramer S, Sawka C. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach. J Surg Oncol 2009; 99:517-24. [PMID: 19466743 DOI: 10.1002/jso.21282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Cancer pathology reports contain information which is critical for patient management and for cancer surveillance, resource planning, and quality purposes. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) has defined scientifically validated content of checklists that form the basis for synoptic cancer pathology reporting. We outline how the CAP standards were implemented in a large Canadian province over a 3-year period resulting in improvements in rates of synoptic reporting and completeness of cancer pathology reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Srigley
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Program Cancer Care Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gill AJ, Johns AL, Eckstein R, Samra JS, Kaufman A, Chang DK, Merrett ND, Cosman PH, Smith RC, Biankin AV, Kench JG. Synoptic reporting improves histopathological assessment of pancreatic resection specimens. Pathology 2009; 41:161-7. [PMID: 19320058 DOI: 10.1080/00313020802337329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
AIM We examined whether introduction of a standardised pancreatic cancer minimum data set improved the reporting of key pathological features across multiple institutions. METHODS From seven different pathology departments that are members of the New South Wales Pancreatic Cancer Network, 109 free text reports and 68 synoptic reports were compared. RESULTS AJCC stage could not be inferred from 44% of free text reports, whereas stage was reported in all 68 synoptic reports. In the free text reports 28 different names were used to designate margins. All margins were reported in only 12 (11%) of the free text reports compared with 64 (94%) of the synoptic reports (p = 0.0011). The presence or absence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion was reported in 72 (66%) and 92 (84%) of free text reports, respectively. In contrast, lymphovascular space and perineural invasion were reported in all synoptic reports (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0058). CONCLUSION We conclude that synoptic reporting of pancreatic resections without any other intervention increases the information contained within histopathology reports. Therefore, the introduction of minimal data set synoptic reports is a simple and feasible mechanism to immediately improve reporting for pancreatectomy specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Gill
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Highway, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
King B, Corry J. Pathology reporting in head and neck cancer-Snapshot of current status. Head Neck 2009; 31:227-31; discussion 232-3. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.20957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
8
|
Jara-Lazaro AR, Tan PH. Pattern and spectrum of morphology referrals in breast pathology consultation. Pathology 2008; 40:564-72. [PMID: 18752122 DOI: 10.1080/00313020802320457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to identify common reasons for second opinion breast pathology referrals at the Pathology Department, Singapore General Hospital, focusing on queries and diagnostic issues raised by referring clinicians and pathologists. METHODS Request forms for breast pathology consultations were retrieved from a specialist's correspondence files consisting of pathologists' referrals, and from centralised laboratory records, comprising clinician-initiated referrals. Clinical and histomorphological queries raised by the referrals were collated. RESULTS Of 299 cases evaluated, clinician-initiated referrals (n = 137, 46%) included requests for review of overall histopathology to confirm carcinoma subtype (n = 47), grade (n = 2), size (n = 4), lymphovascular invasion (n = 1) and confirm hormonal receptor and c-erbB-2 assays (n = 33). Also required were: comparison of recurrent with previous lesions (n = 8); settling discrepant diagnoses between two or more prior pathology reports (n = 4); verification of microinvasion (n = 6), in situ carcinomas (n = 6) or atypical ductal hyperplasias (n = 4); delineation of benign (n = 8) and spindle cell lesions (n = 3); to establish a breast origin of metastatic lesions (n = 5); and distinction of carcinoma from lymphoma (n = 2). Pathologist-initiated referrals (n = 162, 54%) sought arbitration between borderline proliferative lesions (n = 46) and papillary lesions (n = 34); verification of microinvasion (n = 23), stromal lesions (n = 16), and carcinoma subtype (n = 13), especially if the patient was young (n = 5); clarification of metaplastic changes (n = 4) and lobular neoplasia (n = 8); and comparison of fibroepithelial lesions (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS Clinicians sought a second opinion mainly to verify histological diagnoses and report important pathological details for staging and confirmation of hormonal receptor and c-erbB-2 status prior to therapy. Borderline breast lesions are worrisome for both clinicians and pathologists in view of implications for management.
Collapse
|
9
|
BALLEINE RL, BILOUS AM, MOREY AL. Painting by numbers: The power and peril of synoptic pathology reporting for cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2008.00153.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
10
|
Irwin MR, Downey DB, Gardi L, Fenster A. Registered 3-D ultrasound and digital stereotactic mammography for breast biopsy guidance. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2008; 27:391-401. [PMID: 18334434 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2007.908686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Large core needle biopsy is a common procedure used to obtain histological samples when cancer is suspected in diagnostic breast images. The procedure is typically performed under image guidance, with freehand ultrasound and stereotactic mammography (SM) being the most common modalities used. To utilize the advantages of both modalities, a biopsy device combining three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) and digital SM imaging with computer-aided needle guidance was developed. An implementation of a stereo camera method was applied to SM calibration, providing a target localization error of 0.35 mm. The 3-D transformation between the two imaging modalities was then derived, with a target registration error of 0.52 mm. Finally, the needle guidance error of the device was evaluated using tissue-mimicking phantoms, showing a sample mean and standard deviation of 0.44 +/- 0.22 and 0.49 +/- 0.27 mm for targets planned from 3DUS and SM images, respectively. These results suggest that a biopsy procedure guided using this device would successfully sample breast lesions at a size greater than or equal to the smallest typically detected in mammographic screening (approximately 2 mm).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Irwin
- Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, N6A 5K8 Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Karim RZ, Van Den Berg KS, Colman MH, McCarthy SW, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma. Histopathology 2007; 52:130-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02921.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
|