Intestinal Obstruction

Early versus late adhesiolysis for adhesive-related intestinal obstruction: a nationwide analysis of inpatient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Classical teaching advocates watchful waiting for 2 days before operating on adhesive-related intestinal obstructions (AIOs). Our aim was to compare the clinical and cost outcomes of early versus late adhesiolysis for AIOs.

DESIGN

Patients undergoing adhesiolysis for AIOs from the 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were stratified to early (≤2 days from admission) vs. late (>2 days) adhesiolysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were post-operative complications (POCs), post-operative length of stay (PLOS), and in-hospital cost.

RESULTS

From 5,443 patients who underwent adhesiolysis for AIOs, 53 and 47 % underwent early and late adhesiolysis, respectively. Late adhesiolysis patients were older (65.0 vs. 60.1 years) and more co-morbid compared to the early group (p < 0.05). After adjustment with propensity score methods, late adhesiolysis patients had no difference in mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95%-confidence intervals [CI] 0.67-1.36, p = 0.79) or POCs (OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.89-1.14, p = 0.91) compared to the early group, but had 9.8 % increased PLOS and 41.9 % increased in-hospital cost (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-day limit of watchful waiting is not associated with increased mortality or POCs for those patients undergoing adhesiolysis for an AIO. Late adhesiolysis, however, was associated with significantly increased PLOS and in-hospital cost compared to early adhesiolysis.

Does a water soluble contrast enema assist in the management of acute large bowel obstruction: A prospective study of 117 cases

We have performed a prospective study on 117 patients in order to assess the value of a single contrast water soluble enema in acute large bowel obstruction. In 99 cases where the plain films suggested a diagnosis of mechanical obstruction, the Diodone enema confirmed its presence in 52, and relocated its site in 11. There was free flow of contrast to the caecum in the remaining 35, 11 of whom were shown to have idiopathic pseudoobstruction. The plain films suggested a diagnosis of pseudo-obstruction in 18 patients. The Diodone enema confirmed this diagnosis in 15, but revealed an unsuspected mechanical obstruction in two. The examination failed in two cases. We conclude that the water soluble single contrast enema is of value in the management of large bowel obstruction. It will confirm the diagnosis of mechanical obstruction and prevent unnecessary surgery in patients with pseudo-obstruction.

Mechanical intestinal obstruction in patients with gynecologic disease: a review of 368 patients

To review the management of intestinal obstruction associated with gynecologic disease, the authors studied the records of 368 patients with acute intestinal obstruction. Most patients (83%) had gynecologic malignancies. Obstruction of the small intestines was more common than obstruction of the large intestines (77% versus 23%). Major causes of mechanical small bowel obstruction included extrinsic neoplasms (62%, mostly ovarian carcinomas), radiation therapy-associated strictures and adhesions (17%), postoperative adhesions (14%), and inflammatory strictures and adhesions (3%). Obstruction of the colon was caused mainly by extrinsic neoplasms (45%), strictures and adhesions associated with radiation therapy (26%), fecal impaction (9%), and intrinsic neoplasms (8%). Gastrointestinal intubation successfully relieved 81% of small bowel obstructions caused by postoperative adhesions. Tube suction alone was rarely successful when the obstruction was caused by malignant neoplasms. The prognosis was dependent on the cause of the underlying disease. The cases studied in this report were compared with a large number of cases of bowel obstruction in general surgery. It is concluded that bowel obstruction associated with gynecologic disease has unique features deserving wider recognition.