ECG changes during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography and coronary artery disease

Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Air Embolism During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a minimally invasive procedure that is widely used by endoscopists and has a robust therapeutic profile. It uses endoscopy and imaging for a variety of diagnostic as well as therapeutic purposes. It is used for the management of a lot of pancreaticobiliary diseases such as obstructive jaundice, obstruction related to bile ducts, pancreatic biliary tumors, and traumatic or iatrogenic damage to the bile ducts. Other therapeutic interventions that can be done via ERCP include sphincterotomy, dilation of strictures, removal of biliary stones and placement of stents. Air embolism presents with cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurologic signs and symptoms. Treatment of air embolism should be started early in suspected cases, and it should be in the differential diagnoses of various complications secondary to high risk of ERCP, especially if a cardiopulmonary compromise is present. Air embolism is rare but a serious complication associated with ERCP. The physicians must keep this in mind while performing ERCP in patients with predisposing risk factors. This review highlights the mechanism, causes, risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical signs, diagnostic modalities, treatment, and preventive measures to deal with this catastrophic complication.

Sudden death after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)--case report and literature review

There are only a few cases found in literature regarding air embolism in endoscopic procedures, especially in connection to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We are presenting a case of a 56-year-old female patient who suffered from non-Hodgkin lymphoma located in her right groin. She was also diagnosed with choledocholithiasis and underwent ERCP to remove the gallstones. Immediately after the procedure she went into sudden cardiac arrest and subsequently died, despite all of our efforts. We reviewed literature in order to identify possible causes of death because fatal outcome following an uneventful and successful procedure was not expected. It is important to bear in mind all possible complications of ERCP. Our focus during the literature search was on air embolism.

Safety and efficacy of ERCP after recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina

BACKGROUND

ERCP after myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina (UnA) can potentially entail significant cardiovascular risks.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the safety of ERCP after MI or UnA.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS

Adult patients less than 30 days after MI or UnA.

SETTING

Three hospitals from 1985 to 2010, encompassing 7600 ERCPs.

INTERVENTIONS

ERCP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

ERCP diagnosis, therapy, efficacy, and complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (mean age 77.9 ± 11.4 years) underwent ERCP on average 6.9 ± 7.7 days after MI. ERCP indications were suspected choledocholithiasis/gallstone pancreatitis (n = 10); cholangitis (n = 7); obstructive jaundice with suspected pancreatic mass (n = 1); and biliary stent removal/replacement (n = 2). ERCP revealed choledocholithiasis (n = 8); previous stent (n = 2); and nonpathologic findings (n = 3). Therapies included balloon sweep (n = 11), sphincterotomy (n = 8), visible stones extracted by balloon sweep (n = 8), and biliary stent placement/replacement/removal (n = 3). Two mild complications occurred: hypotension during ERCP successfully treated with ephedrine and obstructing periampullary clot successfully removed at repeat ERCP. Eleven patients subsequently did well (mean hospital discharge 6.5 days after ERCP); 1 patient with metastatic ovarian cancer remained ventilator dependent, and another patient with multiple comorbidities had a fatal pulmonary embolus 10 days after ERCP. Six patients underwent ERCP 7.5 ± 5.2 days after UnA for suspected choledocholithiasis (n = 5) and bile duct injury (n = 1). ERCP findings included choledocholithiasis (n = 3), cystic duct leak (n = 1), ampullary stenosis (n = 1), and nonpathologic findings (n = 1). Sphincterotomy was performed in 5 patients, visible stones were extracted by balloon sweep in 3, and a biliary stent was inserted in 1. One mild complication occurred: hypotension during ERCP which was successfully treated with ephedrine. All 6 patients were discharged (mean 8.0 days after ERCP).

LIMITATIONS

Small study size; retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that therapeutic ERCP involves acceptable risks when performed soon after MI or UnA for suspected choledocholithiasis or other therapeutic indications and may be performed in such situations when strongly indicated.

Myocardial ischemia during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: an overlooked issue with significant clinical impact

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The occurrence of peri-procedural myocardial ischemia with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been documented, but its significance remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of myocardial ischemia during ERCP procedures and to analyze the potential association between myocardial ischemia and post-ERCP complications.

METHODS

Ambulatory 24-h ST-segment monitoring from 30 min prior to 24 h after ERCP was obtained on 71 patients from September 2006 to August 2007. Changes in vital signs during ERCP, post-ERCP complications, and their outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Cardiac ischemia occurred in 13 patients (18.3%) during ERCP and one patient developed myocardial infarction. More patients in the ischemic group (38.5%) than in the non-ischemic group (5.2%) had ST-T changes in pre-ERCP resting electrocardiography (P < 0.01). Hypotension during ERCP was found only in the ischemic group (15.4% vs 0%; P = 0.03). Patients with cardiac ischemia during ERCP had a significantly higher rate of elevated serum amylase and lipase levels (53.8% vs 15.5%; P < 0.01) and post-ERCP pancreatitis (30.8% vs 6.9%; P = 0.03). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that cardiac ischemia during ERCP (OR: 5.21, P = 0.050) and pancreatic duct cannulation (OR: 5.7, P = 0.036) were independent predictors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

ST-T changes on resting electrocardiography and intra-procedural hypotension are risk factors of myocardial ischemia during ERCP. Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia, hyperlipasemia, and pancreatitis were associated with myocardial ischemia during ERCP.

Cardiovascular considerations in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy

Gastrointestinal endoscopies are common procedures for diagnosis and treatment. Patients with various cardiovascular conditions can undergo these procedures, including those patients with acute myocardial infarction, but appropriate precautions need to be maintained, especially with procedure-induced autonomic nervous system pertubations that can affect heart rate and blood pressure. In this article, treatment recommendations are included for those patients undergoing endoscopy who are receiving anticoagulation and for those who are at risk for bacterial endocarditis.

Transnasal endoscopic retrograde chalangiopancreatography using an ultrathin endoscope: A prospective comparison with a routine oral procedure

AIM: To investigate if transnasal endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (n-ERCP) using an ultrathin forward-viewing scope may overcome the disadvantages of conventional oral ERCP (o-ERCP) related to the large-caliber side-viewing duodenoscope.

METHODS: The study involved 50 patients in whom 25 cases each were assigned to the o-ERCP and n-ERCP groups. We compared the requirements of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) prior to ERCP, rates and times required for successful cannulation into the pancreatobiliary ducts, incidence of post-procedure hyperamylasemia, cardiovascular parameters during the procedure, the dose of a sedative drug, and successful rates of endoscopic naso-biliary drainage (ENBD).

RESULTS: Screening gastrointestinal observations were easily performed by the forward-viewing scope and thus no prior EGD was required in the n-ERCP group. There was no significant difference in the rates or times for cannulation, or incidence of hyperamylasemia between the groups. However, the cannulation was relatively difficult in n-ERCP when the scope appeared U-shape under fluoroscopy. Increments of blood pressure and the amount of a sedative drug were significantly lower in the n-ERCP group. ENBD was successfully performed succeeding to the n-ERCP in which mouth-to-nose transfer of the drainage tube was not required.

CONCLUSION: n-ERCP is likely a well-tolerable method with less cardiovascular stress and no need of prior EGD or mouth-to-nose transfer of the ENBD tube. However, a deliberate application is needed since its performance is difficult in some cases and is not feasible for some endoscopic treatments such as stenting.