1
|
van Peer SE, Hol JA, van der Steeg AFW, van Grotel M, Tytgat GAM, Mavinkurve-Groothuis AMC, Janssens GOR, Littooij AS, de Krijger RR, Jongmans MCJ, Lilien MR, Drost J, Kuiper RP, van Tinteren H, Wijnen MHWA, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM. Bilateral Renal Tumors in Children: The First 5 Years' Experience of National Centralization in The Netherlands and a Narrative Review of the Literature. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235558. [PMID: 34884260 PMCID: PMC8658527 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Survival of unilateral Wilms tumors (WTs) is exceeding 90%, whereas bilateral WTs have an inferior outcome. We evaluated all Dutch patients with bilateral kidney tumors, treated in the first five years of national centralization and reviewed relevant literature. We identified 24 patients in our center (2015–2020), 23 patients had WT/nephroblastomatosis and one renal cell carcinoma. Patients were treated according to SIOP-RTSG protocols. Chemotherapy response was observed in 26/34 WTs. Nephroblastomatosis lesions were stable (n = 7) or showed response (n = 18). Nephron-sparing surgery was performed in 11/22 patients undergoing surgery (n = 2 kidneys positive margins). Local stage in 20 patients with ≥1 WT revealed stage I (n = 7), II (n = 4) and III (n = 9). Histology was intermediate risk in 15 patients and high risk in 5. Three patients developed a WT in a treated nephroblastomatosis lesion. Two of 24 patients died following toxicity and renal failure, i.e., respectively dialysis-related invasive fungal infection and septic shock. Genetic predisposition was confirmed in 18/24 patients. Our literature review revealed that knowledge is scarce on bilateral renal tumor patients with metastases and that radiotherapy seems important for local stage III patients. Bilateral renal tumors are a therapeutic challenge. We describe management and outcome in a national expert center and summarized available literature, serving as baseline for further improvement of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E. van Peer
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Janna A. Hol
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Alida F. W. van der Steeg
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Martine van Grotel
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Godelieve A. M. Tytgat
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Annelies M. C. Mavinkurve-Groothuis
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Geert O. R. Janssens
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke S. Littooij
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Wilhelmina’s Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald R. de Krijger
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn C. J. Jongmans
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc R. Lilien
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Wilhelmina’s Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jarno Drost
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Oncode Institute, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roland P. Kuiper
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Marc H. W. A. Wijnen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| | - Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (A.F.W.v.d.S.); (M.v.G.); (G.A.M.T.); (A.M.C.M.-G.); (G.O.R.J.); (A.S.L.); (R.R.d.K.); (M.C.J.J.); (M.R.L.); (J.D.); (R.P.K.); (H.v.T.); (M.H.W.A.W.); (M.M.v.d.H.-E.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Han Q, Li K, Dong K, Xiao X, Yao W, Liu G. Clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of bilateral Wilms' tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53:2465-2469. [PMID: 30274708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wilms' tumor(WT) is the most common malignant renal tumor of childhood. Despite the good prognosis of WT, bilateral Wilms' tumor (BWT) still has a poor outcome. We systematically reviewed the literature on BWT, aiming to define its clinical features, treatment, and outcomes. METHODS PubMed, OVID EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published from 1980 to 2017. Case series and comparative studies reported clinical data of BWT patients were included. RESULTS A total of 32 studies comprising 1457 patients were retained for primary outcome. Hemihypertrophy, cryptorchidism, and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome(BWS) are the most common congenital anomalies and syndrome. 86% of patients had favorable histology (FH). Patients with local stage I or II accounted for 64%, and 12.6% had metastasis at diagnosis. Bilateral nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) was achieved in 33.8%. Recurrence and renal failure occurred in 20% and 8%. The overall survival (OS) was 73%. In comparative studies, OS of patients undergoing bilateral NSS was similar to that of other operation types. CONCLUSION Prognosis of BWT has been improved but is significantly poorer than WT. Bilateral NSS was recommended by most centers to preserve more renal volume. However, finding a balance between retaining renal function and avoiding recurrence remains a question. TYPE OF STUDY Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qilei Han
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Kuiran Dong
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianmin Xiao
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Yao
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gongbao Liu
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
AIMS Cytogenetic abnormalities of Wilms' tumour (WT) treated in a single institution in Western Australia were reviewed. Correlation with histologic subtypes, stage, presence of nephrogenic rests and age of the patient at diagnosis were also evaluated. METHODS 53 WT specimens were encountered between 1995 and 2009. Tissue culture was obtained in 49 (92%) specimens. Reports documenting histopathological features of the tumour, stage and outcome were also retrieved. RESULTS A total of 53 tumour specimens from 42 patients/cases were examined and staged in accordance with the National Wilms' Tumor Study (NWTS). Thirty-eight cases were unilateral (34 unifocal, 4 multifocal) and four were bilateral (2 multifocal). Fifty tumours showed favourable histology WT. One tumour was a cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma (CPDN). Two tumours showed diffuse anaplasia. Eighteen specimens had nephrogenic rests, seven with perilobar rests, 10 with intralobar rests and one with both types of nephrogenic rests. Twelve WTs were assigned as stage 1, 22 as stage 2, 16 as stage 3, and two each for stages 4 and 5. For chromosomal analysis, 92% of the specimens yielded results, of which 70% showed abnormal karyotype and 22% displayed normal karyotypic findings. Hyperdiploidy was more common than hypodiploidy. The most common chromosomal gain involved chromosome 12. Low stage tumours tended to have abnormal karyotypes with hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy being more common. There was no statistical correlation between abnormal karyotype and stage or abnormal karyotype and age group or abnormal karyotype and non-blastemal WT. Eleven (58%) tumours harbouring nephrogenic rests displayed an abnormal karyotype. 16q loss or der(16)t(1;16) were more common in younger patients but no association was made between this chromosomal abnormality and stage. Monosomy 22 and gain of 1q were more common in older patients. Furthermore, monosomy 22 tended to occur in tumours of earlier stage. No correlation between 11p deletions and age or stage was seen. CONCLUSIONS WTs are karyotypically heterogeneous tumours. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of WTs still remains a useful technique to assist in the understanding of these tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena MdZin
- School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|