Autoimmune cholangitis syndrome with a bias towards primary biliary cirrhosis

Diagnosis and management of the overlap syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis may have cholestatic features that are outside the classical phenotype and that resemble findings in other immune-mediated liver diseases. These cholestatic phenotypes have been designated 'overlap syndromes'.

OBJECTIVES

To recognize the overlap syndromes in adults and manage them appropriately.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was reviewed for published experiences from 1984 to 2013.

RESULTS

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis may exhibit features of primary biliary cirrhosis (7% to 13%), primary sclerosing cholangitis (6% to 11%) or a cholestatic syndrome without other diagnostic features (5% to 11%). These mixed phenotypes may represent classical autoimmune hepatitis with atypical features, transition states in the evolution of classical cholestatic syndromes, concurrent separate diseases or pathogenically distinct disorders. The 'Paris criteria' have been endorsed for the diagnosis of the overlap syndrome with primary biliary cirrhosis, and treatment with conventional immunosuppressive therapy alone or in combination with low-dose ursodeoxycholic acid can be guided by the serum alkaline phosphatase level. The overlap syndrome with primary sclerosing cholangitis or with cholestasis without diagnostic features is commonly treated with immunosuppressive therapy and ursodeoxycholic acid. Responses are variable and commonly incomplete (20% to 100% improvement) depending on the degree of cholestasis.

DISCUSSION

The overlap syndromes are clinical descriptions rather than pathological entities, and the dominant component of the disease determines its designation and therapy. Cholestatic findings in autoimmune hepatitis influence the response to immunosuppressive therapy.

CONCLUSION

The overlap syndromes must be considered in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and cholestatic findings, concurrent inflammatory bowel disease or steroid-refractory disease.

The overlap syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has two major variant phenotypes in which the features of classical disease are co-mingled with those of primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis. These overlap syndromes lack codified diagnostic criteria, established pathogenic mechanisms, and confident management strategies. Their clinical importance relates mainly to the identification of patients who respond poorly to conventional corticosteroid treatment. Scoring systems that lack discriminative power have been used in their definition, and a clinical phenotype based on pre-defined laboratory and histological findings has not been promulgated. The frequency of overlap with primary biliary cirrhosis is 7-13 %, and the frequency of overlap with primary sclerosing cholangitis is 8-17 %. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis and features of cholestatic disease must be distinguished from patients with cholestatic disease and features of autoimmune hepatitis. Variants of the overlap syndromes include patients with small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis, antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis, and immunoglobulin G4-associated disease. Conventional corticosteroid therapy alone or in conjunction with ursodeoxycholic acid (13-15 mg/kg daily) has been variably effective, and cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and budesonide have been beneficial in selected patients. The key cholestatic features that influence the prognosis of autoimmune hepatitis must be defined and incorporated into the definition of the syndrome rather than rely on designations that imply the co-mingling of different diseases with manifestations of variable clinical relevance. The overlap syndromes in autoimmune hepatitis are imprecise, heterogeneous, and unfounded, but they constitute a clinical reality that must be accepted, diagnosed, refined, treated, and studied.

Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of bile duct injury in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Bile duct injury is not a feature of classical autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but it has been described in variant forms of the disease.

AIMS

Our goals were to assess the similarity of AIH with bile duct injury to classical disease and to evaluate the possibility of concurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC).

METHODS

Fifteen patients with bile duct injury were compared with 151 patients with classical AIH. Patterns of nuclear immunofluorescence and the frequency and nature of autoantibodies associated with AIH and PBC were determined.

RESULTS

Patients with bile duct injury had the same nuclear-staining patterns, frequency and nature of autoantibodies, and genetic risk factors as the comparison group. Features specific for PBC, including the multiple nuclear dot pattern of immunofluorescence and antibodies to the M2 antigens, Sp100 and nuclear pore complex antigen, gp210, did not distinguish them from classical disease. Remission and treatment failure occurred with similar frequencies in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AIH and bile duct injury lack features of PBC, and they respond as well to corticosteroid therapy as patients with classical disease. Background bile duct changes should not alter the diagnosis or treatment of AIH.

Review article: is there an optimal therapeutic regimen for antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis (autoimmune cholangitis)?

Testing for antimitochondrial antibodies is the most useful laboratory procedure in the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis; nevertheless, 5-10% of patients with typical features of primary biliary cirrhosis do not have detectable antimitochondrial antibodies, their condition being referred to as antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis or "autoimmune cholangitis". Uncertainty exists whether antimitochondrial antibody-positive and -negative primary biliary cirrhosis represent distinct entities. We reviewed studies that compared: (i) the clinical, laboratory and histological characteristics of antimitochondrial antibody-positive and -negative primary biliary cirrhosis; (ii) the response to treatment of both conditions; and (iii) the response of autoimmune cholangitis to ursodeoxycholic acid and immunosuppressive therapy. Antimitochondrial antibody-positive and -negative primary biliary cirrhosis were characterized by similar clinical, laboratory and histological abnormalities, clinical course and survival. Antimitochondrial antibody status did not seem to affect the response to ursodeoxycholic acid. At present, the efficacy of therapies for autoimmune cholangitis has not been established in controlled trials. Of 52 patients with autoimmune cholangitis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid in 13 uncontrolled studies, 83% had serum biochemical improvement. Also, a favourable effect of immunosuppressive drugs occurred in 57% of 54 patients with autoimmune cholangitis in 17 uncontrolled studies. Each of these trials included very few patients and most evaluated the effects of treatment on surrogate markers of disease only. No marker that consistently distinguished patients who would respond favourably to ursodeoxycholic acid or immunosuppression was apparent. Consequently, treatment is, at present, empirical. However, ursodeoxycholic acid may be given when histology reveals bile duct lesions, whereas immunosuppressive therapy should probably be reserved for patients exhibiting interface hepatitis.

