Renal cell carcinoma in a 33-year-old male with an unusual morphology and an aggressive clinical course possible Xp11.2 translocation

Study of Treatment Outcome in Adults with TFE-Related RCC

Introduction TFE Translocation renal cell carcinoma (TRCC) represents 1 to 5% of all cases of renal cell carcinoma, with the highest frequency among children and young adults. Management of these tumors is not very well defined in literature. Although in pediatric age group it has favorable prognosis, in adults it has an aggressive nature, with poor outcome. This is a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome in adult patient 18 years or above treated at our hospital between January 2013 and November 2018.

Material and Methods Clinical and pathological data of 26 patients from a single institution diagnosed with TRCC between January 2013 and November 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All cases of TRCC were confirmed with immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization. We analyzed our data of patients treated with surgery only or who progressed after surgery and treated with systemic therapy or who presented with upfront unresectable or metastatic disease treated with systemic therapy with respect to event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results Between January 2013 and November 2018, 26 adult patients who were treated at our center were eligible for this analysis as per our criteria. Out of 26 patients, 25 patients had radical surgery after evaluation and 1 had metastatic disease who was started on systemic therapy. Out 25 patients who were treated with radical surgery, 16 patients progressed and they were started on systemic therapy except for 1 patient who defaulted. Median time to start systemic therapy among patient treated with curative nephrectomy was 13 months. Median EFS and median OS among overall population were 22 and 30 months, respectively. Among 16 patients who were treated with systemic therapy, median EFS to first-line therapy was 8 months and to second-line therapy was 2.5 months. Median OS was 17 months in patients treated with systemic therapy.

Conclusion TRCC is rare in adult population but carries significant risk of disease progression even after initial curative treatment with potential response to targeted therapy for short duration.

Combination of immunohistochemistry, FISH and RT-PCR shows high incidence of Xp11 translocation RCC: comparison of three different diagnostic methods

We evaluated the frequency of translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and how well the TFE3 immunoreactivity is concordant with TFE3 gene translocation status proved by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay and RT-PCR. TFE3 and Cathepsin K expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 185 RCC cases, and 48 cases either of more than weak expression of TFE3 or of positivity for Cathepsin K were done for FISH analysis and RT-PCR. All the RT-PCR positive cases were confirmed by cloning and sequencing. Of the 14 cases with strong nuclear TFE3 expression, 12 showed a break-apart signal by FISH. ASPL- and PRCC-TFE3 translocations were detected in 13 and one case, respectively, by RT-PCR. Of 21 cases with weak TFE3 expression, five were translocation-positive by FISH. ASPL-, PRCC-, and PSF-TFE3 translocations were detected by RT-PCR (n=3, 3, and 1, respectively). All 13 TFE3-negative/cathepsin K-positive cases were negative by FISH and two each harbored ASPL- and PRCC-TFE3 translocations that were detected by RT-PCR. A high rate of TFE3 immunoreactivity (8.6%) was confirmed by RT-PCR (13.5%) and FISH (9.7%). Higher translocation rate of RT-PCR means RT-PCR detected translocation in TFE3 weak expression group and only cathepsin K positive group more specifically than FISH. Thus, RT-PCR would complement FISH analysis for detecting translocation RCC with fusion partners.

A case of metastatic Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma successfully managed by cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by axitinib therapy

Targeted medications for metastatic adult Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain to be identified. We herein report a case of metastatic Xp11.2 translocation RCC controlled with cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and axitinib therapy. A 57-year-old woman complained of fatigue and low back pain. Imaging studies revealed a right renal tumor, with multiple lung and mediastinal lymph node metastases. Although the patient received 10 mg axitinib therapy for 5 months at the hospital she was initially admitted to, the size of the primary and metastatic lesions was not reduced. Thus, she was referred to the Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) for further treatment, where she underwent CN. On macroscopic examination, almost the entire kidney was replaced by a yellowish brown tumor >80 mm in diameter. Immunohistochemical examination confirmed the diagnosis of Xp11.2 translocation RCC. One month after surgery, axitinib therapy was resumed and the size of the metastatic lesions gradually decreased. These findings suggest that axitinib therapy is effective for adult Xp11.2 translocation RCC.

Validation and utilization of a TFE3 break-apart FISH assay for Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma

Background

Xp11.2 or TFE3 translocation renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) are characterized by chromosome translocations involving the Xp11.2 breakpoint resulting in transcription factor TFE3 gene fusions. The most common translocations documented in TFE3 RCCs are t(X;1) (p11.2;q21) and t(X;17) (p11.2;q25) which leads to fusion of TFE3 gene on Xp11.2 with PRCC or ASPL respectively. TFE3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been inconsistent over time due to background staining problems in part related to fixation issues. Karyotyping to detect TFE3 gene rearrangement requires typically unavailable fresh tissue. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is generally very challenging due to degradation of RNA in archival material. The study objective was to develop and validate a TFE3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to confirm Xp11 translocation RCCs and ASPS.

