Saliva transport to the distal esophagus

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder in adults and children. The global prevalence of GERD is high and increasing. Non-erosive reflux disease is the most common phenotype of GERD. Heartburn and regurgitation are considered classic symptoms but GERD may present with various atypical and extra-oesophageal manifestations. The pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial and different mechanisms may result in GERD symptoms, including gastric composition and motility, anti-reflux barrier, refluxate characteristics, clearance mechanisms, mucosal integrity and symptom perception. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of GERD is commonly established on the basis of response to anti-reflux treatment; however, a more accurate diagnosis requires testing that includes upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy and reflux monitoring. New techniques and new reflux testing parameters help to better phenotype the condition. In children, the diagnosis of GERD is primarily based on history and physical examination and treatment vary with age. Treatment in adults includes a combination of lifestyle modifications with pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical intervention. In refractory GERD, optimization of proton-pump inhibitor treatment should be attempted before a series of diagnostic tests to assess the patient's phenotype.

Saliva transit in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Saliva is an important factor in the neutralization of the acidity of the refluxed material that comes from the stomach to the esophagus. The impairment of saliva transit from oral cavity to distal esophagus may be one of the causes of esophagitis and symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). With the scintigraphic method, the transit of 2 mL of artificial saliva was measured in 30 patients with GERD and 26 controls. The patients with GERD had symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation, a 24-hour pH monitoring with more than 4.2% of the time with pH below four, 26 with erosive esophagitis, and four with non-erosive reflux disease. Fourteen had mild dysphagia for solid foods. Twenty-one patients had normal esophageal manometry, and nine had ineffective esophageal motility. They were 15 men and 15 women, aged 21-61 years, mean 39 years. The control group had 14 men and 12 women, aged 19-61 years, mean 35 years. The subjects swallowed in the sitting and supine position 2 mL of artificial saliva labeled with 18 MBq of (99m) Technetium phytate. The time of saliva transit was measured from oral cavity to esophageal-gastric transition, from proximal esophagus to esophageal-gastric transition, and the transit through proximal, middle, and distal esophageal body. There was no difference between patients and controls in the time for saliva to go from oral cavity to esophageal-gastric transition, and from proximal esophagus to esophageal-gastric transition, in the sitting and supine positions. In distal esophagus in the sitting position, the saliva transit duration was shorter in patients with GERD (3.0 ± 0.8 seconds) than in controls (7.6 ± 1.7 seconds, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the saliva transit from oral cavity to the esophageal-gastric transition in patients with GERD has the same duration than in controls. Saliva transit through the distal esophageal body is faster in patients with GERD than controls.

Infectious causes of esophageal cancer

There are very few data linking infectious agents and esophageal cancer. There are conflicting data for some viruses, notably human papillomavirus, but very few data for bacteria, parasites, fungi, or yeast. Esophageal cancer is increasing in Western countries and the reasons for this remain unknown.

Effects of anatomical position on esophageal transit time: A biomagnetic diagnostic technique

AIM: To study the esophageal transit time (ETT) and compare its mean value among three anatomical inclinations of the body; and to analyze the correlation of ETT to body mass index (BMI).

METHODS: A biomagnetic technique was implemented to perform this study: (1) The transit time of a magnetic marker (MM) through the esophagus was measured using two fluxgate sensors placed over the chest of 14 healthy subjects; (2) the ETT was assessed in three anatomical positions (at upright, fowler, and supine positions; 90º, 45º and 0º, respectively).

RESULTS: ANOVA and Tuckey post-hoc tests demonstrated significant differences between ETT mean of the different positions. The ETT means were 5.2 ± 1.1 s, 6.1 ± 1.5 s, and 23.6 ± 9.2 s for 90º, 45º and 0º, respectively. Pearson correlation results were r = -0.716 and P < 0.001 by subjects’ anatomical position, and r = -0.024 and P > 0.05 according the subject’s BMI.

CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that using this biomagnetic technique, it is possible to measure the ETT and the effects of the anatomical position on the ETT.

