Glucose variation in centrifuged serum and lithium-heparin gel tubes stored for up to 96 hours at room temperature or 4 °C

The stability of 65 biochemistry analytes in plasma, serum, and whole blood

OBJECTIVES

The pre-analytical stability of various biochemical analytes requires careful consideration, as it can lead to the release of erroneous laboratory results. There is currently significant variability in the literature regarding the pre-analytical stability of various analytes. The aim of this study was to determine the pre-analytical stability of 65 analytes in whole blood, serum and plasma using a standardized approach.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 30 healthy volunteers (10 volunteers per analyte) into five vacutainers; either SST, Li-heparin, K2-EDTA, or Na-fluoride/K-oxalate. Several conditions were tested, including delayed centrifugation with storage of whole blood at room temperature (RT) for 8 h, delayed centrifugation with storage of whole blood at RT or 4 °C for 24 h, and immediate centrifugation with storage of plasma or serum at RT for 24 h. Percent deviation (% PD) from baseline was calculated for each analyte and compared to the maximum permissible instability (MPI) derived from intra- and inter-individual biological variation.

RESULTS

The majority of the analytes evaluated remained stable across all vacutainer types, temperatures, and timepoints tested. Glucose, potassium, and aspartate aminotransferase, among others, were significantly impacted by delayed centrifugation, having been found to be unstable in whole blood specimens stored at room temperature for 8 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented provides insight into the pre-analytical variables that impact the stability of routine biochemical analytes. This study may help to reduce the frequency of erroneous laboratory results released due to exceeded stability and reduce unnecessary repeat phlebotomy for analytes that remain stable despite delayed processing.

Quantitative protein mass-spectrometry requires a standardized pre-analytical phase

OBJECTIVES

Quantitative protein mass-spectrometry (QPMS) in blood depends on tryptic digestion of proteins and subsequent measurement of representing peptides. Whether serum and plasma can be used interchangeably and whether in-vitro anticoagulants affect the recovery is unknown. In our laboratory serum samples are the preferred matrix for QPMS measurement of multiple apolipoproteins. In this study, we investigated the effect of different matrices on apolipoprotein quantification by mass spectrometry.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 44 healthy donors in Beckton Dickinson blood tubes simultaneously for serum (with/without gel) and plasma (heparin, citrate or EDTA). Nine apolipoproteins were quantified according to standard operating procedure using value-assigned native serum calibrators for quantitation. Tryptic digestion kinetics were investigated in the different matrices by following formation of peptides for each apolipoprotein in time, up to 22 h.

RESULTS

In citrate plasma recovery of apolipoproteins showed an overall reduction with a bias of -14.6%. For heparin plasma only -0.3% bias was found compared to serum, whereas for EDTA-plasma reduction was more pronounced (-5.3% bias) and variable with >14% reduction for peptides of apoA-I, A-II and C-III. Digestion kinetics revealed that especially slow forming peptides showed reduced formation in EDTA-plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma anticoagulants affect QPMS test results. Heparin plasma showed comparable results to serum. Reduced concentrations in citrate plasma can be explained by dilution, whereas reduced recovery in EDTA-plasma is dependent on altered proteolytic digestion efficiency. The results highlight the importance of a standardized pre-analytical phase for accurate QPMS applications in clinical chemistry.

Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers

Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers. There is a continual debate on what type of sample a clinical laboratory should use. While serum is still considered the gold standard and remains the required sample for some assays, laboratories must consider turn-around time, which is an important metric for laboratory performance and, more importantly, plays a critical role in patient care. In addition, a body of evidence emphasise the choice of plasma in order to prevent modifications of some analytes due to the coagulation process and related interferences. Advantages and disadvantages of serum and plasma are discussed on the basis of current literature and evidence. In addition, data are provided on the current utilisation of the samples (serum or plasma) in Italy and in other countries. Finally, a rationale for a possible switch from serum to plasma is provided.