1
|
Jacobson ME, Rick JW, Gerbens LAA, Baghoomian W, Gould LJ, Marzano AV, Chen DM, Oakes DL, Dissemond J, Yamamoto T, Shinkai K, Nolan B, Lobato D, Thomas KS, Ortega-Loayza AG. A core domain set for pyoderma gangrenosum trial outcomes: an international eDelphi and consensus study from the UPGRADE initiative. Br J Dermatol 2024; 190:392-401. [PMID: 37952167 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin condition with no current standardized outcomes or outcome measures. With a rich investigational therapeutic pipeline, standardization of outcomes and improvement of data quality and interpretability will promote the appropriate and consistent evaluation of potential new therapies. Core outcome sets (COS) are agreed, standardized sets of outcomes that represent the minimum that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific condition. OBJECTIVES To identify and reach a consensus on which domains (what to be measured) should be included in the Understanding Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Review and Analysis of Disease Effects (UPGRADE) core domain set for clinical trials in PG. METHODS Collaborative discussions between patients and PG experts, and a systematic review of the literature identified items and prospective domains. A three-round international eDelphi exercise was performed to prioritize the domains and refine the provisional items (consensus: ≥ 70% of participants rating a domain as 'extremely important' and < 15% of participants voting 'not important'), followed by an international meeting to reach consensus on the core domain set (consensus: < 30% disagreement). Item-generation discussions and consensus meetings were hosted via online videoconferences. The eDelphi exercise and consensus voting were performed using Qualtrics survey software. Participants were adults with PG, healthcare professionals, researchers and industry representatives. RESULTS Collaborative discussions and systematic reviews yielded 115 items, which were distilled into 15 prospective domains. The eDelphi exercise removed the three lowest-priority domains ('laboratory tests', 'treatment costs' and 'disease impact on family') and ranked 'pain', 'quality of life' and 'physical symptoms' as the highest-priority prospective domains. Consensus was reached on the domains of 'pain', 'quality of life' and 'clinical signs'. The domain of 'disease course/disease progression' narrowly failed to reach consensus for inclusion in the core set (32% of participants voted 'no'). Refinement of this domain definition will be required and presented for consideration at future consensus meetings. CONCLUSIONS The UPGRADE core domain set for clinical trials in PG has been agreed by international multistakeholder consensus. Future work will develop and/or select outcome measurement instruments for these domains to establish a COS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Jacobson
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jonathan W Rick
- Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Louise A A Gerbens
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection, and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wenelia Baghoomian
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Lisa J Gould
- South Shore Health Center for Wound Healing, Weymouth, MA, USA
| | - Angelo V Marzano
- Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Diana M Chen
- Genentech Incorporated, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Debbie L Oakes
- South Shore Health Center for Wound Healing, Weymouth, MA, USA
| | - Joachim Dissemond
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology, and Allergology, University of Essen-Duisburg, Essen, Germany
| | - Toshiyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Dermatology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kanade Shinkai
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alex G Ortega-Loayza
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kridin K, Laufer Britva R, Tzur Bitan D, Damiani G, Cohen AD. Is pyoderma gangrenosum associated with solid malignancies? Insights from a population-based cohort study. Australas J Dermatol 2021; 62:336-341. [PMID: 34076886 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The question of whether solid malignancies (SMs) are associated with pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) remains to be conclusively answered. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of SM among patients with PG and the odds of PG after a diagnosis of SM. METHODS A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted to study the risk for SM in patients with PG (n = 302) as compared with age-, sex- and ethnicity-matched control subjects (n = 1799). A case-control design was used to estimate the odds of PG in those with a preexisting history of SM. RESULTS The prevalence of a preexisting SM was comparable in patients with PG and controls (7.5% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.490). The odds of having PG following a diagnosis of a SM was not statistically increased (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.53-1.36). The incidence of SM was 6.8 (95% CI, 3.5-12.2) and 7.9 (95% CI, 6.1-10.1) per 1000 person-years among patients with PG and controls, respectively. Patients with PG were not more likely to develop SM as compared to controls (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.44-1.69). Patients with a dual diagnosis of PG and SM were older and had more frequent comorbid conditions and increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS SM is not associated with provoking PG, and patients with PG are not at an increased risk of developing SM. A thorough routine screening for SM in patients with new-onset PG is an unnecessary approach based on the study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalaf Kridin
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | | | - Dana Tzur Bitan
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Giovanni Damiani
- Clinical Dermatology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Arnon D Cohen
- Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,Siaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|