Analysis of factors associated with recovery of the serum pepsinogen ratio after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a long-term follow-up study in Korea

RE.GA.IN.: the Real-world Gastritis Initiative-updating the updates

At the end of the last century, a far-sighted 'working party' held in Sydney, Australia addressed the clinicopathological issues related to gastric inflammatory diseases. A few years later, an international conference held in Houston, Texas, USA critically updated the seminal Sydney classification. In line with these initiatives, Kyoto Global Consensus Report, flanked by the Maastricht-Florence conferences, added new clinical evidence to the gastritis clinicopathological puzzle.The most relevant topics related to the gastric inflammatory diseases have been addressed by the Real-world Gastritis Initiative (RE.GA.IN.), from disease definitions to the clinical diagnosis and prognosis. This paper reports the conclusions of the RE.GA.IN. consensus process, which culminated in Venice in November 2022 after more than 8 months of intense global scientific deliberations. A forum of gastritis scholars from five continents participated in the multidisciplinary RE.GA.IN. consensus. After lively debates on the most controversial aspects of the gastritis spectrum, the RE.GA.IN. Faculty amalgamated complementary knowledge to distil patient-centred, evidence-based statements to assist health professionals in their real-world clinical practice. The sections of this report focus on: the epidemiology of gastritis; Helicobacter pylori as dominant aetiology of environmental gastritis and as the most important determinant of the gastric oncogenetic field; the evolving knowledge on gastric autoimmunity; the clinicopathological relevance of gastric microbiota; the new diagnostic horizons of endoscopy; and the clinical priority of histologically reporting gastritis in terms of staging. The ultimate goal of RE.GA.IN. was and remains the promotion of further improvement in the clinical management of patients with gastritis.

Useful Serum Pepsinogen Levels for Detecting Ongoing Helicobacter pylori Infection in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on 13C-urea Breath Test Findings

BACKGROUND /AIMS

The serum pepsinogen (PG) assay is used to screen subjects at high risk for gastric cancer. Currently, there are few studies on the PG levels for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. This study aimed to determine the PG assay findings for detecting ongoing infection.

METHODS

Asymptomatic subjects who underwent a ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) on the day of gastroscopy and serum assay for cancer screening were included. Subjects with a recent intake of acid suppressants or antibiotics, gastrectomy, or renal failure were excluded. H. pylori infection was defined as a positive ¹³C-UBT result.

RESULTS

Among the 500 included subjects, 167 (33.4%) had current infection. The serum PG II levels of > 12.95 ng/mL (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.930, sensitivity 86.5%, specificity 90.7%) and PG I/II ratios of < 4.35 (AUC = 0.875, sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 79.6%) were related to infection. The PG I/II ratios were inversely correlated with age (r = -0.160, p = 0.039). The cutoff values of PG I/II ratios were lower in older subjects aged ≥ 50 years (< 4.05; AUC = 0.875, sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 88.2%) than in younger subjects aged < 50 years (< 4.35; AUC = 0.873, sensitivity 77.4%, specificity 88.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum PG II levels > 12.95 ng/mL and PG I/II ratios < 4.35 suggest ongoing infection in asymptomatic subjects; therefore, H. pylori confirmation tests (i.e., ¹³C-UBT) should be considered under these conditions. Stricter criteria are required in older subjects aged ≥ 50 years (PG I/II ratio < 4.05) to detect ongoing infection than younger subjects.

