Outcome for biliary atresia patients treated at a low-volume centre

Variations in Nuss Procedure Operative Techniques and Complications: A Retrospective Review

INTRODUCTION

 The Nuss procedure is the most common and preferred operative correction of pectus excavatum. Surgeon preference and patient factors can result in variations in Nuss procedure technique. We hypothesize that certain techniques are associated with increased risk of complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 We performed a single-center retrospective review of Nuss operations from 2016 to 2020. Variations in intraoperative techniques included sternal elevator (SE) use, number of bars placed, and usage of bilateral stabilizing sutures. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were reported as median with interquartile ranges or percentages. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined with Wilcoxon's rank-sum and chi-square tests. Multivariate analysis was performed to control for introduction of intercostal nerve cryoablation and surgeon volume, and reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

 Two hundred and sixty-five patients were identified. Patients repaired with two bars were older with a larger Haller index (HI). Patient demographics were not significantly different for SE or stabilizing suture use. Placement of two bars was associated with significantly increased risk of readmission. Similarly, SE use was associated with increased risk of pleural effusion and readmission. Finally, the use of bilateral stabilizing sutures resulted in less frequent slipped bars without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

 Older patients with a larger HI were more likely to need two bars placed to repair pectus excavatum. Placement of multiple bars and SE use are associated with significantly higher odds of certain complications.

Liver stiffness measurement predicts the difficulty of Kasai procedure in biliary atresia: a single center retrospective analysis of 199 patients

Background

Kasai procedure is the standard initial treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The key to perform a successful surgery is to accurately remove the fibrous portal plate near the liver hilum. Yet how to estimate surgical difficulty pre-operatively remains unclear. This study aims to design an algorithm that predicts the difficulty of Kasai procedure using liver stiffness measurement (LSM).

Methods

One hundred ninety-nine patients were included from April 2012 to December 2016. The patients were all surgically diagnosed with biliary atresia. Group A comprised of patients with porta hepatis retraction (the angle between the plane of the fibrous porta plate and the plane of the medial liver closest to the plate was equal to or smaller than 90°), group B comprised of patients without porta hepatis retraction (the angle between the plane of the fibrous porta plate and the plane of the medial liver closest to the plate was greater than 90°). Liver function measurements and LSM were measured for all patients within three days before surgery.

Results

Our study included 19 cases in group A (9 males, 10 females) and 180 cases in group B (87 males, 93 females). LSM had statistical differences between the two groups, 28.10(14.90) kPa VS 10.89(7.10) kPa, P = 0.000. There was a significant relationship between LSM and operative age, TBA, AST, GGT (P = 0.000, 0.003, 0.003, 0.012, correlation coefficient = 0.323, 0.213, 0.207, 0.179). The AUROC of LSM was 0.919. When the cutoff value was 15.15 kPa(OR = 3.989; P = 0.000), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 0.947, 0.750, 0.285, 0.992 and 0.768, respectively. When the value was 23.75 kPa(OR = 3.483; P = 0.000), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 0.631, 0.950, 0.571, 0.960 and 0.919, respectively.

Conclusions

LSM can be used to predict the difficulty in dissecting fibrous portal plate, and in turn, the difficulty of Kasai procedure. LSM > 23.75 kPa suggests a more complicated surgery.

Learning Curve Analysis of Open Kasai Portoenterostomy for Biliary Atresia

BACKGROUND

Open Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) remains the mainstay of treatment for biliary atresia (BA) even in the era of minimally invasive surgery and is generally considered to be technically challenging. This study describes the learning curve (LC) of open KPE and its effect on outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our center, the caseload of BA was relatively low with average annual caseload below five in the past, and open KPE was started in the early 2000s. This study retrospectively enrolled the first 35 consecutive children undergoing open KPE for BA by the same surgeon in our center between June 2003 and April 2014. The LC was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method for operative time (OT).

RESULTS

The CUSUM LC of OT, which peaked at the 23rd case, was best modeled as a second-order polynomial with equation CUSUM (min) = -0.8851 × case number² + 33.54 × case number -45.978 (R² = 0.7287). The LC consisted of two distinct phases: phase 1 (the initial 23 cases), representing the initial learning phase and phase 2 (the remaining 12 cases), representing acquisition of technical competency. Preoperative parameters were comparable between the two phases (each P > 0.05). Of note, OT and estimated blood loss significantly decreased in phase 2 compared with phase 1 (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the rates of early jaundice clearance and 2-y native liver survival significantly increased in phase 2 (P = 0.032; P = 0.034, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The two phases identified by CUSUM analysis of OT represents characteristic stages of LC for open KPE of the surgeon in our center. It is possible for surgeons to achieve competency of this demanding technique in centers with relatively low caseload of BA and late start of KPE.