Methods

Representative sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were selected in 40 possible cases. Approximately 60 tumor cells were analyzed in the targeted region. The validation of TFE3 FISH was done with 11 negative and two positive cases. Cut off for a positive result was validated as >7.15 % positive nuclei with any pattern of break-apart signals. FISH evaluation was done blinded of the immunohistochemical or karyotype data.

Results

Three out of forty cases were positive for the TFE3 break-apart signals by FISH. The negative cases were reported as clear cell RCC with papillary features (10), clear cell RCC with sarcomatoid areas (2), Papillary RCC with clear cell areas (9), Chromophobe RCC (2), RCC, unclassified type (3) and renal medullary carcinoma (1). 3 of the negative cases were consultation cases for renal tumor with unknown histology. Seven negative cases were soft tissue tumor suspicious for ASPS.

Conclusion

Our study validates the utility of TFE3 break-apart FISH on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections for diagnosis and confirmation of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs and ASPS.

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography characteristics of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion

PURPOSE

To characterize Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

This study retrospectively collected the MRI and CT data of twelve patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC confirmed by pathology. Nine cases underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and 6 cases underwent CT, of which 3 cases underwent MRI and CT simultaneously. The MRI and CT findings were analyzed in regard to tumor position, size, hemorrhagic, cystic or necrotic components, calcification, tumor density, signal intensity and enhancement features.

RESULTS

The age of the 12 patients ranged from 13 to 46 years (mean age: 23 years). T2WI revealed heterogeneous intensity, hyper-intensity, and slight hypo-intensity in 6 cases, 2 cases, and 1 case, respectively. On DCE-MR images, mild, moderate, and marked rim enhancement of the tumor in the corticomedullary phase (CMP) were observed in 1, 6, and 2 cases, respectively. The tumor parenchyma showed iso-attenuation (n = 4) or slight hyper-attenuation (n = 1) compared to the normal renal cortex on non-contrast CT images. Imaging findings were suggestive of hemorrhage (n = 4) or necrosis (n = 8) in the tumors, and there was evidence of calcification in 8 cases by CT (n = 3) and pathology (n = 8). On dynamic contrast-enhanced CT images, 3 cases and 1 case manifested moderate and strong CMP enhancement, respectively. Nine tumors by MRI and 4 tumors by CT showed prolonged enhancement. Three neoplasms presented at stage I, 2 at stage II, 3 at stage III, and 4 at stage IV according the 2010 AJCC staging criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

XP11.2 translocation RCC should be considered when a child or young adult patient presents with a renal tumor with heterogeneous features such as hemorrhage, necrosis, cystic changes, and calcification on CT and MRI and/or is accompanied by metastatic evidence.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis for TFE3 rearrangement in Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma: validation and clinical experience with 75 cases

Renal cell carcinoma with TFE3 rearrangement at Xp11.2 is a distinct subtype manifesting an indolent clinical course in children, with recent reports suggesting a more aggressive entity in adults. This subtype is morphologically heterogeneous and can be misclassified as clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinoma. TFE3 is also rearranged in alveolar soft part sarcoma. To aid in diagnosis, a break-apart strategy fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe set specific for TFE3 rearrangement and a reflex dual-color, single-fusion strategy probe set involving the most common TFE3 partner gene, ASPSCR1, were validated on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from nine alveolar soft part sarcoma, two suspected Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma, and nine tumors in the differential diagnosis. The impact of tissue cut artifact was reduced through inclusion of a chromosome X centromere control probe. Analysis of the UOK-109 renal carcinoma cell line confirmed the break-apart TFE3 probe set can distinguish the subtle TFE3/NONO fusion-associated inversion of chromosome X. Subsequent extensive clinical experience was gained through analysis of 75 cases with an indication of Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma (n=54), alveolar soft part sarcoma (n=13), perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (n=2), chordoma (n=1), or unspecified (n=5). We observed balanced and unbalanced chromosome X;17 translocations in both Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma, supporting a preference but not a necessity for the translocation to be balanced in the carcinoma and unbalanced in the sarcoma. We further demonstrate the unbalanced separation is atypical, with TFE3/ASPSCR1 fusion and loss of the derivative X chromosome but also an unanticipated normal X chromosome gain in both males and females. Other diverse sex chromosome copy number combinations were observed. Our TFE3 FISH assay is a useful adjunct to morphologic analysis of such challenging cases and will be applicable to assess the growing spectrum of TFE3-rearranged tumors.