Analysis of long-term serological and histological changes after eradication of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>

Stratification of gastric cancer risk by measuring serological biomarkers is useful for screening of gastric cancer. However, this method has problem such as overlooking past infected patients. We aimed to evaluate the association between Helicobacter pylori infection status and serological biomarkers. We divided 5,268 patients according to Helicobacter pylori infection status and past infected patients were divided into 12 groups according to time elapsed since eradication. We analyzed mean serum H. pylori immunoglobulin G antibody, pepsinogen titers, histological and endoscopic atrophy score of each group. Mean H. pylori immunoglobulin G antibody showed a decreasing tendency, there was no significant difference from the uninfected group at 11 years after eradication (p = 0.19). PGI, PGII decreased in short term after eradication. However, both PGI and PGII gradually increased as long-term changes after eradication, became comparable to those in the uninfected group (p = 0.41, p = 0.37, respectively). Histological atrophy improved gradually, became equivalent to uninfected group. Endoscopic atrophy score did not improve for long term after eradication. In conclusion, patients with long term after eradication reach the uninfected condition serologically, histologically. Endoscopic assessment of gastric mucosal atrophy may be useful for accurate assessment of gastric cancer risk.

Serum Assay Findings after Successful Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Serum pepsinogen (PG), anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) immunoglobulin G (IgG), and gastrin-17 (G-17) are plasma biomarkers for gastritis. H. pylori serology titers and PG levels increase during active H. pylori infection; moreover, elevated PG II levels indicate a high risk for diffuse-type gastric cancer in East Asian populations. Serum PG I/II ratios and PG I levels decrease with the progression of gastric corpus atrophy; thus, a combination of serum PG I levels ≤70 ng/mL and a PG I/II ratio ≤3 (serologic atrophy) indicates a high risk of intestinal-type gastric cancer. Serum G-17 is often not used as an indicator in H. pylori-seroprevalent populations because it is usually elevated in subjects with H. pylori infections. When H. pylori is eradicated, most patients show a rapid decrease in serum PG II levels and anti-H. pylori IgG titers within a few months. Seroreversion is required for several months to years after regression of H. pylori. Moreover, seroreversion may not always be achieved in all eradicated cases. The serum PG I/II ratio starts to increase after eradication; therefore, serologic atrophy improves accordingly, unless severe atrophy is present. Thus, some eradicated patients may show normal serum assay findings but have a higher risk for developing gastric cancer than H. pylori-naive subjects. Furthermore, serum PG levels decrease after gastrectomy and increase with the intake of certain drugs (e.g., aspirin or acid suppressants) or in renal failure patients. Due to such wide variations, serum assays are inadequate for the confirmation of H. pylori eradication. It is useful when interpreted with gastroscopy and other H. pylori test findings.

Scoring model for discriminating gastric cancer risk in patients with negative serum pepsinogen and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody results

BACKGROUND

The ABC test measures serum pepsinogen and anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody levels to predict precancerous conditions in the stomach and gastric cancer. However, a limitation of this test is that the gastric cancer risk is not negligible in patients with a negative result.

METHODS

Based on their ABC results, 1157 patients were classified into Groups A (n = 392), B (n = 479), C (n = 247), and D (n = 39). In Group A, 24.2% of patients had atrophic gastritis and/or intestinal metaplasia and had thus been incorrectly assigned to Group A. Patients in Group A were then assigned to derivation (n = 236) and validation (n = 156) cohorts by 3:2 random sampling. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors discriminating between a correct (true) and incorrect (false) Group A classification.

RESULTS

A 4-point discriminative model was constructed based on a high-negative H. pylori IgG antibody titer and the patient's age (50-64 and ≥65 years). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.868 and 0.894, respectively. In the validation cohort, the addition of a discriminative model score ≥2 to the ABC method showed a similar accuracy for predicting gastric cancer risk compared with the ABC method alone (93.8% vs. 92.4%).

CONCLUSION

The 4-point discriminative model may help identify patients with a normal serological test who are nonetheless at risk of developing gastric cancer.

Application of serum pepsinogen and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) combined with gastrin-17 (G-17) detection in the screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of early gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor. The aim of the present study was to analyze the application value of serum pepsinogen (PG), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), and gastrin-17 (G-17) detection in the screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of early gastric cancer.