The role of histologic evaluation in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis and its variants

The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis requires a constellation of clinical, laboratory, and histologic features that exclude other conditions and support the syndrome. Interface hepatitis is the histologic hallmark of the disease, and it may be associated with panacinar hepatitis with or without bridging necrosis or multiacinar necrosis. The liver tissue examination at accession supports the diagnosis and assesses disease severity. It can also suggest the diagnosis in patients with atypical presentations, including those with an acute onset or cryptogenic disease. The liver tissue examination during therapy defines end points of treatment (remission) and evaluates unexpected outcomes (treatment failure, incomplete response). Manifestations of bile duct injury are incompatible with the classic diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and they may be coincidental findings of no or uncertain clinical significance or weak expressions of a variant form. Histologic features of autoimmune hepatitis may intermix with those of PBC, PSC, and chronic hepatitis C infection, or they may occur in autoimmune cholangitis or cryptogenic chronic hepatitis. Conditions in which the histologic findings suggest the overlap of two disorders or are insufficient for designation as classic disease constitute the variant syndromes.

Autoimmune cholangitis: not just AMA-negative primary biliary cirrhosis

Variant forms of chronic cholestatic liver disease in adults, such as autoimmune cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis-autoimmune hepatitis overlap, and primary sclerosing cholangitis-autoimmune hepatitis overlap constitute approximately 20% of cases of autoimmune liver disease. Retrospective study design may obscure subtle differences in clinical features. Careful prospective studies are needed to help clarify classification of these disorders. Autoimmune cholangitis is often considered synonymous with antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis, but may instead be a heterogeneous group of disorders including some cases of isolated small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis. The variable response of variant syndromes to established therapies such as corticosteroids provides justification for continued efforts to define their clinicopathologic features.

Autoimmune liver disease. Current standards, future directions

The diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis continues to evolve as new diagnostic tests and new therapies are added to the armamentarium. Also encouraging are the advances in the understanding of the human immune system and its involvement in the origin and course of auto immune diseases in general and in the variants of autoimmune liver disease. Promising changes are expected in the next few years as new medications become available to the practicing hepatologist. New immune tests may allow therapies to be customized to patients, and antiviral therapies may also eventually be used in the management of this autoimmune liver diseases.

Autoimmune cholangitis within the spectrum of autoimmune liver disease

Autoimmune cholangitis is an idiopathic disorder with mixed hepatocellular and cholestatic findings. Our goal was to characterize the disease prospectively by application of uniform diagnostic criteria. Twenty patients were identified and compared with 242 patients with conventional forms of autoimmune liver disease. Patients with autoimmune cholangitis were distinguished from type 1 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) by lower serum levels of aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma-globulin, and immunoglobulin G; higher serum levels of alkaline phosphatase; and lower frequencies of autoantibodies. They were distinguished from primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) by higher serum levels of AST and bilirubin, lower serum concentrations of immunoglobulin M, and greater occurrence of autoantibodies. Their female predominance, lower serum alkaline phosphatase levels, higher frequency of autoantibodies, and absence of inflammatory bowel disease differentiated them from primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Laboratory findings ranged widely and did not characterize individual patients. HLA risk factors were similar to those of type 1 AIH and PBC, and different from those of PSC. Treatment responses to corticosteroids or ursodeoxycholic acid were poor. Composite histological patterns resembled mainly PBC or PSC. We conclude that autoimmune cholangitis diagnosed by prospective analysis cannot be assimilated into a single, conventional, diagnostic category. It may represent variant forms of diverse conditions, a transition stage, or a separate entity with varying manifestations.

Autoimmune cholangitis and primary biliary cirrhosis--an autoimmune enigma

AIMS/BACKGROUND

Autoimmune cholangitis/cholangiopathy (AIC) is an enigmatic disease marked by chronic cholangitis, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and sero-negativity for conventionally detected antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA). We examined whether AIC is a distinct entity, an AMA-negative variant of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), or a cholangiopathic variant of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) by comparing the clinical, laboratory and autoantibody profiles of 21 cases of AIC, 37 cases PBC and 16 cases of AIH from selected Japanese patients.

METHODS

The specificities of AMA and ANA were determined by immunofluorescence, immunoblotting and enzyme inhibition assays using various mitochondrial and nuclear autoantigens, and the frequencies for these groups were compared.

RESULTS

By clinical, biochemical and histological data, AIC and PBC were similar and both were clearly distinct from AIH. Serologically, by immunofluorescence of AMA and ANA, there was polarisation. By immunoblotting, and notwithstanding the negative test for AMA, a proportion of the AIC sera reacted with the E2 subunits of the 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase enzyme complexes, but more particularly with the lower molecular weight E2 subunits. The antinuclear reactivity in AIC was with centromere, Sp100 and nuclear pore complex proteins as in PBC, but preferentially with the nuclear pore complex.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that AIC and PBC are similar diseases. However this duo is of interest because, usually, among sets of autoimmune syndromes, differences in serological targetting are matched by differences in clinical presentation: AIC and PBC are an exception to this.