Validation of suPAR turbidimetric assay on Cobas® (c502 and c702) and comparison to suPAR ELISA

suPAR in cardiovascular disease

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), the soluble counterpart of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, is found in the circulation at various levels. suPAR and its parent molecule, cell surface uPAR, exhibit similar structure and extracellular functional roles facilitating fibrinolysis, cellular adhesion, and migration. Studies have assessed the correlation between suPAR in cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is postulated that suPAR may serve as an indicator of inflammatory activation and burden during CVD progression. Increased suPAR independently predicts poorer outcomes in acute coronary syndromes, in heart failure, as well as in coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis. To guide translation into clinical utization, suPAR has been assessed in numerous CVD settings for improved risk discrimination independently or in association with established traditional risk factors. Whilst the involvement of suPAR has been explored in other diseases such as kidney diseases and cancer, there is only emerging evidence of suPAR's mechanistic involvement in cardiovascular disease. In this review, we provide a background into suPAR and its potential role as a biomarker in CVD.

Establishing reference intervals for soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in Northern European adults

Objectives

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) may have untapped potential in clinical diagnostics. Previous studies determined reference intervals using an enzyme-linked immunoassay, but there is a need for reference intervals using a faster assay if the analysis is to be used in emergency medicine. The current study aims to determine reference intervals for suPAR using a fully automated particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline A28-A3c.

Design and methods

Blood samples were prospectively collected from Danish blood donors. Plasma suPAR was analyzed on the cobas 8000 module c502 in an open channel using a PETIA. Sex-partitioned reference intervals were determined using a parametric quantile approach.

Results

The study included 241 participants-123 females and 118 males. The common reference interval for suPAR was 1.56-4.11 ng/mL (95% confidence intervals (CI) for the lower and upper limits were 1.56-1.63 and 3.81-4.47, respectively). The reference interval for females was 1.59-4.65 ng/mL (95% CIs 1.48-1.70 and 4.09-5.48, respectively) and for males, 1.56-3.59 ng/mL (95% CIs 1.47-1.65 and 3.31-3.93, respectively).

Conclusions

Our results support using sex-partitioned reference intervals for suPAR and provide a basis for future studies using the PETIA method.

Advances in sepsis biomarkers

Sepsis, a dysregulated host immune response to an infectious agent, significantly increases morbidity and mortality for hospitalized patients worldwide. This chapter reviews (1) the basic principles of infectious diseases, pathophysiology and current definition of sepsis, (2) established sepsis biomarkers such lactate, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, (3) novel, newly regulatory-cleared/approved biomarkers, such as assays that evaluate white blood cell properties and immune response molecules, and (4) emerging biomarkers and biomarker panels to highlight future directions and opportunities in the diagnosis and management of sepsis.

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR) Analysis for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptors (suPARs) are a biomarker for inflammatory diseases. This study aims to investigate its diagnostic properties regarding periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent joint puncture for suspected PJI. The presence of PJI was determined according to the criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). Laboratory study analyses included the determination of white blood cells (WBC) in whole blood, C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood plasma, and suPAR in both blood plasma and synovial fluid. Appropriate diagnostic cut-off values were identified utilizing Youden's J, and their diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for each marker. Sixty-seven cases were included in the final analysis. Forty-three samples (64%) were identified as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and twenty-four specimen (36%) were PJI negative cases. The PPV and NPV were 0.80 and 0.70 for synovial suPAR, 0.86 and 0.55 for CRP, 0.84 and 0.31 for WBC and 1.00 and 0.31 for plasma suPAR. Synovial suPAR showed a solid diagnostic performance in this study and has the potential to be an alternative or complementary biomarker for PJI. Further investigations in larger patient collectives are indicated.

Cross-sectional study investigating the association between inflammatory biomarkers and neuropathy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate circulating levels of inflammatory markers in adolescents with type 1 diabetes with and without different types of neuropathies and evaluate the association between inflammatory biomarkers, nerve function and clinical parameters.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Hospitals and Steno Diabetes Center in Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

Adolescents with more than 5 years of diabetes duration were investigated for large fibre, small fibre and autonomic neuropathy as a part of the T1DANES study. Blood samples from the participants were analysed for inflammatory biomarkers by Meso Scale Discovery multiplexing technology.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Inflammatory biomarkers and results of diagnostic nerve tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-six adolescents with type 1 diabetes and 23 healthy controls were included. The adolescents with diabetes had significantly higher interferon-gamma, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), interleukin (IL)-10 and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) compared with healthy controls (p values<0.05). TNF-a was higher in the adolescents with large fibre neuropathy (LFN) (p=0.03) compared with those without LFN in the group with diabetes. A negative correlation was seen between TNF-a and conduction velocity in nervus tibialis (p=0.04), and higher TNF-a and IL-6 were associated with higher gastric motility index (TNF-a, p value=0.03; IL-6, p value=0.02). There were no significant associations between inflammatory markers and expressed symptoms, haemoglobin A1c, diabetes duration or body mass index standard derivation score (p values>0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the inflammatory markers suggested them as poor screening methods for all types of neuropathies with an area under the curve between 0.47 and 0.67.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm increased low-grade inflammation in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. TNF-a was higher in adolescents with LFN and correlated negatively with nervus tibialis conduction velocity. The other inflammatory biomarkers fail to support differences in those with and without different types of diabetic neuropathies. However, TNF-a and IL-6 were positively correlated to gastric motility index.

suPAR cut-offs for stratification of low, medium, and high-risk acute medical patients in the emergency department

Background

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels have previously been associated with readmission and mortality in acute medical patients in the ED. However, no specific cut-offs for suPAR have been tested in this population.

Methods

Prospective observational study of consecutively included acute medical patients. Follow-up of mortality and readmission was carried out for 30- and 90 days stratified into baseline suPAR < 4, 4–6 and > 6 ng/ml. suPAR levels were measured using suPARnostic® Turbilatex assay on a Cobas c501 (Roche Diagnostics Ltd) analyser.

Results

A total of 1747 acute medical patients in the ED were included. Median age was 70 (IQR: 57–79) and 51.4% were men. Adjusted linear regression analysis showed that suPAR, independently of age, sex and C-reactive protein levels, predicted 30- and 90-day mortality (Odds ratio for doubling in suPAR 1.96 (95% confidence intervals: 1.42–2.70) Among patients with suPAR below 4 ng/ml (N = 804, 46.0%), 8 (1.0%) died within 90-day follow-up, resulting in a negative predictive value of 99.0% and a sensitivity of 94.6%. Altogether 514 (29.4%) patients had suPAR of 4–6 ng/ml, of whom 43 (8.4%) died during 90-day follow-up. Among patients with suPAR above 6 ng/ml (N = 429, 24.6%), 87 patients (20.3%) died within 90-day follow-up, resulting in a positive predictive value of 20.1% and a specificity of 78.7%.

Conclusions

suPAR cut-offs of below 4, between 4 and 6 and above 6 ng/ml can identify acute medical patients who have low, medium or high risk of 30- and 90-day mortality. The turbidimetric assay provides suPAR results within 30 min that may aid in the decision of discharge or admission of acute medical patients.

The Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor as a Biomarker for Survival and Early Treatment Effect in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is prognostic for overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC). Our study explored the association between baseline suPAR and OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic CRC (mCRC). It is also the first study to explore the association between the initial change in suPAR level and OS, PFS and the first CT response evaluation. The study included 132 patients with mCRC treated with chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) with or without an EGFR-inhibitor. Blood samples were drawn before the first treatment cycle and in between the first and second treatment cycle. suPAR levels were determined using an ELISA assay. Using the Kaplan-Meyer method, we demonstrated a significantly shorter OS for patients with suPAR levels above the median (HR = 1.79, 95%CI = 1.10-2.92, p = 0.01). We also showed association between plasma suPAR level, gender and performance status (PS). However, we could not show any association with PFS, and analysis on the change in suPAR level provided no significant results. The results showing association between baseline suPAR and OS are in line with previous findings.

Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study

BACKGROUND

The major obstacle in prescribing an appropriate and targeted antibiotic treatment is insufficient knowledge concerning whether the patient has a bacterial infection, where the focus of infection is and which bacteria are the agents of the infection. A prerequisite for the appropriate use of antibiotics is timely access to accurate diagnostics such as point-of-care (POC) testing.The study aims to evaluate diagnostic tools and working methods that support a prompt and accurate diagnosis of hospitalised patients suspected of an acute infection. We will focus on the most common acute infections: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute pyelonephritis (APN). The objectives are to investigate (1) patient characteristics and treatment trajectory of the different acute infections, (2) diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of infection markers, (3) diagnostic accuracy of POC urine flow cytometry on diagnosing and excluding bacteriuria, (4) how effective the addition of POC analysis of sputum to the diagnostic set-up for CAP is on antibiotic prescriptions, (5) diagnostic accuracy of POC ultrasound and ultralow dose (ULD) computerized tomography (CT) on diagnosing CAP, (6) diagnostic accuracy of specialist ultrasound on diagnosing APN, (7) diagnostic accuracy of POC ultrasound in diagnosing hydronephrosis in patients suspected of APN.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

It is a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study, including 1000 adults admitted with suspicion of an acute infection. Participants will, within the first 24 hours of admission, undergo additional diagnostic tests including infection markers, POC urine flow cytometry, POC analysis of sputum, POC and specialist ultrasound, and ULDCT. The primary reference standard is an assigned diagnosis determined by a panel of experts.

ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND REGISTRATION

Approved by Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark, Danish Data Protection Agency and clinicaltrials.gov. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals, and positive, negative and inconclusive results will be published.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT04661085, NCT04681963, NCT04667195, NCT04652167, NCT04686318, NCT04686292, NCT04651712, NCT04645030, NCT04651244.

Promising Novel Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases remain the most common causes of death globally, according to the World Health Organization. In recent years, a great number of biomarkers have been investigated, whereas only some have gained value in the diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification of different cardiovascular illnesses. As numerous studies have investigated the diagnostic yield of novel biomarkers in various disease entities every year, this review aims to provide an overview of the current status of four promising representatives. In particular, this manuscript refers to soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), growth differentiation factor (GDF-15) and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). These markers are of special interest as they are thought to provide an accurate estimate of cardiovascular risk in certain patient populations, especially those with pre-existing diseases, such as obesity or diabetes mellitus. We sought to give an overview of their function, individual diagnostic and predictive value and determination in the laboratory. A review of the literature regarding the aforementioned cardiovascular biomarkers yielded manifold results with respect to their individual diagnostic and prognostic value. Yet, the clinical relevance of these findings remains unclear, warranting further studies to identify their optimal use in clinical routine.