Methods

In total, 122 patients with gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected as the gastric cancer group and subdivided into the early gastric cancer (group A) and advanced gastric cancer (group B) groups. Sixty-five patients with benign gastric disease treated in the same hospital during the same period were selected as the control group, and 122 healthy people who underwent physical examination during the same period were allocated to the control group. The differences in the levels of G-17, PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII, and CA72-4 were compared; receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn; and the efficacy of different factors in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer was calculated.

Results

G-17, PGI, and PGI/PGII levels in the gastric cancer group were significantly lower than those in the healthy group, and CA72-4 was significantly higher than that in the healthy group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in PGII between the 2 groups (P>0.05). G-17, PGI, and PGI/PGII levels in groups A and B were significantly lower than those in the control group. CA72-4 in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of the control group, and was highest in group B (P<0.05). The areas under the curve (AUC) of G-17, PGI, PGI/PGII, and CA72-4 were 0.671, 0.726, 0.769, and 0.602, respectively, and the AUC of combined detection was 0.883, which was significantly higher than that of single detection.

Conclusions

Serum PG, CA72-4 combined with G-17 detection has high sensitivity and specificity in the screening and diagnosis of early gastric cancer, and has high clinical application value.

A panel of stomach-specific biomarkers (GastroPanel®) for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis: A prospective, multicenter study in a low gastric cancer incidence area

BACKGROUND

Analysis of serum biomarkers for the assessment of atrophic gastritis (AG), considered as gastric precancerous lesion, is of growing interest and recommended by current guidelines. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a panel of biomarkers (GastroPanel®) for the detection of AG in France, a country of a low gastric cancer (GC) incidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study, consecutive patients considered at increased risk of GC and undergoing upper endoscopy with gastric biopsies were included. Blood samples were collected for the analysis of GastroPanel® (association of Pepsinogens I and II, Gastrin-17, and Helicobacter pylori serology) using ELISA. The results of GastroPanel® were compared to the results of histology considered as the reference.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2019, 344 patients (148 cases with AG, 196 controls without AG) were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for the detection of AG by GastroPanel® were of 39.9% (95% CI 31.9; 48.2), 93.4% (95% CI 88.9; 96.4), 81.9 (95% CI 71.1; 90.0), and 67.3 (95% CI 61.4; 72.8), respectively. The sensitivity was significantly higher for the detection of severe AG [60.8% (95% CI 46.1; 74.6) P = .015] and corpus AG [61.0% (95% CI 49.2; 72.0), P = .004]. Diagnostic performances of GastroPanel® tended to be better than those of Pepsinogen I alone, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .068).

CONCLUSION

Serum pepsinogen and GastroPanel® tests show promising results for the detection of AG, especially of corpus AG and severe AG, in patients at high risk of GC in France.

Optimized diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori and tailored eradication therapy for preventing gastric cancer: a proposal for SHAKE strategy

INTRODUCTION

To decrease gastric cancer-related mortality, the Korean National Cancer Screening Program provides biennial screening gastroscopy to all individuals aged >40 years. However, a test-and-treat strategy of Helicobacter pylori for preventing gastric cancer has not been established.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we present up-to-date results of endoscopic findings of H. pylori gastritis, optimal sites for H. pylori detection, gastric cancer risk assessment using serum pepsinogen, tailored eradication based on the antimicrobial resistance against H. pylori, and post-eradication surveillance.

EXPERT OPINION

Here we propose approaches to H. pylori diagnosis and treatment for preventing gastric cancer, termed 'Screening for H. pylori in Korea and Eradication (SHAKE)' strategy. This strategy consists of the following: (1) optimized H. pylori diagnosis, (2) individualized management based on the H. pylori infection status, and (3) tailored eradication therapy. H. pylori gastritis can be diagnosed by endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosal pattern at the greater curvature of the corpus. Measurement of the serum pepsinogen I/II ratio is useful for assessing the risk of gastric cancer. As a first-line treatment, tailored eradication based on the results of molecular testing is effective in a country with a high rate of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori.