|
1
|
Plage H, Furlano K, Neymeyer J, Weinberger S, Gerdes B, Hubatsch M, Ralla B, Franz A, Fendler A, de Martino M, Roßner F, Schallenberg S, Elezkurtaj S, Kluth M, Lennartz M, Blessin NC, Marx AH, Samtleben H, Fisch M, Rink M, Kaczmarek K, Ecke T, Hallmann S, Koch S, Adamini N, Minner S, Simon R, Sauter G, Weischenfeldt J, Klatte T, Schlomm T, Horst D, Zecha H, Slojewski M. CEA (CEACAM5) expression is common in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder but unrelated to the disease course. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:585-592. [PMID: 38873357 PMCID: PMC11168773 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a cell surface glycoprotein that represents a promising therapeutic target. Serum measurement of shedded CEA can be utilized for monitoring of cancer patients. Material and Methods To evaluate the potential clinical significance of CEA expression in urothelial bladder neoplasms, CEA was analysed by immunohistochemistry in more than 2500 urothelial bladder carcinomas in a tissue microarray format. Results CEA staining was largely absent in normal urothelial cells but was observed in 30.4% of urothelial bladder carcinomas including 406 (16.7%) with weak, 140 (5.8%) with moderate, and 192 (7.9%) with strong staining. CEA positivity occurred in 10.9% of 411 pTaG2 low-grade, 32.0% of 178 pTaG2 high-grade, and 43.0% of 93 pTaG3 tumours (p < 0.0001). In 1335 pT2-4 carcinomas, CEA positivity (34.1%) was lower than in pTaG3 tumours. Within pT2-4 carcinomas, CEA staining was unrelated to pT, pN, grade, L-status, V-status, overall survival, recurrence free survival, and cancer specific survival (p > 0.25). Conclusion CEA increases markedly with grade progression in pTa tumours, and expression occurs in a significant fraction of pT2-4 urothelial bladder carcinomas. The high rate of CEA positivity in pT2-4 carcinomas offers the opportunity of using CEA serum measurement for monitoring the clinical course of these cancers. Moreover, CEA positive urothelial carcinomas are candidates for a treatment by targeted anti-CEA drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Plage
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Kira Furlano
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Jörg Neymeyer
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Sarah Weinberger
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Benedikt Gerdes
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Mandy Hubatsch
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Bernhard Ralla
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Antonia Franz
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Annika Fendler
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Michela de Martino
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Florian Roßner
- Institute of PathologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Simon Schallenberg
- Institute of PathologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Sefer Elezkurtaj
- Institute of PathologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Niclas C. Blessin
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Andreas H. Marx
- Department of PathologyAcademic Hospital FuerthFuerthGermany
| | | | - Margit Fisch
- Department of UrologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of UrologyMarienhospital HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Krystian Kaczmarek
- Department of Urology and Urological OncologyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of UrologyHelios Hospital Bad SaarowBad SaarowGermany
| | - Steffen Hallmann
- Department of UrologyHelios Hospital Bad SaarowBad SaarowGermany
| | - Stefan Koch
- Department of PathologyHelios Hospital Bad SaarowBad SaarowGermany
| | - Nico Adamini
- Department of UrologyAlbertinen HospitalHamburgGermany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Joachim Weischenfeldt
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
- Biotech Research & Innovation Center (BRIC)University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Finsen LaboratoryRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of UrologyHelios Hospital Bad SaarowBad SaarowGermany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of PathologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Henrik Zecha
- Department of UrologyCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
- Department of UrologyAlbertinen HospitalHamburgGermany
| | - Marcin Slojewski
- Department of Urology and Urological OncologyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
The Impact of Molecular Biology in the Seeding, Treatment Choices and Follow-Up of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases-A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24021127. [PMID: 36674640 PMCID: PMC9863977 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a clear association between the molecular profile of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) and the degree to which aggressive progression of the disease impacts patient survival. However, much of our knowledge of the molecular behaviour of colorectal cancer cells comes from experimental studies with, as yet, limited application in clinical practice. In this article, we review the current advances in the understanding of the molecular behaviour of CRCLM and present possible future therapeutic applications. This review focuses on three important steps in CRCLM development, progression and treatment: (1) the dissemination of malignant cells from primary tumours and the seeding to metastatic sites; (2) the response to modern regimens of chemotherapy; and (3) the possibility of predicting early progression and recurrence patterns by molecular analysis in liquid biopsy.
Collapse
|