Oral cancer

Donor-Site Morbidity after Fibula Transplantation in Head and Neck Tumor Patients: A Split-Leg Retrospective Study with Focus on Leg Stability and Quality of Life

The free fibula flap has been one of the most important microvascular grafts for orofacial reconstruction for more than 30 years. The complication rates at the donor-site reported in literature are considered to be low, but the published data vary greatly in some cases. In particular, restrictions in the stability and balance of the involved leg and their effects on the quality of life have been described very inconsistently to date. Therefore, this study mainly focuses on the stability and balance of the affected leg in a split-leg design. Between December 2014 and January 2018, out of 119 subjects who underwent mainly jaw ablative tumor surgery and reconstruction using a fibula flap, 68 subjects were examined for donor site morbidity. Besides reporting general types of complications, two specific test procedures were used. The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) as a practical test for ankle function and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) as a questionnaire in order to assess quality of life, depending on the lower leg function. SEBT revealed an average of 55.3 cm with the operated leg as the supporting leg, which corresponds to 95.5% of 57.9 cm achieved with the healthy leg as the supporting leg. An average FADI score of 89.4% was recorded. SEBT and FADI seem to be suitable methods of examination for subjects post fibular transplantation and pointed out minimal limitations of the involved legs in comparison to the unaffected legs. These limitations were clinically not relevant and they had minor influence on the subjects' quality of life and their daily activities.

[Delayed referrals of oral cancer patients: the perception of dental surgeons]

The scope of this study was to verify the possible reasons to justify the delay in the referral of oral cancer patients to specialized health care sectors from the standpoint of the dental surgeons involved in Primary Health Care (PHC) in Porto Alegre, state of Rio Grande do Sul. This target public of this study was dental surgeons working in five different labor environments in PHC in Porto Alegre. Criteria for inclusion was dental surgeons graduated in and working in PHC. The data collection instrument was the focus group technique and application of a structured questionnaire. After data collection, interpretative analysis was conducted with classification of the information under four main headings: professional, team, community and services network. The results suggest that there are several factors associated with delayed in referral of patients with oral cancer to specialized health care sectors. These include omission of early diagnosis, lack of multidisciplinary work and insufficient attention to the need for joint community responsibility with patients for their own health status. It is also due to deficiencies in the health service network, specifically regarding the quality of communication between professionals at different levels of the health services.

Professional delay in head and neck cancer patients: Analysis of the diagnostic pathway

The aim of this study was to identify which factors are related to specialist delay and to determine the length of the diagnostic pathway in head and neck cancer patients. Three hundred and six patients with a carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx or oral cavity were included in the study. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for specialist delay. Large (T3-T4) tumors showed significantly less specialist delay than small (T1-T2) tumors (p=0.045, odds ratio [OR]=0.6). Pharyngeal (p=0.00, OR=0.2) and oral carcinomas (p=0.00, OR=0.2) had less specialist delay than glottic carcinomas. Hoarseness was associated with prolonged specialist delay (p=0.00, OR=5.9). Heavy drinking in combination with smoking (p=0.005, OR=0.3), a sore throat (p=0.02, OR=0.4) or having a lesion (p=0.03, OR=0.2) showed a shorter diagnostic period. The duration of the diagnostic process in a general hospital ranged from 0 to 570 days, with a median of 14 days. Only a small group of patients met the ideal management standards in our head and neck clinic. Although prolonged delay was associated with small (glottic) tumors, the diagnostic process takes a fairly long time. The results indicate that continued educational programs for professionals are warranted.

Training in oral disease, diagnosis and treatment for medical students and doctors in the United Kingdom

To find out if the training of medical undergraduates and qualified doctors was adequate to diagnose, investigate, manage, and refer common oral disorders appropriately, we sent anonymous questionnaires to undergraduate and postgraduate medical and dental deans, accident and emergency (A&E) doctors, and dentists. We wanted to know if they were capable of diagnosing and treating 10 common oral disorders, and if their training was adequate to enable them to do so. Ten clinical photographs with short clinical histories were sent to 48 A&E physicians together with a structured questionnaire. Twenty-one of the 29 medical schools in the UK responded to a questionnaire about the teaching given in the current curriculum about oral anatomy and pathology, and the prevention of oral disease. A questionnaire sent to the deans of the 16 British dental schools asked how many academic staff were involved in undergraduate teaching, and how many in postgraduate courses. A third questionnaire was sent to the 24 postgraduate medical deans to find out how many postgraduate courses there were for qualified medical staff. Of the 48 medical staff, 134 (28%) diagnosed cases correctly, compared with 194 (88.7%) of the 22 dentists, indicating serious deficiencies in diagnostic awareness. Only 11 of the 21 medical schools who responded currently incorporate teaching of oral pathology in their curricula. We conclude that doctors and medical students are inadequately educated about oral diseases with obvious consequences.

Oral lichen planus and malignant transformation: is a recall of patients justified?

There has been a continuous debate regarding the possible malignant potential of oral lichen planus (OLP). Based on the results from follow-up studies, OLP is regarded by several authors as a pre-malignant condition, and patients with OLP have been recommended to have their lesions monitored two to four times annually. This recommendation needs reconsideration, because a recall system of all patients with OLP requires substantial economic resources. In a reality where such resources are limited, a recall system must be weighed against other benefits and the fact that the malignant potential of OLP is most likely very low. The present review focuses on the diagnostic criteria for OLP, the pre-malignant potential of OLP, and the extent to which the available information can be used to reduce morbidity and mortality of oral cancer related to OLP.