[Aging and esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease]

BACKGROUND

Alterations of esophageal contractions may worsen the esophageal lesions caused by gastroesophageal reflux. The impairment of the contractions may be localized only in the distal esophagus or in the entire esophageal body, and may be worse with the aging process.

AIMS

To evaluate the proximal and distal esophageal contractions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms with or without esophagitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied esophageal motility in 104 patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, 42 with normal esophageal endoscopic examination, 47 with mild esophagitis and 15 with severe esophagitis. The esophageal contractions were measured by the manometric method at 2, 7, 12 and 17 cm from the upper esophageal sphincter, after five swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water.

RESULTS

The amplitude and area under the curve of contractions were lower in patients with severe esophagitis than in patients without esophagitis or with mild esophagitis in the distal part of the esophageal body (17 cm from the upper esophageal sphincter). In the proximal esophageal body there was no difference in amplitude or area under the curve. In the entire esophageal body there was no difference between the three groups of patients in duration, velocity of peristaltic contractions, or proportion of failed, simultaneous, non-propagated or peristaltic contractions. There was no difference between the patients with less than 50 years or with more than 50 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe esophagitis had lower distal esophageal contraction amplitude than patients without esophagitis or with moderate esophagitis. There was no effect of aging on esophageal contractions.

Relevance of mild ineffective oesophageal motility (IOM) and potential pharmacological reversibility of severe IOM in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Several studies showed high prevalence of ineffective oesophageal motility (IOM) in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and suggested an important role for ineffective oesophageal motility in increased acid exposure. However, impedance-manometric studies proposed that only severe ineffective oesophageal motility might affect oesophageal clearance.

OBJECTIVES

(i) To re-assess the relevance of mild IOM in GERD and (ii) to test the reversibility of IOM.

METHODS

Oesophageal motility, clearance and acid exposure were assessed in 191 GERD patients: 99 without IOM; 58 with mild IOM (30-80% ineffective contractions) and 34 with severe IOM (>80% ineffective contractions). In 30 patients with oesophagitis, the potential reversibility of IOM was evaluated with edrophonium intravenously.

RESULTS

Patients with mild IOM had identical oesophageal clearance and acid exposure in comparison with those without IOM. Patients with severe IOM had a higher probability of prolonged supine clearance and acid exposure [odds ratio: 2.88 (1.16-7.17); 2.48 (0.99-6.17)]. This effect was independent of the presence of hiatal hernia and male sex. Severe IOM could be transiently reverted in 55% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild IOM does not affect oesophageal clearance. Only severe IOM is associated with prolonged clearance and acid exposure, particularly in supine periods. The edrophonium test might be useful to predict severe IOM response to prokinetic medications.

Primary and secondary esophageal contractions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

We studied the primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis in 36 patients with heartburn and acid regurgitation and in 14 asymptomatic volunteers. Primary peristalsis was elicited by ten swallows of a 5-mL bolus of water and secondary peristalsis was elicited by intra-esophageal infusion of 5, 10, and 15 mL water, 0.1 N hydrochloric acid and air. Esophageal contractions were measured by an 8-lumen manometric catheter assembly incorporating a 6-cm sleeve device. Contractions were registered at 3, 9, and 15 cm from the upper margin of the sleeve and the infusion was done through a side hole located at 12 cm. Twenty patients had normal endoscopic esophageal examination, 10 with normal (group I) and 10 with abnormal pH-metric examination (group II), and 16 had esophagitis (group III). The amplitude of contractions after swallows was lower (97.8 +/- 10.0 mmHg) in the distal esophagus of group III patients than in controls (142.3 +/- 14.0 mmHg). Patients of group III had fewer secondary contractions (water: 25% of infusion) than patients of the other groups and controls (67% of infusion). Patients of group III also had a lower amplitude of secondary peristalsis in the distal esophagus (water: 70.1 +/- 9.6 mmHg) than controls (129.2 +/- 18.2 mmHg). We conclude that patients with esophagitis have an impairment of primary and secondary peristalsis in the distal esophagus.