TFE3 rearrangements in adult renal cell carcinoma: clinical and pathologic features with outcome in a large series of consecutively treated patients

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with chromosomal rearrangement of transcription factor for immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer 3 (TFE3) at Xp11.2 is a distinct subtype that was initially described in children and has been reported to display an indolent course. Recent reports have identified RCC with TFE3 rearrangements in adults and have suggested a more aggressive course in this population. However, only a few studies have examined these tumors in a large series of consecutively treated adults. We screened 632 RCCs from patients consecutively treated by surgery at a single institution by fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect TFE3 rearrangements. We identified 6 RCCs with TFE3 rearrangement. Patient ages ranged from 25 to 78 years and included 4 women and 2 men. Tumors showed significant histologic variability. Comparison of the clinical and pathologic features between RCCs with TFE3 rearrangements and RCCs without TFE3 rearrangements showed no significant differences. Follow-up period for patients with TFE3-rearranged RCC ranged from 0.8 to 16.5 years, with 4 of 6 dying from the disease. Cancer-specific survival for patients with TFE3-rearranged RCC was significantly worse than for patients with TFE3-rearrangement-negative papillary-type RCC (P<0.001) but not different from that for TFE3-rearrangement-negative clear cell-type RCC. In conclusion, we present an assessment of TFE3 rearrangement status in a large series of adults consecutively treated by surgery for RCC. Our findings confirm that RCCs with TFE3 rearrangement account for only approximately 1% of adult RCCs. The results also suggest that adult RCC with TFE3 rearrangement may be a clinically aggressive tumor.

[Xp11.2 translocation renal carcinoma in adults over 50 years of age: about four cases]

OBJECTIVE

To describe demographic, therapeutic and follow-up data of four cases of renal cell carcinoma with Xp11.2 translocation in adults older than 50 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2011, 170 patients underwent surgery for renal cell carcinoma in our center. Systematic histopathologic analysis of specimen removed was performed. Complementary immunohistochemical analysis was performed only in cases with uncertain diagnosis or in patients younger than 40 years of age.

RESULTS

Among these 170 patients with a median age of 59years old (21-89), immunohistochemistry helped find a TFE3 translocation in four cases (2.4%). There were three women and one man of 53, 71, 75 and 86years old respectively. One patient was metastatic at diagnosis. Radical nephrectomy was first performed in all cases. TNM staging was T3aN2R0, T3bN0R0, T2N2R0 and T3aN2R2, with a Furhman grade of 4. Two patients progressed with metastasis 5 and 7months after surgery, and two with lymphatic invasion 2 and 9months after nephrectomy. One patient died during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma was uncommon after 50years of age in our series, but probably under estimated. It seemed to be associated with a poor prognosis. Larger studies must be performed to optimize its specific treatment.

Molecular heterogeneity of TFE3 activation in renal cell carcinomas

Renal cell carcinomas associated with Xp11.2 translocations have recently been identified as a distinct biological entity. The translocation results in the fusion of the transcription factor TFE3 to one of several different fusion partners including PRCC, PSF, NONO, ASPL or CTLC with consecutive overexpression of the chimeric protein. As the true frequency of these neoplasms as well as the biological properties of TFE3 activation in renal cell carcinomas are largely unknown, we have examined TFE3 expression as well as the underlying genetic alterations in a large, hospital-based series of renal cell carcinomas with long-term follow-up information. Out of a total of 876 tumours, TFE3 translocations were detected in five cases (0.6%). Three additional cases were identified in a second series of cases comprising of renal cell carcinomas developing in patients before the age of 50. However, using immunohistochemistry, 9% of all renal cell carcinomas showed some degree of TFE3 reactivity. Interestingly, these cases were associated with high nuclear grade, greater tumour extent and metastatic disease as well as an unfavourable patient outcome on uni- and multivariate analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) revealed TFE3 amplifications as an additional, novel mechanism leading to increased TFE3 expression levels. In conclusion, our data show that Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas are uncommon tumours accounting for <1% of adult renal cell carcinomas and that the diagnosis of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas needs to be verified using molecular techniques. In turn, TFE3 overexpressing tumours show an aggressive behaviour and Xp11 translocation is only one of several possible underlying genomic alterations.

TFE3 Translocation-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma Presenting as Avascular Necrosis of the Femur in a 19-Year-Old Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature

In the United States, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 3% of adult malignancies and 90–95% of all neoplasms arising from the kidney. According to the National Cancer Institute, 58 240 new cases and 13 040 deaths from renal cancer will occur in 2010. RCC usually occurs in older adults between the ages of 50 and 70 and is rare in young adults and children. We describe a case of a TFE3 translocation-associated RCC in a 19-year-old patient presenting as avascular necrosis of the femur. Due to the rarity of this malignancy, we present this case including a review of the existing literature relative to diagnosis and treatment.

Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy for the treatment of adult metastatic Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adult "translocation" renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bearing transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene fusions at Xp11.2, is a recently recognized, unique entity for which prognosis and therapy remain poorly understood. In the current study, the authors investigated the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in this distinct subtype of RCC.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to describe the clinical characteristics and outcome of adult patients with metastatic Xp11.2 RCC who had strong TFE3 nuclear immunostaining and received anti-VEGF therapy. Tumor response to anti-VEGF therapy was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) distributions.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were identified, of whom 10, 3, and 2 received sunitinib, sorafenib, and monoclonal anti-VEGF antibodies, respectively. The median follow-up was 19.1 months, the median age of the patients was 41 years, and the female:male ratio was 4:1. Initial histologic description included clear cell (n = 8 patients), papillary (n = 1 patient), or mixed clear cell/papillary RCC (n = 6 patients). Five patients had received prior systemic therapy. Five patients had undergone fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis and all demonstrated a translocation involving chromosome Xp11.2. When treated with VEGF-targeted therapy, 3 patients achieved a partial response, 7 patients had stable disease, and 5 patients developed progressive disease. The median PFS and OS of the entire cohort were 7.1 months and 14.3 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult-onset, translocation-associated metastatic RCC is an aggressive disease that affects a younger population of patients with a female predominance. In the current study, VEGF-targeted agents appeared to demonstrate some efficacy.

Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), a recently recognized distinct subtype, are rare tumors predominantly reported in young patients. They comprise at least one-third of pediatric RCCs, and only few adult cases have been reported. They are characterized by various translocations involving chromosome Xp11.2, all resulting in gene fusions involving the transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene. In recent years, at least 6 different Xp11.2 translocation RCCs have been identified and characterized at the molecular level. These include a distinctive RCC that bears a translocation with the identical chromosomal breakpoints (Xp11.2, 17q25) and identical resulting ASPL-TFE3 gene fusion as alveolar soft part sarcoma. They typically have papillary or nested architecture and are composed of cells with voluminous, clear, or eosinophilic cytoplasm. Their most distinctive immunohistochemical feature is nuclear labeling for TFE3 protein. Although only limited data are available so far, they are believed to be rather indolent, but there have been increasing, recent reports of an aggressive clinical course in adult cases. The consistent immunohistochemical staining for TFE3 in all RCC with unusual histology, regardless of patient age, is likely to expand the spectrum of Xp11.2 translocation RCC with respect to age, clinical behavior, and molecular abnormalities.

Renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations, report of a case

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) associated with Xp11.2 translocations (Xp11.2 translocation RCCs) are rare and occur predominantly in children and adolescents. A case of such tumor in a 12-year boy is reported. Grossly the cut surface of the ill-defined mass was polychromatic, containing areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of epithelioid cells with clear to weakly eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in nested, alveolar, and pseudopapillary formations. Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells were positive for transcription factor E3 and CD10. We concluded that this case was an Xp11.2 translocation RCC.

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma occurring during pregnancy with a novel translocation involving chromosome 19: a case report with review of the literature

The recently recognized renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) associated with Xp11.2 translocations (TFE3 transcription factor gene fusions) are rare tumors predominantly reported in children. They comprise at least one-third of pediatric RCCs and only few adult cases have been reported. Here, we present a case of Xp11.2 translocation RCC in 26-year-old pregnant female. Her routine antenatal ultrasonography accidentally found a complex cystic right renal mass. Further radiologic studies revealed unilocular cyst with multiple mural nodules at inferior pole of right kidney, which was suspicious for RCC. She underwent right radical nephrectomy at 15 weeks gestation. Macroscopically, the cystic tumor was well encapsulated with multiple friable mural nodules on its inner surface. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of clear and eosinophilic/oncocytic voluminous cells arranged in papillary, trabecular, and nested/alveolar patterns. Occasional hyaline nodules and numerous psammoma bodies were present.

Immunohistochemically, the tumor showed strong nuclear positivity for TFE3. Epithelial membrane antigen, CD10, and E-cadherin were strongly positive. Cytokeratin AE1/AE3, cytokeratin CAM-5.2, calveolin, and parvalbumin were moderately positive. Cytokeratin 7, renal cell carcinoma antigen, and colloidal iron were focally weakly positive. BerEP4 and carbonic anhydrase IX were negative. Cytogenetically, the tumor harbored a novel variant translocation involving chromosomes X and 19, t(X;19)(p11.2;q13.1). Interphase FISH analysis performed on cultured and uncultured tumor cells using a dual-color break-apart DNA probe within the BCL3 gene on 19q13.3 was negative for the BCL3 gene rearrangement. She received no adjuvant therapy, delivered a normal term baby five months later, and is alive without evidence of disease 27 months after diagnosis and surgery. Unlike most recently reported Xp11.2 translocation RCCs in adult patients with aggressive clinical course, this adult case occurring during pregnancy with a novel translocation involving chromosome 19 followed an indolent clinical course.