Monitoring aspirin therapy with the Platelet Function Analyzer‐100

Comparison of current platelet functional tests for the assessment of aspirin and clopidogrel response

The two most widely used antiplatelet drugs in the world are aspirin and clopidogrel. However, some patients on aspirin and/or clopidogrel therapy do not respond appropriately to either aspirin or clopidogrel. This phenomenon is usually called “aspirin/clopidogrel resistance”. Several platelet function tests have been used in various studies for the assessment of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in healthy individuals and patients admitted in cardiology departments. An accurate assessment of platelet response to aspirin/clopidogrel could benefit patients by proposing tailored-antiplatelet therapy based on test results. However, there is a clear lack of standardisation of such techniques and their analytical variability may induce misinterpretation. After a quick report of the mechanisms responsible for aspirin/clopidogrel resistance, we describe the pre-analytical aspects and the analytical performances of current platelet function tests (Light-transmission aggregometry, whole-blood aggregometry, VerifyNow®, Platelet Function Analyzer®, thromboelastography, VASP assay) that are used for the assessment of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance in clinical studies. Considering the different variables that have to be taken into account with each of the platelet function tests, a particular attention should be paid when interpreting results.

Inconsistency of different methods for assessing ex vivo platelet function: relevance for the detection of aspirin resistance

BACKGROUND

Assays to evaluate platelet function are often interchangeably used to assess "resistance" to aspirin. We compared different platelet function assays in patients treated or untreated with aspirin.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Platelet function was evaluated in 162 subjects, 85 of whom were not being treated with any antiplatelet drug and 77 of whom were receiving chronic therapy with low-dose aspirin. Platelet Function Analyzer collagen/ADP- and collagen/epinephrine closure times, as well as light transmittance aggregometry in response to ADP, collagen and arachidonic acid (this last in 47 aspirin-treated patients) were determined. In 43 aspirin-treated patients, serum thromboxane B(2) levels were also measured.

RESULTS

In untreated patients, collagen/ADP- and collagen/epinephrine-closure times were correlated with each other (r=0.5, P=0.0001), but did not correlate with ADP- or collagen-induced aggregation. In patients treated with aspirin, collagen/ADP-closure time values were not different from those in untreated patients, while the collagen/epinephrine-closure time was prolonged. ADP-induced aggregation was unaffected by aspirin, while collagen-induced aggregation was reduced. Arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was almost completely suppressed (% maximum light transmittance aggregometry =5 ± 13%). There was, however, no correlation between the various platelet function tests. Serum thromboxane B(2), an index of platelet cyclooxygenase-1 activity, was almost completely suppressed (down to 8 ± 17 ng/mL) in treated patients, and was not correlated with arachidonic acid-, ADP- and collagen-induced aggregation or with collagen/ADP-closure time, but was inversely correlated with collagen/epinephrine-closure time.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high heterogeneity of results of tests evaluating inhibition of platelet function by aspirin, and the results of functional tests do not match biochemical measurement of cyclooxygenase-1 activity. Extreme caution should, therefore, be used in defining "resistance" to aspirin on the basis of the results of these tests.

Variability in aggregometry response before and after initiation of clopidogrel therapy

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of clopidogrel therapy by in vitro methods has limitations which may be of clinical importance. We wanted to explore the variability in aggregometry response in aspirin sensitive patients before and after initiation of clopidogrel therapy.

METHODS

ADP 9.37 microM, AA 1.2mM and TRAP 25 mM stimulated light transmissions aggregometry (LTA) were performed twice before (Exams 1 and 2; 3 weeks apart)-and within one year after-initiation of clopidogrel therapy (Exam 3) in 79 patients treated with PCI. Repeated ADP aggregometry was also performed in 16 healthy volunteers in order to estimate LTA measurement error.

RESULT

Inter-individual differences in ADP aggregation e.g. at Exam 1 were substantial (range 17-77%, SD 15.8%). Intra-individual changes between Exams 1 and 2 were significant (-27 to +36%, SD 14.6%, p<0.05). Inter-individual differences at Exam 3 (on clopidogrel treatment) were larger than expected from Exams 1 and 2 (p<0.01). AA aggregation was the same before and during clopidogrel treatment. In controls, inter-individual differences were smaller at ADP 10 than at ADP 5 microM.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-individual differences in ADP aggregation were significant both before and during clopidogrel therapy, and there were significant intra-individual variations over time. Therefore, prediction of aggregometry response before or during clopidogrel therapy based on single tests may be unreliable. Inter-individual differences in healthy controls are smaller at high concentrations of ADP, and comparisons of aggregometry response should be performed with caution unless ADP concentrations are standardized.